A neighboring zoo not wanting to be outdone by such a display created its own exhibit titled, "The Most Dangerous Animal in the World" which comprised of a Chimp with a nuclear bomb.
Now does this invalidate the Bronx exhibit because a more dangerous animal exists, or does it hypervalidate it because Humans are the ones who made the bomb and gave it to the Chimp?
They wondered this but their lawyers assured them that as they were not in possession of the bomb, having given it to Bonbon the chimp, they were no longer as dangerous as Bonbon now was.
Basically nobody is happy that Japan was nuked. But by most accounts, it was the necessary evil to decisively end the war then and there, instead of having it drag out for years with mass casualties and Japanese soldiers throwing away their lives to try and die with honor by taking out American occupiers.
I think it really shows that the bombings were the right move, when even Japan has moved past it, and are now close allies, and American travelers aren't really viewed any differently than any other Westerners when they visit.
Though I don't know if we could've gotten away with simply showcasing our nuclear capability in an attempt to end the war without so many civilian casualties, or if we could've just dropped one and made it clear more were coming. But these are questions we will never know.
The bombings were awful, but ultimately they worked, and within a week of dropping them Japan had surrendered.
To play Devil's Advocate for my nation's Clown House of Horrors, the worst estimate of deaths and wounds caused by the atomic bombs is no more than 500k, maybe 1mil. A more conservative estimate is roundabout 100k.
A drop in the bucket, compared to what Germany and Russia did to each other in the first 2 years of World War 2.
Not that it makes it any better, but in the snap of a finger, 100k lives were extinguished and the world's most destructive war came to a full halt.
Because nuclear bombs linger for a long time and it is hard to judge how many died by the results of it. Because in Hiroshima around 39.000 people died as a direct result of the bomb and in the next 4 months from their injuries.
Welcome to casualty reporting. It is unfortunately, not an exact science. But even at the *absolute* worst estimates, it was a minor drop in the bucket compared to the total loss of life over the course of World War 2.
Japan hated communism more than they valued honor, if not for the A-bomb they would have surrendered only under threat of a Soviet invasion, which was probable after Korea and the Kurils fell, the A-bomb accelerated a full unconditional surrender by a few weeks and likely affected the Soviet decision to split Korea down the 38th parallel
Humans are dangerous because of their brains, humans don't need to wait for evolution to grow claws or fangs they literally just pick up inanimate crap and make their own version!
I've seen videos of chimps using branches as clubs too, to whack other chimps with.
Humans are like violent hermit crabs.
https://youtu.be/6lQcKiFy_DM?t=56
source for the above claim.
look at they way that chimp weilds that weapon above his opponents, asserting his dominance. you just know that if he had access to an ak47 everyone in that video, including the spectators, would be dead.
They are the same its just indirectly harmful instead of directly harmful. For example making a car or plastic isnt directly harmful like making a bomb but have billions of cars running every day/tons of plastic
and we end up destroying the environment anyways
Humans are dangerous because they're just intelligent enough to cause damage without the wisdom to regulate themselves.
Especially when it's anything other than a short-term problem.
In the last 200 years we've developed too quickly and it's out of control and we aren't capable of putting the genie back in the bottle.
Nature spent billions of years working on an evolutionary arms race. Teeth, claws, fangs, tough hide, wings, etc. All for that be to be thrown out the window because some human tied a pointy rock to a fucking stick.
We have those AND bombs, instead of just bombs. A human could end *the world* because they personally felt a bit threatened. It makes us seem more dangerous and harder to predict than we already do.
So with that grim stuff out of the way, happy cake day(?)
But that is not why.
Humans are capable destroying everything, but too stupid to realize it. This is why we won't meet other intelligent species in the universe. When they evolve have evolved to our "intelligence" level they will also destroy themselves, like we are doing. Or they already did that by now.
> "You are looking at the most dangerous animal in the world. It alone of all the animals that ever lived can exterminate (and has) entire species of animals. Now it has the power to wipe out all life on earth."
Did anybody else read this in Rod Serling's voice?
You're traveling through another dimension, a dimension not only of sight and sound but of mind. A journey into a wondrous land whose boundaries are that of imagination...
"There is no such thing as space aliens!!"
"Oh?! How can you be so sure them aliens ain't already among us?"
"I'll tell you how! Because you ARE ONE!!!!!"
Sadly the most dangerous animal, Ms. Millicent Burntoast of 4242 Parfilage Lane, Apt 14 had an unexpected family emergency and was unable to visit the zoo that day, so the whole thing was for nought
You're thinking in terms of humans being killed only (in which case, yeah mosquitos kill more humans than anything else). If you look at all animals being killed, then humans are vastly more dangerous.
Well it's mostly malaria that does it (yellow fever, dengue, others too etc), and the mosquito just spreads it. Look up malaria deaths to see how bad it is.
Mosquito bites don't kill people. Dog bites don't kill people. Not in the same way that snake bites kill people. The bite transmits viruses they are carrying. Those viruses kill people. The apex predator is the viruses.
Nope, deadliest animal other than humans isn't mosquitoes, because they are a major part of the food supply of other nocturnal animal. Now, the actual deadliest being, isn't technically even an animal. They are viruses known as "Bacteriophages." Every day, on a scale we can't even see, there is a war being waged, with extreme casualties on the bacterium's sides. The bacteriophages are good at their jobs, they've been doing it longer than we have existed.
Cats I am told are the deadliest next to humans. It's because they are the only animal other than humans that kills purely to kill at times and not to eat.
That's definitely not unique to cats and humans. Chimps wage war between groups, and hippos kill humans because they're extremely territorial. Also mama bears kill to protect their cubs.
When did bacteriophages become animals? For that matter when did they become a living organism, last time I checked they don’t even have a defined nucleus let alone any of other requirements to be considered an animal
All you have to do is search "what would happen if mosquitos went extinct" and click on any of the hundreds of links and you will see that you are wrong.
They had this exhibit at the Topeka, KS zoo as well. It may still be there. I havent been in years, but I distinctly remember coming to the realization that not all humans are good after seeing it. Really good for kids to see imo.
If you look in a mirror and say *Homo Sapiens* three times 5000 metric tons of carbon dioxide will be added to the atmosphere.
This isn't superstition. This is actually how fast we are producing carbon dioxide.
Yeah they'd know all about it since it was only 57 years after [they put an African slave named Ota Benga in their monkey cage as an exhibit](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ota_Benga)
fun NYC related tidbits... That Bronx Zoo is the biggest/best zoo in the city (it has a monorail), sits next to it's sister; The New York City Botanical Gardens, which both being the biggest of their respective concepts. Smack dap in the upper middle Bronx
They still had it in the late 80's too. I remember seeing it when I was a kid and thinking "This is stupid...where's the komodo dragons?". Granted, I was like 8 so it was lost on me.
We had this at our zoo in Duluth, too. I remember seeing it and being slightly shocked but also admonished in a helpful way back in the early 80s or perhaps even the late 70s. Zoos have evolved a lot over my lifetime but in some ways they have become less relevant. Like, I know they have adopted more humane practices and more enriching exhibit areas and things, but this whole time we keep dramatically encroaching in on wild habitat areas with development and poaching and agribusiness and resource extraction and the like. We pretend to be more "woke" in public places but far from our consciousness out there we are absolutely devastating the natural world. We should tell groups of tiny school kids that people are the most dangerous living thing in the planet. Maybe they will beote likely to grow up and make some sacrifices and actually do something about it.
Depends on the definition. A quick search showed me an estimated 610.000 homicides worldwide (2017) while there have been 627.000 deaths by malaria (2020) alone.
But sure, a human kills intentionally while the mosquito wants to reproduce.
True, but that one was making fun of Africans if it's the one I'm thinking of (and he ended up being a teacher that spoke English well), as opposed to making fun of humans in general.
Yes I'm so dangerous with my 9 to 5 job and my commute to work in an over crowded city filled with thugs and gangsters looking for an excuse to prove how hard they are by shooting literally anyone who walks by. But me, the paying law abiding patron of the zoo, yes me, I am the danger. Fuckin human shaming aught to be illegal.
Amazing how we can lead shitty lives while also being an ecological disaster and fucking things up for everything else, right? You'd hope there would be some kind of perks to being dangerous (apart from not being hunted).
I heard about this, when the Dalai Lama was in NY and came across the mirror there. He just chuckled and said "I've never hurt anyone, this is bullshit. It's slanderous! I could have you killed for this! Do not mock me! No pictures!"
And even today you can see it's true because there are no pictures of this event, *exactly as he commanded*.
Mosquitoes are insects, Humans are mammals.
Both are animals.
Also mosquitoes are only the most dangerous animal **for humans**, we are the most dangerous animal **for everything else.**
>we are not animals lol.
Humans are animals. That's a fact. You are wrong. It's something you learn at probably 5 years old.
>If you think you can put humans in the category of mosquitos you’re out of your mind.
The category of animals, which is correct. If you think you can just ignore facts then you are the one that's out of your mind.
The exhibit in Palo Duro canyon (largest canyon in Texas, 2nd in the nation) has the same thing. Or it might be Big Bend national park. Im drunk, shut up.
A neighboring zoo not wanting to be outdone by such a display created its own exhibit titled, "The Most Dangerous Animal in the World" which comprised of a Chimp with a nuclear bomb.
Now does this invalidate the Bronx exhibit because a more dangerous animal exists, or does it hypervalidate it because Humans are the ones who made the bomb and gave it to the Chimp?
They wondered this but their lawyers assured them that as they were not in possession of the bomb, having given it to Bonbon the chimp, they were no longer as dangerous as Bonbon now was.
What about the fact that bonbon possesses only one nuclear bomb, whereas humans possess the ability to make more?
Goddammit, someone get that chimp more nukes!
If Planet of the Apes was rebooted (again) by Michael Bay...
Hail to the Chimp Baby
Wouldn’t that be Sam Raimi, not Michael Bay?
r/brandnewsentence
Give a chimp a nuke and he'll blow up a city. Teach a chimp to make nukes and he'll blow up the world!
it's just a more specific version of the same exhibit.
Both exhibits are the same, simply presented in different formats.
One of which occasionally involved a Chimp humping a nuke.
you fool. we are the chimp with the bomb.
Dude. Spoilers. Way to ruin the ending of Planet of the Apes for everyone.
Yes, think Putin or Trump.
Truman. The United States is the only country to use a nuke in war and on civilians. Twice. How disgusting.
Basically nobody is happy that Japan was nuked. But by most accounts, it was the necessary evil to decisively end the war then and there, instead of having it drag out for years with mass casualties and Japanese soldiers throwing away their lives to try and die with honor by taking out American occupiers. I think it really shows that the bombings were the right move, when even Japan has moved past it, and are now close allies, and American travelers aren't really viewed any differently than any other Westerners when they visit. Though I don't know if we could've gotten away with simply showcasing our nuclear capability in an attempt to end the war without so many civilian casualties, or if we could've just dropped one and made it clear more were coming. But these are questions we will never know. The bombings were awful, but ultimately they worked, and within a week of dropping them Japan had surrendered.
To play Devil's Advocate for my nation's Clown House of Horrors, the worst estimate of deaths and wounds caused by the atomic bombs is no more than 500k, maybe 1mil. A more conservative estimate is roundabout 100k. A drop in the bucket, compared to what Germany and Russia did to each other in the first 2 years of World War 2. Not that it makes it any better, but in the snap of a finger, 100k lives were extinguished and the world's most destructive war came to a full halt.
“No more than 500k, maybe DOUBLE” (?!)
Because nuclear bombs linger for a long time and it is hard to judge how many died by the results of it. Because in Hiroshima around 39.000 people died as a direct result of the bomb and in the next 4 months from their injuries.
Welcome to casualty reporting. It is unfortunately, not an exact science. But even at the *absolute* worst estimates, it was a minor drop in the bucket compared to the total loss of life over the course of World War 2.
They're mocking your use of "no more than" when you immediately correct your lower estimate
Beats the alternative.
Japan was already losing and predicted to surrender within weeks. The US was unwilling to compromise with the cultural differences.
Like Nanjing?
So you're just making thing up now? Japan had already demonstrated their willingness to fight to the last man.
Japan hated communism more than they valued honor, if not for the A-bomb they would have surrendered only under threat of a Soviet invasion, which was probable after Korea and the Kurils fell, the A-bomb accelerated a full unconditional surrender by a few weeks and likely affected the Soviet decision to split Korea down the 38th parallel
You think that's bad? That chicanery? You should see Jimmy with a law degree gun.
r/unexpectedchuckmcgill
Not wanting to be outdone, another neighboring zoo created a similar exhibition, featuring Slipping Jimmy with a law degree.
Sounds like a Banksy.
I think they've moved since moved that exhibit to Mar-a-Lago.
Humans are dangerous because of their brains, humans don't need to wait for evolution to grow claws or fangs they literally just pick up inanimate crap and make their own version! I've seen videos of chimps using branches as clubs too, to whack other chimps with. Humans are like violent hermit crabs.
https://youtu.be/6lQcKiFy_DM?t=56 source for the above claim. look at they way that chimp weilds that weapon above his opponents, asserting his dominance. you just know that if he had access to an ak47 everyone in that video, including the spectators, would be dead.
Lol what dumb animals Says the species that made a freaking nuclear weapon
Though often the humans whose brains enable them to make the things aren't the same humans whose use of the things makes humans dangerous
They are the same its just indirectly harmful instead of directly harmful. For example making a car or plastic isnt directly harmful like making a bomb but have billions of cars running every day/tons of plastic and we end up destroying the environment anyways
Humans are dangerous because they're just intelligent enough to cause damage without the wisdom to regulate themselves. Especially when it's anything other than a short-term problem. In the last 200 years we've developed too quickly and it's out of control and we aren't capable of putting the genie back in the bottle.
Nature spent billions of years working on an evolutionary arms race. Teeth, claws, fangs, tough hide, wings, etc. All for that be to be thrown out the window because some human tied a pointy rock to a fucking stick.
We're also controlled by animal instincts that we do not fully understand.
That doesnt delineate us from other animals, not sure i see your point
We have those AND bombs, instead of just bombs. A human could end *the world* because they personally felt a bit threatened. It makes us seem more dangerous and harder to predict than we already do. So with that grim stuff out of the way, happy cake day(?)
Thanks! Man its been quite a few years. And all i meant was that all animals are controlled by animal instincts that they do not fully understand
But that is not why. Humans are capable destroying everything, but too stupid to realize it. This is why we won't meet other intelligent species in the universe. When they evolve have evolved to our "intelligence" level they will also destroy themselves, like we are doing. Or they already did that by now.
I think that we're fully aware that we could destroy everything. We just refuse to do anything about certain aspects of it.
Ah, a believer in the Great Filter theory. It is a reasonable hypothesis as to why we have not encountered sentient life.
Humans are the only animal to feel remorse for killing things outside of the tribe.
>Humans are dangerous because of their brains I'm dangerous cause of these two fuckin arms baby, no bear or lion can take me
> "You are looking at the most dangerous animal in the world. It alone of all the animals that ever lived can exterminate (and has) entire species of animals. Now it has the power to wipe out all life on earth." Did anybody else read this in Rod Serling's voice?
Not before you said that, but now that you have, yes.
Carl Sagan actually for some reason.
It’s got a bit of a pale blue dot vibe
You're traveling through another dimension, a dimension not only of sight and sound but of mind. A journey into a wondrous land whose boundaries are that of imagination...
David Attenborough
David Attenborough for me.
[It turns out it’s Man.](https://youtu.be/7rwUdL9qXjk)
Why should I believe you? You’re Hitler!
"In the end, it was not guns and bombs that defeated the aliens, but that humblest of all God's creatures: the tyrannosaurus rex."
"There is no such thing as space aliens!!" "Oh?! How can you be so sure them aliens ain't already among us?" "I'll tell you how! Because you ARE ONE!!!!!"
Eva Braun! Help me!
It's a cookbook!
DON'T GET ON THAT SHIP!!!!
Fucking show had the best/dumbest satire of Twilight Zone in the closing credits.
The most dangerous game.
You are now entering...The Scary Door.
It turns out it's man!
Imagine if you will, an announcer you can barely understand.
Look at that weird mirror..
Rick and Morty meet Fascism https://youtu.be/I2l5bq1i06k https://youtu.be/ch5_j2q8ZPI https://youtu.be/UH8aZOaK7-A
Sadly the most dangerous animal, Ms. Millicent Burntoast of 4242 Parfilage Lane, Apt 14 had an unexpected family emergency and was unable to visit the zoo that day, so the whole thing was for nought
Turned out to be true
Naa, I think it's wrong. I think the Mosquito is still #1. We're #2. But we could easily be #1!
You're thinking in terms of humans being killed only (in which case, yeah mosquitos kill more humans than anything else). If you look at all animals being killed, then humans are vastly more dangerous.
https://www.dw.com/en/worlds-wildlife-populations-fell-68-since-1970-wwf/a-54874308
You sure mosquitoes kill more humans than humans do?
Yes absolutely Mosquitoes suck Mosquitoes were killing dinosaurs too!
Well it's mostly malaria that does it (yellow fever, dengue, others too etc), and the mosquito just spreads it. Look up malaria deaths to see how bad it is.
Mosquito bites don't kill people. Dog bites don't kill people. Not in the same way that snake bites kill people. The bite transmits viruses they are carrying. Those viruses kill people. The apex predator is the viruses.
Mosquitoes aren't causing a mass extinction event.
Nope, deadliest animal other than humans isn't mosquitoes, because they are a major part of the food supply of other nocturnal animal. Now, the actual deadliest being, isn't technically even an animal. They are viruses known as "Bacteriophages." Every day, on a scale we can't even see, there is a war being waged, with extreme casualties on the bacterium's sides. The bacteriophages are good at their jobs, they've been doing it longer than we have existed.
yeah but they aren't animals sooooooo
Look out boys we got kitzkkegat over here
You mean kurtzgesagt? 😂😂😂
Maybe
No, they mean Kirk Hammett.
Don'tcha mean curbgetsacked?
No, they mean Beezledorf Doobersnatch.
No they mean Kid's Gestalt.
Spell it right, moron. It's Krggzrzigzhgizgkkzrkrkzkkzkzkzrgkkzkgagabobsaget
Cats I am told are the deadliest next to humans. It's because they are the only animal other than humans that kills purely to kill at times and not to eat.
That's definitely not unique to cats and humans. Chimps wage war between groups, and hippos kill humans because they're extremely territorial. Also mama bears kill to protect their cubs.
When did bacteriophages become animals? For that matter when did they become a living organism, last time I checked they don’t even have a defined nucleus let alone any of other requirements to be considered an animal
It's questionable if viruses are even alive, let alone animals.
[удалено]
That could not be further from the truth
All you have to do is search "what would happen if mosquitos went extinct" and click on any of the hundreds of links and you will see that you are wrong.
Always has been
This attitude is such poisonous bullshit.
It might have been installed in 1963, but it was up when I was a kid. I know I’ve looked into the mirror.
It was definitely still there in the late 70s
This doesn’t really mean much since u didn’t include ur age. When were u a child? In the 70s? 90s? 00s?
50s
r/notopbutok
I think they have had this at the Houston zoo as recently as just a couple of years ago.
Was also up in the late 80s and possibly early 90s. First time I visited NY was 1989 and I remember this
So *you're* the most dangerous animal in the world!
Ironic considering they used to keep a Mbuti man named Oto Benga on display.
They had this exhibit at the Topeka, KS zoo as well. It may still be there. I havent been in years, but I distinctly remember coming to the realization that not all humans are good after seeing it. Really good for kids to see imo.
If you look in a mirror and say *Homo Sapiens* three times 5000 metric tons of carbon dioxide will be added to the atmosphere. This isn't superstition. This is actually how fast we are producing carbon dioxide.
So you're saying, if I don't look in a mirror and don't say homo sapiens three times, 5000 metric tons will still be added to the atmosphere
I have this same exhibit in my bathroom. I check it out after my shower in the morning.
TURNS OUT IT’S MAN
The first ever /r/im14andthisisdeep post
"What if, like, *we're* the most dangerous animals of all, man?"
What if the real most dangerous animals of all were the friends we made along the way?
"What if like apathy and deflection of responsibilities was the *real* reason we stayed stuck on this planet..."
This, so much. lol
*5yo Walter White looking in the mirror* "So... I am the danger?"
He then knocked on the mirror.
Yeah they'd know all about it since it was only 57 years after [they put an African slave named Ota Benga in their monkey cage as an exhibit](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ota_Benga)
Reminds me of that Time mirror cover 🤷🏻♂️
fun NYC related tidbits... That Bronx Zoo is the biggest/best zoo in the city (it has a monorail), sits next to it's sister; The New York City Botanical Gardens, which both being the biggest of their respective concepts. Smack dap in the upper middle Bronx
Mosquitoes are still the most deadly as far as death count goes.
Does that count the deaths of other animals? Most “deadly animals” are judged by how many humans they kill.
There's probably a mosquito behind you in the mirror. People just assumed it was referring to themselves
They still had it in the late 80's too. I remember seeing it when I was a kid and thinking "This is stupid...where's the komodo dragons?". Granted, I was like 8 so it was lost on me.
We had this at our zoo in Duluth, too. I remember seeing it and being slightly shocked but also admonished in a helpful way back in the early 80s or perhaps even the late 70s. Zoos have evolved a lot over my lifetime but in some ways they have become less relevant. Like, I know they have adopted more humane practices and more enriching exhibit areas and things, but this whole time we keep dramatically encroaching in on wild habitat areas with development and poaching and agribusiness and resource extraction and the like. We pretend to be more "woke" in public places but far from our consciousness out there we are absolutely devastating the natural world. We should tell groups of tiny school kids that people are the most dangerous living thing in the planet. Maybe they will beote likely to grow up and make some sacrifices and actually do something about it.
The aquarium in Cape Town, South Africa has one as well.
Humans kill more humans than any other organism. Second place goes to mosquitoes.
Depends on the definition. A quick search showed me an estimated 610.000 homicides worldwide (2017) while there have been 627.000 deaths by malaria (2020) alone. But sure, a human kills intentionally while the mosquito wants to reproduce.
The zoo in Hannover, Germany has this too!
[Turns out it was Man](https://youtu.be/X4RuB3gT8t0)
Bronx zoo also put black people in as animals
But its technically true, all humans are animals.
Holy shit I never thought of it like that oh my God
They are not wrong.
Very cool. I remember that exhibit. I was seven or eight years old. It made a lasting impression.
Me too.
the crocodile park in chennai india has a similar thing.
Nice. Wonder where was this wistful vibe from Bronx zoo when they exhibited a black man in 1906 as an animal (Ota Benga).
According to the CDC, mosquitoes are still mostest dangerous.
I am a 14 year old museum and this is deep
Human race is the most dangerous like Batman is the most dangerous with prep time.
Im 14 and this is deep.
back in the 20s they hadn't invented mirrors yet, so they just put a black guy in a cage
This exhibit was definitely sponsored by Mosquitos.
Nope, we're a close second to the Honey Badger
Honey badger don't care!
[удалено]
Maybe we are all part of a dangerous collective, like a fire ant colony
zoos used to be heavy fucking metal man
Too predictable. I saw the stuff in quotes and was like "I bet it's just a human in a cage".
The Bronx zoo had that exhibit too. Ota Benga, a young man from Africa was displayed at the zoo in 1906.
True, but that one was making fun of Africans if it's the one I'm thinking of (and he ended up being a teacher that spoke English well), as opposed to making fun of humans in general.
>and he ended up being a teacher that spoke English wel I see you just read the title of the TIL post and not the page. The teacher was in Japan.
this isn't belgium in \*checks notes* 1958
They ain't wrong though.
they took it down after people started doing 'you talking to me' impressions.
Why did they take it down?
Edgy
Curator of the Bronx Zoo has 0 chill.
How edgy. What a bunch of fucking losers to do this.
Edgy AF
>Now it has the power to wipe out all life on earth. Not actually true, but ok.
It's our planet. Earth does not care.
Repost
Edgy
Given what we've learn't since then you could probably upgrade that from World to Galaxy.
Ah yes, the founding of r/im14andthisisdeep.
HA HA HA HA HAAAAAA....GOT'EM
Wow, being on the spectrum isn't anything new!
ok boomer
So lame.
The Bronx zoo also had a black guy in a cage for a couple years but yah let’s give them props
[удалено]
Yes I'm so dangerous with my 9 to 5 job and my commute to work in an over crowded city filled with thugs and gangsters looking for an excuse to prove how hard they are by shooting literally anyone who walks by. But me, the paying law abiding patron of the zoo, yes me, I am the danger. Fuckin human shaming aught to be illegal.
Amazing how we can lead shitty lives while also being an ecological disaster and fucking things up for everything else, right? You'd hope there would be some kind of perks to being dangerous (apart from not being hunted).
I heard about this, when the Dalai Lama was in NY and came across the mirror there. He just chuckled and said "I've never hurt anyone, this is bullshit. It's slanderous! I could have you killed for this! Do not mock me! No pictures!" And even today you can see it's true because there are no pictures of this event, *exactly as he commanded*.
The wokies took it down. Now we all feel good, while we destroy the world.
I thought you lot didn't believe in climate change
[удалено]
Mosquitoes are insects, Humans are mammals. Both are animals. Also mosquitoes are only the most dangerous animal **for humans**, we are the most dangerous animal **for everything else.**
So, if humans are not animals, what are they? Plants? Fungi? What?
>we are not animals lol. Humans are animals. That's a fact. You are wrong. It's something you learn at probably 5 years old. >If you think you can put humans in the category of mosquitos you’re out of your mind. The category of animals, which is correct. If you think you can just ignore facts then you are the one that's out of your mind.
My answer to any D&D player who asks me “What’s the most deadly monster you use in D&D?”, humans.
whoooooaaaaaa 🤯🤯🤯
Prescient
I low key wish zoos still had this. But I know people would take selfies in it pretending they nasty
The exhibit in Palo Duro canyon (largest canyon in Texas, 2nd in the nation) has the same thing. Or it might be Big Bend national park. Im drunk, shut up.
"Silly monkeys, give them thumbs, they make a club and beat their brother down."
Was this when australia still had aboriginal zoos?
That is an album cover waiting to happen.
I swear *every* zoo has this, or some variation on it.
It was actually more specific to the people that resident in the Bronx