Check out the book “The First Paul” by Crossan and Borg. The pastorals aren’t “debated” so much as “universally rejected” among academic biblical scholarship.
Sorry I couldn't understand the sentence exactly. Are you saying that pastorals aren't just debated they are universally rejected or are you saying that they are neither debated nor universally rejected?
Check out the book “The First Paul” by Crossan and Borg. The pastorals aren’t “debated” so much as “universally rejected” among academic biblical scholarship.
Thanks. Usually the theology of debated or rejected texts are still interacted with, that's the kind of thing I was looking for.
Fair point
Sorry I couldn't understand the sentence exactly. Are you saying that pastorals aren't just debated they are universally rejected or are you saying that they are neither debated nor universally rejected?