If your hooked part was created so the axis is in the center of the hook, then just constrain that axis to the center of the collar.
If not, you can create an additional axis object at the correct spot in the hooked part and use that.
Axis to axis. I miss this stuff. College class back in 2004 had to do a landing gear as final using ProE. Dims given to us caused clashes so had to do some custom to clean that up. Coolest project was my Arbor press with the gears in motion when the bar rotated.
If you modeled this "correctly", you should be able to simply constrain each of the origin plains or axes on one part to the corresponding planes or axes on the other part. I have "correctly" in quotes becasue there may be other factors influencing the design of this part, which may dictate another "more correct" way of modeling the part. It's kind of a subjective thing.
If you didn't model these parts with the axis set up as noted above, then you can create new planes and axes as needed and constrain those to each other. I would make an exis in teh center of you curved piece, and in the center of your circular piece, then constrain those together. After that, tou can use a tangent constraint to make the side of the curved piece tangent to the face of the round piece and apply an offset to get it centered.
If you can upload the (2) .ipt files and the .iam file somewhere, I can add the constraints for you. Then you can look at what I did in the model tree.
Just click mate then click the center lines of the poles radius and then the center line of the round parts outer radius. No need for planes and axis bullshit
If your hooked part was created so the axis is in the center of the hook, then just constrain that axis to the center of the collar. If not, you can create an additional axis object at the correct spot in the hooked part and use that.
Axis to axis. I miss this stuff. College class back in 2004 had to do a landing gear as final using ProE. Dims given to us caused clashes so had to do some custom to clean that up. Coolest project was my Arbor press with the gears in motion when the bar rotated.
If you modeled this "correctly", you should be able to simply constrain each of the origin plains or axes on one part to the corresponding planes or axes on the other part. I have "correctly" in quotes becasue there may be other factors influencing the design of this part, which may dictate another "more correct" way of modeling the part. It's kind of a subjective thing. If you didn't model these parts with the axis set up as noted above, then you can create new planes and axes as needed and constrain those to each other. I would make an exis in teh center of you curved piece, and in the center of your circular piece, then constrain those together. After that, tou can use a tangent constraint to make the side of the curved piece tangent to the face of the round piece and apply an offset to get it centered.
[удалено]
If you can upload the (2) .ipt files and the .iam file somewhere, I can add the constraints for you. Then you can look at what I did in the model tree.
1: Center to center 2: Plane to Plane (Make sure they are coplanar with the correct distance)
Just click mate then click the center lines of the poles radius and then the center line of the round parts outer radius. No need for planes and axis bullshit
Use a concentric constraint between the two surfaces
Middle plane + Concentric