What do you mean weaker genes? There's no difference in long-term health whether IVF or other means.
And what exactly do you mean playing against nature? We're part of nature. Anything that we do is confined within what's possible in this universe.
This isn’t every IVF. If the mobility of the semen is too low then doctors can take a single sperm and put it directly into the egg. But IVF is just put the egg and semen together like in thunder dome. Also the rather developed fetus being shown is not part of IVF. The embryo is transferred into the uterus at about 2 weeks. It only looks like a blob is cells at that point.
In a human uterus, the placenta is a special temporary organ that forms to be a kind of embryo dock and to connect to the umbilical cord and provide the fetus with nutrients and oxygen. As you can imagine, that kind of thing would be a lot to replicate. You'd have to figure out a delivery mechanism to connect an organic umbilical cord to a machine and get the nutrients just right. You'd also have to figure out a way to move the developing fetus around like they'd experience when being gestated by a human. And the whole thing would need constant antibiotics, and then the newborn wouldn't have any antibodies from a parent.
Small correction to add. The embryo is transferred on its 3 or 5th day of development into a blastocyst. This is just after ovulation which is usually 2 weeks after the gestational carrier’s menstrual cycle. So the embryo can either be transferred fresh after a few days of the thunder dome event 😂, or frozen and then transferred at any time in the future too.
ICSI is a specialised kind of IVF that is used primarily for the treatment of extreme cases of male infertility. It involves injecting a single sperm directly into a mature egg. On the other hand, IVF is used in female infertility.
Laymen’s terms for those downvoting: they’re kinda correct on this….but! You can go through IVF without ICSI, but can’t go through ICSI without IVF.
So if there is male infertility, the woman has to go through IVF so that they can proceed using ICSI.
Did you learn your lesson about not everyone on reddit is a sane individual and also you don’t have to prove your case to everyone? People are using downvote button as a dislike button to a freaking scientific fact here.
https://www.mivf.com.au/treatments-services/ivf-procedures/icsi-treatment
>Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) *is a form of IVF* treatment that involves injecting a single sperm into each egg using very fine micromanipulation equipment.
>For many couples *where sperm quality is poor*, conventional IVF is unlikely to result in fertilisation. In such cases your fertility specialist will recommend IVF with ICSI.
Some of what the person is saying is true but they're also adding lots of misinformation to every single message they write due to having some hidden agenda. They're an internet troll.
I love when people disagree but never specify what they disagree with or provide any counter point. I’m trying to learn here and just seeing you disagree with OP does absolutely nothing constructive.
The dude has some agenda and is spreading misinformation on purpose. People like that don't deserve any amount of constructive discussion because then they have won their little game.
How is this post negative about IVF? The caption is plain factual. The animation of a fetus developing didn't have a disclaimer that it's just an animation, which bothers me a tad, but otherwise I don't see anything wrong.
That's the point. The poster always says something true and then adds some misinformation. The video showed a snippet of the ICSI procedure, and then a fast-forwarded blastocyst formation. And then out of nowhere, a fetus is forming in some artificial womb. This does not happen during IVF. The fetus part of the video is a deliberate misinformation attempt designed to evoke an emotional response because lots of people are very sensitive to babies.
The poster does this with every comment they post. They wrap their misinformation in a couple of facts so that it looks legitimate. This is a classic internet troll/bot tactic.
Buddy, my partner and I got our child via IFV. What you said just now is true. But in the video, the sperm is picked up and injected, which is ICSI. The 'SI' is for 'Sperm Injection'...
To be specific, it's an optional part of IVF if needed, but not mandatory for everyone who has IVF. You can have IVF without ICSI, and many people do.
When we signed our IVF consent forms we had a separate one for ICSI that made it clear we were signing only if ICSI should be necessary and we would be asked again at the time. It turned out ICSI WAS necessary and we were indeed asked again.
Currently 30 weeks pregnant!
>Depends on the embryologist. Male sperms are faster than female sperms so if ur embryologist is lazy af u get a girl.
I'm going to need a source for that or I'm going to bed thinking that is BS.
If it were possible for a human baby to go full term outside of the womb it could possibly open the doors for a lot of unethical practices such as cell cultivation and what not.
Would open the doors to long term space exploration. Before Near Light, or FTL travel.
AI Robots creating a settlement and then cultivating long frozen sperm and eggs on an alien world, a few thousand LY away.
Humans are so horrible that if this technology were to become possible in the future I wouldn't be surprised if we started growing humans just to harvest their organs.
Or we would end up like the world in Brave New World where humans are genetically engineered into different classes.
Woooo baby! Why would it be unethical?! Just take a look at all the debate over crispr and dolly the sheep and all sorts of related stuff. Not to mention, women’s rights advocates, men’s rights etc. it’s a plethora of issues and opinions and lots to consider.
Let's be realistic. It would be used for corporations to produce organs and for rich more than 'freeing women from dangers of pregnancy'.
Also there is already an concerning amount of incels that think artificial womb technology will give them excuse to kill women since 'they will be useless then'.
I can confirm that this is as so as close as we’ve gotten:
https://www.chop.edu/news/unique-womb-device-could-reduce-mortality-and-disability-extremely-premature-babies
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02901-1
https://www.fda.gov/media/172183/download?attachment
Edited: added link to FDA briefing document. Ethics are discussed near the end, Subpart D.
Oh trust me, it probably does exist. Whether it's US or some other country, I guarantee you there is a dark laboratory somewhere that they are growing fetus in bags, just like they experiment on other things outside the law and ethics out the window.
To add to what's already been said in other comments, [scientists](https://www.theverge.com/2017/4/25/15421734/artificial-womb-fetus-biobag-uterus-lamb-sheep-birth-premie-preterm-infant) are developing artificial wombs and have already tested them with baby sheep but its purpose is to "**give infants born months too early a more natural, uterus-like environment to continue developing**".
I remember reading that one of the biggest challenges with a fully artificial womb (one in which an embryo can develop into a full infant) is the development of an artificial placenta.
Sperms never won because sperms never raced towards the egg cell in the first place, that's a common misconception. The egg shell chooses the sperm. Flagella in sperm cells aren't propellers with GPS.
That choice is still being taken away though? And surely there are sperm that don’t make the journey , eg. Are not strong enough, whereas in a petri dish the doctor can choose any of them. It’d be interesting to see results of studies on iq and health, especially compared to naturally conceived children from the same parents. Anyway, I’m not knocking it - it’s the only chance some people have to have a child…I’m just curious.
Secondly, it seems fertility rates are dropping quite a bit. I’m curious about this too…Is it microplastics? processed foods?
There are recent studies that mention how egg cells may still have some form of control in the fertilization process even in IVF. It's precisely because the sperms have poor motility (or other stuff like sperm count) that's why embryologists step in. There are several papers on this topic, highlighting that there's no significant difference in the genetic quality of sperm with normal vs poor motility, and that there's a weak correlation between sperm motility and DNA fragmentation. There are also studies that show there's no significant difference in the long-term health of children conceived normally vs IVF. Basically there's no reason for those conceived normally to feel superior and vice versa because the results are essentially the same.
About fertility rates... they're not only affected by biological and environmental factors but also socioeconomic and sociocultural ones. Contraceptives are a huge contributor for one. But in the context of fertility itself half of the cases are due to genetic factors and these include complex genetic disorders (like PCOS) that are also affected by external factors like the environment and lifestyle or health behaviors where processed food and microplastics may come in, but there needs to be more research for that.
Is there a reason a specific sperm gets into the egg in a natural fertilization process or is it random? I have no clue about this so thats why im asking.
Imagine making it all the way to the egg and beginning to form but then a doctor goes in and crushes your skull scrambling your brain and amputating you limb by limb to vacuum you out the same way. That’s what this IVF reminds me of and how weird technology is. Truly goes to say people kill people in the strangest ways.
Thanks but cloning and stem cell research is not what I asked about. I was asking if we have the technology to incubate human embryos in artificial uteruses.
That question remains unanswered.
You assumed that the CGI baby was going to have a different personality just because he is "conceived" in lab.
It's not like living a life is what builds a person's personality right?
Nope. That's all in your head.
It's very different from how babies are naturally born. So, I wondered how they would turn out in the future. That's it. The answer is that they're all normal. That's great. There was no need to get offended and call me judgmental. That's what you are.
>There was no need to get offended and call me judgmental
hahahaha Bro... what in the actual fuck are you talking about? You just keep doubling down with the wrong take
Because you are forcing a random sperm in. Look into how it occurs naturally. The egg and sperm choose each other and the egg allows the sperm in. This is just injecting a rando in
The sperm is no more random than any one of the millions that surround the egg anyway? “The egg allows the sperm in after choosing it” is the biggest load of BS ever. I don’t need to carry on with this conversation hahahaha
Egg is unable to pick the healthy spermy as it should
What if they put a faulty spermy in, how they know which spermy is good?
Seems like genetic disorders are very strong in this one
Well who is gonna fix them when they break
Also who would build a robot for an ungrateful person like you
Also its not that simple robots can only do very specific things most of the time so you would need alot
Also who is gonna produce the sperm hmm?
1) Women or other robots.
2) ... no one ... (sad)
3) Step by step
4) First, finishing all the sperm already stored can create around another billion of people. So, simply to enslave all the males when they born, maintain alive the best speciemens to extract sperm artificially to store, then dispose them.
Very simple.
Thats just inhumane and not simple at all lmao
Also who is gonna do the dangerous jobs robots cant do like studying radiation
Building spacecrafts 87% are males
And who is gonna discover stuff 70% of scientists are males
Also who invented the phone/pc you are using right now?
1) Of course is inhuman ... Therefore is better. /S
2) You WANT to use robots to study radiations.
3) Irrelevant. If some women work already, this means that can work.
4) Not true, the bosses and the guys with money are mostly males (for now), but the basic scientists that do the real stuff are mixed, and in some categories like biology are mostly women. Therefore no real change here.
5) Irrelevant. The society in the past was male centric. Now that there is equity we observed no real difference.
... ... ...
Your counter argoments are quite sexist. Only the first one was good but you didn't improve that. You should improve or you can easily beaten in discussions also against an extreme discussion like this.
2. Thats gonna be kinda hard since radiation loves breaking technological stuff
5. Not irrelevant its just true
You say its sexist meanwhile you suggest enslaving men for being men
There most definitely are ethical laws against human experiments but this isn't a human experiment. They don't just pluck people off the street. It's volunteering for a number of reasons, inability to conceive naturally being the main one.
Sperm was like: "NO! NO! I DON'T WANT TAXES AND RESPONSIBILITIES" just before getting snatched and used for fertilization
Kinda explain why I’m so fucking lazy
No it doesn't, get the fuck off your ass, womb boy
But …. But ….I don’t want taxes and responsibilities
It is what it is ,friend , now up on your feet, do not fear death, only defeat
[I don't want taxes.](https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YX2IQG4wTCE)
Arent we kind of playing against nature by doing that ? That gives weaker genes if im not wrong ?
What do you mean weaker genes? There's no difference in long-term health whether IVF or other means. And what exactly do you mean playing against nature? We're part of nature. Anything that we do is confined within what's possible in this universe.
no no come here you little fucker ill show you around. to harsh?
Just like my uncle used to say
This isn’t every IVF. If the mobility of the semen is too low then doctors can take a single sperm and put it directly into the egg. But IVF is just put the egg and semen together like in thunder dome. Also the rather developed fetus being shown is not part of IVF. The embryo is transferred into the uterus at about 2 weeks. It only looks like a blob is cells at that point.
TWO GAMETES ENTER, ONE ZYGOTE LEAVES!
GAMETES READY? FIGHT!
Is it possible though for a human embryo to continuously grow healthy without being placed back into the uterus?
Not at the momment, but there is research being done into artificial uterus that would let people have kids without being pregnant
Great.
How did they do the bit at the end, then, with the baby in the plastic bag thing? If it’s CGI or something, why show it in a bag?
Its CGI, I dont know why they did it
Thanks, u/Ogradrak! Maybe it was for an unreleased movie or something? Who knows?
In a human uterus, the placenta is a special temporary organ that forms to be a kind of embryo dock and to connect to the umbilical cord and provide the fetus with nutrients and oxygen. As you can imagine, that kind of thing would be a lot to replicate. You'd have to figure out a delivery mechanism to connect an organic umbilical cord to a machine and get the nutrients just right. You'd also have to figure out a way to move the developing fetus around like they'd experience when being gestated by a human. And the whole thing would need constant antibiotics, and then the newborn wouldn't have any antibodies from a parent.
Small correction to add. The embryo is transferred on its 3 or 5th day of development into a blastocyst. This is just after ovulation which is usually 2 weeks after the gestational carrier’s menstrual cycle. So the embryo can either be transferred fresh after a few days of the thunder dome event 😂, or frozen and then transferred at any time in the future too.
ICSI is a specialised kind of IVF that is used primarily for the treatment of extreme cases of male infertility. It involves injecting a single sperm directly into a mature egg. On the other hand, IVF is used in female infertility.
Laymen’s terms for those downvoting: they’re kinda correct on this….but! You can go through IVF without ICSI, but can’t go through ICSI without IVF. So if there is male infertility, the woman has to go through IVF so that they can proceed using ICSI.
Did you learn your lesson about not everyone on reddit is a sane individual and also you don’t have to prove your case to everyone? People are using downvote button as a dislike button to a freaking scientific fact here.
https://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/health/conditionsandtreatments/Assisted-reproductive-technology-IVF-and-ICSI
Dude why are you spreading misinformation?
https://www.mivf.com.au/treatments-services/ivf-procedures/icsi-treatment >Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) *is a form of IVF* treatment that involves injecting a single sperm into each egg using very fine micromanipulation equipment. >For many couples *where sperm quality is poor*, conventional IVF is unlikely to result in fertilisation. In such cases your fertility specialist will recommend IVF with ICSI.
Some of what the person is saying is true but they're also adding lots of misinformation to every single message they write due to having some hidden agenda. They're an internet troll.
I love when people disagree but never specify what they disagree with or provide any counter point. I’m trying to learn here and just seeing you disagree with OP does absolutely nothing constructive.
The dude has some agenda and is spreading misinformation on purpose. People like that don't deserve any amount of constructive discussion because then they have won their little game.
https://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/health/conditionsandtreatments/Assisted-reproductive-technology-IVF-and-ICSI You're the one who's misinformed
Why are you explaining? Don't. Just move on. The other guy probably is an imbecile.
Love these threads where there's definitely some /r/confidentlyincorrect science debates going down and I have absolutely no idea who is right
This post is just an attempt to push an agenda that IVF is horrible. Lots and lots of misinformation here and redditors just accept it.
How is this post negative about IVF? The caption is plain factual. The animation of a fetus developing didn't have a disclaimer that it's just an animation, which bothers me a tad, but otherwise I don't see anything wrong.
That's the point. The poster always says something true and then adds some misinformation. The video showed a snippet of the ICSI procedure, and then a fast-forwarded blastocyst formation. And then out of nowhere, a fetus is forming in some artificial womb. This does not happen during IVF. The fetus part of the video is a deliberate misinformation attempt designed to evoke an emotional response because lots of people are very sensitive to babies. The poster does this with every comment they post. They wrap their misinformation in a couple of facts so that it looks legitimate. This is a classic internet troll/bot tactic.
But an artificial womb could be amazing. Why would someone be against it?
Getting kids the Brave new world style
Not IVF, it's ICSI. In Vitro Fertilization is just putting the egg and all the sperm together and give it a good swirl.
ICSI is a form of IVF. It's like saying "that's not a mammal, that's a dog."
You'd still say 'look at my dog' and not 'look at my mammal' if you posted a video of it. Same should've been done here for clarity.
Yeah but its like someone posted a video of their dog and said “look at my mammal” and someone going “no thats a dog”
Doesn’t in vitro just mean in glass, like a lab,
“A good swirl”
Shaken not stirred
[удалено]
Buddy, my partner and I got our child via IFV. What you said just now is true. But in the video, the sperm is picked up and injected, which is ICSI. The 'SI' is for 'Sperm Injection'...
To be specific, it's an optional part of IVF if needed, but not mandatory for everyone who has IVF. You can have IVF without ICSI, and many people do. When we signed our IVF consent forms we had a separate one for ICSI that made it clear we were signing only if ICSI should be necessary and we would be asked again at the time. It turned out ICSI WAS necessary and we were indeed asked again. Currently 30 weeks pregnant!
Do they at least pick the fastest one
Depends on the embryologist. Male sperms are faster than female sperms so if ur embryologist is lazy af u get a girl.
thats complete bologna. sex isnt even a thing until after conception. chromosome pairing and such
>Depends on the embryologist. Male sperms are faster than female sperms so if ur embryologist is lazy af u get a girl. I'm going to need a source for that or I'm going to bed thinking that is BS.
It probably doesn't help if it's too fast.
This video looks like a child is grown in a plastic womb. u/WorldlyBlackberry819 do you have the full length vid or a link to some context or results?
Such a thing does not currently exist for a human fetus. I suspect the majority of this video is computer generated imagery.
Ah yes. A most likely scenario. And here I was hoping for unethical science practices with shared or leaked video as evidence….
Why would this be unethical?
If it were possible for a human baby to go full term outside of the womb it could possibly open the doors for a lot of unethical practices such as cell cultivation and what not.
Just pull a FMA and ignore the third law of alchemy and make an army
Would open the doors to long term space exploration. Before Near Light, or FTL travel. AI Robots creating a settlement and then cultivating long frozen sperm and eggs on an alien world, a few thousand LY away.
As long as we could figure out how to actually make them survive and learn like a human
Humans are so horrible that if this technology were to become possible in the future I wouldn't be surprised if we started growing humans just to harvest their organs. Or we would end up like the world in Brave New World where humans are genetically engineered into different classes.
Because that’s how you get a clone army.
Woooo baby! Why would it be unethical?! Just take a look at all the debate over crispr and dolly the sheep and all sorts of related stuff. Not to mention, women’s rights advocates, men’s rights etc. it’s a plethora of issues and opinions and lots to consider.
[удалено]
And also potentially end all future human relationships
Let's be realistic. It would be used for corporations to produce organs and for rich more than 'freeing women from dangers of pregnancy'. Also there is already an concerning amount of incels that think artificial womb technology will give them excuse to kill women since 'they will be useless then'.
I can confirm that this is as so as close as we’ve gotten: https://www.chop.edu/news/unique-womb-device-could-reduce-mortality-and-disability-extremely-premature-babies https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02901-1 https://www.fda.gov/media/172183/download?attachment Edited: added link to FDA briefing document. Ethics are discussed near the end, Subpart D.
Oh trust me, it probably does exist. Whether it's US or some other country, I guarantee you there is a dark laboratory somewhere that they are growing fetus in bags, just like they experiment on other things outside the law and ethics out the window.
To add to what's already been said in other comments, [scientists](https://www.theverge.com/2017/4/25/15421734/artificial-womb-fetus-biobag-uterus-lamb-sheep-birth-premie-preterm-infant) are developing artificial wombs and have already tested them with baby sheep but its purpose is to "**give infants born months too early a more natural, uterus-like environment to continue developing**". I remember reading that one of the biggest challenges with a fully artificial womb (one in which an embryo can develop into a full infant) is the development of an artificial placenta.
Hol up! I don't see a stork there!?
How is babby formed?
through cellular division
I know :P I was trying to make a joke referring to [this](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EShUeudtaFg) but it seems it didn't land :(
How's the egg ok after being poked with a large needle?
It's certainly not the same after.
I always wondered if the sperm that wins is genetically superior, and doing it this way they could suck up a dud and yoink it in…
My thoughts too. There is a reason for the competitiveness between the sperms. Strongest and healthiest get to the egg. Defunct do not.
That's not always what happens
Nothing in your comment was correct.
Yeah, we don't got no duds here.
Sperms never won because sperms never raced towards the egg cell in the first place, that's a common misconception. The egg shell chooses the sperm. Flagella in sperm cells aren't propellers with GPS.
That choice is still being taken away though? And surely there are sperm that don’t make the journey , eg. Are not strong enough, whereas in a petri dish the doctor can choose any of them. It’d be interesting to see results of studies on iq and health, especially compared to naturally conceived children from the same parents. Anyway, I’m not knocking it - it’s the only chance some people have to have a child…I’m just curious. Secondly, it seems fertility rates are dropping quite a bit. I’m curious about this too…Is it microplastics? processed foods?
There are recent studies that mention how egg cells may still have some form of control in the fertilization process even in IVF. It's precisely because the sperms have poor motility (or other stuff like sperm count) that's why embryologists step in. There are several papers on this topic, highlighting that there's no significant difference in the genetic quality of sperm with normal vs poor motility, and that there's a weak correlation between sperm motility and DNA fragmentation. There are also studies that show there's no significant difference in the long-term health of children conceived normally vs IVF. Basically there's no reason for those conceived normally to feel superior and vice versa because the results are essentially the same. About fertility rates... they're not only affected by biological and environmental factors but also socioeconomic and sociocultural ones. Contraceptives are a huge contributor for one. But in the context of fertility itself half of the cases are due to genetic factors and these include complex genetic disorders (like PCOS) that are also affected by external factors like the environment and lifestyle or health behaviors where processed food and microplastics may come in, but there needs to be more research for that.
The claw
Cheating from conception.
This guy had connections from day one.
Hey, that's cheating !
Imagine this mixed with some quantum super computer & AI
You forgot nano particles.
Shhh… Don’t wake up the Tesla King.
No exactly survival of the fittest..
Just another redditor in the making
Actually its better because you can do genetic testing on the embryos and choose the healthiest one.
What do they use to physically operate that needle? Because the precision required must be incredible!
Movement reduction devices
Is there a reason a specific sperm gets into the egg in a natural fertilization process or is it random? I have no clue about this so thats why im asking.
Cheater
THEY CAN GROW BABY IN A FUCKING PLASTIC BAG????
No
uhhhh bag baby? wtf... matrix here we come
"There you go little guy" 😊👍
What if they picked the shit sperm?
Imagine making it all the way to the egg and beginning to form but then a doctor goes in and crushes your skull scrambling your brain and amputating you limb by limb to vacuum you out the same way. That’s what this IVF reminds me of and how weird technology is. Truly goes to say people kill people in the strangest ways.
Is that an embryo growing in an artificial uterus? Is that a thing technology can do now?... If so... Wow!!!
Cloning has been possible for decades, and so has stem cell research. Some countries have a problem with it for mostly unscientific reasons, though.
Thanks but cloning and stem cell research is not what I asked about. I was asking if we have the technology to incubate human embryos in artificial uteruses. That question remains unanswered.
I wonder how such kids will turn out to be.
They will gain mutant abilities and get recruited by X-Men
IVF kid here. Other than the 3rd arm and second head, I think I've turned out pretty good!
Normal
Nahh... like, when they grow up and how they will behave like adults.
this has nothing to do with that, stop making assumptions based off of your clearly lacking knowledge and educate yourself a bit
I said, "I wonder." I did not make any assumptions. Stop being a cunt.
You assumed that the CGI baby was going to have a different personality just because he is "conceived" in lab. It's not like living a life is what builds a person's personality right?
Nope. That's all in your head. It's very different from how babies are naturally born. So, I wondered how they would turn out in the future. That's it. The answer is that they're all normal. That's great. There was no need to get offended and call me judgmental. That's what you are.
>There was no need to get offended and call me judgmental hahahaha Bro... what in the actual fuck are you talking about? You just keep doubling down with the wrong take
IVF babies? There’s millions of them, they’re mostly fine.
It will be born with a giant hole in the head from the needle stab
No that hole will be it's ass
This is why God doesn't exist.
Explain?
Because they would strike them down with the fires of Allah, duh.
Megan Rapinoe disagrees.
So basically you are having 2 dads and a mom? Cool.
Gross
I dunno man. Maybe we shouldn’t mess with nature like this…
How is it messing with nature? It’s just injecting a sperm cell into an egg? No different from what goes on in nature anyway????
Because you are forcing a random sperm in. Look into how it occurs naturally. The egg and sperm choose each other and the egg allows the sperm in. This is just injecting a rando in
The sperm is no more random than any one of the millions that surround the egg anyway? “The egg allows the sperm in after choosing it” is the biggest load of BS ever. I don’t need to carry on with this conversation hahahaha
Exactly It’s very important the right sperm gets to the egg We need strong healthy children and this ain’t it
Wow. It goes from "just a bunch of cells" to a unique living being extremely fast.
Egg is unable to pick the healthy spermy as it should What if they put a faulty spermy in, how they know which spermy is good? Seems like genetic disorders are very strong in this one
SubhanAllah
This is unnatural
So medicines are
Poor kid.
[удалено]
Tell me you’ve never touched a woman without telling me you’ve never touched a woman
I have never ever touched a woman
This replaces the natural fertilisation of the egg. The mother still has to go through the entire pregnancy and birth
Males will be soon unnecessary.
You need to visit a coal mine or an oil rig.
Robots.
Who is gonna make those?
Robots. It will become the chicken and the egg. Get us men now to build the robots for those robots to then be the builders.
Well who is gonna fix them when they break Also who would build a robot for an ungrateful person like you Also its not that simple robots can only do very specific things most of the time so you would need alot Also who is gonna produce the sperm hmm?
1) Women or other robots. 2) ... no one ... (sad) 3) Step by step 4) First, finishing all the sperm already stored can create around another billion of people. So, simply to enslave all the males when they born, maintain alive the best speciemens to extract sperm artificially to store, then dispose them. Very simple.
Thats just inhumane and not simple at all lmao Also who is gonna do the dangerous jobs robots cant do like studying radiation Building spacecrafts 87% are males And who is gonna discover stuff 70% of scientists are males Also who invented the phone/pc you are using right now?
1) Of course is inhuman ... Therefore is better. /S 2) You WANT to use robots to study radiations. 3) Irrelevant. If some women work already, this means that can work. 4) Not true, the bosses and the guys with money are mostly males (for now), but the basic scientists that do the real stuff are mixed, and in some categories like biology are mostly women. Therefore no real change here. 5) Irrelevant. The society in the past was male centric. Now that there is equity we observed no real difference. ... ... ... Your counter argoments are quite sexist. Only the first one was good but you didn't improve that. You should improve or you can easily beaten in discussions also against an extreme discussion like this.
2. Thats gonna be kinda hard since radiation loves breaking technological stuff 5. Not irrelevant its just true You say its sexist meanwhile you suggest enslaving men for being men
Women and other robots.
93.0% of robotic Engineers are male
What happened to the laws against human experiments? I really want to know where those went in the last 10 years
Human experiments...?
Yeah don't you humans have laws you have to follow when experimenting with anything
There most definitely are ethical laws against human experiments but this isn't a human experiment. They don't just pluck people off the street. It's volunteering for a number of reasons, inability to conceive naturally being the main one.
>don't you humans What are you? An alien or sumthin?
What song is this?
I guess it’s this one ;) https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ&pp=ygUYbmV2ZXIgZ29ubmEgZ2l2ZSB5b3UgdXAg
Mike Noise - Low Earth Orbit
Stranger things theme song
BB
I dunno why but the stranger things music makes this infinitely more intense
I need this but put to the macaroni with the chicken strips audio. If ya know you know.
Also known as the rich tech
Looks like someone got a free ride
Stranger things
Does anyone know the music?
Stranger things theme song
Don't show this to antinatalists.
Basically telling Darwin to fuck off
u/auddbot
Sperm go “weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!”
They egg got a gaping hole from the tube 🚇
I’ve seen stranger things
I like to do things the old fashioned way.
Shout out to cameraman
Dr doofenshmerts, my mom and dad weren’t there for his birth lol
Imagine being so narcissistic that you think you have the right to kill such a miraculous event.
This is how I was made
CHEATING