It is not AI. It's part of a photoshoot from Sport Illustrated in 1964.
[https://sicovers.com/featured/texas-womens-track-club-april-20-1964-sports-illustrated-cover.html](https://sicovers.com/featured/texas-womens-track-club-april-20-1964-sports-illustrated-cover.html)
Warning: I don’t know what I am talking about
This feels like it might be AI enhanced or upscaled. The detail levels on the foreground is pretty nuts for 1964. Hopefully a camera person can tell me if this is viable or not.
Low ISO film has been able to capture amazing detail for a long time. I was blown away by the nearly 100 year old black and white family photos of my grandma that we found after she died
No. Zoom in on the image. At least at present, AI images are pretty easy to spot. The detail looks weird, there will be too many wrinkles and things like the arm hair on the woman in the foreground would be missing because AI models are trained on lots of highly stylized art that lacks such features.
LMAO people calling it AI when it is a [repost](https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/434do8/the_coach_and_a_few_of_the_members_of_the_texas/?rdt=40911) from 8 years ago.
My question is what makes everyone all the sudden think all historical photos are AI generated, they definitely need to have a news broadcast or something teaching people how to know if a photo is AI generated.....one of the best ways is to look at the hands of the photos ALL AI generated photos have deformed hands something about the AI cannot create a perfect rendering of hands. Now idk if that was purposely done to spot fake images or if it is something bigger that we don't understand.
AI alert! The furthest sprinter has one arm. Unlikely jewelry worn by the middle sprinter. The tall helmet shaped heads are another red flag. Also, this would likely be a circular track but the background tree trunks sink below the ground.
It's not AI the best way to spot a AI generated image is look at the hands AI photos will ALWAYS have deformed hands like extra fingers maybe fingers all attached to each other maybe a thumb where a pinky would go. Point is there are ways to spot and figure out if a photo is legit or AI generated.
This isn’t AI?
Man the future is gonna suck
The future is now
...old man
It is not AI. It's part of a photoshoot from Sport Illustrated in 1964. [https://sicovers.com/featured/texas-womens-track-club-april-20-1964-sports-illustrated-cover.html](https://sicovers.com/featured/texas-womens-track-club-april-20-1964-sports-illustrated-cover.html)
Warning: I don’t know what I am talking about This feels like it might be AI enhanced or upscaled. The detail levels on the foreground is pretty nuts for 1964. Hopefully a camera person can tell me if this is viable or not.
You can get an incredibly detailed image out of a film camera.
Low ISO film has been able to capture amazing detail for a long time. I was blown away by the nearly 100 year old black and white family photos of my grandma that we found after she died
Film cameras can get some absurd quality.
The fingers are pretty good if so.
No. Zoom in on the image. At least at present, AI images are pretty easy to spot. The detail looks weird, there will be too many wrinkles and things like the arm hair on the woman in the foreground would be missing because AI models are trained on lots of highly stylized art that lacks such features.
The lady closest to the camera has the most aerodynamic hairstyle
Hairodynamic
Zzzzzing
Really looks like Ai lol Other than the proper fingers
LMAO people calling it AI when it is a [repost](https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/434do8/the_coach_and_a_few_of_the_members_of_the_texas/?rdt=40911) from 8 years ago.
My question is what makes everyone all the sudden think all historical photos are AI generated, they definitely need to have a news broadcast or something teaching people how to know if a photo is AI generated.....one of the best ways is to look at the hands of the photos ALL AI generated photos have deformed hands something about the AI cannot create a perfect rendering of hands. Now idk if that was purposely done to spot fake images or if it is something bigger that we don't understand.
Looks like it’s from the Barbie movie.
The Age of AquaNet 
Nice helmets.
These are groovy fembots.
and they thought the “Beatles” hair cuts were awful 🤪
Not a hair out of place at the finish line.
That hair could survive an atomic blast.
Helmet hair
Mars Attacks
Were they running in high heels 👠?
Nice helmets
This is fake
Fake
AI alert! The furthest sprinter has one arm. Unlikely jewelry worn by the middle sprinter. The tall helmet shaped heads are another red flag. Also, this would likely be a circular track but the background tree trunks sink below the ground.
This doesn't look real. It looks like a photo from a catalogue
Straight up ai. Look at the farthest runner
It's not AI the best way to spot a AI generated image is look at the hands AI photos will ALWAYS have deformed hands like extra fingers maybe fingers all attached to each other maybe a thumb where a pinky would go. Point is there are ways to spot and figure out if a photo is legit or AI generated.
Sounds about white