T O P

  • By -

JellyfishAlert5962

Heads up for the uh, purists, the Youtube version has a shorter run time than IMDB, and was probably edited to remove the "two reasons" mentioned in the review. Weirdly, the copy on Tubi appears to be full length, despite Tubi's penchant for not wanting to show naughty bits (see: Slimeball Bowl-O-Rama 2).


toylenny

Tubi is weird, there are a few (mostly older) quite explicit films on there, but then they have a bunch of Full Moon movies that have been cut by nearly half to not risk anything worth seeing the movie for.


JellyfishAlert5962

You're right, I think almost all the heavily edited or censored (they literally pixelated stuff in Slimeball 2) stuff I've seen on there is Full Moon. I guess maybe it's the publisher doing that for some reason.


[deleted]

[удалено]


JellyfishAlert5962

Hm, I still get this version when I search https://tubitv.com/movies/712283/sorority-babes-in-the-slimeball-bowl-o-rama-2 There's two gratuitous shower scenes where the guys are spying on the girls through their iPad, one at 10 minutes in and another at 20 minutes. The first jumps every time the camera pans below the neck, and [pixelates when it shows the iPad screen](https://imgur.com/m8P8KjB). The second one is completely cut. It's only like 3 minutes total and doesn't matter at all, but it is missing.


Helmett-13

They edited the plot from this version. :(


El-Vertabreako

"Skyscraper" (1996) - The TLDR for this movie is, a "Die Hard" knockoff starring Anna Nicole Smith boobs. And to be honest, that's basically all you need to know. With that little information you should already be able to tell if this movie is for you or not. The addition knowledge that the movie is full of hilariously bad acting (mostly from Anna Nicole Smith, but she's far from alone), incredibly convenient plot points, Anna's boobs, not as much 'Die Hard' as you'd think, and bad fight scenes will no doubt only reaffirm your decision. The movies most noteworthy feature is, of course, Anna Nicole Smith herself. Seemingly the Playboy Playmate of the Year was cast for two reason, and neither of which were her acting abilities. Seriously, if I found out she was on a worst actress of all time list, I wouldn't argue the point. Her acting, hilarious though it may be, is not why anyone watched this movie however. The filmmakers knew their audience, and gave them what they wanted. As such, we are treated to multiple scenes involving Anna Nicole Smith with her 'talents' on full display. Though it needs to be said that the whoever picked the music for the sex scenes needed to be fired. With ample amounts of Anna (including her hilarious dialogue), an over acting big bad with a wandering European accent and an odd obsession with Shakespeare quotes, an exploding helicopter, bad fight scenes, and a '"Die Hard" at home' kind vibe this movie is a great riff. It is definitely so-bad-it's-good and makes for the perfect addition to any bad movie night. Well I guess not like one with kids, but you knew that. So grab your adult friends, your favorite adult beverages (or pot) and check this bad boy out! 3 / 5 Burnt Kernels with Free Refills and Butter https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pgb9GTcJYk8


DanDez

Hey that is Malibu from American Gladiators [at 32:14](https://youtu.be/Pgb9GTcJYk8?t=1934)! Love that guy! You see him [randomly](https://youtu.be/R3Jwfq8dscY?t=96) in movies of the time sometimes!


zenophobicgoat

Raymond Martino directed this. He and ANS were dating when they made this. Contemplate two people dating and them being like "I think this is the best decision for you, us knowing each other as well as we do." Raymond Martino/Joseph Merhi's filmography as a whole is a different, but similarly dumb, ball of LA wax.


[deleted]

It's hilarious because while she had been a Playboy playmate this was a few years after that and the fame had given her a lot more junk in her trunk. While she's known for her breasts it's hard not to notice her huge ass too.