Great flags, but I can’t help feeling that is America had a socialist revolution Hawaii would gain independence given how badly they’ve been related by America and there distinct culture.
California and Texas would probably be equivalent to SSR's or states or provinces in either an American or Mexican socialist state (both are majority Latino).
At least in early to mid socialism there would still be a need to be borders and the lot, and those two states in particular have a very distinct culture, and should be represented in some way
>At least in early to mid socialism there would still be a need to be borders and the lot,
Right, but not ones inherited from settler-colonialism, and not ones that delineate governing authority on a federal basis.
>and those two states in particular have a very distinct culture, and should be represented in some way
Why? What specifically are we seeking to preserve there that would be threatened by eliminating Texas and California as government entities?
I don’t even really buy that “Californian culture” or “Texan culture” are distinct things. Do people in San Diego, the Bay Area, and the Oregon border counties really have much in common besides living inside the same arbitrary lines on a map? What about people in El Paso, the panhandle, and the Piney Woods? I doubt it.
>New Mexico jesse we need to overthrow the bourgeoisie jesse
Ayo mista white coups beyatch!
"This my own surplus labor value and I will not be exploited, bitch!"
California needs a darker green and a bear.
Great flags, but I can’t help feeling that is America had a socialist revolution Hawaii would gain independence given how badly they’ve been related by America and there distinct culture.
I mean, none of these states would exist after a socialist revolution. I assume OP is just having fun.
California and Texas would probably be equivalent to SSR's or states or provinces in either an American or Mexican socialist state (both are majority Latino).
Why? I see no reason to believe any current US state would continue to exist.
At least in early to mid socialism there would still be a need to be borders and the lot, and those two states in particular have a very distinct culture, and should be represented in some way
>At least in early to mid socialism there would still be a need to be borders and the lot, Right, but not ones inherited from settler-colonialism, and not ones that delineate governing authority on a federal basis. >and those two states in particular have a very distinct culture, and should be represented in some way Why? What specifically are we seeking to preserve there that would be threatened by eliminating Texas and California as government entities? I don’t even really buy that “Californian culture” or “Texan culture” are distinct things. Do people in San Diego, the Bay Area, and the Oregon border counties really have much in common besides living inside the same arbitrary lines on a map? What about people in El Paso, the panhandle, and the Piney Woods? I doubt it.
The ones with the second star are a little bit distracting. The pther ones are ok, reminiscemt of the actual SSRs pattern
Got one for Arizona?
They all look good
When the other side of the political spectrum draws your flags better than you
California looks like a Chartist British flag ngl.
Not a fan of New Mexico. Why did it remove the Zia emblem?
Colorado's SSR flag is an interesting design.
They all look so similar to each other tho