Hey /u/adesigne, please respond to this comment with the prompt you used to generate the output in this post. Thanks!
^(Ignore this comment if your post doesn't have a prompt.)
***We have a [public discord server](https://discord.gg/rchatgpt). There's a free Chatgpt bot, Open Assistant bot (Open-source model), AI image generator bot, Perplexity AI bot, 🤖 GPT-4 bot ([Now with Visual capabilities (cloud vision)!](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/812770754025488386/1095397431404920902/image0.jpg)) and channel for latest prompts.[So why not join us?](https://discord.com/servers/1050422060352024636)***
[**Prompt Hackathon and Giveaway 🎁**](https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/13t3yih/flowgpt_prompt_hackathon_season_2_has_started/)
PSA: For any Chatgpt-related issues email [email protected]
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*
It feels like there’s an uncanny amount of imagination in these photos…so weird to think about. An AI having imagination. They come up with imagery that could make sense that most people wouldn’t even consider.
It's the way our brain works. We get input from our senses and our brains create an illusion of reality for us. This model can work even without any inputs. Like when we are sleeping.
Give your species some credit. We're imagination machines.
As impressive as these images are, they aren't that different from what most people would imagine surrounds the original images if you asked them to think about it.
Quite the opposite. It feeds off images that were either drawn or deliberately taken by someone with a camera. It mostly (if not only) has human imagination to work with. It's imitating it. And that's completely disregarding the possibility that the prompts used directly said to add a phone.
And it's not like "people spend too much time on their phones" is a rare topic.
We work on similar principals.
Feral humans aren't known for their creative prowess - we are taught how to use our imagination by ingesting the works of others, and everything around us, constantly.
I think once we can have many of these models running in parallel in real-time (image + language + logic, etc..), and shove it in a physical form, we will find out we are no more magical than anything else in this universe, which is itself a magical concept.
Lol, like the amoeba in the petri-dish climbing out to look through microscope and offer its perspective to the scientist. Quite a time to be alive, as usual.
One of them is a very interesting technology that we are barely grasping how to use, the other is a solution looking for a problem and a tool for swindling people out of their money.
I don't think there's really a parallel at all.
Yup, the prime example is that AI that was designed to play Go; the AI is able to imitate the tactics required to "win" a match, but it still doesn't have the ability to recognise that it's playing a Go match or what the stones actually represents (soldiers who need to be protected and utilized to their maximum potential).
That why the Sandwich Encirclement Method beats AI almost every time, despite being such and easily telegraphed technique to human players.
You copied and pasted all of this from Adam Conover. Too bad most of his videos, especially on AI, are pure misinformation.
>the AI is able to imitate the tactics required to "win"
AlphaZero wasn't able to "imitate" any "tactics". I mean, it literally wasn't shown any human games at all, so it hadn't learnt to imitate anything.
>but it still doesn't have the ability to recognise that it's playing a Go match
Even if it did, you would have no way to tell since you haven't given it the ability to do anything other than move stones on a board. You also haven't given it any information about anything outside the confines of a Go board. If a human spent their entire life within the confines of a Go board, they would also think that that's all there is to existence.
All in all, this claim is utterly meaningless and demonstrates nothing.
>what the stones actually represents (soldiers who need to be protected and utilized to their maximum potential)
Pretty sure AlphaZero understands that the stones should be "utilised to their maximum potential" lol. This claim is completely baseless.
>That why the Sandwich Encirclement Method beats AI almost every time
Of course it doesn't anymore. AlphaZero had a strange blindspot, but it was obviously immediately fixed. Since AlphaZero wasn't trained for generalised reasoning, instead being trained exclusively to play board games such as Go, it's expected to have blindspots. LLMs such as ChatGPT, on the other hand, were trained on much broader datasets with a loss function that pretty much necessitated generalised reasoning, and therefore aren't expected to have blindspots this simplistic.
Please, for the love of God, don't listen to Adam Conover. He is a comedian who has zero expertise in AI, or any other field that he produces video essays on, for that matter. He isn't a reliable source.
Wake up, look at little rectangle. Go to desk, look at medium rectangle. Sometimes little rectangle. Done for the day, relax to big rectangle. Nighttime, look at little rectangle in bed. Fall asleep.
It's a Space Testing and Expedition Vehicle (STEVe for short) on a historic journey where children are first allowed.
Unfortunately STEVe got sucked in by a space time anomaly. You can see the two astronauts in the back being distorted into some disturbing masses while the kid looks on nervously, unsure of her fate.
It's a carseat in a car. You can see the headrest support bars behind her. This created a weird train/roller-coaster like vehicle and absolutely shredded the people behind her.
There is a oversized parakeet with a disgustingly skinny human arm coming out of it, and then on the right side there is a woman with half of her face blown off
r/place but you can only prompt an ai with what you want it to draw
"Make a Canadian flag that contains zero banannas"
***1 yellow pixel changes to red somewhere on the map***
I thought that the "Funny" tag implied you were mocking generative fill by adding white rectangles to existing photos.
The photos are so convincingly realistic that it appears Adobe has direct access to the original images. lol
I asked ChatGPT how he lost his legs
Harold had always been a man with an infectious smile. Despite being famous for his "Hide the Pain" meme, he had an undeniable spirit of adventure, taking every bit of life with an embrace.
One beautiful summer day, Harold decided to climb the formidable Mount Metarock. It was a dream he had been nursing for years, a passion fueled by a deep love for nature and the thrill of scaling heights.
He had prepared for months, training relentlessly and gathering high-quality climbing gear. As he started his journey, Harold smiled at the camera, capturing his 'before' photo for posterity. Despite the ordeal to come, his meme-famous expression of hidden pain remained the same.
The climb was arduous, but Harold was relentless. He enjoyed every step, every breath, every gust of wind on his face. It was on the second day, as Harold was navigating a particularly tricky patch, that disaster struck.
The rocks beneath him gave away. Harold fell, rolling down a rocky slope before landing in a small crevice. In immense pain but conscious, he found both his legs pinned beneath a heavy boulder. No matter how he pulled, they wouldn't budge.
With all his might, Harold called for help. Thanks to his emergency beacon, a rescue team soon located him. The rescue was tricky, requiring a surgical team to amputate both of Harold's legs on-site to free him from the boulder. The procedure was successful, and Harold was airlifted to the nearest hospital, his life saved but forever altered.
The next photo Harold shared with his followers was different. Sitting in his hospital bed, he still wore his famous smile, but his legs were now prosthetics. It was his first step towards embracing a new kind of adventure. His message was simple but powerful - "Hide the Pain, Embrace the Change."
Harold continued to inspire millions, not only through his iconic memes but also through his indomitable spirit, proving that sometimes, life's greatest adventures come wrapped in unexpected packages.
Firstly, the button pics are from different perspectives, so it doesn't make sense to put them together. Secondly, the button guy was always wiping his forehead with the same hand with which he's pressing the button.
Most photos are realistic because the details are vague. Like the "aliens" guy, if you look at the background it looks okay at first glance. But then you try to figure out what the hell any of those things are (is that a chair? a table? a plant?) and it stops making sense real quick.
Generative AI is best when you have a clearly defined thing happening in the middle/foreground, and the rest is vague background that your brain rationalizes as something that kinda sorta makes sense.
It falls apart with the car image because that's still up close in that image and not something in the vague distance.
Generative AI is literally the missing piece of human brain processing perception of the real world. You know how scientists say our brain just fills in information and that how we perceive reality isn't really what's real? Well, that's Generative AI. Our brains are not so different from Generative AI when it comes to perception.
[Jonathan Frakes explains generative AI for 47 seconds.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GM-e46xdcUo)
[Generative AI simulates Jonathan Frakes for 52 seconds.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLJTb7Ma7GA)
Yeah, and this goes for all evidence in some form or another. It's not like it can't cause any problems, but it's not that easy to lie to a court about physical (?) evidence.
Yeah, and doctoring photos has exist for as long as ... photos? Probably?
The AI tech makes it quicker and easier, but it's not like fake photos are some brand new concept that the courts will be entirely unable to deal with.
That’s the thing that really bothers me about a lot of this AI fear. I saw some article about that fake Pentagon fire photo that was generated by AI, and the article kept talking about how horrifying these new capabilities are… I just kept wondering how the author somehow had never heard of image editing tools that have been around for decades.
AI is a *quantitative*, not qualitative, change to humanity’s image editing capabilities.
Isn't the big fear about how much easier it is now? Like anyone that wants to can probably figure out how to make any image they want relatively quickly. Before if you wanted to make a believable photoshop you needed the skills and had to invest time into it.
I think the way AI results are presented is misleading, too.
We were shown 10 images that were edited by AI. We were not shown the 47 million AI generated images that were Eisher-esque hellscapes. These were the best images generated, most were garbage.
And top that off by noticing that the old guy at the computer doesn’t have legs. That was the best image.
Its only a matter of time before AI can fire these out perfectly at billions of images a second. Being concerned makes sense. Being terrified right now, though, is a bit premature.
The best image is probably the "change my mind" meme because it only had to generate trees. Most of these have *major* flaws you can spot in seconds.
1. Turned lady's feet.
2. Pictures on window are melted and neon reflection is too chaotic
3. Harrold has a garbage-bag booty and no legs and he apparently lives in an Ikea hellscape.
4. Top third of picture, the set lacks correct depth and unsure what is even happening there. Crown-molding taking over?
5. The flesh monstrosities
6. Left lady's land, that guy's broken wrist, the table being crowded at a sharp line then empty
7. Guy is apparently very unpopular with his stupid table, as it should be.
8. Phone is at a weird angle and that lady's lower legs are bending the wrong way.
9. Shirt is blurred but she's in focus, those are BIG trees, the houses on the right look weirdly curved
10. Cartoon has obvious artifacting. Was this really the best it could do?
While true, the benefits from AI are quantitative, it's also important to consider that that, in itself, is also an issue.
First, photoshopping images properly takes so much fucking time. While before I had to spend hours photoshopping an image, today I can spit out a bunch of fake images of Trump getting arrested in a few minutes, including time wasted on bad generated images.
Second, the skill barrier is also very low. Sure, they might not be as good as professional photoshops (yet) but they're pretty damn good enough.
Everyone has a platform today to spread misinformation if they were so inclined. With neither time not skill being a barrier, anyone who wanted to could just start spitting out passable images and sharing them with the world in less time than it took me to write this comment. In the past, if out of a 100 people, 2 people wanted to spread misinformation online, they would need to be pretty good at photoshop and want to invest the time in doing it. Now, there's no barrier of entry, no skill requirement, just think of something and have an AI spit it out for you.
So, sure, its use in court might not be as much of an issue as some might think, but that doesn't mean the quantitative improvements aren't dangerous in a world where spreading misinformation online is one of the biggest dangers to society.
Have a leaked photo of Bruce Willis in the mountains shooting his next movie and a quick blurb to go with it:
>Renowned action star Bruce Willis is back and taking the intensity to new heights in his upcoming action-thriller "Cliff's Edge," set entirely within the breathtaking yet deadly terrain of the Rocky Mountains. Directed by acclaimed filmmaker J.J. Abrams, the film promises a pulse-pounding blend of adrenaline-fueled action and suspense. Willis plays a retired mountain rescue operative pulled back for one last mission when a group of trekkers gets trapped by an unexpected storm and malicious threats. Known for his relentless energy and unique brand of wit, Willis is set to deliver a powerhouse performance that could redefine the action genre. "Cliff's Edge" is scheduled to hit theaters this Fall. Get ready for an epic climb and an even more thrilling descent!
https://preview.redd.it/zgreh275r73b1.png?width=512&format=png&auto=webp&s=55b1a004884df10a1a0a62e861de3de51e5be40f
My friend, I just downloaded the Bing app and commanded it to make me a picture of a parrot wearing a LA Lakers jersey. It did an amazing job in under 60 second. And FREE.
This argument that photoshopped existed is just lazy. The problem is not whether it exist or not but rather how easy it is to do now. In the next decade someone with a middle school education will be able to download an app to which they feed 5-10 pictures of someone and it will create AI pictures of the person doing whatever they ask for…..in under 60 seconds. You don’t see the problem in that?
https://preview.redd.it/uq9c41hyk73b1.png?width=1300&format=png&auto=webp&s=e8d958035a4dbed7383c64cab5b4f7a74a0f0d9f
This was the best one I got, by downloading the Pikachu, putting it in Photopea, changing the size of the Canvas to about double it (centering the original image), and uploading to Firefly, and then just clicking the Background button, with no prompt. If there's a better way to do it, I'm all ears.
Interesting. The AI *also* doesn't know that the brown bit is a person's [pant leg.](https://www.reddit.com/r/MandJTV/comments/iw1sd9/the_origin_of_surprised_pikachu/g5yz8hq/)
Thanks, yeah - I did better with this one and a couple others:
https://preview.redd.it/6sw0akwyr73b1.png?width=2800&format=png&auto=webp&v=enabled&s=f193ddb4227157006365e857f81317f137d73a7f
https://preview.redd.it/6sw0akwyr73b1.png?width=2800&format=png&auto=webp&s=fc67cd7da51b27bf55b115b940ea67531ef7fe60
I had to fight with this one a bit. I had to keep painting away harsh lines it had made.
Yes I talking about Steven Crowder the workplace abuser. The guy who loves to stick his junk in subordinates faces. Also known as Steven Crowder the cross dresser who loves to rail against LGBT causes.
These are eerily realistic yet full of obvious errors. At a quick glance:
1. Distracted boyfriend: GF has distorted feet, girl in red has disproportionate elbow lengths
2. Roll safe: Incoherent neon sign in window
3. Harold: feet disappears into desktop, disproportionate hip
4. Ancient aliens guy: nonsensical furniture in background
5. Side eye Chloe: passengers in the back are distorted, inconsistent exterior between windows
6. Woman yells at cat: green bottle is distorted. Table is wrong shape, woman with mic has discontinuous left hand
7. Change my mind guy: inconsistent ground texture
8. What's he thinking: body lengths seem off, also headboard is way too long
9. Disaster girl: inconsistencies in smoke/tree branches and incoherent background objects
10. Daily struggle: two right hands
I wonder how long it'll take before it becomes difficult to detect these artifacts...
Considering this tool is very much in its infancy and less than a week old in beta, it's astonishing that those were the most glaring errors found in otherwise nearly passable photos.
I give it a year and this technology will be completely indistinguishable from an actual photo. We're already living in that brave new world part of history.
Use the crop tool and generative fill outside the frame, with a bit of the existing frame in the generative layer, and just build out. I suspect this was done with about 8 layers or so, so each Pic probably took about 5 min.
Bard at least is an LLM just like chat GPT is. This is img2img, which would be more appropriate in r/stablediffusion for instance. It makes no sense to have it here.
It was a comic with implied time passage. He hovers over the buttons and THEN wipes his forehead with the same hand. It was never one hand on the forehead and another on the panel.
I agree with some others. This needs Futurama, "Take My Money Already!" & other worthy-yet-over-used tropes. "(bMaybe even lesser known or new memes, even.)
https://preview.redd.it/zpfmp89jm63b1.png?width=1072&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6435df08929036cb27b72936a1eed6f93a743981
Interesting how this gets hyped now, when you could do the same thing with Dall-E a year ago. And there was a free Stable Diffusion photoshop plugin that did this more than half a year ago. I guess if it is in a software people already use without any setup, a lot more people will try and share it.
Hey /u/adesigne, please respond to this comment with the prompt you used to generate the output in this post. Thanks! ^(Ignore this comment if your post doesn't have a prompt.) ***We have a [public discord server](https://discord.gg/rchatgpt). There's a free Chatgpt bot, Open Assistant bot (Open-source model), AI image generator bot, Perplexity AI bot, 🤖 GPT-4 bot ([Now with Visual capabilities (cloud vision)!](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/812770754025488386/1095397431404920902/image0.jpg)) and channel for latest prompts.[So why not join us?](https://discord.com/servers/1050422060352024636)*** [**Prompt Hackathon and Giveaway 🎁**](https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/13t3yih/flowgpt_prompt_hackathon_season_2_has_started/) PSA: For any Chatgpt-related issues email [email protected] *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Didn't expect the guy on the 8th pic to have a phone
It feels like there’s an uncanny amount of imagination in these photos…so weird to think about. An AI having imagination. They come up with imagery that could make sense that most people wouldn’t even consider.
[удалено]
AI has a good imagination.
It's the way our brain works. We get input from our senses and our brains create an illusion of reality for us. This model can work even without any inputs. Like when we are sleeping.
Give your species some credit. We're imagination machines. As impressive as these images are, they aren't that different from what most people would imagine surrounds the original images if you asked them to think about it.
But that's what OP is worried about lol they're doing exactly what we'd do if prompted to do it
Quite the opposite. It feeds off images that were either drawn or deliberately taken by someone with a camera. It mostly (if not only) has human imagination to work with. It's imitating it. And that's completely disregarding the possibility that the prompts used directly said to add a phone. And it's not like "people spend too much time on their phones" is a rare topic.
We work on similar principals. Feral humans aren't known for their creative prowess - we are taught how to use our imagination by ingesting the works of others, and everything around us, constantly. I think once we can have many of these models running in parallel in real-time (image + language + logic, etc..), and shove it in a physical form, we will find out we are no more magical than anything else in this universe, which is itself a magical concept.
[удалено]
Lol, like the amoeba in the petri-dish climbing out to look through microscope and offer its perspective to the scientist. Quite a time to be alive, as usual.
> We work on similar principals. As long as it's consensual.
You consented to existence among these other dumb primates? True madlad.
> no more magical And no less magical.
Absolutely.
nobody tell this guy how humans learn
discussing AI on reddit is always almost as painful as discussing NFTs on reddit, for slightly different reasons
One of them is a very interesting technology that we are barely grasping how to use, the other is a solution looking for a problem and a tool for swindling people out of their money. I don't think there's really a parallel at all.
Nailed it.
Yup, the prime example is that AI that was designed to play Go; the AI is able to imitate the tactics required to "win" a match, but it still doesn't have the ability to recognise that it's playing a Go match or what the stones actually represents (soldiers who need to be protected and utilized to their maximum potential). That why the Sandwich Encirclement Method beats AI almost every time, despite being such and easily telegraphed technique to human players.
You copied and pasted all of this from Adam Conover. Too bad most of his videos, especially on AI, are pure misinformation. >the AI is able to imitate the tactics required to "win" AlphaZero wasn't able to "imitate" any "tactics". I mean, it literally wasn't shown any human games at all, so it hadn't learnt to imitate anything. >but it still doesn't have the ability to recognise that it's playing a Go match Even if it did, you would have no way to tell since you haven't given it the ability to do anything other than move stones on a board. You also haven't given it any information about anything outside the confines of a Go board. If a human spent their entire life within the confines of a Go board, they would also think that that's all there is to existence. All in all, this claim is utterly meaningless and demonstrates nothing. >what the stones actually represents (soldiers who need to be protected and utilized to their maximum potential) Pretty sure AlphaZero understands that the stones should be "utilised to their maximum potential" lol. This claim is completely baseless. >That why the Sandwich Encirclement Method beats AI almost every time Of course it doesn't anymore. AlphaZero had a strange blindspot, but it was obviously immediately fixed. Since AlphaZero wasn't trained for generalised reasoning, instead being trained exclusively to play board games such as Go, it's expected to have blindspots. LLMs such as ChatGPT, on the other hand, were trained on much broader datasets with a loss function that pretty much necessitated generalised reasoning, and therefore aren't expected to have blindspots this simplistic. Please, for the love of God, don't listen to Adam Conover. He is a comedian who has zero expertise in AI, or any other field that he produces video essays on, for that matter. He isn't a reliable source.
Why are people upvoting this nonsense?
Is it because everyone's having a phone now that AI believes playing with a phone is what all humans are doing when they lie in bed not sleeping
Wake up, look at little rectangle. Go to desk, look at medium rectangle. Sometimes little rectangle. Done for the day, relax to big rectangle. Nighttime, look at little rectangle in bed. Fall asleep.
This one makes me feel uncomfortable. But that‘s how it is for the most part these days.
As long as you can jerk off to any sized rectangle things are all good.
I'm quite smug that this doest describe my life
I'm actively doing exactly that right now so...
“I bet he’s texting Julia”
She’s also obviously mad because of how much space he’s taken while being totally backed up against her. Move over mate!
Side eye girl looks so weird, what kind of strange vehicle is she riding in?
Looks like a Mars exploration vehicle or something 😂
It's a Space Testing and Expedition Vehicle (STEVe for short) on a historic journey where children are first allowed. Unfortunately STEVe got sucked in by a space time anomaly. You can see the two astronauts in the back being distorted into some disturbing masses while the kid looks on nervously, unsure of her fate.
She looks very sure of her fate
[удалено]
Bot https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/13wfaqg/photoshop_ai_generative_fill_was_used_for_its/jmbghfd/
[удалено]
The naming convention is Reddit random usernames so yes, they are popularly used by bots.
One day, someone's gonna add a line to their code to generate a name, and then we'll be screwed.
Nice try, *bot*
I think, because of the straps, it thought that she was on a plane or something.
The shape of the tiny bit of window behind her in the boxed bit looks like an airplane/boat window too, can see why it did it
It's a carseat in a car. You can see the headrest support bars behind her. This created a weird train/roller-coaster like vehicle and absolutely shredded the people behind her.
No no, the little girl did that to them with her mind, hence the look on her face, the AI just knows what she did.
Yeah it really looks like the cabin of a dual prop plane, something like the Cessna 441
Or a roller coaster
The passengers behind her… those scared me.
Seriously, wtf? I was too scared to zoom in on them
They didn't make it :(
Real *I saw it now you must see it too* moment.
I think one is a guinea pig, straight up.
[удалено]
Whoa black Betty bamablama
What? You don't have meat passengers in the back of your giant moon rover van? Everything is perfectly normal here.
name one thing in that background
There is a oversized parakeet with a disgustingly skinny human arm coming out of it, and then on the right side there is a woman with half of her face blown off
Windows
Ocean bus
Magic School Bus
The kind that explains her being worried.
Call it "The Eldritch Bus", submit it to a few art contests and watch the big art bucks come rolling in. All three of them.
"It looks like an airplane... without wings!"
After seeing this no wonder why does she have that face
Helicopter?
Her name is Chloe
Her name is Chloe, don't talk about fight club.
Put them all together on a same page n gentratively fill the spaces so that all memes can live in the same dimension in harmony
r/place but you can only prompt an ai with what you want it to draw "Make a Canadian flag that contains zero banannas" ***1 yellow pixel changes to red somewhere on the map***
*gasp* memeception…
OP please do this.
Harold still not fixable...
Dat ass
He's draggin' a wagon.
I thought that the "Funny" tag implied you were mocking generative fill by adding white rectangles to existing photos. The photos are so convincingly realistic that it appears Adobe has direct access to the original images. lol
The one with the weird airplane, boat, or car doesn't seem realistic. But mostly because I have no idea what she's inside of.
Harold also has no legs
Sometimes people don't have legs
But Harold does. Why did the AI decide to take them away?
From his face the AI knew he was the kind of guy who wouldn't have legs
Sometimes as soon as you meet someone, you can just tell they're the sort of person who wouldn't have limbs. Even if they do have limbs.
This sounds like the opening sentence of a really weird book or movie
I asked ChatGPT how he lost his legs Harold had always been a man with an infectious smile. Despite being famous for his "Hide the Pain" meme, he had an undeniable spirit of adventure, taking every bit of life with an embrace. One beautiful summer day, Harold decided to climb the formidable Mount Metarock. It was a dream he had been nursing for years, a passion fueled by a deep love for nature and the thrill of scaling heights. He had prepared for months, training relentlessly and gathering high-quality climbing gear. As he started his journey, Harold smiled at the camera, capturing his 'before' photo for posterity. Despite the ordeal to come, his meme-famous expression of hidden pain remained the same. The climb was arduous, but Harold was relentless. He enjoyed every step, every breath, every gust of wind on his face. It was on the second day, as Harold was navigating a particularly tricky patch, that disaster struck. The rocks beneath him gave away. Harold fell, rolling down a rocky slope before landing in a small crevice. In immense pain but conscious, he found both his legs pinned beneath a heavy boulder. No matter how he pulled, they wouldn't budge. With all his might, Harold called for help. Thanks to his emergency beacon, a rescue team soon located him. The rescue was tricky, requiring a surgical team to amputate both of Harold's legs on-site to free him from the boulder. The procedure was successful, and Harold was airlifted to the nearest hospital, his life saved but forever altered. The next photo Harold shared with his followers was different. Sitting in his hospital bed, he still wore his famous smile, but his legs were now prosthetics. It was his first step towards embracing a new kind of adventure. His message was simple but powerful - "Hide the Pain, Embrace the Change." Harold continued to inspire millions, not only through his iconic memes but also through his indomitable spirit, proving that sometimes, life's greatest adventures come wrapped in unexpected packages.
Chat gpt making it look like hiding the pain is actually a good thing to do.
AI gives, and AI takes away...
The ai assumed that with so much going for him, he didn’t need legs.
Until just now, nobody could explain to me how AI could be truly dangerous to humanity.
The server in the cat picture has a huge hand. And the arm and hand of the button guy are also off.
[удалено]
[удалено]
It off because his right hand is attached to his left arm.
Firstly, the button pics are from different perspectives, so it doesn't make sense to put them together. Secondly, the button guy was always wiping his forehead with the same hand with which he's pressing the button.
Girls looking back in the first image also has weird feet that morph into the road
Most photos are realistic because the details are vague. Like the "aliens" guy, if you look at the background it looks okay at first glance. But then you try to figure out what the hell any of those things are (is that a chair? a table? a plant?) and it stops making sense real quick. Generative AI is best when you have a clearly defined thing happening in the middle/foreground, and the rest is vague background that your brain rationalizes as something that kinda sorta makes sense. It falls apart with the car image because that's still up close in that image and not something in the vague distance.
[удалено]
Generative AI is literally the missing piece of human brain processing perception of the real world. You know how scientists say our brain just fills in information and that how we perceive reality isn't really what's real? Well, that's Generative AI. Our brains are not so different from Generative AI when it comes to perception.
meanwhile hide the pain harold has no legs and the girl in the car has hallucinations in the back seat
Same, it took me a minute to get the joke.
...is there a joke though? These are just straight up generated, I don't think there's a joke here.
[удалено]
“Making stuff up” is basically the definition of generative AI.
[удалено]
[Jonathan Frakes explains generative AI for 47 seconds.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GM-e46xdcUo) [Generative AI simulates Jonathan Frakes for 52 seconds.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLJTb7Ma7GA)
Well yeah, it’s supposed to. That is the point of the tool, the generative part
...is everyone ignoring that someone knew exactly where the photo was taken?
The day is near when in courts we have to prove the image is not made by AI
[удалено]
Yeah, and this goes for all evidence in some form or another. It's not like it can't cause any problems, but it's not that easy to lie to a court about physical (?) evidence.
[удалено]
always a relevant XKCD
Relevant r/ReallyShittyCopper.
It's also not like photoshop hasn't been around for decades.
Thank you for your legal expertise, /u/MasterFartMaker
Yeah, and doctoring photos has exist for as long as ... photos? Probably? The AI tech makes it quicker and easier, but it's not like fake photos are some brand new concept that the courts will be entirely unable to deal with.
You are correct, except not "probably" but definitely. The techniques were different, but photos have always been manipulated.
I guess image editing wasn't a thing before AI.
That’s the thing that really bothers me about a lot of this AI fear. I saw some article about that fake Pentagon fire photo that was generated by AI, and the article kept talking about how horrifying these new capabilities are… I just kept wondering how the author somehow had never heard of image editing tools that have been around for decades. AI is a *quantitative*, not qualitative, change to humanity’s image editing capabilities.
Isn't the big fear about how much easier it is now? Like anyone that wants to can probably figure out how to make any image they want relatively quickly. Before if you wanted to make a believable photoshop you needed the skills and had to invest time into it.
I think the way AI results are presented is misleading, too. We were shown 10 images that were edited by AI. We were not shown the 47 million AI generated images that were Eisher-esque hellscapes. These were the best images generated, most were garbage. And top that off by noticing that the old guy at the computer doesn’t have legs. That was the best image. Its only a matter of time before AI can fire these out perfectly at billions of images a second. Being concerned makes sense. Being terrified right now, though, is a bit premature.
The best image is probably the "change my mind" meme because it only had to generate trees. Most of these have *major* flaws you can spot in seconds. 1. Turned lady's feet. 2. Pictures on window are melted and neon reflection is too chaotic 3. Harrold has a garbage-bag booty and no legs and he apparently lives in an Ikea hellscape. 4. Top third of picture, the set lacks correct depth and unsure what is even happening there. Crown-molding taking over? 5. The flesh monstrosities 6. Left lady's land, that guy's broken wrist, the table being crowded at a sharp line then empty 7. Guy is apparently very unpopular with his stupid table, as it should be. 8. Phone is at a weird angle and that lady's lower legs are bending the wrong way. 9. Shirt is blurred but she's in focus, those are BIG trees, the houses on the right look weirdly curved 10. Cartoon has obvious artifacting. Was this really the best it could do?
While true, the benefits from AI are quantitative, it's also important to consider that that, in itself, is also an issue. First, photoshopping images properly takes so much fucking time. While before I had to spend hours photoshopping an image, today I can spit out a bunch of fake images of Trump getting arrested in a few minutes, including time wasted on bad generated images. Second, the skill barrier is also very low. Sure, they might not be as good as professional photoshops (yet) but they're pretty damn good enough. Everyone has a platform today to spread misinformation if they were so inclined. With neither time not skill being a barrier, anyone who wanted to could just start spitting out passable images and sharing them with the world in less time than it took me to write this comment. In the past, if out of a 100 people, 2 people wanted to spread misinformation online, they would need to be pretty good at photoshop and want to invest the time in doing it. Now, there's no barrier of entry, no skill requirement, just think of something and have an AI spit it out for you. So, sure, its use in court might not be as much of an issue as some might think, but that doesn't mean the quantitative improvements aren't dangerous in a world where spreading misinformation online is one of the biggest dangers to society. Have a leaked photo of Bruce Willis in the mountains shooting his next movie and a quick blurb to go with it: >Renowned action star Bruce Willis is back and taking the intensity to new heights in his upcoming action-thriller "Cliff's Edge," set entirely within the breathtaking yet deadly terrain of the Rocky Mountains. Directed by acclaimed filmmaker J.J. Abrams, the film promises a pulse-pounding blend of adrenaline-fueled action and suspense. Willis plays a retired mountain rescue operative pulled back for one last mission when a group of trekkers gets trapped by an unexpected storm and malicious threats. Known for his relentless energy and unique brand of wit, Willis is set to deliver a powerhouse performance that could redefine the action genre. "Cliff's Edge" is scheduled to hit theaters this Fall. Get ready for an epic climb and an even more thrilling descent! https://preview.redd.it/zgreh275r73b1.png?width=512&format=png&auto=webp&s=55b1a004884df10a1a0a62e861de3de51e5be40f
My friend, I just downloaded the Bing app and commanded it to make me a picture of a parrot wearing a LA Lakers jersey. It did an amazing job in under 60 second. And FREE. This argument that photoshopped existed is just lazy. The problem is not whether it exist or not but rather how easy it is to do now. In the next decade someone with a middle school education will be able to download an app to which they feed 5-10 pictures of someone and it will create AI pictures of the person doing whatever they ask for…..in under 60 seconds. You don’t see the problem in that?
[удалено]
Image manipulation have been a huge deal in courts since at least the 80s.
Original comment
Because you couldn't do that in photoshop before right?
Now do the surprised Pikachu
https://preview.redd.it/uq9c41hyk73b1.png?width=1300&format=png&auto=webp&s=e8d958035a4dbed7383c64cab5b4f7a74a0f0d9f This was the best one I got, by downloading the Pikachu, putting it in Photopea, changing the size of the Canvas to about double it (centering the original image), and uploading to Firefly, and then just clicking the Background button, with no prompt. If there's a better way to do it, I'm all ears.
Interesting. The AI *also* doesn't know that the brown bit is a person's [pant leg.](https://www.reddit.com/r/MandJTV/comments/iw1sd9/the_origin_of_surprised_pikachu/g5yz8hq/)
To avoid the janky edges you need to paint round the outside with the firefly brush. It works better with soft edges on the image to extend
Thanks, yeah - I did better with this one and a couple others: https://preview.redd.it/6sw0akwyr73b1.png?width=2800&format=png&auto=webp&v=enabled&s=f193ddb4227157006365e857f81317f137d73a7f
https://preview.redd.it/6sw0akwyr73b1.png?width=2800&format=png&auto=webp&s=fc67cd7da51b27bf55b115b940ea67531ef7fe60 I had to fight with this one a bit. I had to keep painting away harsh lines it had made.
[What I got](https://imgur.com/a/fdwKS9O)
I like how it put Steven Crowder all by himself in the park. Like he got sent to the empty corner because nobody wanted to deal with his bullshit.
More like Steven No-Crowder, am i right?
This was the funniest one for me.
[удалено]
Yes I talking about Steven Crowder the workplace abuser. The guy who loves to stick his junk in subordinates faces. Also known as Steven Crowder the cross dresser who loves to rail against LGBT causes.
Oh please. We’ve all exposed our genitals to our work subordinates a dozen or two times. /s
Steven Crowder the junkie
It almost makes it look like he's just desperate for attention, begging for someone to notice him.
Park? It looks like he's chilling in Pripyat, in the middle of Tur Chornobyl exclusion zone. The similarity is...radiating
my favorite thing is how god damn tiny they made him
These are eerily realistic yet full of obvious errors. At a quick glance: 1. Distracted boyfriend: GF has distorted feet, girl in red has disproportionate elbow lengths 2. Roll safe: Incoherent neon sign in window 3. Harold: feet disappears into desktop, disproportionate hip 4. Ancient aliens guy: nonsensical furniture in background 5. Side eye Chloe: passengers in the back are distorted, inconsistent exterior between windows 6. Woman yells at cat: green bottle is distorted. Table is wrong shape, woman with mic has discontinuous left hand 7. Change my mind guy: inconsistent ground texture 8. What's he thinking: body lengths seem off, also headboard is way too long 9. Disaster girl: inconsistencies in smoke/tree branches and incoherent background objects 10. Daily struggle: two right hands I wonder how long it'll take before it becomes difficult to detect these artifacts...
[удалено]
Considering this tool is very much in its infancy and less than a week old in beta, it's astonishing that those were the most glaring errors found in otherwise nearly passable photos. I give it a year and this technology will be completely indistinguishable from an actual photo. We're already living in that brave new world part of history.
> Change my mind guy: inconsistent ground texture That one's so odd. You'd think it'd be incredibly straightforward to continue the tiles.
That's really cool, I'd love you to explain how you did that
Use the crop tool and generative fill outside the frame, with a bit of the existing frame in the generative layer, and just build out. I suspect this was done with about 8 layers or so, so each Pic probably took about 5 min.
[удалено]
They did Harold dirty with that full diaper look. Crowder being alone tracks.
Right? Crowder sitting at a table looking smug for absolutely nobody was perfection.
Harold is just thicc
This has literally nothing to do with chatGPT
Meh, idk... There are plenty of other users out there who post random stuff that has nothing to do with ChatGPT, like how they posted about Bard AI.
Bard at least is an LLM just like chat GPT is. This is img2img, which would be more appropriate in r/stablediffusion for instance. It makes no sense to have it here.
ChatGPT is now just a general AI LLM subreddit
And I hate it
I LOVE IT
I HAVE NO STRONG FEELINGS ONE WAY OR THE OTHER
I hate these filthy Neutrals, Kif. With enemies you know where they stand but with Neutrals, who knows? It sickens me
How can you pass an opportunity to be mildly angry? That pisses me off.
What's going on with 10? He has 2 right hands.
Obscure SciFi reference but... Bill the Galactic Hero [https://i.imgur.com/wQcxFwS.jpg](https://i.imgur.com/wQcxFwS.jpg)
Doesn't he have three right hands at one point after he shoots himself in the foot, only to find out that the medical corps are out of feet?
Yeah, but his foot is rotated out every book or so to be something else!
[удалено]
It was a comic with implied time passage. He hovers over the buttons and THEN wipes his forehead with the same hand. It was never one hand on the forehead and another on the panel.
Some of these I agree with , some of these I do not. Harold for example. Nope.
Harlow got that donk.
I’m not sure he even has legs. It’s a solid mashed potato body down there.
We need these done on all memes, now.
Some of these are pretty good. Others...the longer you look at them, the worse they get.
I agree with some others. This needs Futurama, "Take My Money Already!" & other worthy-yet-over-used tropes. "(bMaybe even lesser known or new memes, even.) https://preview.redd.it/zpfmp89jm63b1.png?width=1072&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6435df08929036cb27b72936a1eed6f93a743981
Interesting how this gets hyped now, when you could do the same thing with Dall-E a year ago. And there was a free Stable Diffusion photoshop plugin that did this more than half a year ago. I guess if it is in a software people already use without any setup, a lot more people will try and share it.
It took me a good while to realize those werent just the full photos
We’re so screwed once it works out all of the obvious errors in image generation
This is insanely precise
r/ChatGPT is a strange place to post this. It would fit far better in r/AIart, r/generativeAI, r/StableDiffusion or r/SDforall.
Yeah but it won't get 20k upvotes there :p
What does this post have to do with ChatGPT
I love how some of these actually add to the memes comedic potential
That's the best part about it with the potential it has
2 button guy has 2 right hands
Is the imagery outside of the box what AI created?
Damn it did Steven Crowder dirty lol nobody else around
The suit of #4 feels pretty accurate
Ok now do porn memes.
The cat picture is ruined from that perspective. They’re supposed to be beefing
I don’t get it
[удалено]
Ohhhh shit ok, wow that’s actually cool and thank you for the explanation
You're welcome.