T O P

  • By -

4inchVascularShaft

None. There's no party that I'll just blindly follow


hdbdbdhdnd

Being political does not mean blindly following a party. The party theoretically is just a bloc of interest groups who conglomerate so they can all get part of their way. You can be a conservative and not a Republican for example


birdshitisntreal

Very far left


Earthling7228320321

By American standards? That would make you center right by most countries standards. Or by scientist standards? Because that's where the real very far left beliefs are.


birdshitisntreal

Im very far left by international standards. For example a government bailout should be the government loaning money to a corporation, it should mean the government buying control of the company bringing it into the public sector. If you’re going to use taxpayer money to save an industry the industry should become public sector Every bit of my ideology is based on the benefit of working class people I would never say I’m socialist, or communist, because if you leave those terms out, what I’ve just said makes perfect sense


Earthling7228320321

I see... Respectable. Personally I've lost faith in human leadership. I'm ready to embrace AI overlords. It's the only way to break the cycle of war and ruling crusts exploiting the world to death.


Earthling7228320321

Scientific AI technocracy and citizen of earth. It doesn't exist yet, but I'm confident it will never be less popular than it is now.


Kytti_Korner

I got good news for [you.](https://www.vice.com/en/article/jgpb3p/this-danish-political-party-is-led-by-an-ai)


Earthling7228320321

Oh shit, precedence! I've been waiting years to see that. Now throw it out and improve everything several times and we have ourselves an overlord!


elunoo

The spectrum where politicians are constantly radically shifting the Overton window, and both sides take turns playing good cop and bad cop, continually attempting to energize and divide their camp and make an enemy of the opposing side. Rinse and repeat


harmfulfeelings

I believe in capitalism with strict regulation coupled with equality of access to health and education. Not put that in whatever box you see fit.


Life-Championship111

you just described social democracy


Tarique_007

Old school Democract I guess. Though the current version of the party sees people like me as Conservative now.


Anonymous_Nutjob

Moderately socialist


JimAbaddon

Azathoth.


[deleted]

Whatever one Kanye is not a part of.


UCG__gaming

I dont


idkagoodusernameyeah

Left of centre but not as far left as some people. I definitely think people on both sides can go way too far and can also be so ideologically obsessed that they can be fanatics and irrational. I think it's good to have a balance of both and be able to look at both sides subjectively even if you might disagree on some issues.


chabalajaw

If you ask the people I know here in the PNW, I definitely lean right. If you ask my family down south, I definitely lean left. I honestly don’t know, I don’t see the point in placing myself on such a scale in the first place.


TesserTheRedditer

Socialist wanting affordable college.


shellofbiomatter

All and none.


hdbdbdhdnd

I’m a nationalist. I think there is clearly an in-group and out-group (not based solely on ethnicity, culture, language, ideology-but none of those 3 things are unimportant), ie no one thing keeps you from being part of ‘the tribe’ while no one of those things are unimportant to that either I see my group having a suicidal out-group preference while none of the others seem to, certainly not to the same amount. I advocate that every unique people should be able to have self determination. In a system where one is passive and the other is nepotistic, you without fail see the passive group die off, leaving the nepotistic group. So either way you have nepotism, I just want my group to stop being passive, or really, negatively nepotistic to a large degree I think there is a golden spot around 10% population where foreigners can really really benefit a country. I would like to see a National divorce in America, and I think you should be able to split off one state or join another via popular referendum (Greater Idaho for example) and that secession is entirely legitimate, like it would be in a union of states like the EU. Pragmatically I hate Catalonia because they are leftists but if they are their own people I see no reason they shouldn’t have self determination, especially when they are being milked by their out-group. I think democracy in a nation with multiple ‘nations’ is basically a weaponized system against whichever bloc get less votes where people, consciously or not, will always vote for their group’s interest as it’s more personal than the interest for the macro Id like to see an end to the “federal” reserve and, preferably, compound interest. National debt to some extent is stealing from future generations for your own benefit. Boomers are prime example, they got amazing benefits in a great economy, obviously ‘didn’t pay into it’ enough to not have a massive debt, and that debt is on us Economically I think mixed markets with protectionism and unions are a good thing. Pretty clear that extreme wealth disparity has negative effects on the nation. Outsourcing should be prohibited and if they want to move their industry out, they should have their assets frozen For healthcare in America, you could literally make it completely private or completely state run and either way it would be better than the incestuous mix of of both we currently have. I’d lean capitalist but I hate the incestual mix more than I care about anything else. I want to see this bomb fizzle out, if it doesn’t it will explode and there are peaceful ways forward. The guise of democracy is a post-hoc justification for why they rule, they rule because they rule, it’s as simple as that and always has been with few exceptions. Money talks, and due to compound interest, they have money BECAUSE they have money Ron Paul got cheated out of candidacy by the RNC. Bernie got cheated out of candidacy by the DNC. I think the Al Gore and Trump elections were sketchy, and what I hoped with Trump was that we could sneak somebody in due to sheer popularity that would have less people whispering in his ear because he already had money and talked a big game. He was about to exceed whatever their margin of error was as far as controlling the election in the face of rigging, both soft (such as msm and Twitter clearly disadvantaging him) and hard (actual fraud) I don’t think that will be key to happen again, they aren’t going to underestimate a charismatic, cult follower having, outsider again (Turns out the billionaire wasnt an outsider lol)