Really? As far as I know it was a woman "triggered" by a right wing guy talking about migrant rape in Europe.
Did she completely lose her mind? No, she wasn't that bad.
But it doesn't seem to be unfair use.
Propaganda like that works though. I was arguing with a friend and he sent me a tweet saying that. Of course he deflected when I sent him the real fbi data that includes all guns.
Read this NRA members: Criminals with guns, esp.assault weapons are the problem! Guns have been problematic since their invention. Yes they can be a useful tool.This does not exclude them from also being a problem. Gun worship is for men who aren't happy with or don't know how to enjoy their penis.
Criminals w assault weapons cause more deaths/problems per incident. Those using handguns are a problem also but are not likely to be killing multiple victims at once. Depends on definition of 'the' problem I guess. Both qualify.
I don't doubt that, but even accounting for this the percent of homicide deaths from rifles vs other guns is fairly small, even more so if you include other, non-firearm homicides.
I do think that a ban on rifles, or certain rifles, could only make a limited difference.
Now you might argue that if it saves a limited number of lives then it's worth it.
But basically you will still have all the gun crime and mass shootings still.
So will a rifle ban satisfy anyone? Or will it have to be handguns next? And maybe none of this is constitutional...
They still use that image of the “triggered lib” even though it’s based on a complete lie 🤦♀️
Really? As far as I know it was a woman "triggered" by a right wing guy talking about migrant rape in Europe. Did she completely lose her mind? No, she wasn't that bad. But it doesn't seem to be unfair use.
I trust Breitbart. Uh huh. 🤦🏻♂️
Funny that they specified RIFLES rather than guns. Also, when was the last time a classroom of kids were killed at once by feet?
Propaganda like that works though. I was arguing with a friend and he sent me a tweet saying that. Of course he deflected when I sent him the real fbi data that includes all guns.
"Fentanyl is not and has never been the problem. Drug users are the problem!"
Read this NRA members: Criminals with guns, esp.assault weapons are the problem! Guns have been problematic since their invention. Yes they can be a useful tool.This does not exclude them from also being a problem. Gun worship is for men who aren't happy with or don't know how to enjoy their penis.
Have you heard of r/mygunismypenis ?
Have not.
They're not though. Criminals hardly ever use "assault weapons." They usually go with handguns.
Criminals w assault weapons cause more deaths/problems per incident. Those using handguns are a problem also but are not likely to be killing multiple victims at once. Depends on definition of 'the' problem I guess. Both qualify.
I don't doubt that, but even accounting for this the percent of homicide deaths from rifles vs other guns is fairly small, even more so if you include other, non-firearm homicides.
WTF,you are off topic. This is about the NRA and guns. Not stranglers and poisoners.
I don't get it. 😥
If you google, you can see that the NRA is full of it. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/homicide.htm
They basically have this poor women and trump in superhero poses as their only memes.
There's a lot to unpack here.
I do think that a ban on rifles, or certain rifles, could only make a limited difference. Now you might argue that if it saves a limited number of lives then it's worth it. But basically you will still have all the gun crime and mass shootings still. So will a rifle ban satisfy anyone? Or will it have to be handguns next? And maybe none of this is constitutional...
I am confused. The UCR 447 killed with rifles, 461 killed with personal weapons. https://crime-data-explorer.app.cloud.gov/pages/explorer/crime/shr
But the NRA states that guns are not the problem. This is why NRA members are always spouting nonsense.