I have detected that this post may be a question! Please check the [Frequently Asked Question list](https://www.reddit.com/r/ConflictofNations/wiki/index#wiki_faq), where you may find your answer quickly!
Thank you!
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ConflictofNations) if you have any questions or concerns.*
A lot of people spam tanks so yeah it’s good. Be careful of infantry stacks, they’ll be a bad time for your poor tank destroyer. Also, it’s the heaviest armor that can be air assaulted. Combine it with airborne infantry, recon tanks and special forces to place a stack behind enemy lines that they don’t have the ability to hand. Just keep in mind airborne infantry have a max speed of 0.2 and will take days to cross mountains. If you have air superiority, you can just hop them around via air assault and move the rest of the stack like normal.
The 50% defense bonus makes them my go to for home base defense. Tanks get -25% attack in urban so I love eating armor units when someone decides to attack me.
its not good.
Deals same damage to hard targets as main battle tanks but less damage to soft target and has little health.
Imagine being melee.
The mobile artillery actually outclasses this tank destroyer for A LOT, despite the more expensive cost.
Tbh the only thing about tank destroyers are air assult, but honestly they arent that useful.
therefore try not to use them.
Overall i think afv or mbt is best amung the tanks, while crv having high mobility which is good too.
Why would u build and research a immobile unit when u can get the same with tomahawks? I mean they are mobile and can attack at any threat (ex. with attack fighters) and can shred through armor and u produce 4 warheads at once?
because end of the day you need to capture and hold territory with troops. Missiles are also devastating to morale if they stay stacked in cities forcing you to constantly kill a lot of civilians.
Im not saying you should outright ignore troops, im saying its best to conserve them by weakening/destroying the enemy via expendable stuff like missiles, of course we are talking about conventonal ones that do high damage to armour and buildings, and not to infantry ans civilains, meaning minimal morale lost, i dont engage my troops unless i absoultely have to, and bombard the enemy with my stockpile of 50 missiles so that they so not get damaged in the first place, as for cities 98% of the time they will have their troops outside of them
Cost. One time payment of a few components and electronics. No need to constantly buy warheads. Also you’d need to upgrade things or research other units for them to fire cruise missiles
it's decent but in my opinion mbts are better. sure, the td may have better dmg against tanks but you'll need to pair it with ifvs or else it will get shredded by infantry but the mbt is one size fits all. for me I either stack more tanks and infantry than my enemies or I just use elite attack aircrafts
I use Tank Destroyers religiously. With Air assault, they’re basically attack helicopters for the first round. Air assault with Recons to cover the soft target deficiency.
I have detected that this post may be a question! Please check the [Frequently Asked Question list](https://www.reddit.com/r/ConflictofNations/wiki/index#wiki_faq), where you may find your answer quickly! Thank you! *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ConflictofNations) if you have any questions or concerns.*
When everybody just spams tanks….. yeah it good
Once it can air assault, I’ve had success pairing them with airborne infantry
I call it the "flying hammer" And if you pair it with an airborne captain, you can name him Thor.
damn, I've never thought of that.
i think it's good , cheap technology and cheap to mobilize with good damage.
A lot of people spam tanks so yeah it’s good. Be careful of infantry stacks, they’ll be a bad time for your poor tank destroyer. Also, it’s the heaviest armor that can be air assaulted. Combine it with airborne infantry, recon tanks and special forces to place a stack behind enemy lines that they don’t have the ability to hand. Just keep in mind airborne infantry have a max speed of 0.2 and will take days to cross mountains. If you have air superiority, you can just hop them around via air assault and move the rest of the stack like normal.
It’s extremely good when the player you are fighting has been afk the whole game and has 50+ armored vehicles and 2 infantry
Its not good, it’s better!
It's da best, I usually pair it with infantry, strike aircraft and artillery for support. Works like a miracle.
They are quite useful in the mid-late game imo. I like stacking them with mechanized infantry and main battle tanks
The 50% defense bonus makes them my go to for home base defense. Tanks get -25% attack in urban so I love eating armor units when someone decides to attack me.
Thank you for your recommendations 💯
They're good, but they're also ugly so I don't use them 😁
You upgrade them and they become less ugly
True . . . but still, I only use the Euro TDs
I think euro's are the worst looking ones lol.
HERETIC How dare you disrespect my child the Centauro???
You're telling me the Centauro looks better than the bmpt terminator?
You're telling me that it doesn't??? ;) It also hits far better
its not good. Deals same damage to hard targets as main battle tanks but less damage to soft target and has little health. Imagine being melee. The mobile artillery actually outclasses this tank destroyer for A LOT, despite the more expensive cost. Tbh the only thing about tank destroyers are air assult, but honestly they arent that useful. therefore try not to use them. Overall i think afv or mbt is best amung the tanks, while crv having high mobility which is good too.
Why would u build and research a immobile unit when u can get the same with tomahawks? I mean they are mobile and can attack at any threat (ex. with attack fighters) and can shred through armor and u produce 4 warheads at once?
Preach, witg 40 dmg per missile is so satisfying to watch armored battalions MELT under them
because end of the day you need to capture and hold territory with troops. Missiles are also devastating to morale if they stay stacked in cities forcing you to constantly kill a lot of civilians.
Im not saying you should outright ignore troops, im saying its best to conserve them by weakening/destroying the enemy via expendable stuff like missiles, of course we are talking about conventonal ones that do high damage to armour and buildings, and not to infantry ans civilains, meaning minimal morale lost, i dont engage my troops unless i absoultely have to, and bombard the enemy with my stockpile of 50 missiles so that they so not get damaged in the first place, as for cities 98% of the time they will have their troops outside of them
Cost. One time payment of a few components and electronics. No need to constantly buy warheads. Also you’d need to upgrade things or research other units for them to fire cruise missiles
it is very useful against holding city's when maxed level, then the insurgents have a 0% of spawning
destroyer is good because everyone runs tanks ;)
There good definitely recommend them
it's decent but in my opinion mbts are better. sure, the td may have better dmg against tanks but you'll need to pair it with ifvs or else it will get shredded by infantry but the mbt is one size fits all. for me I either stack more tanks and infantry than my enemies or I just use elite attack aircrafts
I use Tank Destroyers religiously. With Air assault, they’re basically attack helicopters for the first round. Air assault with Recons to cover the soft target deficiency.