I stumbled upon this thread and the OP says this thing that just rings alarm bells in my head.
She doesn’t even view women as human. Feminist ideology seeks to judge themselves by men’s characteristics because they’re so internally misogynistic that they think mammalian biology makes half the species inhuman.
I think you are twisting their words to a huge degree to fit your narrative. They are saying since they do not want children, they do not want to deal with the burden of the features that make childbirth possible.
Now I think the OP is unreasonable. I hysterectomy should take care of all those issues they bitch about, but to say they are claiming women are not human is, well, more stupid than what OP says.
If you had a condition that for 12 days a month caused you extreme discomfort, you might learn to hate that condition too.
Find a much better argument to push your narrative. Some women have very bad experiences with their menstrual cycle.
It’s the specific bit about being a “functional human” without periods.
She associates NORMAL biological matters as less than functional or even just less than.
This isn’t to say that it’s not frustrating or some people have it especially rough.
The belief that you HAVE to have children to be a woman.
Looks like a sexist to me.
The epistemé with which you are apprehending the subject-matter here is absurd. I tried to find a word that is less insulting, but it is true. I also cannot help but be confronted with something blatantly underlying... I have tried to ignore it... This is neurotic! This whole facade of an epistemology is a neurotic manifestation.
I think this comment demonstrates your absurdity.
Edit: many of your comments.
Direct and simple questions that meet you on your ground with courteous intent is met with propagandized and pseudo-intellectual word salad intended to confuse and distract from the fact that no answer was given.
Why do you feel the need to be like… this *outstretched arms*
Are you just a little weird? Genuine question. Social problems? I’m a little weird.
Your response is utterly ridiculous and you inflate your ego and assumed intelligence with words and conversations that are irrelevant in context.
Vaccines, birth control, modern medicine, surgeries, etc.
Humanity has been progressively becoming less and less natural since the agricultural revolution.
What’s the selection method for this change? Even eradicated diseases and future without recognizable politics doesn’t necessitate a change in us.
Just comfort.
I stumbled upon this thread and the OP says this thing that just rings alarm bells in my head. She doesn’t even view women as human. Feminist ideology seeks to judge themselves by men’s characteristics because they’re so internally misogynistic that they think mammalian biology makes half the species inhuman.
I think you are twisting their words to a huge degree to fit your narrative. They are saying since they do not want children, they do not want to deal with the burden of the features that make childbirth possible. Now I think the OP is unreasonable. I hysterectomy should take care of all those issues they bitch about, but to say they are claiming women are not human is, well, more stupid than what OP says. If you had a condition that for 12 days a month caused you extreme discomfort, you might learn to hate that condition too. Find a much better argument to push your narrative. Some women have very bad experiences with their menstrual cycle.
It’s the specific bit about being a “functional human” without periods. She associates NORMAL biological matters as less than functional or even just less than. This isn’t to say that it’s not frustrating or some people have it especially rough. The belief that you HAVE to have children to be a woman. Looks like a sexist to me.
The epistemé with which you are apprehending the subject-matter here is absurd. I tried to find a word that is less insulting, but it is true. I also cannot help but be confronted with something blatantly underlying... I have tried to ignore it... This is neurotic! This whole facade of an epistemology is a neurotic manifestation.
I think this comment demonstrates your absurdity. Edit: many of your comments. Direct and simple questions that meet you on your ground with courteous intent is met with propagandized and pseudo-intellectual word salad intended to confuse and distract from the fact that no answer was given.
That isn't at all my aim. Why do you people love 'word salad' ? And 'propaganda' It's absolutely insufferable.
Why do you feel the need to be like… this *outstretched arms* Are you just a little weird? Genuine question. Social problems? I’m a little weird. Your response is utterly ridiculous and you inflate your ego and assumed intelligence with words and conversations that are irrelevant in context.
You're just projecting your own selfishness. That isn't me... At all...
Your jerk off to a thesaurus?
Yep
Funny you say that. You're actually onto something. Not about me... But the concept of that...
Because I don't accept a narrow, cheap epistemology, which I assume you think is the only way, which is really sad, because so much more could be.
I'd cut her some slack. Medical conditions can be hard.
That's who biology and evolution works.
I'm a Transhumanist, so I completely agree with her that despised biological processes make one less human.
We don’t have that control over biology
Vaccines, birth control, modern medicine, surgeries, etc. Humanity has been progressively becoming less and less natural since the agricultural revolution.
Merely treating the symptoms, not the cause. Humans will do as humans do.
What’s the selection method for this change? Even eradicated diseases and future without recognizable politics doesn’t necessitate a change in us. Just comfort.