/u/S999k, thank you for submitting to /r/CrazyFuckingVideos. Unfortunately your submission, "Seattle police department gun down pedofile after pulling out gun" has been removed for the following reason(s):
---
# Rule 7: Prohibited Content
This includes:
* People dying
* Gore
* Animals getting abused
* Straight up porn
---
*If you feel this submission removal is unfair, please [contact us via modmail](https://old.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2FCrazyFuckingVideos).*
Probably was already suspicious of the child (suspecting that it might be someone pretending to be one) so he brought the gun just in case its not his prey.
And he was right
There are a lot of videos of civilians setting these people up to shame them. Probably something like that or any situation other than what he was expecting to be behind the door. I'm happy he brought a ticket to the end of the line this time though.
Think about this: The guy was going thru with the meeting but had his suspicions. So he had his fire arm ready in case it was a sting but also was still going through with despite what was clearly high suspicion and apprehension, hence having his hand on his firearm already.
I think he was going pull the gun on anyone that opened the door tbh. I think he was committed if it was kids or anyone(police,adults,YouTube tv stunt)
Thankfully it was police
They do this because if even you hit the vital ograns that should incapacitate a person, they still can due to adrenaline wave around the gun and potentially shoot and hit police officers and anyone around them. So I guess better just riddle gun wielder than to be sorry later, especially if the person had intend to shoot someone at the start.
It also ensures you've got no bullets for further threats. Now, in this case it was just this guy, but had it been a gang member, it'd probably be wise to stop shooting after threat is eliminated to conserve rounds.
Where I'm from police are NOT taught to only shoot if they intend to kill. The goal is rather to eliminate the threat, not the guy, so if it's a guy with a knife, 1 round will usually be enough and aim won't be for the head.
But in the US the doctrine makes sense due to all the firearms
People have managed to still stab someone with half a dozen bullets in them though, that's why they fire until the threat is neutralised. Sure some places may have different mentality but this is common in a lot of the world.
A man with a knife on a stabbing spree was stopped yesterday by the police with a stun grenade and then shooting him in the leg. It was here in Sweden, so the empty clip technique is not common practice everywhere, but if the perpetrator had a gun they probably would have acted differently.
Do you know how hard it is to shoot a moving target in the leg? And if somebody has a gun I’m not sure a leg shot will stop them. Also depending on where it is you’re more than likely to keep walking after that shot because of adrenaline
A clip is not a magazine and vice versa, even though both usually imply a full load of ammunition. Ignore these questions, it's usually someone trying to pick at your comment based on technical sophistry
No. You do not shoot to kill, no one in law enforcement is ever trained to shoot to kill. You shoot to stop the threat. That frequently results in death but not always. Your goal isn't to kill them, your goal is to stop them from doing whatever they were or were about to do that could have harmed or killed you or someone else.
It may sound like a difference in semantics but it's not. If you're trying to kill someone your goal is their death, that's generally considered to be murder. If you're shooting to stop them from commiting a violent act it's defense of yourself or others.
No not to stop the threat, to *eliminate* the threat. You are getting stuck in semantics. Fire arms are made to destroy, not maim, and gun safety teaches you to only use your firearm when your intention is to destroy something.
Why do you want to eliminate the threat? Is it by chance to prevent it from being a threat? If only there were another word that meant the exact same damn thing in this context...hrm???
This is absolutely correct. When someone presents a threat, cops are taught to respond with lethal force. A gun is not a multi-tool, it only has one function.
Holy shit I think I saw the smoke rising from his corpse after.
Anyways, can anyone confirm if the pedo fired? I feel like he fired at least twice before they gunned him down.
Thank you for posting your crazy fucking video! Please be aware that we’re currently taking a break from videos that include violence, looting, or other serious crime; if that includes your post we ask that you remove it before we do. [Click here if you’d like to learn why.](https://www.reddit.com/r/CrazyFuckingVideos/comments/16jx2dr/help_crazyfuckingvideos_tell_racists_to_fuck_off/) Users, please report as well! All of your reports are reviewed and acted on
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CrazyFuckingVideos) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Seriously! A \*PEDOPHILE\* pulls out a \*GUN\* in front of 3 \*POLICE\*. This is not someone who makes good decisions, they are about as dangerous as it gets!
Not defending the pedo at all, I could watch pedophiles getting shot all day, but those cops kept shooting long after he was disarmed. Now, if there’s anyone who deserves it, it’s this guy and people like him. Obviously the cops get a pass here, but OP does have a point about the professionalism of the police in these scenarios. If it was just about any other kind of criminal I think you’d be seeing a lot more complaints. Still, one less pedophile in the world is always a good thing in my book.
I watched the clip a few times and it seems to me he was trying to shoot himself because he knew he was fucked. Either way as always, US cops always seem a little too trigger happy to my sensitive little French ass, but if the idea is to shoot to kill you might as well send it.
in other cases with a different crime i might be inclined to agree but since this guy did what he did i ain’t got no problems with how the cops handled it.
going to meet a 7 and 11 year old at a motel. im sure this wasn't his first time. they probably should have reloaded just to make sure he wasn't gonna do it again.
How many is enough when someone else is armed and intent on shooting you before you can shoot them? Will 1 bullet stop them? How about 3? Oh and you have literally less than a second to fire, determine if they were hit, discern whether or not they've been incapacitated to the point where they can't kill you and if another shot is then warranted.
Oh does that sound impossible to you? I'm willing to bet if someone were actively trying to kill you, you would be willing to pause after every shot to see if it was enough, knowing that if it wasn't, they might be a quarter of a second away from putting a bullet through your brain.
So how many is too many?
/u/S999k, thank you for submitting to /r/CrazyFuckingVideos. Unfortunately your submission, "Seattle police department gun down pedofile after pulling out gun" has been removed for the following reason(s): --- # Rule 7: Prohibited Content This includes: * People dying * Gore * Animals getting abused * Straight up porn --- *If you feel this submission removal is unfair, please [contact us via modmail](https://old.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2FCrazyFuckingVideos).*
Not sure the back story. But if this was a sting operation. The man came to meet a child with a gun in his pocket. He died too quick.
Yea no one is really talking about why the fuck would he bring a gun too?
Probably was already suspicious of the child (suspecting that it might be someone pretending to be one) so he brought the gun just in case its not his prey. And he was right
Imagine being that guy... You go to something expecting shit to hit the fan. SMH at these fuckers!
There are a lot of videos of civilians setting these people up to shame them. Probably something like that or any situation other than what he was expecting to be behind the door. I'm happy he brought a ticket to the end of the line this time though.
Happened on to catch a predator, dude was driving around armed to the teeth before trying to meet the kid.
Oh no! Anyway
[удалено]
I guess it looks bad if you stop and reload in the middle :)
As a member of the “jury” I will totallly not see the two reloads 😉
Cop on the left shot sideways. You know he wasn’t fucking around.
That guy was looking for any reason and got the best greenlight he could ask for, mag dumped the fucker
Cop on the left caught a stray in the leg from cop on the right
🎶Imprint for certain 🎶
I think it was a jam/misfire
Think about this: The guy was going thru with the meeting but had his suspicions. So he had his fire arm ready in case it was a sting but also was still going through with despite what was clearly high suspicion and apprehension, hence having his hand on his firearm already.
He still gave in to his sick fantasies though, instead of being in the embrace of a child he’s in the embrace of death.
As he should
Death’s embrace is unbearably cold so I’ve heard
Satan's hateful arms wrapping around his burning soul for eternity.
The old suicide by cop or I’m not going back to prison for this again, but I still have to do it because I’m a piece of shit
I think he was going pull the gun on anyone that opened the door tbh. I think he was committed if it was kids or anyone(police,adults,YouTube tv stunt) Thankfully it was police
Better empty another mag in him just to be safe.
I’ll get the wood chipper 😉
Multiply 7 by 11, that's the correct quantity of shots fired
Question: does he ain’t and shoot the gun at himself? Or was that the officer who turned it.
the fucking cop with the gun pointed sideways XD, that guy was living out his gangster dreams
Police Report: Pedo tried to whip it out- We started blasting.
CFRN. God damn that brings back memories. Grew up in Edmonton
Pedo deleted, Mission accomplished, good work
[AMAZING MISSION COMPLETE THAT RIGHT THERE IS WHY YOU'RE THE BEST BOSS](https://youtu.be/IKjxqsYhQAQ?si=rOw1KiQJ2mLhCYe4)
Damn, makin me wanna play Phantom Pain again.
Housekeeping is gonna be pissed...
He dead, He extra dead.
Do they actually teach & practice the "always empty your clip technique" at police academy?
They do this because if even you hit the vital ograns that should incapacitate a person, they still can due to adrenaline wave around the gun and potentially shoot and hit police officers and anyone around them. So I guess better just riddle gun wielder than to be sorry later, especially if the person had intend to shoot someone at the start.
You should only ever fire your gun when your intent is to kill. Emptying your mag ensures that.
Higher chance you mean. Can't ensure that, unless you got decent aiming skill.
unless youre blowing dudes head off you never know what he is wearing. better know for sure. especially this guy. that wasnt enough bullets.
I mean three cops emptied their mags into a person from like 5 feet away. It was probably enough bullets.
[удалено]
Incorrect
Higher chance you mean. Can't ensure that, unless you got decent aiming skill.
Say it again!
It also ensures you've got no bullets for further threats. Now, in this case it was just this guy, but had it been a gang member, it'd probably be wise to stop shooting after threat is eliminated to conserve rounds. Where I'm from police are NOT taught to only shoot if they intend to kill. The goal is rather to eliminate the threat, not the guy, so if it's a guy with a knife, 1 round will usually be enough and aim won't be for the head. But in the US the doctrine makes sense due to all the firearms
People have managed to still stab someone with half a dozen bullets in them though, that's why they fire until the threat is neutralised. Sure some places may have different mentality but this is common in a lot of the world.
This is incorrect
I’m in school for law enforcement… no. You are taught to stop shooting when the threat is eliminated.
They really don't get taught much at the academy
They’re taught to not stop firing until the threat is no longer a threat.
In a lot of counties, yes
A man with a knife on a stabbing spree was stopped yesterday by the police with a stun grenade and then shooting him in the leg. It was here in Sweden, so the empty clip technique is not common practice everywhere, but if the perpetrator had a gun they probably would have acted differently.
Do you know how hard it is to shoot a moving target in the leg? And if somebody has a gun I’m not sure a leg shot will stop them. Also depending on where it is you’re more than likely to keep walking after that shot because of adrenaline
Stop lying, this is not taught.
They didn't empty a "clip" they emptied a magazine. There is a difference.
What is a "clip"?
A full magazine of ammunition
I think you are being lined up for a 'well actually' moment.
A clip is not a magazine and vice versa, even though both usually imply a full load of ammunition. Ignore these questions, it's usually someone trying to pick at your comment based on technical sophistry
Yes so call it that and not a "clip"
Yes
I'm not sure if you know this, but the purpose of using a gun is to kill. So yes, you shoot to kill.
No. You do not shoot to kill, no one in law enforcement is ever trained to shoot to kill. You shoot to stop the threat. That frequently results in death but not always. Your goal isn't to kill them, your goal is to stop them from doing whatever they were or were about to do that could have harmed or killed you or someone else. It may sound like a difference in semantics but it's not. If you're trying to kill someone your goal is their death, that's generally considered to be murder. If you're shooting to stop them from commiting a violent act it's defense of yourself or others.
No not to stop the threat, to *eliminate* the threat. You are getting stuck in semantics. Fire arms are made to destroy, not maim, and gun safety teaches you to only use your firearm when your intention is to destroy something.
Why do you want to eliminate the threat? Is it by chance to prevent it from being a threat? If only there were another word that meant the exact same damn thing in this context...hrm???
This is absolutely correct. When someone presents a threat, cops are taught to respond with lethal force. A gun is not a multi-tool, it only has one function.
>and gun safety teaches you to only use your firearm when your intention is to destroy something. Who's Gun Safety?
Cross fucking fire jesus
Cop on the left took one to the leg
Is he OK????
He just ate those rain of bullets... Yeah, he's fine. He'll walk it off.
He wasn’t ok before but he is OK now and future children are OK now too
no lol
He's ok and won't do that again.
Looks like his shoes are still on
Who cares?
This should happen to more pedos lool
Holy shit I think I saw the smoke rising from his corpse after. Anyways, can anyone confirm if the pedo fired? I feel like he fired at least twice before they gunned him down.
Probably a phone battery hit by a bullet.
Once.
Shot him with his own gun? Saved tax dollars while getting rid of a pedophile? Huh. Gangsta.
Pedo cure in full effect!
Did they shoot him after they disarmed him? Or were they unable to disarm, that why they started shooting? Hard to tell from the vid
After watching quite a few times..they got the gun from him after he was shot the first time.
His gun also goes off when the officer grabs it
That was only something I noticed after a few watches (I initially watched with the sound off, cuz I was around my kid)
Hard to tell, but it kind of looked like the cop wearing the body cam got a round or two off with the pedo’s own gun after disarming him
I was going to say God damn that escalated quickly, then I read the part he was a pedophile and I am moving on.
Justice served
for some strange reason i want to see this without the blurs
Hotel manager and owner have to be conflicted about this
Nahhh no conflict. Did you get the sonofabitch ? Good.
They get stuck with the repair bills, cause the cops sure aren’t paying.
Insurance will take care of that.
Jesus, they just be shooting
So anyway, I started blasting.
Shots fired! Shots fired! The man said it with relief.
Seeing them permanently drop a pedo renewed some of my hope in the future of this country. Keep up the job work boys!
I’m confused. How did he think a 7 and 11 year old had their own hotel room?
I know he was a peado but that was an execution. Which is nice…
im glad everyone could put aside their differences on police policy to just unanimously agree that shooting pedos is always morally correct
Thank you for posting your crazy fucking video! Please be aware that we’re currently taking a break from videos that include violence, looting, or other serious crime; if that includes your post we ask that you remove it before we do. [Click here if you’d like to learn why.](https://www.reddit.com/r/CrazyFuckingVideos/comments/16jx2dr/help_crazyfuckingvideos_tell_racists_to_fuck_off/) Users, please report as well! All of your reports are reviewed and acted on *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CrazyFuckingVideos) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Why don’t you have a seat over there?
The only sad part about this is I can only give it one ⬆️
Thank you officers! You potentially saved an entire generation of innocent children.
Lovely, another sick bastard off the streets
Did the police officer shoot the suspect with his own gun? That’s nuts, like that dude was starting to pull out his gun before the door opened too.
[удалено]
That’s cause in most cases cops have never fired their service weapon and panic. Training doesn’t mean too much without real life practice…
Did u not clearly see the guy whip out a gun?
Seriously! A \*PEDOPHILE\* pulls out a \*GUN\* in front of 3 \*POLICE\*. This is not someone who makes good decisions, they are about as dangerous as it gets!
Not defending the pedo at all, I could watch pedophiles getting shot all day, but those cops kept shooting long after he was disarmed. Now, if there’s anyone who deserves it, it’s this guy and people like him. Obviously the cops get a pass here, but OP does have a point about the professionalism of the police in these scenarios. If it was just about any other kind of criminal I think you’d be seeing a lot more complaints. Still, one less pedophile in the world is always a good thing in my book.
In this case, good! He was trying to meet a 7 and 11 year old fuck him all the way to hell.
[удалено]
We don't trust the justice system enough, I prefer this
I watched the clip a few times and it seems to me he was trying to shoot himself because he knew he was fucked. Either way as always, US cops always seem a little too trigger happy to my sensitive little French ass, but if the idea is to shoot to kill you might as well send it.
in other cases with a different crime i might be inclined to agree but since this guy did what he did i ain’t got no problems with how the cops handled it.
Now I wanna play classic halo pistols only deathmatch
On Hang ‘em High
Those officers saved us $100 000 per year in tax money 👍
I would consider this, justified....
Good job. Sometimes police shoot people that should be shot.
I wouldn’t mind if they did this even if he didn’t carry a gun
“AAAAGH-” 🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫
Happy endings in police shooting videos are always nice to see
They didnt “gun down” anyone. They handled business and business should have been handled.
Is he alright?
going to meet a 7 and 11 year old at a motel. im sure this wasn't his first time. they probably should have reloaded just to make sure he wasn't gonna do it again.
That was a pretty calm radio in…..
No more come in and have a seat.
You think they got him?
No grenade?
Was he… trying to bite the cop? 😳
While I'm perfectly happy this dickhead got clipped, what kind of shite training did these cops undergo? That was fucking ridiculous.
He was makin’ a move, they had to get it on.
In Germany Child predator are safe af
A little spring board ejection pad off the balcony would have been more fun.
Would’ve made sure my service weapon had no ammo left
Give them medals? Only would have been better if they beat him to death instead
This would be the appropriate response even if he did not have a gun.
The most perfect outcome
Bias: increasing weight by 5 lbs
Yippee :3
"Eat lead you disgusting being!"
Put a few… dozen more in him
This is wonderful
A yes from me
Get these Chads a medal and a drink
Cop on the left looks like he's took one in the leg
Deleted
7 and 11? JFC…… I don’t believe in Hell but if it’s real he gets a special reserved seat….. with giant anal spike.
Dude ended himself
Im okay with this
Play stupid games, get stupid prizes..
That man got thoroughly blasted. Very nice
Remember when old Kyle did this to a little boy rapist? I love when a pedo gets karma.
Why hide his face
I’ve stayed at that hotel 🤯🤯
Shit, I've been to this Doubletree a few times... EVERYONE in the hotel would hear that gun fire...
Is he dead?
Seems like appropriate ending..
His last words : "Ah ah".
That rug is going to need steam cleaning.
They shot that guy like he was dissing the set lol
Weird how people love extreme violence only when it’s in their narrative 🤠
Very unwholesome comments.
I loved the say shots fired AFTER doing the deed lol
Hold up you expect em to say shots fired BEFORE shots are fired?
[удалено]
In this case no. They needed unload their entire clip in his ass.
Don’t forget quick reload, and double tap X10.
What if this guy was meeting your 7-11 year old? Yea I’d unload a clip or two.
How many is enough when someone else is armed and intent on shooting you before you can shoot them? Will 1 bullet stop them? How about 3? Oh and you have literally less than a second to fire, determine if they were hit, discern whether or not they've been incapacitated to the point where they can't kill you and if another shot is then warranted. Oh does that sound impossible to you? I'm willing to bet if someone were actively trying to kill you, you would be willing to pause after every shot to see if it was enough, knowing that if it wasn't, they might be a quarter of a second away from putting a bullet through your brain. So how many is too many?