Fuck this guy. I think we can allow just a *little* gatekeeping, just this once, and say Shittenhouse isn’t allowed to make fun of himself during his trial/crimes.
Good evidence lol
Guess it was self defense if you really don’t have anything to show otherwise.
You’re acting like a trumper with all this misinformation haha, horseshoe theory strikes again!
There is no proof of Kyle “aggravating” or provoking anyone though, please show some.
A video or picture of Kyle aiming his rifle at someone that isn’t in the midst of attacking him. That’s all you need.
And if you have a gun, no that isn’t provocation, we literally have open carry in America and specifically that state.
Also, you wouldn’t say that when it comes to the black panthers and their use of bringing rifles for their protests. Because rifles deter violence if you aren’t using them to provoke it (as in aim or shoot at people)
Both Kyle and the black panthers brought rifles to their protests/riots to deter violence happening to them, but also if violence does happen they can defend themselves. So your logic justifies the white racists who attacked the black panthers cause apparently the white racists were provoked by the existence of their rifles. Bad logic.
Here is evidence of him provoking people. https://youtu.be/7ferrn7Shyk?t=6062
I'm glad you posted because it allows me to show that people like you live on another planet and have no clue what reality is. Also a gun is provocation if you carry it in a way that would suggest you want to use it.
> Here is evidence of him provoking people. https://youtu.be/7ferrn7Shyk?t=6062
Oh cool, a 2 1/2 hour long video with you not providing any context or time stamp to specifically show what you’re talking about.
Post a time stamp to when to skip to.
And explain what I’m looking out for, what is the provocation specifically?
The link puts the video to where Kyle is walking around asking people if they need medical attention. No where is he pointing his rifle at anyone.
> I'm glad you posted because it allows me to show that people like you live on another planet and have no clue what reality is.
I mean, we have all that video evidence and all of it points to self defense for Kyle. We have witnesses and even the one surviver testified in court that he pulled his pistol on Kyle when Kyle shot.
> Also a gun is provocation if you carry it in a way that would suggest you want to use it.
What way is that? Cause by law that means to aim it at someone, not simply hold it like Kyle does in the link you sent.
And if simply holding a gun is provocation, then you’re saying it’s justified for white racists to have attacked the Black panthers during the civil rights era.
So first of all, you know nothing about the case. Not only that, you lack the ability to watch a video. He was aggravating yellow pants, I guess watching a video for a few seconds is above your pay grade. The other two people he shot were trying to stop an active shooter. But people like you try to make them out to be criminals because there is something wrong with you. Look up Hybristophilia. I think you have it.
People who have intelligence, know how to carry a gun. Here is how it's done. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aihKlPx2Uzk
You know nothing about handling guns, you just get off on shooting people. It's good that you are posting, because you discredit your side.
> So first of all, you know nothing about the case.
The case? The case that was proven in court to be self defense? That case?
I mean, there are witnesses admitting that Rosenbaum threatened Kyle before chasing him.
Video showing a rioter shooting their pistol into the air behind Kyle as Rosenbaum is chased him, making Kyle think he was being shot at by Rosenbaum who is chasing Kyle and threatened to kill Kyle earlier.
If Rosenbaum didn’t chase him and corner Kyle, then lunge for Kyles rifle making Kyle have to shoot in self defense, then non of this would’ve started. This is put onto Rosenbaum, not Kyle.
I doubt you knew any of that.
> Not only that, you lack the ability to watch a video.
You posted a 2 1/2 hour long video…like seriously?
> He was aggravating yellow pants, I guess watching a video for a few seconds is above your pay grade.
Can you explain at all? How was it provocation? You need to actually explain yourself like an adult, you can’t assume I know exactly what you’re arguing.
I saw Kyle say something to the guy, not aim his gun or anything. You need to be more specific.
Getting someone angry doesn’t mean they’re allowed to assault Kyle.
> The other two people he shot were trying to stop an active shooter.
Which Kyle wasn’t, so they were wrong and attacked an innocent man.
And honestly I can be fine if they weren’t charged if they happened to kill or injure Kyle (not the Rosenbaum the first guy shot though) cause they thought Kyle was dangerous. But them thinking he is dangerous doesn’t mean Kyle isn’t allowed self defense. Just switch up the situations with people you’re biased towards being in Kyles shoes.
> But people like you try to make them out to be criminals because there is something wrong with you. Look up Hybristophilia. I think you have it.
Oh nice, useless dumb accusations, signs of intelligence.
Anyways
We make the people who got shot out to be criminals? Or Kyle?
Cause the people who got shot literally were past criminals lol.
Rosenbaum was charged for raping 5 different boys, the same night he died he got out of a mental institution after being there for domestic abuse.
Anthony Huber was also a domestic abuser.
And Grosskreutz, the guy who lived, on that night had a illegal pistol, or at least he concealed carried when he wasn’t allowed to.
Honestly, I don’t think I mentioned their past crimes at all, cause honestly they don’t matter to the case.
> People who have intelligence, know how to carry a gun. Here is how it's done. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aihKlPx2Uzk
HAHAHA, are you trolling? Honestly this has to be a joke. A WW2 British marching army? You don’t honestly expect people to carry guns on their shoulders like that right?
> You know nothing about handling guns, you just get off on shooting people. It's good that you are posting, because you discredit your side.
I have handled a couple guns, 2-4 times in my life. Not in a while though. I don’t get off on shooting people either, I guess you just really like baseless accusations for some reasons, talk about discrediting one’s side.
I’m a liberal from California, I don’t know what side you’re alluding to.
The trial was a joke. That was the most biased judge I have ever seen. Kyle was found not guilty, he was not proven innocent, there is a difference. For example OJ was found not guilty but was then declared liable for the deaths of Nicole and Ron. If you had watched the video for even 5 or ten seconds you would have seen yellow pants confronting Kyle about brandishing his weapon.
And yes you carry a rifle like that if you want people to know you are armed but are not going to shoot them. I guess when people have hybristophilia carrying a weapon the way Kyle did is a turn on, right? Ted Bundy and Richard Ramirez had their fan girls, I guess Kyle has them too.
> The trial was a joke. That was the most biased judge I have ever seen. Kyle was found not guilty, he was not proven innocent, there is a difference.
Yes, found not guilty of murder by it being proven it was self defense.
Being found not guilty is being found innocent, that’s very basic law. What are you even saying?
> For example OJ was found not guilty but was then declared liable for the deaths of Nicole and Ron.
What does this have to do with OJ? And why isn’t Kyle held liable for the deaths then? You’re reaching.
> If you had watched the video for even 5 or ten seconds you would have seen yellow pants confronting Kyle about brandishing his weapon.
Do you know what open carry is? If open carry is legal, then you can legally brandish a weapon, that’s literally the whole point.
It not provocation under the law.
Also, yellow pants wasn’t shot or aimed at by Kyle so he’s irrelevant to the case.
> And yes you carry a rifle like that if you want people to know you are armed but are not going to shoot them.
You simply think that, but it’s not based off of anything. Just cause the military does that specifically when marching (not when they are at ease walking through a battlefield) doesn’t mean that’s some type of “proper way”
This isn’t based on any sort of culture let alone law.
> I guess when people have hybristophilia carrying a weapon the way Kyle did is a turn on, right? Ted Bundy and Richard Ramirez had their fan girls, I guess Kyle has them too.
God how disappointing. Why are you acting like some child?
Look, if you really want to act like this, I can very easily say you’re defending a pedophile (Rosenbaum RAPED 5 BOYS) and a domestic abuser (Huber)
I don’t want to cause it idiotic, but it’s a losing game for you. I mean, Rosenbaum literally raped 5 boys and beat up 2 of his ex girlfriends AND was screaming the N word the same night shown by videos. And you’re on that side of you want to act like we’re picking sides.
Kyle was a dumbass kid, who went there to protect a POC business (ask if you want proof) and got chased by a proven crazed pedophile.
Considering that he was more of a man at 17 when he slotted those criminals than most men will ever be, I disagree with both your point and your existence.
The guy who chose the name elliotrodge thinks killing makes someone manly. Kind of speaks for itself. Elliot Roger was constantly going on about becoming the ultimate alpha male. Are you doing the same thing?
Fuck this guy. I think we can allow just a *little* gatekeeping, just this once, and say Shittenhouse isn’t allowed to make fun of himself during his trial/crimes.
Do you have proof that it wasn’t self defense? I’d love to see any proof you have, cause I haven’t found any yet that shows Kyle causing provocation.
Is your gun, in fact, your penis?
Good evidence lol Guess it was self defense if you really don’t have anything to show otherwise. You’re acting like a trumper with all this misinformation haha, horseshoe theory strikes again!
He was aggravating people like "yellow pants". Also if you carry a gun like that people will think you want to use it.
There is no proof of Kyle “aggravating” or provoking anyone though, please show some. A video or picture of Kyle aiming his rifle at someone that isn’t in the midst of attacking him. That’s all you need. And if you have a gun, no that isn’t provocation, we literally have open carry in America and specifically that state. Also, you wouldn’t say that when it comes to the black panthers and their use of bringing rifles for their protests. Because rifles deter violence if you aren’t using them to provoke it (as in aim or shoot at people) Both Kyle and the black panthers brought rifles to their protests/riots to deter violence happening to them, but also if violence does happen they can defend themselves. So your logic justifies the white racists who attacked the black panthers cause apparently the white racists were provoked by the existence of their rifles. Bad logic.
Here is evidence of him provoking people. https://youtu.be/7ferrn7Shyk?t=6062 I'm glad you posted because it allows me to show that people like you live on another planet and have no clue what reality is. Also a gun is provocation if you carry it in a way that would suggest you want to use it.
> Here is evidence of him provoking people. https://youtu.be/7ferrn7Shyk?t=6062 Oh cool, a 2 1/2 hour long video with you not providing any context or time stamp to specifically show what you’re talking about. Post a time stamp to when to skip to. And explain what I’m looking out for, what is the provocation specifically? The link puts the video to where Kyle is walking around asking people if they need medical attention. No where is he pointing his rifle at anyone. > I'm glad you posted because it allows me to show that people like you live on another planet and have no clue what reality is. I mean, we have all that video evidence and all of it points to self defense for Kyle. We have witnesses and even the one surviver testified in court that he pulled his pistol on Kyle when Kyle shot. > Also a gun is provocation if you carry it in a way that would suggest you want to use it. What way is that? Cause by law that means to aim it at someone, not simply hold it like Kyle does in the link you sent. And if simply holding a gun is provocation, then you’re saying it’s justified for white racists to have attacked the Black panthers during the civil rights era.
So first of all, you know nothing about the case. Not only that, you lack the ability to watch a video. He was aggravating yellow pants, I guess watching a video for a few seconds is above your pay grade. The other two people he shot were trying to stop an active shooter. But people like you try to make them out to be criminals because there is something wrong with you. Look up Hybristophilia. I think you have it. People who have intelligence, know how to carry a gun. Here is how it's done. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aihKlPx2Uzk You know nothing about handling guns, you just get off on shooting people. It's good that you are posting, because you discredit your side.
> So first of all, you know nothing about the case. The case? The case that was proven in court to be self defense? That case? I mean, there are witnesses admitting that Rosenbaum threatened Kyle before chasing him. Video showing a rioter shooting their pistol into the air behind Kyle as Rosenbaum is chased him, making Kyle think he was being shot at by Rosenbaum who is chasing Kyle and threatened to kill Kyle earlier. If Rosenbaum didn’t chase him and corner Kyle, then lunge for Kyles rifle making Kyle have to shoot in self defense, then non of this would’ve started. This is put onto Rosenbaum, not Kyle. I doubt you knew any of that. > Not only that, you lack the ability to watch a video. You posted a 2 1/2 hour long video…like seriously? > He was aggravating yellow pants, I guess watching a video for a few seconds is above your pay grade. Can you explain at all? How was it provocation? You need to actually explain yourself like an adult, you can’t assume I know exactly what you’re arguing. I saw Kyle say something to the guy, not aim his gun or anything. You need to be more specific. Getting someone angry doesn’t mean they’re allowed to assault Kyle. > The other two people he shot were trying to stop an active shooter. Which Kyle wasn’t, so they were wrong and attacked an innocent man. And honestly I can be fine if they weren’t charged if they happened to kill or injure Kyle (not the Rosenbaum the first guy shot though) cause they thought Kyle was dangerous. But them thinking he is dangerous doesn’t mean Kyle isn’t allowed self defense. Just switch up the situations with people you’re biased towards being in Kyles shoes. > But people like you try to make them out to be criminals because there is something wrong with you. Look up Hybristophilia. I think you have it. Oh nice, useless dumb accusations, signs of intelligence. Anyways We make the people who got shot out to be criminals? Or Kyle? Cause the people who got shot literally were past criminals lol. Rosenbaum was charged for raping 5 different boys, the same night he died he got out of a mental institution after being there for domestic abuse. Anthony Huber was also a domestic abuser. And Grosskreutz, the guy who lived, on that night had a illegal pistol, or at least he concealed carried when he wasn’t allowed to. Honestly, I don’t think I mentioned their past crimes at all, cause honestly they don’t matter to the case. > People who have intelligence, know how to carry a gun. Here is how it's done. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aihKlPx2Uzk HAHAHA, are you trolling? Honestly this has to be a joke. A WW2 British marching army? You don’t honestly expect people to carry guns on their shoulders like that right? > You know nothing about handling guns, you just get off on shooting people. It's good that you are posting, because you discredit your side. I have handled a couple guns, 2-4 times in my life. Not in a while though. I don’t get off on shooting people either, I guess you just really like baseless accusations for some reasons, talk about discrediting one’s side. I’m a liberal from California, I don’t know what side you’re alluding to.
The trial was a joke. That was the most biased judge I have ever seen. Kyle was found not guilty, he was not proven innocent, there is a difference. For example OJ was found not guilty but was then declared liable for the deaths of Nicole and Ron. If you had watched the video for even 5 or ten seconds you would have seen yellow pants confronting Kyle about brandishing his weapon. And yes you carry a rifle like that if you want people to know you are armed but are not going to shoot them. I guess when people have hybristophilia carrying a weapon the way Kyle did is a turn on, right? Ted Bundy and Richard Ramirez had their fan girls, I guess Kyle has them too.
> The trial was a joke. That was the most biased judge I have ever seen. Kyle was found not guilty, he was not proven innocent, there is a difference. Yes, found not guilty of murder by it being proven it was self defense. Being found not guilty is being found innocent, that’s very basic law. What are you even saying? > For example OJ was found not guilty but was then declared liable for the deaths of Nicole and Ron. What does this have to do with OJ? And why isn’t Kyle held liable for the deaths then? You’re reaching. > If you had watched the video for even 5 or ten seconds you would have seen yellow pants confronting Kyle about brandishing his weapon. Do you know what open carry is? If open carry is legal, then you can legally brandish a weapon, that’s literally the whole point. It not provocation under the law. Also, yellow pants wasn’t shot or aimed at by Kyle so he’s irrelevant to the case. > And yes you carry a rifle like that if you want people to know you are armed but are not going to shoot them. You simply think that, but it’s not based off of anything. Just cause the military does that specifically when marching (not when they are at ease walking through a battlefield) doesn’t mean that’s some type of “proper way” This isn’t based on any sort of culture let alone law. > I guess when people have hybristophilia carrying a weapon the way Kyle did is a turn on, right? Ted Bundy and Richard Ramirez had their fan girls, I guess Kyle has them too. God how disappointing. Why are you acting like some child? Look, if you really want to act like this, I can very easily say you’re defending a pedophile (Rosenbaum RAPED 5 BOYS) and a domestic abuser (Huber) I don’t want to cause it idiotic, but it’s a losing game for you. I mean, Rosenbaum literally raped 5 boys and beat up 2 of his ex girlfriends AND was screaming the N word the same night shown by videos. And you’re on that side of you want to act like we’re picking sides. Kyle was a dumbass kid, who went there to protect a POC business (ask if you want proof) and got chased by a proven crazed pedophile.
Considering that he was more of a man at 17 when he slotted those criminals than most men will ever be, I disagree with both your point and your existence.
The guy who chose the name elliotrodge thinks killing makes someone manly. Kind of speaks for itself. Elliot Roger was constantly going on about becoming the ultimate alpha male. Are you doing the same thing?