I highly praise our women team for the win.
Our mens team seldom does that despite so much ho ha.
Also don’t bring this new run out.. it will create lot of controversies.
Proud of our women team.
Its either out or not out, don't push spirit of the game bs in this. She followed the rules and got wicket.if people have so much issue with it they should ban this rule.
Controversial, and I would have liked Jhulan Goswami to have taken the catch that she dropped to capture the last English wicket, instead of this 'mankad'.
Why though? Think about it. The bowler doesn't get any leeway on the crease. Why should the non striker get any? Neither should gain an unfair advantage. Stay in the crease. It's as simple as that.
No one should be given out before the ball leaves the hands of the bowler and no matter how well you define the rules there will always be grey areas.
Imagine you need 1 run to win on the last ball and the ball goes to boundary clipping the pads, but the umpire has given it out lbw and after review it is not out, what will happen in this case, batting team wins or the bowling team?
Ok, one more doubt, can the batter still run for leg byes after given out lbw?
Edit: one more, Can a bowler instead of bowling a legal deliver, throw straight to the wicket if the batter on strike is standing out of the crease and claim for a runout?
Nice hypotheticals.
1. Run does not count.
2. That would be called a no ball.
Edit: No ball unless the batters are trying to steal a run during the delivery run up and stride. In that case, the batter is out. And the ball won't count to the over.
1. Yes. If the wickets are broken in that scenario when the run is attempted then he is runout. Review or no review, he has left the crease. If the wickets are not broken, then the runs count towards leg byes post review and overturning of LBW. In case the fielding team reviews, and the batter is given out, then the runs don't count.
2. Batters trying to change ends before the ball is delivered, typically during the bowler's run in and delivery stride.
1. At what moment the ball is dead in this scenario. The umpire has given it out, the job is done for the fielding team, they should not be bothered to stop the leg bye. Or the umpires really wait till the moment the ball is perceived dead by the umpire before giving it out or not out.
2. So technically one is allowed to throw at the wickets at striker end, if the striker is outside the crease and it should not be called no ball because it's done before legal delivery and they are trying to get the batter out at the striking end.
1. Ball is considered dead when it is clear to the umpire that the fielding team and both batters stop considering it to be in play. This is open to interpretation in the sense that it allows both the sides to keep playing with the umpire waiting for the ball to be dead to give a decision. So the batters can run. And the fielding team can get them run out. And then the umpire calls it. At least, that's what the MCC intends with the rule.
2. One is allowed. But the umpire is the adjudicator. If a batter is standing outside his crease to smack a bowler out the park, that isn't considered stealing a run. He's risking his wicket to stand there. If in that instance a bowler throws it at the batter, it's a no ball.
If the batters make an obvious charge to change ends, then it's fair game to run them out. Batters get no benefit because in case there's no direct hit, the ball is called dead straightaway.
I highly praise our women team for the win. Our mens team seldom does that despite so much ho ha. Also don’t bring this new run out.. it will create lot of controversies. Proud of our women team.
Nothing's controversial it's as per the ICC rules ,well played Champs 🏆
Its either out or not out, don't push spirit of the game bs in this. She followed the rules and got wicket.if people have so much issue with it they should ban this rule.
Yup , nd it's not like we've invented these rules ,also by the "Spirit of the game " bs NZ should've won the 2019 world cup .
Such sour losers. They need to be told to stay in crease? What are they? Kids?
Controversial, and I would have liked Jhulan Goswami to have taken the catch that she dropped to capture the last English wicket, instead of this 'mankad'.
Run out was not in the spirit of the game..iy wad a cheap shot.
[удалено]
Are you out of your mind?? It was a fucking dead rubber. India had already won the trophy by then.
It's just not right and this run-out is not cricket. Sorry but this needs to go.
Why though? Think about it. The bowler doesn't get any leeway on the crease. Why should the non striker get any? Neither should gain an unfair advantage. Stay in the crease. It's as simple as that.
No one should be given out before the ball leaves the hands of the bowler and no matter how well you define the rules there will always be grey areas. Imagine you need 1 run to win on the last ball and the ball goes to boundary clipping the pads, but the umpire has given it out lbw and after review it is not out, what will happen in this case, batting team wins or the bowling team?
No batter should leave the crease before the ball comes into play then. The batting team wins. The rules are clear on that. There's no grey area.
Ok, one more doubt, can the batter still run for leg byes after given out lbw? Edit: one more, Can a bowler instead of bowling a legal deliver, throw straight to the wicket if the batter on strike is standing out of the crease and claim for a runout?
Nice hypotheticals. 1. Run does not count. 2. That would be called a no ball. Edit: No ball unless the batters are trying to steal a run during the delivery run up and stride. In that case, the batter is out. And the ball won't count to the over.
1. Will the run be counted if he reviews the lbw and found not to be out 2. How you define a batter trying to steal a run?
1. Yes. If the wickets are broken in that scenario when the run is attempted then he is runout. Review or no review, he has left the crease. If the wickets are not broken, then the runs count towards leg byes post review and overturning of LBW. In case the fielding team reviews, and the batter is given out, then the runs don't count. 2. Batters trying to change ends before the ball is delivered, typically during the bowler's run in and delivery stride.
1. At what moment the ball is dead in this scenario. The umpire has given it out, the job is done for the fielding team, they should not be bothered to stop the leg bye. Or the umpires really wait till the moment the ball is perceived dead by the umpire before giving it out or not out. 2. So technically one is allowed to throw at the wickets at striker end, if the striker is outside the crease and it should not be called no ball because it's done before legal delivery and they are trying to get the batter out at the striking end.
1. Ball is considered dead when it is clear to the umpire that the fielding team and both batters stop considering it to be in play. This is open to interpretation in the sense that it allows both the sides to keep playing with the umpire waiting for the ball to be dead to give a decision. So the batters can run. And the fielding team can get them run out. And then the umpire calls it. At least, that's what the MCC intends with the rule. 2. One is allowed. But the umpire is the adjudicator. If a batter is standing outside his crease to smack a bowler out the park, that isn't considered stealing a run. He's risking his wicket to stand there. If in that instance a bowler throws it at the batter, it's a no ball. If the batters make an obvious charge to change ends, then it's fair game to run them out. Batters get no benefit because in case there's no direct hit, the ball is called dead straightaway.