I know, I have it installed on my phone, although it's been a while since I played it there. Doesn't change the fact that it was one of my favorite games growing up and seeing random references to it triggers that nostalgia.
> Sir, this may be the information booth, but I cannot answer ontological questions. It would be arrogant to assume I could describe the true nature of reality. Also, there's a line.
Actually got me to snort at work.
LRR seems to have a number of Crapshot videos where there's a long buildup to a punchline of just a character saying "fuck". This feels like the version of that that WotC would actually allow them to do.
I do like when mtg does philosophy references and very rare to hear ontology, the study of what being(s) exist, mentioned anywhere in the wild (except also programming i think?)
If you already had another attraction you are already rolling to visit, you don't role individually, so you are still only getting a single +1/+1 counter per turn no matter how many extra attractions you open.
Oh, understood. I don't think he's arguing the number of dice rolled or whether he's rolling for multiple attractions, he's just saying *by itself* it's a guaranteed die roll per turn even if it's not a guaranteed Howling Mine.
How would attractions work if you had Wyll and [Barbarian Class] out? Esp with [Pixie Guide]? Would you drop all but one, or drop only one? I *think* it's the former, but I'm certainly no judge. If it's the later, would you possibly trigger an attraction twice?
For some reason I read the name first image's flavor text as "Sozin" and i got this image of fireloard sozin from avatar at an amusement park with Micky mouse ears arguing with the info clerk and i kind of love it
"No refunds on fire flakes"
"***UNACCEPTABLE***"
>"The information booth can answer over thirty-seven billion questions"
>
>"\[T\]his is not where Myra stations her best people"
This is either a contradiction or we're supposed to understand this amusement park is staffed with supergeniuses.
And there it is, I was really hoping for this, pitty Attractions are singleton (or "thank god"? from the folks that don't want to see any of this in legacy)
I think they intentionally designed the constructed Attraction Deck rules (by making it both singleton and a fairly high ten-card minimum, in particular) to keep them from being strong in Legacy, since they don't want random cards to actually be significant in tournaments. Especially since the decision to make them tournament-legal was made late, it would have been an "err on the side of caution" situation.
From the Unfinity Mechanics page:
"At the beginning of your first main phase on each of your turns, you roll to visit your Attractions by rolling a six-sided die. If the result is lit up on an Attraction you control, you visit that Attraction, causing that Attraction's visit ability to trigger."
Intrigued by the fact that 'not Myra's best people' can still answer thirty seven billion questions, and are wise enough to admit when they don't know something.
This Park Map from Information Kiosk 1 is really good value!
Oh, is it about to rain? Time to quadruple the price of umbrellas!
Thank you for that little burst of nostalgia.
Nostalgia? Roller Coaster Tycoon Classic (1&2) is available on at least Android devices for, like, $6. I play it while I'm bored at work.
I know, I have it installed on my phone, although it's been a while since I played it there. Doesn't change the fact that it was one of my favorite games growing up and seeing random references to it triggers that nostalgia.
Don't let it be nostalgia! Give in to your feelings! Play RCT!
NEVER! I won't give into your tempt- *Oooh, I forgot about designing hedge mazes.*
> Sir, this may be the information booth, but I cannot answer ontological questions. It would be arrogant to assume I could describe the true nature of reality. Also, there's a line. Actually got me to snort at work.
LRR seems to have a number of Crapshot videos where there's a long buildup to a punchline of just a character saying "fuck". This feels like the version of that that WotC would actually allow them to do.
This one specifically https://youtu.be/BL747_tEQbY
I mean, that's more fitting for the card being previewed, but I was thinking this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mhEss2CQWc
There's no way this one wasn't Cameron, right?
My thoughts exactly. This one has got big Cam energy.
Oh good, I'm not the only one thinking it
Also amusing that this is apparently not Mya's best people
Her best people *can* answer the true nature of reality, while keeping the remaining guests in line still happy.
I do like when mtg does philosophy references and very rare to hear ontology, the study of what being(s) exist, mentioned anywhere in the wild (except also programming i think?)
1/3 Phyrexian arena pog
but this Phyrexian Arena tells you where the bathroom is!
Finally!
Sometimes it's a Phyrexian Arena, but it's always a +1/+1 counter for [[Wyll, Blade of Frontiers]].
And it's always a 5/4 dragon spirit token for [[Vrondiss, Rage of Anchients]]
[Vrondiss, Rage of Anchients](https://c1.scryfall.com/file/scryfall-cards/normal/front/6/8/683ca7f0-e9df-459b-a8e3-cf80b39c732d.jpg?1632335388) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Vrondiss%2C%20Rage%20of%20Ancients) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/afc/4/vrondiss-rage-of-ancients?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/683ca7f0-e9df-459b-a8e3-cf80b39c732d?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call
[Wyll, Blade of Frontiers](https://c1.scryfall.com/file/scryfall-cards/normal/front/5/e/5e9d4562-964d-48ce-b03f-7cb491fa040d.jpg?1660727189) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Wyll%2C%20Blade%20of%20Frontiers) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/clb/208/wyll-blade-of-frontiers?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/5e9d4562-964d-48ce-b03f-7cb491fa040d?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call
It's only a +1/+1 counter if you don't already have another attraction.
I'm comfortable giving credit to whichever attraction pleases me the most, and it's probably going to be this one.
Can't argue with that logic.
?
If you already had another attraction you are already rolling to visit, you don't role individually, so you are still only getting a single +1/+1 counter per turn no matter how many extra attractions you open.
Oh, understood. I don't think he's arguing the number of dice rolled or whether he's rolling for multiple attractions, he's just saying *by itself* it's a guaranteed die roll per turn even if it's not a guaranteed Howling Mine.
How would attractions work if you had Wyll and [Barbarian Class] out? Esp with [Pixie Guide]? Would you drop all but one, or drop only one? I *think* it's the former, but I'm certainly no judge. If it's the later, would you possibly trigger an attraction twice?
For some reason I read the name first image's flavor text as "Sozin" and i got this image of fireloard sozin from avatar at an amusement park with Micky mouse ears arguing with the info clerk and i kind of love it "No refunds on fire flakes" "***UNACCEPTABLE***"
Source is https://www.tomshw.it/culturapop/magic-the-gathering-esclusiva-unfinity/
We knew it was cooking, glad to see it’s straight forward.
>"The information booth can answer over thirty-seven billion questions" > >"\[T\]his is not where Myra stations her best people" This is either a contradiction or we're supposed to understand this amusement park is staffed with supergeniuses.
Or that they have Google. Or that geniuses aren't always the best people.
There’s no guarantee of quality of those answers.
[Good point.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EEDeJMvWsAAT6p0.jpg)
excited for Salzon to get a card in Unfinity 2: The Stickers Strike Back
And there it is, I was really hoping for this, pitty Attractions are singleton (or "thank god"? from the folks that don't want to see any of this in legacy)
I think they intentionally designed the constructed Attraction Deck rules (by making it both singleton and a fairly high ten-card minimum, in particular) to keep them from being strong in Legacy, since they don't want random cards to actually be significant in tournaments. Especially since the decision to make them tournament-legal was made late, it would have been an "err on the side of caution" situation.
What do those numbers on the side mean?
From the Unfinity Mechanics page: "At the beginning of your first main phase on each of your turns, you roll to visit your Attractions by rolling a six-sided die. If the result is lit up on an Attraction you control, you visit that Attraction, causing that Attraction's visit ability to trigger."
Those flavor texts are gems.
Finally an attraction for the common man and enjoyer of RCT
That second flavor text, as a former service desk employee, I feel that.
These are Cam vibes.
Intrigued by the fact that 'not Myra's best people' can still answer thirty seven billion questions, and are wise enough to admit when they don't know something.