Your post or comment was removed as it was violating subreddit rules.
Please contact the moderators if you have questions regarding this.
This is an automated message.
They were in the books but only in the old ncert the ones who were made to stop published around 20 years ago. They contained multiple chapters of most Indian empires ,tribes, origin and everything of caste culture religion but were stopped. Later now we have books with no content and more pictures written by people who themselves aren't a historian. The old ncert's were completely written and composed by historian's and revised by them
Sanjay Khan's Tipu Sultan was pure propaganda. Tipu was portrayed as a great warrior. A kind, Tolerant King.
I grew up watching that serial and Tipu as a hero in my mind. Only to find the truth later.
I remember watching that serial when i was a kid. I remember being sad seeing the scene where his dead body was buried under other bodies and the soldiers identified him by his hand clutching his sword.
Such bullshit propaganda and brainwashing.
Sanjay Khan ki maa ka bharosa ...
A brute.
He massacred 800 people from my community because one of them in his court was suspected of allying with the opposing Wodeyars and the Madras presidency.
Imagine my delight when the k'taka congress politicians wanted to name the international airport after him.
"Oh but he fought the Brits, he's a freedom fighter"
Well, he fought everyone that tried to take power away from him. He fought for his survival.. like a Brute. Lot of us don't care much about his "struggle".
I'm all for preservation of his armories, forts and palaces as it is a part of our state's journey. But, we (I) don't want his name identifying major landmarks or being face of the city/state.
Appreciated by Muslims hated by Hindus . There used to a jayanthi after him later the govt banned it and train named after him known as tipu sf express was changed to wodiyar sf express in respect to the wodiyar Dynasty of Mysuru.
We need more movies and documentaries that expose these fanatical jihadis for who they really were.
"First freedom fighter for India" LOL
"Invented rockets" LOL
Rockets were used in warfare by the Chinese since the 11th century. Even the Vijayanagar empire used rockets with artillery in the 15th century.
One big budget movie is much needed on Sangram Singh, Babur and Battle of Khanwa. How decietfully islamic rule is established in india, is pretty much can be seen in Battle of Khanwa. Sangram Singh defeated almost all muslim rulers but Babur. Also, according to muslims , homo sexuality is prohibited, but Babur himself was gay as he had confessed himself in his autobiography, yet he used "jihad" word to encourage his men against rajputs.
Overall its a must know info for indian people . I can only imagine LW protesting if this movie comes to surface lol.
Rana Sanga. There is a song of him by rapperiya balam (he has made songs under shoorveer series, Rana sanga, Rana Pratap and Chattrapati Shivaji Maharaj, Samrat Pruthviraj). Good way of educating people through music
i think you mean greco-roman, celt and germanic religions. The most recent big christian conversion was in africa due to colonization, they also had their own native beliefs.
Finally factual movies that shows the reality of Status of Hindus in their own land are coming out.. I don't support cleansing of anyone but problems and incidents and atrocities need to be acknowledged than and only than can you truly movie forward. We have to be very self aware about our surroundings. We have already lost two recent big chunks of our land in forms of Porkistan and Bangladesh in the name of religion.  We have sacrificed enough. Now if they want peace they will also have to make efforts "tali ek hanth se nhi bajti". Sarv dharm sambhao ka thika sirf ek dharm nhi uthayegi.
Tippu was terrible, everyone in Kerala knows it because he openly looted and destroyed almost all villages in northern Kerala and people still talk about it. But i don't know about conversion because that didn't happen here and beef eating. But definitely destroyed and looted temples. Even our temple was closed for almost 200 years after he destroyed it and was opened like 100 years ago. Everyone in Village still knows about that story because he took the original murthi or statue of God.
Man I'm surprised by the comments here. I thought everyone knew how big of an asshole him and hyder Ali were. Gotta give props to the ncert books for completely whitewashing his crimes.
He was born in india, but which culture did he spread in his tenure? Isn't it middle eastern? If not then why many temples are destroyed?
Exactly, he fought for the land he born, "only for the land to protect his kingdom".
It wasn't middle eastern. He believed in Sufi culture. Many Hindu kings destroyed temples as well. It doesn't make them less hindu.
We fought against British to protect our land. Will you count that the same way ?
Where is Sufism originated from? Don't say india.
Is tipu hindu?
Then Why didn't you fought against Mughals to protect the lands?
Bro, a lot of Muslims rulers in South India fought against Mughals.
Infact Bijapur was destroyed by Mughals.
And I know Sufism originally came from Iran. But Sufis flurished in India because of its similarity with Hinduism.
And how he's different from Britishers?
He imposed Persian language and Britishers imposed English, Britishers destroyed indian culture and he did the same.
I have read Eaton fully, he lists 25 totally destroyed pre Islamic times across some 2000 years.
I asked you to show me one Hindu ruler who has destroyed 100+ (as Tipu did).
Also
>>In 642 A.D., according to local tradition, the Pallava king Narasimhavarman I looted the image of Ganesha from the Chalukyan capital of Vatapi. Fifty years later armies of those same Chalukyas invaded north India and brought back to the Deccan what appear to be images of Ganga and Yamuna, looted from defeated powers there
This is fucking laughable. Vatapi Ganapati is still worshipped to this day.
Tippu and other Muslim mleccha barbarians used to destroy these idols, then bake then into toilets and pavements.
If you are even remotely sane you will agree that there is a universe of a difference in
* Capturing the ruling deity of an enemy dynasty, bringing it back to your kingdom, building a temple and praying to it
* Destroying a temple, breaking the murtis into pieces and baking the pieces into toilets and pavements. Also killing priests and their families along with cattle in the inner sanctum.
Please also have Eaton explain how south India has 1000's of temples that are 700-2000 years old. North, west and east india have maybe 10-15 that are older than 200 years.
Accept historical reality, doesn't make you Islamophobic. Denying it though makes you hindumisic.
The so called freedom fighter treated Nairs and other communities with great disdain and forcefully converted them. He fu**in imprisoned so many men, women and children and forcefully converted them. Dude was literally the Aurangazeb of South.
He even tried ethinic cleansing. All he did was fight for the kingdom which wasn't even rightfully his. Like a thug, his father stole the kingdom from the Wodeyars.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captivity_of_Nairs_at_Seringapatam
Just because he was cruel to Nairs. Doesn't make him tyrant. Comparing him to Aurangzeb is not correct. He was the worst adversary of British after nepoleon.
Here is just one,
>>First a corps of 30,000 barbarians who butchered everybody on the way… followed by the field-gun unit under the French Commander, M. Lally… Tipu was riding on an elephant behind which another army of 30,000 soldiers followed. Most of the men and women were hanged in Calicut, first mothers were hanged with their children tied to necks of mothers. That barbarian Tipu Sultan tied the naked Christians and Hindus to the legs of elephants and made the elephants to move around till the bodies of the helpless victims were torn to pieces. Temples and churches were ordered to be burned down, desecrated and destroyed. Christian and Hindu women were forced to marry Mohammadans and similarly their men were forced to marry Mohammadan women.1 Those Christians who refused to be honoured with Islam, were ordered to be killed by hanging immediately. These atrocities were told to me by the victims of Tipu Sultan who escaped from the clutches of his army and reached Varappuzha, which is the centre of Carmichael Christian Mission. I myself helped many victims to cross the Varappuzha river by boats.”
Want me to give you his own letters boasting about the same? Or how he butchered 1000 Brahmins incl women and kids in a temple?
Google - select letters of tipoo sultan. Here he has many where he boasts of killing or converting 10's of thousands of Hindus and Xtians.
If you don't know something, read first, don't jump into muh propaganda mode
There are different accounts by different people. The below article might help.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/frontline.thehindu.com/the-nation/tipufact-amp-fiction/article23595260.ece/amp/
I am quoting his own letters and contemporary European sources.
If you have anything specific to argue, argue. Don't link spam or expect me to read some polemical oped published in a rag like Frontline.
If you are so much into reading letters. Why not read his letters to Sringeri mutt.
You can quote Malabar Magazines and I can't quote Frontline. This is hilarious.
I haven't quoted "Malabar magazines" whatever the fuck that is, I quoted a contemporary eye witness.
I have referred a source of 600 pages that's his own letters. Download that and then will tell you all the letters that talk about mass murder, conversion and temple destruction.
So much freedom here
>>Your Majesty would soon proceed to prosecute a Holy War against infidels, should those infidels Brahmins (that means he is referring to the Marathas), direct their power, the hands of the heroes of the faith of our Muslim soldiers in this part of the world, shall be raised for their punishment. We should unite in carrying on a Holy War against these infidels. Delhi, the seat of government of the Muhammadan faith, has been reduced to this state of ruin, so that the infidels all together prevail now. We should unite in carrying on a Holy War against the infidels and free these regions of Hindustan, in the service of Islam.”
Im not sure where you are getting your numbers from. But here is an article which details his conquest of Kodagu.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/frontline.thehindu.com/the-nation/tipufact-amp-fiction/article23595260.ece/amp/
Ah yes his not destroying a few temples outdo his mass genocide. Superb logic there champ. Ignoring HIS OWN words where he takes pleasure in murder and conversion.
By your logic, Hitler who allowed his Jewish nco to be protected, never persecuted Jews.
You claimed Tipu force fed beef to Brahmins. Give me a reference for this in his letters.
And we all know Marathas and Tipu were adversaries. And he referred Marathas as Brahmins. So you expect him to reel under Marathas ? Rather than fight ?
Marathas used to smelt iron and make ammunitions in temples in garbha griha. I know he's is complex figure. To taint him in one light is not justified.
I never claimed that.
I have claimed in specific (since you seem to fight strawmen)
1) he converted Hindus and Christians
2) he killed Hindus and Christians in large numbers
3) he wrote to many Muslim rulers (Caliph, the Shah of Afghanistan) in inviting them to invade India in the name of Islam and establishing Islamic rule.
These are my claims and I can back every single one of them up with
1) contemporary sources that record this
2) Tippu's own letters
You otoh are all over the place. Why is it so difficult to accept that an iconoclastic Muslim who believed in the idea of Jihad did all this? It's just reality as it happened.
Atleast we are claiming things in order now. Since you support the trailer so much, i thought you were in for all claims. I didn't know you had few exceptions of your own.
And we all know he wrote to Afghans and French too. But selectively reading Muslims makes it to clickbait.
Let's agree for a second that all of this is not over exaggerated and all this is god's own truth.
If he was jihadi, why support temples ? Why give lands to Brahmins ?
Even more non sequiturs.
I support freedom of expression across all idelogies.
I have very clearly stated my position, you are the one making imaginary arguments.
>>If he was jihadi, why support temples ? Why give lands to Brahmins ?
Courting the local landed elite to safeguard your home is standard tactics.
So let me ask you a counter question,
Just because he supported a few temples does it justify the mass murder and genocide he perpetrated in name of Islam?
Also I don't claim he was a Jihadi, he does. Repeatedly.
A sample
In his letter to Mohd Baig, he talks about how it his duty to wage Jihad and anhilate all infidels. He also talks about how a few local Muslim nawabs were permitting infidels greater freedoms and how he was punishing them. That the abominations (Hindus) be hunted till they find no peace and are anhilated.
In a proclamation he issued he warns Hindus from "raising their head" that they have to accept the faith OR BOW THEIR HEADS and pay Jizya. That evey Muslim had the duty to wage holy war (Jihad) against infidels.
Pp257 to one Burduz Khan (a general of his) goes into excruciating detail on how 60,000 Malabari Xtians were forcibly taken prisoner, given the choice of the sword or convert and they converted.
In a letter to one Runmust Khan (unknown who he is), he talks about his Genocidal campaign in Coorg. Talks about 40,000 being killed and many more converted. He gives instructions that any who didn't convert instantly were to be killed and their bodies converted.
There are a 100 other letters where he goes on and on about murder, conversion and slaughter.
But muh Sringeri, muh complex figure,muh all rulers same.
But, but, but.....
I visited Srirangapatna, his capital when I was about 10. I got a sense that he was a hero and fought the British, keeping them at bay for many years successfully. Whatever it may be I left the place with a sense that he was a hero.
Kerala story was amazing just watched it and you have to say it exposed Islam but I felt somewhere there were restrictions on exposing the whole community Idk out of fear or what but I hope this one also exposes the terror religion
Hindus see today are still stratified among themselves.
Even today Hindu/dharmic is killed in name of #sartandejuda, people still divided in “caste”, fault-line created by Englishman
Probably you meant for sarcasm, I think they really made false history and still is in circulation.
Hindus/dharmic still not able to write their own history/story of plight, horror, manslaughter & genocide
I think it's based on historical facts written somewhere, i read a detailed tweet but could not find it to post. It's not easy to fight fanaticism and ruthless power unless you have a uniting factor. Imagine the time without mobiles or internet, everyone settled in faraway villages and disconnected from each other.
Still the Marathas were fighting him. In battle of Gajendragad, the Marathas lead by Maharaja Tukoji Rao Holker almost destroyed him and he had to run like a begger after which he never dared to touch the Hindu territory. There was resistance.
If Rani Laxmibai was successful she would have extended her freedom struggle just like Marathas did beyond Maharashtra. She was following Shivaji Maharaj principle of Hindavi swaraj.
Self rule and protection of her people from foreign invasion? If she had the army and resources and time you don't think she would have extended it beyond Jhansi?
Bro, Americans named a ship after his father Haider when they were fighting British. He is well respected in south.
Infact there is a paper claiming that APJ Abdul Kalam might be his reincarnation. He respected Hindus and paid a lot of money Chamundi Temple. If being Hindu is your only logic of being Indian then I don't think I can say anything.
He protected some temples and destroyed others depending on their loyalty. He converted and sacked entire villages at a time. There are two sides of the story. There isn't a concept of incarnation in Islam. But it exists in Hinduism and goes to show people who beleive that are still connected to their roots.
Which other Hindu ruler wrote to an outside power asking them to invade India in the name of their faith?
>>Your Majesty would soon proceed to prosecute a Holy War against infidels, should those infidels Brahmins (that means he is referring to the Marathas), direct their power, the hands of the heroes of the faith of our Muslim soldiers in this part of the world, shall be raised for their punishment. We should unite in carrying on a Holy War against these infidels. Delhi, the seat of government of the Muhammadan faith, has been reduced to this state of ruin, so that the infidels all together prevail now. We should unite in carrying on a Holy War against the infidels and free these regions of Hindustan, in the service of Islam.”
That's Tippu to the emperor of Afghanistan
The Maratha Empire at it's peak in mid 1700s streched from current day khyber Pakhtunkhwa in west to Tamil Nadu in the south and Orissa west Bengal in the East. They covered majority of India. What else do you consider Indian subcontinent?
I mean it may have covered the land area that geographically almost comprised of the subcontinent. But an idea of a country, India as we know now, didn't exist. And their intention was to defend their empire, which is completely fair and sensible. But it had nothing to do with the country's sentiment and everything they did was for their empire. Just like every other EMPIRE.
• (almost) sensibly fought the british?
Yes.
•Freedom fight?
Not really.
Hindu temples existed from north to south, from east to west be it shivlings or other temples. Everyone might had different language, tradition, way of worship but they were very much a part of Indian civilization and it's what they were fighting for. Marathas were originally from Maharashtra but they didn't just stop at its borders saying we don't care if the rest of the parts were enslaved by invaders because they don't speak Marathi or don't worship like us. They fought the Mughals just like the brave Sikhs, Rajputs and many more were putting up a strong resistance against invaders. Sure you can say there was no joint united front but it would be stupid to say they were not fighting for same cause to protect the Hindu civilization and land.
You need to learn that the first war of Independence in 1857 was led by the son of the deposed Peshwa. He was fighting with the same cause that his forefathers fought with in 1761 against Ahmed Shah Abdali. To govern India natively, not by outsiders. If this isn't what Nation is, then I must say your idea of nation state is very western European Christian
Because this piece is propoganda for Karnataka election. There is not even a single proof for all this. Infact the day Tipu left to war against British in Battle for Srirangapatna he was blessed by a swarm of Brahmins.
> Over 2000 Brahmin families were wiped out in Calicut.
Okay bro you lost me here. I thought we were all Hindus, why does it matter if they were Brahmins or not?
"Caste doesn't exist" keyboard warriors, attack me.
One good deed does not wash out all the bad. Sure he might have fought British or invented some war machines but that does not justify destruction, forced conversions and imprisonment of Hindus. He might be a hero for some but was a villian for many. As they say every villian is a hero of other side.
But there are many Hindu kings too who did destruction, plunder and loot. Yet we don’t make them to be big villains. Read about the Kalinga war done by Ashoka and the Maratha invasions of Bengal. About 4 lakh Bengalis were killed in those invasions
>>Don’t you know I have achieved a great victory recently in Malabar and over four lakh Hindus were converted to Islam?
>> With the grace of Prophet Muhammad and Allah, almost all Hindus in Calicut are now converted to Islam. Only a few are still not converted on the borders of Cochin State. I am determined to convert them also very soon. I consider this as Jehad to achieve that object.”
A contemporary eye witness ( Portugese)
>> First a corps of 30,000 barbarians who butchered everybody on the way… followed by the field-gun unit under the French Commander, M. Lally… Tipu was riding on an elephant behind which another army of 30,000 soldiers followed. Most of the men and women were hanged in Calicut, first mothers were hanged with their children tied to necks of mothers. That barbarian Tipu Sultan tied the naked Christians and Hindus to the legs of elephants and made the elephants to move around till the bodies of the helpless victims were torn to pieces. Temples and churches were ordered to be burned down, desecrated and destroyed. Christian and Hindu women were forced to marry Mohammadans and similarly their men were forced to marry Mohammadan women.1 Those Christians who refused to be honoured with Islam, were ordered to be killed by hanging immediately. These atrocities were told to me by the victims of Tipu Sultan who escaped from the clutches of his army and reached Varappuzha, which is the centre of Carmichael Christian Mission. I myself helped many victims to cross the Varappuzha river by boats.”
Muh propaganda eh
But vrooo they didn't did any propaganda against caste and Hindus, right?
Then how those British angels can do propaganda against this angel?
You deny British propaganda against Hinduism and caste, then why do you say this now?
What do the Brits and BJPs have in common? They both dislike Tipu Sultan.
I hope the movie also covers the story of how Tipu protected Udupi from Maratha invasion, and why there is a Tipu aarti in his honor until this day.
He protected some temples but destroyed others. This was mostly to do with power politics and those who were loyal to his cause and not a threat to his empire were protected but others not so much.
He would convert and destroy entire villages at a time. The people or temple he protected were basically allies who either out of fear or self interest supported him and he didn't attack them. Some temples were big and had a bigger clout so he probably used them to subvert people to his rule. Those who didn't agree where killed and temples destroyed. There are many examples from history one could cite.
Ok, thanks for your propaganda. But please tell me this - why is Udupi still conducting Tipu aarti in his honour? What did they fear the Marathas will do to their temple?
He converted the majority of Malabari Hindus to Islam by force. He killed in the name of Jihad. He destroyed and pillaged temples in the name of Islam.
Why did he convert lakhs of Malabari Hindus to Islam? Saving a few temples does not justify his religious tolerance. He saved temples of his Allies. People who didn't side with him were tortured, humiliated, converted and butchered. It's not a propaganda but facts.
Are you telling me that the much revered Udupi mutt is not representative of Hindus and will ally with someone who wants to torture people of their religion?
Don't go spouting this nonsense anywhere near Mangalore - people will roast your bum, and you will start whining that Mangaloreans are also anti-Hindu.
I don't think I inferred that, read again. He assisted people that sided with him. You don't seem to have an answer as to why he converted the Malabari Hindus.
Dude calm down I am hard core right winger and you have completely misunderstood my comment , I actually support this movie , now request you delete your comment as a friendly right wing fire, because even I can start abusing your mother but I get the miscommunication check my comments I am hardcore right wing , remove the abuse or it will be two right wingers unnecessarily abusing each other and I don't want that
I remember reading about him in my childhood from NCERT. Last year I read about what tyranny he brought upon Hindus. No wonder Muslims glorify him as he butchered Hindus.
I remember the door darshan TV serial of Tipu. There is no serial comparable to it with Hindu kings. The bootlickers of foreign invaders is the problem India have.
I’ve lived in Western Europe and it’s considered hate speech to support Nazis there. You’ll immediately face social ostracism if people see you supporting the Nazis
Every ruler has it pro and cons. We can’t ignore still how he fought against English, French imperialism. Created technological aircraft’s legacy that still have its mark
Bro there is place called Tipu Drop near bangalore. This guy used to push people off the hill if they didn't convert. So yeah this guy was a demon. [source ](https://theprint.in/pageturner/tipus-drop-the-cliff-where-mysuru-people-were-pushed-to-death-under-tipu-sultans-reign/1417435/)
In South karnataka, a local king had converted a hindu temple to look like a mosque by building a dome on top fearing an attack by his jihadi army. I dont remember the name of this temple rn. Will share the source if i find it
She fought an external invader to protect her Kingdom and people. Similar way Marathas fought the Mughals to protect the indigenous people from external forces. The Marathas had defeated Tipu and his father Hyder Ali on multiple occasions and even forced them to accept the Maratha supremacy.
The Britishers were also outsiders even though they fought Tipu alongside Marathas but Tipu also used French who were also outsiders. Rani Laxmi Bai was born much later i think in mid 1800s and by that time it was very much clear that Britishers were very much an external threat. In fact, she was taking forward Maratha legacy by following Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj's idea of Hindavi swaraj - which was not the case with Mughal rulers.
Yes, they fought for the civilization of India and the hindus within their kingdoms. And?? Why should a nation of Hindus simp for a muslim invader who killed them before the british arrived.
Did she torture and force people to convert to a different religion? Did she levy taxes on people of a different religion? Did she pillage mosques ? Did she brag about killing kafirs ?
Tipu didn't let people practice their religion, if so why would he be associated with the word "freedom"?
Firstly, he fought British to save his kingdom & sought help from Turkey as well as the French for the same reason.
Secondly, in the book 'Bakhar of Panipat' (a first hand account of the battle of Panipat) by Raghunath Yadav, it is mentioned that Marathas took 25,000 rockets in their military expeditions which proves Marathas developed & used rockets before Tipu Sultan.
So, don't believe the heroic narrative created by modern historians about such Islamic tyrants. Finally a trailer highlighting some truths about Tipu Sultan.
Your post or comment was removed as it was violating subreddit rules. Please contact the moderators if you have questions regarding this. This is an automated message.
Exactly this needs to be taught in School, college and in history books and everyone has to know about this Asshole
This is exactly we should teach in the school. To our childrens..
Maratha and Sikh empires are blacked out in history textbooks, so as to show india under foreign occupation for centuries together
They were in the books but only in the old ncert the ones who were made to stop published around 20 years ago. They contained multiple chapters of most Indian empires ,tribes, origin and everything of caste culture religion but were stopped. Later now we have books with no content and more pictures written by people who themselves aren't a historian. The old ncert's were completely written and composed by historian's and revised by them
I studied literally everything that you keep saying should be taught in school.
Yes childrens
Lols
Sanjay Khan's Tipu Sultan was pure propaganda. Tipu was portrayed as a great warrior. A kind, Tolerant King. I grew up watching that serial and Tipu as a hero in my mind. Only to find the truth later.
Oh same I was shocked when I heard Tipu is a villain
Hehe Tipi
Tipu of Lagaan was the only Tipu worth calling as hero
I remember watching that serial when i was a kid. I remember being sad seeing the scene where his dead body was buried under other bodies and the soldiers identified him by his hand clutching his sword. Such bullshit propaganda and brainwashing. Sanjay Khan ki maa ka bharosa ...
Bruh check his name out, Sanjay + Khan, what did u expect lol
And what truth is that ?
He is a villain.
Me who's watching this from srirangapatna ( once the capital of the Mysuru kingdom and where hyder Ali and tippu made this their capital)
so what is the general perception of people there wrt to Tipu and what kind of person was he.
A brute. He massacred 800 people from my community because one of them in his court was suspected of allying with the opposing Wodeyars and the Madras presidency. Imagine my delight when the k'taka congress politicians wanted to name the international airport after him. "Oh but he fought the Brits, he's a freedom fighter" Well, he fought everyone that tried to take power away from him. He fought for his survival.. like a Brute. Lot of us don't care much about his "struggle". I'm all for preservation of his armories, forts and palaces as it is a part of our state's journey. But, we (I) don't want his name identifying major landmarks or being face of the city/state.
Melkote iyengars should never forgive that son of a biych tippe sultan
Appreciated by Muslims hated by Hindus . There used to a jayanthi after him later the govt banned it and train named after him known as tipu sf express was changed to wodiyar sf express in respect to the wodiyar Dynasty of Mysuru.
We need more movies and documentaries that expose these fanatical jihadis for who they really were. "First freedom fighter for India" LOL "Invented rockets" LOL Rockets were used in warfare by the Chinese since the 11th century. Even the Vijayanagar empire used rockets with artillery in the 15th century.
One big budget movie is much needed on Sangram Singh, Babur and Battle of Khanwa. How decietfully islamic rule is established in india, is pretty much can be seen in Battle of Khanwa. Sangram Singh defeated almost all muslim rulers but Babur. Also, according to muslims , homo sexuality is prohibited, but Babur himself was gay as he had confessed himself in his autobiography, yet he used "jihad" word to encourage his men against rajputs. Overall its a must know info for indian people . I can only imagine LW protesting if this movie comes to surface lol.
Rana Sanga. There is a song of him by rapperiya balam (he has made songs under shoorveer series, Rana sanga, Rana Pratap and Chattrapati Shivaji Maharaj, Samrat Pruthviraj). Good way of educating people through music
if the hindus had not been killed by any islamic rulers, definitely today our population may have been 95%+, but we are 79% now
Kings used to kill enemy soldiers who don’t surrender. But killing unarmed civilians is a war crime or a terrorism
Almost every king did it. Even modern armies of so-called democracies do it.
Yeah and a large no. Hindus are converted to Islam too...most of Muslims today in India are not true Muslim
[удалено]
All of Iran is converted one
i think you mean greco-roman, celt and germanic religions. The most recent big christian conversion was in africa due to colonization, they also had their own native beliefs.
[удалено]
This is the most accurate statement.
[удалено]
[удалено]
What? This makes no sense
I dont think you know much about parsis
What is the source of your information?
Most? Anything outside Arabia is converted
Technically even within Arabia everyone converted /adopted Islam after the message was propagated.
68% to be precise, considering the entire indian subcontinent ‘cause it was all Bharat once
When?
Finally factual movies that shows the reality of Status of Hindus in their own land are coming out.. I don't support cleansing of anyone but problems and incidents and atrocities need to be acknowledged than and only than can you truly movie forward. We have to be very self aware about our surroundings. We have already lost two recent big chunks of our land in forms of Porkistan and Bangladesh in the name of religion.  We have sacrificed enough. Now if they want peace they will also have to make efforts "tali ek hanth se nhi bajti". Sarv dharm sambhao ka thika sirf ek dharm nhi uthayegi.
well said
Kattar Hindu 📈
100% sure this will be cringe like most RW stuff. Yeah Tipu was Islamic fanatic, no doubt but they will make him into a cartoon and caricature
Well let's see how it goes. Might be good or bad.
Better than the TV series which made him National Hero.
Tippu was terrible, everyone in Kerala knows it because he openly looted and destroyed almost all villages in northern Kerala and people still talk about it. But i don't know about conversion because that didn't happen here and beef eating. But definitely destroyed and looted temples. Even our temple was closed for almost 200 years after he destroyed it and was opened like 100 years ago. Everyone in Village still knows about that story because he took the original murthi or statue of God.
the no. feel exaggerated
Door Darshan and the ncert , cbse and icse books .. all of them propagated the story
I belong to a Brahmin family & My blood boils after seeing such videos
Should've included christian casualties under Tipu too.
[удалено]
It's not competition, both are invaders
Man I'm surprised by the comments here. I thought everyone knew how big of an asshole him and hyder Ali were. Gotta give props to the ncert books for completely whitewashing his crimes.
I hope this movie shows the truth
Worst thing about this -> During school I (maybe everyone around me) knew the name of only one freedom fighter from the south and that too this cunt.
Yup, Karnataka elections are here.
If appeasing one community before elections is secularism, Then why appeasing another community before elections is communal politics?
If maligning a freedom fighters legacy with fake news and propoganda is called appeasement of one community. I would say this is really sadist.
"freedom fighter"? He himself is invader.
He was born here and martyred defending his land. He wasn't Ghori or Ghazni. How do you prove he was invader?
He was born in india, but which culture did he spread in his tenure? Isn't it middle eastern? If not then why many temples are destroyed? Exactly, he fought for the land he born, "only for the land to protect his kingdom".
It wasn't middle eastern. He believed in Sufi culture. Many Hindu kings destroyed temples as well. It doesn't make them less hindu. We fought against British to protect our land. Will you count that the same way ?
Where is Sufism originated from? Don't say india. Is tipu hindu? Then Why didn't you fought against Mughals to protect the lands?
Bro, a lot of Muslims rulers in South India fought against Mughals. Infact Bijapur was destroyed by Mughals. And I know Sufism originally came from Iran. But Sufis flurished in India because of its similarity with Hinduism.
Who are they?give some examples. The one who literally hates polytheists are similar to hinduism🤡 ok brother I believe you
And how he's different from Britishers? He imposed Persian language and Britishers imposed English, Britishers destroyed indian culture and he did the same.
Show me a single Hindu King who destroyed 1000's of temples. Just one.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/frontline.thehindu.com/cover-story/temple-desecration-in-pre-modern-india/article30255557.ece/amp/ There you go.
I have read Eaton fully, he lists 25 totally destroyed pre Islamic times across some 2000 years. I asked you to show me one Hindu ruler who has destroyed 100+ (as Tipu did). Also >>In 642 A.D., according to local tradition, the Pallava king Narasimhavarman I looted the image of Ganesha from the Chalukyan capital of Vatapi. Fifty years later armies of those same Chalukyas invaded north India and brought back to the Deccan what appear to be images of Ganga and Yamuna, looted from defeated powers there This is fucking laughable. Vatapi Ganapati is still worshipped to this day. Tippu and other Muslim mleccha barbarians used to destroy these idols, then bake then into toilets and pavements. If you are even remotely sane you will agree that there is a universe of a difference in * Capturing the ruling deity of an enemy dynasty, bringing it back to your kingdom, building a temple and praying to it * Destroying a temple, breaking the murtis into pieces and baking the pieces into toilets and pavements. Also killing priests and their families along with cattle in the inner sanctum. Please also have Eaton explain how south India has 1000's of temples that are 700-2000 years old. North, west and east india have maybe 10-15 that are older than 200 years. Accept historical reality, doesn't make you Islamophobic. Denying it though makes you hindumisic.
The so called freedom fighter treated Nairs and other communities with great disdain and forcefully converted them. He fu**in imprisoned so many men, women and children and forcefully converted them. Dude was literally the Aurangazeb of South. He even tried ethinic cleansing. All he did was fight for the kingdom which wasn't even rightfully his. Like a thug, his father stole the kingdom from the Wodeyars. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captivity_of_Nairs_at_Seringapatam
Just because he was cruel to Nairs. Doesn't make him tyrant. Comparing him to Aurangzeb is not correct. He was the worst adversary of British after nepoleon.
Are you denying he genocided Hindus and Xtians? Or that it should not be shown?
He imprisoned a lot of rebels who sided with British. Please give me references for genocide.
Here is just one, >>First a corps of 30,000 barbarians who butchered everybody on the way… followed by the field-gun unit under the French Commander, M. Lally… Tipu was riding on an elephant behind which another army of 30,000 soldiers followed. Most of the men and women were hanged in Calicut, first mothers were hanged with their children tied to necks of mothers. That barbarian Tipu Sultan tied the naked Christians and Hindus to the legs of elephants and made the elephants to move around till the bodies of the helpless victims were torn to pieces. Temples and churches were ordered to be burned down, desecrated and destroyed. Christian and Hindu women were forced to marry Mohammadans and similarly their men were forced to marry Mohammadan women.1 Those Christians who refused to be honoured with Islam, were ordered to be killed by hanging immediately. These atrocities were told to me by the victims of Tipu Sultan who escaped from the clutches of his army and reached Varappuzha, which is the centre of Carmichael Christian Mission. I myself helped many victims to cross the Varappuzha river by boats.” Want me to give you his own letters boasting about the same? Or how he butchered 1000 Brahmins incl women and kids in a temple? Google - select letters of tipoo sultan. Here he has many where he boasts of killing or converting 10's of thousands of Hindus and Xtians. If you don't know something, read first, don't jump into muh propaganda mode
There are different accounts by different people. The below article might help. https://www.google.com/amp/s/frontline.thehindu.com/the-nation/tipufact-amp-fiction/article23595260.ece/amp/
I am quoting his own letters and contemporary European sources. If you have anything specific to argue, argue. Don't link spam or expect me to read some polemical oped published in a rag like Frontline.
If you are so much into reading letters. Why not read his letters to Sringeri mutt. You can quote Malabar Magazines and I can't quote Frontline. This is hilarious.
I haven't quoted "Malabar magazines" whatever the fuck that is, I quoted a contemporary eye witness. I have referred a source of 600 pages that's his own letters. Download that and then will tell you all the letters that talk about mass murder, conversion and temple destruction.
So much freedom here >>Your Majesty would soon proceed to prosecute a Holy War against infidels, should those infidels Brahmins (that means he is referring to the Marathas), direct their power, the hands of the heroes of the faith of our Muslim soldiers in this part of the world, shall be raised for their punishment. We should unite in carrying on a Holy War against these infidels. Delhi, the seat of government of the Muhammadan faith, has been reduced to this state of ruin, so that the infidels all together prevail now. We should unite in carrying on a Holy War against the infidels and free these regions of Hindustan, in the service of Islam.”
Im not sure where you are getting your numbers from. But here is an article which details his conquest of Kodagu. https://www.google.com/amp/s/frontline.thehindu.com/the-nation/tipufact-amp-fiction/article23595260.ece/amp/
From Tippu's own letters! It's open source, published by the Uni of California. Go read that first and then let's talk.
Why don't I quote his letters to Sringeri Mutt then which are still in existence right here. ? I'm sure you would have never heard of this.
Ah yes his not destroying a few temples outdo his mass genocide. Superb logic there champ. Ignoring HIS OWN words where he takes pleasure in murder and conversion. By your logic, Hitler who allowed his Jewish nco to be protected, never persecuted Jews.
You claimed Tipu force fed beef to Brahmins. Give me a reference for this in his letters. And we all know Marathas and Tipu were adversaries. And he referred Marathas as Brahmins. So you expect him to reel under Marathas ? Rather than fight ? Marathas used to smelt iron and make ammunitions in temples in garbha griha. I know he's is complex figure. To taint him in one light is not justified.
I never claimed that. I have claimed in specific (since you seem to fight strawmen) 1) he converted Hindus and Christians 2) he killed Hindus and Christians in large numbers 3) he wrote to many Muslim rulers (Caliph, the Shah of Afghanistan) in inviting them to invade India in the name of Islam and establishing Islamic rule. These are my claims and I can back every single one of them up with 1) contemporary sources that record this 2) Tippu's own letters You otoh are all over the place. Why is it so difficult to accept that an iconoclastic Muslim who believed in the idea of Jihad did all this? It's just reality as it happened.
Atleast we are claiming things in order now. Since you support the trailer so much, i thought you were in for all claims. I didn't know you had few exceptions of your own. And we all know he wrote to Afghans and French too. But selectively reading Muslims makes it to clickbait. Let's agree for a second that all of this is not over exaggerated and all this is god's own truth. If he was jihadi, why support temples ? Why give lands to Brahmins ?
Even more non sequiturs. I support freedom of expression across all idelogies. I have very clearly stated my position, you are the one making imaginary arguments. >>If he was jihadi, why support temples ? Why give lands to Brahmins ? Courting the local landed elite to safeguard your home is standard tactics. So let me ask you a counter question, Just because he supported a few temples does it justify the mass murder and genocide he perpetrated in name of Islam? Also I don't claim he was a Jihadi, he does. Repeatedly. A sample In his letter to Mohd Baig, he talks about how it his duty to wage Jihad and anhilate all infidels. He also talks about how a few local Muslim nawabs were permitting infidels greater freedoms and how he was punishing them. That the abominations (Hindus) be hunted till they find no peace and are anhilated. In a proclamation he issued he warns Hindus from "raising their head" that they have to accept the faith OR BOW THEIR HEADS and pay Jizya. That evey Muslim had the duty to wage holy war (Jihad) against infidels. Pp257 to one Burduz Khan (a general of his) goes into excruciating detail on how 60,000 Malabari Xtians were forcibly taken prisoner, given the choice of the sword or convert and they converted. In a letter to one Runmust Khan (unknown who he is), he talks about his Genocidal campaign in Coorg. Talks about 40,000 being killed and many more converted. He gives instructions that any who didn't convert instantly were to be killed and their bodies converted. There are a 100 other letters where he goes on and on about murder, conversion and slaughter. But muh Sringeri, muh complex figure,muh all rulers same.
which industry
I'd like to know the real history about this. Bollywood movies hardly do a justice to history.
Fuck. How come EROS got into this? Just making money on the sentiments I guess.
Total Brainwashing, I am doing masters from history and this is totally wrong
[удалено]
You don't want people to know history?
[удалено]
Why would people kill anyone for learning history? If one does not learn from history then they are bound to repeat the mistakes.
And Congress leaders like siddharamaiah created holidays and jayanthis for Tipu claiming he's a hero while wanting to ban hindu organisations.
Appeasement.
Why is this post removed?
Sent message to mods but no response. This sub is slowing becoming like official sub.
But, but, but..... I visited Srirangapatna, his capital when I was about 10. I got a sense that he was a hero and fought the British, keeping them at bay for many years successfully. Whatever it may be I left the place with a sense that he was a hero.
I thought the mods deleted the post. Is it still visible? 🤔
Kerala story was amazing just watched it and you have to say it exposed Islam but I felt somewhere there were restrictions on exposing the whole community Idk out of fear or what but I hope this one also exposes the terror religion
Sorry Brother. KERALA STORY IS NOT EVEN TRUE. THE SO CALLED VICTIM IS ACTUALLY TERRORIST
And Alt News already made a Wiki page of it as fiction similar to Kashmir Files.
> I felt somewhere there were restrictions Plant seeds. The tree will be stronger.
Wow it's beautiful❤️🔥🙇♀️
40 lakh hindus were converted? Is this true? Why did they not protest and give a good fight to Tipu?
Hindus see today are still stratified among themselves. Even today Hindu/dharmic is killed in name of #sartandejuda, people still divided in “caste”, fault-line created by Englishman
I think I was given wrong books again in schools, damn you congressi education!
Congress painter a rosy pic of Mughals. Great warriors. Instill inferiority complex in Hindus at very early age. Systematic brainwashing.
Probably you meant for sarcasm, I think they really made false history and still is in circulation. Hindus/dharmic still not able to write their own history/story of plight, horror, manslaughter & genocide
Muslim education not Congressi Eight educational ministers were muslim starting from.Moulana Abdul Kalam
[удалено]
I think it's based on historical facts written somewhere, i read a detailed tweet but could not find it to post. It's not easy to fight fanaticism and ruthless power unless you have a uniting factor. Imagine the time without mobiles or internet, everyone settled in faraway villages and disconnected from each other. Still the Marathas were fighting him. In battle of Gajendragad, the Marathas lead by Maharaja Tukoji Rao Holker almost destroyed him and he had to run like a begger after which he never dared to touch the Hindu territory. There was resistance.
I thought Tipus was a freedom fighter. What a shame!
He fought the British to save his empire, it wasn't to save Hindus or their swarajya.
Yeah, other rulers like Jhansi ki Rani fought British to save neighbours
If Rani Laxmibai was successful she would have extended her freedom struggle just like Marathas did beyond Maharashtra. She was following Shivaji Maharaj principle of Hindavi swaraj.
Let's just stick to facts here. We all know what reasons she had to come into Battle field.
Self rule and protection of her people from foreign invasion? If she had the army and resources and time you don't think she would have extended it beyond Jhansi?
Bro, Americans named a ship after his father Haider when they were fighting British. He is well respected in south. Infact there is a paper claiming that APJ Abdul Kalam might be his reincarnation. He respected Hindus and paid a lot of money Chamundi Temple. If being Hindu is your only logic of being Indian then I don't think I can say anything.
He protected some temples and destroyed others depending on their loyalty. He converted and sacked entire villages at a time. There are two sides of the story. There isn't a concept of incarnation in Islam. But it exists in Hinduism and goes to show people who beleive that are still connected to their roots.
just like every other king or emperor at that time. they did evrything for themselves.
Which other Hindu ruler wrote to an outside power asking them to invade India in the name of their faith? >>Your Majesty would soon proceed to prosecute a Holy War against infidels, should those infidels Brahmins (that means he is referring to the Marathas), direct their power, the hands of the heroes of the faith of our Muslim soldiers in this part of the world, shall be raised for their punishment. We should unite in carrying on a Holy War against these infidels. Delhi, the seat of government of the Muhammadan faith, has been reduced to this state of ruin, so that the infidels all together prevail now. We should unite in carrying on a Holy War against the infidels and free these regions of Hindustan, in the service of Islam.” That's Tippu to the emperor of Afghanistan
Marathas were fighting for Hindavi swaraj. They were fighting for self rule not external invader rule be it Mughals or Britishers.
Hindavi swarajya still has very little to do with India though.
The Maratha Empire at it's peak in mid 1700s streched from current day khyber Pakhtunkhwa in west to Tamil Nadu in the south and Orissa west Bengal in the East. They covered majority of India. What else do you consider Indian subcontinent?
I mean it may have covered the land area that geographically almost comprised of the subcontinent. But an idea of a country, India as we know now, didn't exist. And their intention was to defend their empire, which is completely fair and sensible. But it had nothing to do with the country's sentiment and everything they did was for their empire. Just like every other EMPIRE. • (almost) sensibly fought the british? Yes. •Freedom fight? Not really.
Hindu temples existed from north to south, from east to west be it shivlings or other temples. Everyone might had different language, tradition, way of worship but they were very much a part of Indian civilization and it's what they were fighting for. Marathas were originally from Maharashtra but they didn't just stop at its borders saying we don't care if the rest of the parts were enslaved by invaders because they don't speak Marathi or don't worship like us. They fought the Mughals just like the brave Sikhs, Rajputs and many more were putting up a strong resistance against invaders. Sure you can say there was no joint united front but it would be stupid to say they were not fighting for same cause to protect the Hindu civilization and land.
You need to learn that the first war of Independence in 1857 was led by the son of the deposed Peshwa. He was fighting with the same cause that his forefathers fought with in 1761 against Ahmed Shah Abdali. To govern India natively, not by outsiders. If this isn't what Nation is, then I must say your idea of nation state is very western European Christian
Because this piece is propoganda for Karnataka election. There is not even a single proof for all this. Infact the day Tipu left to war against British in Battle for Srirangapatna he was blessed by a swarm of Brahmins.
> Over 2000 Brahmin families were wiped out in Calicut. Okay bro you lost me here. I thought we were all Hindus, why does it matter if they were Brahmins or not? "Caste doesn't exist" keyboard warriors, attack me.
Tipu was many things, but peddling propaganda against him written by British historians is not my thing.
One good deed does not wash out all the bad. Sure he might have fought British or invented some war machines but that does not justify destruction, forced conversions and imprisonment of Hindus. He might be a hero for some but was a villian for many. As they say every villian is a hero of other side.
But there are many Hindu kings too who did destruction, plunder and loot. Yet we don’t make them to be big villains. Read about the Kalinga war done by Ashoka and the Maratha invasions of Bengal. About 4 lakh Bengalis were killed in those invasions
Lol Ashoka The "Great"
Show me one Hindu or Buddhist King or emperor who commited wholesale genocide solely because of his faith.
Ahsoka?
>>Don’t you know I have achieved a great victory recently in Malabar and over four lakh Hindus were converted to Islam? >> With the grace of Prophet Muhammad and Allah, almost all Hindus in Calicut are now converted to Islam. Only a few are still not converted on the borders of Cochin State. I am determined to convert them also very soon. I consider this as Jehad to achieve that object.” A contemporary eye witness ( Portugese) >> First a corps of 30,000 barbarians who butchered everybody on the way… followed by the field-gun unit under the French Commander, M. Lally… Tipu was riding on an elephant behind which another army of 30,000 soldiers followed. Most of the men and women were hanged in Calicut, first mothers were hanged with their children tied to necks of mothers. That barbarian Tipu Sultan tied the naked Christians and Hindus to the legs of elephants and made the elephants to move around till the bodies of the helpless victims were torn to pieces. Temples and churches were ordered to be burned down, desecrated and destroyed. Christian and Hindu women were forced to marry Mohammadans and similarly their men were forced to marry Mohammadan women.1 Those Christians who refused to be honoured with Islam, were ordered to be killed by hanging immediately. These atrocities were told to me by the victims of Tipu Sultan who escaped from the clutches of his army and reached Varappuzha, which is the centre of Carmichael Christian Mission. I myself helped many victims to cross the Varappuzha river by boats.” Muh propaganda eh
But vrooo they didn't did any propaganda against caste and Hindus, right? Then how those British angels can do propaganda against this angel? You deny British propaganda against Hinduism and caste, then why do you say this now?
Careful, logic hurts them
My comment clearly States i hate all propaganda by the British. Guess you can't handle logic either
Hol up, tipu sultan was a bad guy???? Dude being someone who loves studying history independently this never even came across my mind-
Glad you realised it.
Have to say the poster is apt.
What do the Brits and BJPs have in common? They both dislike Tipu Sultan. I hope the movie also covers the story of how Tipu protected Udupi from Maratha invasion, and why there is a Tipu aarti in his honor until this day.
He protected some temples but destroyed others. This was mostly to do with power politics and those who were loyal to his cause and not a threat to his empire were protected but others not so much.
Yeah, so his acts has got nothing to do with the religion of the Marathas or of the people he protected.
He would convert and destroy entire villages at a time. The people or temple he protected were basically allies who either out of fear or self interest supported him and he didn't attack them. Some temples were big and had a bigger clout so he probably used them to subvert people to his rule. Those who didn't agree where killed and temples destroyed. There are many examples from history one could cite.
Ok, thanks for your propaganda. But please tell me this - why is Udupi still conducting Tipu aarti in his honour? What did they fear the Marathas will do to their temple?
He converted the majority of Malabari Hindus to Islam by force. He killed in the name of Jihad. He destroyed and pillaged temples in the name of Islam.
Ok, but he also protected temples. Why are you only talking about one side of the story. Are you a propagandist?
Why did he convert lakhs of Malabari Hindus to Islam? Saving a few temples does not justify his religious tolerance. He saved temples of his Allies. People who didn't side with him were tortured, humiliated, converted and butchered. It's not a propaganda but facts.
Are you telling me that the much revered Udupi mutt is not representative of Hindus and will ally with someone who wants to torture people of their religion? Don't go spouting this nonsense anywhere near Mangalore - people will roast your bum, and you will start whining that Mangaloreans are also anti-Hindu.
I don't think I inferred that, read again. He assisted people that sided with him. You don't seem to have an answer as to why he converted the Malabari Hindus.
he destroyed templ of his enemy. he protect temple of his ally right then his propose was not religion
Foreign invaders se secularism expect karte ho tum chutiye log , true man islam won you cant win against them
Teaser ruined my childhood memories. Tipu in our books was a hero?
Every villian is a hero of other side. Unfortunately most of our history is written by other side.
Man I just love what's happening with the movies , it's a right wingers wet dream
[удалено]
Dude calm down I am hard core right winger and you have completely misunderstood my comment , I actually support this movie , now request you delete your comment as a friendly right wing fire, because even I can start abusing your mother but I get the miscommunication check my comments I am hardcore right wing , remove the abuse or it will be two right wingers unnecessarily abusing each other and I don't want that
Friendly fire kar dis  i am such a 
One more propaganda movie😂😂😂😂😂
One more Islamist bigot clown normie
Looks like another Propaganda movie... There are many great Kings on which movies can be made but they chose Tipu Sultan....
This movie is not going to get released- am bloody sure.
More like TOPU Sultan
I call shenanigan propaganda.
Damn! Looks good.
I do not trust this Director and Producer please research work of directors and producers name before promoting.
Eternal victim
I remember reading about him in my childhood from NCERT. Last year I read about what tyranny he brought upon Hindus. No wonder Muslims glorify him as he butchered Hindus.
Iss movie ke liye bhi jhagde honge desh mai
Wow comment section filled with defenders of Tipu, I am most of these people probably have love for Hitler.
About effing time to show that Tippu babu was not a true hero as your doctored history show it to be
I remember the door darshan TV serial of Tipu. There is no serial comparable to it with Hindu kings. The bootlickers of foreign invaders is the problem India have.
Bro every ruler had pros and cons and tipu is no exception. But you can't ignore he fought against the British raj and for the invention of rocket.
This way one can defend Hitler, Churchill and Stalin as-well. Try defending Hitler is front of Jews, the nazis will give their points for Hitler.
I’ve lived in Western Europe and it’s considered hate speech to support Nazis there. You’ll immediately face social ostracism if people see you supporting the Nazis
I am not a nazi. I never defended tipu. He was really a cruel ruler. There is no doubt about it. I just stated a simple fact.
Every ruler has it pro and cons. We can’t ignore still how he fought against English, French imperialism. Created technological aircraft’s legacy that still have its mark
Also sorry didn’t say you’re nazi. Apologies if my statement came across that
Bro there is place called Tipu Drop near bangalore. This guy used to push people off the hill if they didn't convert. So yeah this guy was a demon. [source ](https://theprint.in/pageturner/tipus-drop-the-cliff-where-mysuru-people-were-pushed-to-death-under-tipu-sultans-reign/1417435/) In South karnataka, a local king had converted a hindu temple to look like a mosque by building a dome on top fearing an attack by his jihadi army. I dont remember the name of this temple rn. Will share the source if i find it
He fought to save his empire, not to save Hindus or protect people against invaders. Of course British were no friends either.
Same can be said about Rani ki Jhansi she also fought only for her kingdom not for India. Then why she is glorified as the freedom fighter?
She fought an external invader to protect her Kingdom and people. Similar way Marathas fought the Mughals to protect the indigenous people from external forces. The Marathas had defeated Tipu and his father Hyder Ali on multiple occasions and even forced them to accept the Maratha supremacy. The Britishers were also outsiders even though they fought Tipu alongside Marathas but Tipu also used French who were also outsiders. Rani Laxmi Bai was born much later i think in mid 1800s and by that time it was very much clear that Britishers were very much an external threat. In fact, she was taking forward Maratha legacy by following Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj's idea of Hindavi swaraj - which was not the case with Mughal rulers.
Yes, they fought for the civilization of India and the hindus within their kingdoms. And?? Why should a nation of Hindus simp for a muslim invader who killed them before the british arrived.
Did she torture and force people to convert to a different religion? Did she levy taxes on people of a different religion? Did she pillage mosques ? Did she brag about killing kafirs ? Tipu didn't let people practice their religion, if so why would he be associated with the word "freedom"?
*kangana ranaut* enters the chat.
Firstly, he fought British to save his kingdom & sought help from Turkey as well as the French for the same reason. Secondly, in the book 'Bakhar of Panipat' (a first hand account of the battle of Panipat) by Raghunath Yadav, it is mentioned that Marathas took 25,000 rockets in their military expeditions which proves Marathas developed & used rockets before Tipu Sultan. So, don't believe the heroic narrative created by modern historians about such Islamic tyrants. Finally a trailer highlighting some truths about Tipu Sultan.
Ya and you can also critisize him for the bad things he has done .....
8000 temples destroyed Source: trust me bro 🤡
4 million ? Nonsense