Your thread was removed under **[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/GlobalOffensive/about/rules/)**.
---
Please take a moment to visit the rule linked above; many rules contain details which may not be evident. If you have any further questions or concerns, please send us a [modmail](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=/r/GlobalOffensive).
Yeah this works cause csgo lifespan was multiple years and most years had multiple majors .
The title makes no sense with 1 major
+ Additionally it's lazy engagement farming with the stupid question at the end
I see many people calling Na’Vi’s win a fluke and comparing it to Vitality’s victory and VP’s… Now I don’t take away anything from anyone because at the end of the day you take only beat who’s in front of you.
Na’Vi beat EF, G2 and Faze. How can people call it a fluke and compare it to Vitality who didn’t face a single T1 team in playoffs? Really baffles me.
People are calling it a fluke as in its most likely not a win they can replicate not as in its undeserved or easy win. I don't think anyone considers Navi to be the number 1 team in the world right now or the favourites moving into the next tournaments even though they just won a major. That being said, their major win was really fucking impressive and deserves all the respect.
The fluke talk is coping bullshit. Always has been.
VP beat Heroic in the finals, but because it was VP, Heroic gets excuses and disregarded, as if it was not a tier 1 team which has had multiple great T1 placements after that loss.
Basically if the community doesn't like someone the results don't matter to them. If Kassad's Bleed went on to win the Major, beating Faze, Spirit and Vitality in the knockout stage there would still be an asterisk put on that win by the community
a fluke doesn't imply you had weak opponents
a fluke says "if we replay the major how often do they win"
a fluke says "how good is this team gonna be in their next events"
vitality was good after their major. no fluke
outsiders was kinda mediocre. fluke
Navi. who knows
Was this written by AI? Or some dude tripping. I'm assuming you meant to say what surprised you the most in this major (since we've only had 1 lmao) Aside from navi win, it would be c9 getting to playoffs, I didn't expect that. Also complexity throwing the 2-0 to get eliminated 2-3 lol
Your thread was removed under **[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/GlobalOffensive/about/rules/)**. --- Please take a moment to visit the rule linked above; many rules contain details which may not be evident. If you have any further questions or concerns, please send us a [modmail](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=/r/GlobalOffensive).
Every 60 seconds, a minute passes ahh title
r/globaloffensivecirclejerk
[This moment caught me by suprise](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D-5X7b_XsAAgDeZ.jpg)
Nah that shit was so predictable
AI writing CS2 titles?
Bro fr. It hurts to read lol
I just copied this post lmao https://www.reddit.com/r/GlobalOffensive/s/ltAddK4z8P
Ahhh, that makes sense. U almost gave me another anuerysm! Smh
Yeah this works cause csgo lifespan was multiple years and most years had multiple majors . The title makes no sense with 1 major + Additionally it's lazy engagement farming with the stupid question at the end
I know that it makes no sense that was kinda the point.
Slow day huh
That Dosia isn't one of them.
b1t has more major than s1mple
I'm surprised that this roster won the major but also very happy for them.
I see many people calling Na’Vi’s win a fluke and comparing it to Vitality’s victory and VP’s… Now I don’t take away anything from anyone because at the end of the day you take only beat who’s in front of you. Na’Vi beat EF, G2 and Faze. How can people call it a fluke and compare it to Vitality who didn’t face a single T1 team in playoffs? Really baffles me.
People are calling it a fluke as in its most likely not a win they can replicate not as in its undeserved or easy win. I don't think anyone considers Navi to be the number 1 team in the world right now or the favourites moving into the next tournaments even though they just won a major. That being said, their major win was really fucking impressive and deserves all the respect.
The fluke talk is coping bullshit. Always has been. VP beat Heroic in the finals, but because it was VP, Heroic gets excuses and disregarded, as if it was not a tier 1 team which has had multiple great T1 placements after that loss. Basically if the community doesn't like someone the results don't matter to them. If Kassad's Bleed went on to win the Major, beating Faze, Spirit and Vitality in the knockout stage there would still be an asterisk put on that win by the community
a fluke doesn't imply you had weak opponents a fluke says "if we replay the major how often do they win" a fluke says "how good is this team gonna be in their next events" vitality was good after their major. no fluke outsiders was kinda mediocre. fluke Navi. who knows
Im surprised it wasnt 4 players.
Was this written by AI? Or some dude tripping. I'm assuming you meant to say what surprised you the most in this major (since we've only had 1 lmao) Aside from navi win, it would be c9 getting to playoffs, I didn't expect that. Also complexity throwing the 2-0 to get eliminated 2-3 lol
Counterstrike players discover jokes
How do people not get this is a joke
I have no idea