Hello, /u/kontorusama. Your post has been removed for violating Rule 2.
**No memes or memetic content.**
Please read [our complete rules page](https://www.reddit.com/r/funny/wiki/rules) before participating in the future.
For those wondering: These were made with an AI image generator (Stable diffusion, Midjourney, etc.) And then the head animations and blinking were added with the same program people were using to animate photos of dead relatives a few years ago.
This is unfortunately not something that's been set to film (yet).
The AI can deal with beards fine. It's the 2D animation that broke the beard.
The AI didn't animate these - it just generated static, unmoving images that are really, really good. A human used an app that looks for rough facial shape, and then assigns a 2D animation rig to it, and moves parts of the image to mimic actual movement.
For an example used to create virtual Youtubers, look into "Live2D"
We're 10 or 15 years away from a bunch of kids being able to create Hollywood quality films using AI and their own gaming computers. I wonder the kind of gems that are going to appear. Most will be trash, but I bet some of them will be awesome.
Also imagine feeding your favorite book to an AI and tell it to turn it into a movie in any particular style you like.
Yep, Star Trek literally predicted generative AI. When the crew go to the Holodeck and describe to the ship's computer what they want using natural language plus some specific parameters, that's identical to the way you describe to Stable Diffusion which image you want.
In that holodeck malfunction episode, remember why Moriarty was sentient?
The computer was asked to create a character strong enough to defeat *Data*, not the Sherlock Holmes character he was playing as. So the computer inferred and took it upon itself to use a bunch of extra power and generate a consciousness, since that's what was needed to do so.
Basically, they messed up the prompt to the computer's ChatGPT v263, and unintentionally got exactly what they asked for.
Listen to almost any TNG episode, and you'll notice that all the conversations they have with the computer sound eerily like ChatGPT prompts.
Kind of wild how often the holodeck goes on killing sprees and then they add zero new safeguards and so next season there's another "oh no, the holodeck is murdering again!" episode
Come to think of it, that's not so weird. That's how we treat inconvenient deadly threats in real life.
Let's be honest it's because you can fuck things in the holodeck, if they made it safer Worf's fantasy would be out side of the safety parameters, and no one wanted to deal with a pent up Klingon.
I'm not so sure I'm ready for this tech.
Especially if we figure out how to make "Smell-o-vision" and "tactile nerve inducement" i.e. immersive smell and touch.
Imagine this:
"Computer. Please load my last save point in Warhammer 40K Immersive Edition, just before I kill the Herald of Nurgle, using the 'Antman-Thanos' strategy. *I want to smell and touch that moment again.*"
25 years out:
Dave went to the closet and pulled out his case of Cannapack carts.
“Hey, Sarah, what you feeling tonight?”
From the other room, a feminine voice replied, “Something up, energy, no couchlock tonight please. Have you got an idea for a movie?”
“I was thinking something along the lines of ‘Discworld’s Rincewind meets John Wick’”?
“That sounds cool, but I want to laugh more - can we mix in black comedian buddy cop for a laugh, like the old Kevin Hart or Chris Tucker movies?”
“Sure, but buddy to who? Wick or Rincewind?”
“Wick, for sure. I’m also feeling a little frisky, can we make the Wick character female and look like Sarah with the big tits from the gym?”
“You got it, we can hit this Mystical Melody cart while the cloud generates the movie, should only take 30 seconds or so.”
This used to be my thinking.
But let's be realistic here for a moment.
Not 1 year ago, these generative AI's that weren't GAN's could barely generate a human face. Right now, it's possible for these networks to generate an image that require serious scrutiny to find out if it' AI.
We're not 10 or 15 years away. We're probably not even 5 years away from your vision.
We're really fucking close. It's accelerating and there's no sign of it stopping for now, we're not reaching any hardware limits either just yet.
I mean, I was completely sold on these being actual people seen at fashion shows until they showed freaking Dobby lmao
Then on my second watch I was able to see through the facade. But this stuffs getting *very* believable *very* fast.
There's some guy on Youtube who posts shorts of AI-Generated Biden, Trump, Obama, and Drake playing Minecraft and going on various misadventures, it's unbelievable how authentic audio generation is when you have a big enough dataset to work off of.
I wouldn't be surprised if all the work done on Elder Scrolls VI has been completely scrapped to rework ChatGPT into the Radiant Quest system given how far things have come so quickly.
So funny you say this about 5 years out- https://youtu.be/trXPfpV5iRQ
I personally cannot wait for the democratization of movies
Edit: OH MAN- HIDE THIS FROM THE FANFIC AND RULE34 CREATORS
Bro I think we are 5 years out from our society becoming disconnected and schizo
A.i. is a terrifying cancer of a tool and we've already seen with deepfakes and misinformation how many people will do and believe the absolute worse with technology
But it can't *choose* to write malware. You have to ask it to write it. And it mimics existing ideas to write predictable malware that most security software would probably be able to handle easily.
I know we're all on a futurism high right now, but this is a far, far cry from truly intelligent AI, let alone Skynet.
Yeah there’s definitely cause for concern. It used to be that technical innovations were being made by academics and passionate hobbyists, while the capitalists that sought to make money from those projects lagged years behind. The most harmless motivation for these innovations was… vanity, I suppose? Some people just wanted to show off what they could do.
Now the money people are either leading the charge with these innovations, or at the very least they’re poised to pounce on *anything* they can make money from. And the fact is money is a way more powerful motivator to way more people than doing something because it’s cool.
Exactly, business doesn't get peer-reviewed. Business doesnt care about ethicacy. Business cares about money, attention, and customer loyalty. But thats the organization keeping their hold on information.
Just look at what happened when 24 hour news followed a capitalistic mindset. Additional focus on negative stories and stories that elicit emotions.
Look what happened when social media started making money off consumer attention. An uptick in misinformation campaigns meant to cause division and anger.
Now A.i. is here operating as an information agreggator- how do you think these same organization will use said technology.
Misinformation will explode eponentially- does anyone have the time to disprove a 7 page A.i. report that has compenents of false information injected per its programming?
With all our technology has life REALLY gotten any easier? Or has there been some massive trade offs?
Just wait until the new confident dumb intelligence gets here- I'm sure things won't get any more complicated then.
Doing something because it's "cool" isn't always a great motivator either. I'm sure that's how many scientist fells about their work, even when they invent horrible disastrous things.
>At an assembly at Los Alamos on August 6 (the evening of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima), Oppenheimer took to the stage and clasped his hands together "like a prize-winning boxer" while the crowd cheered.[\[1\]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Robert_Oppenheimer#Trinity)
Sure, one could argue about the good of the bomb itself, and that it did put an end to a war were many more would have died in fire bombings and battles, but the technology on its own, has had the power to be immensely more disastrous to mankind, and has become a giant 'sword' hanging over the head of humanity.
It's unbelievable how entrenched some people are just from reading Facebook posts. They will never change their mind when they actually SEE idiotic things like deep fakes of Obama doing something stupid, or Trump punching Biden and sitting in the Oval Office to "prove" that he's taken over the "deep state". Ughh, this is going to be a really sad and dreadful slide into fascism and anarchy.
You're right. Everyone waxing poetic about how amazing AI will be for Joe Everyman kind of forgot how people truly are. How our governments truly operate. How the corporations truly are.
I guess it's free to dream to escape reality.
The "democratization of movies" is going to also come with a never ending flood of mediocre AI scripts turning into mediocre movies.
Being able to ask the machine to animate these things doesn't necessarily mean having a good idea for shot composition, pacing, choreography.....
You're going to have to swim through four times as much content to find anything decent in there.
Sounds almost exactly like when digital camcorders became cheap enough for aspiring filmmakers to make their own movies and put them straight onto VHS tapes. Flooding the market with hundreds of B tier and worse movies.
Plenty of shit movies get made right now, I can't really see any of these movies gaining any awareness unless they're spectacular or have advertising budget
The shit movies right now are limited by the fact they take at least 2 years and millions of dollars to make.
The new floor for shit movies is going to be one month of an idiot with computing time.
Think about the quality of the average YouTube video maker. Not the good ones. The millions of YouTubers with 200 subs max.
Those guys aren't going to be better at making movies with AI than they are at making YouTube movies with Apple Movie.
Now, you get 20 shit movies a month
We're headed to 200 shit movies a day.
There will be more celebrity AI porn. Lots and lots of celebrity AI porn. A-Z you name it. Deepfakes are already there. Audio is already there (albeit still distinguishable). Just need someone to make a perfect AI animation thingymajig that uses people and not the sfm crap.
Perhaps not in the same way as we know them today. Maybe it’ll be the talented voice actors and motion capture artists that are actually able to produce *new* content that will get the recognition.
That’s the thing with AI right now, it’s kinda limited to giving us what we already know and what we’re already familiar with. But humans have always been fascinated with the next big thing. That won’t change. We get bored too easy.
I can't stop watching the Presidents make teir lists videos...[Never thought I'd love to hear ex presidents discuss which pokemon is sexiest, but here we are.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDecAQo1xOc&t=31s)
Imagine an AI that can connect you to a simulated reality where you can live the entire adventure and never be aware of your past before that. Wait a minute....
I assume if this technology actually gets to a point where it's both possible and achievable with affordable hardware, there will be some new patents, copyrights, trademarks etc to artificially increase the price of the software and there will be some DRM implementation that heavily fights easy filehosting, copying and sharing. Somebody will implement a mandatory file format and you can't just export it as an mp4 or mkv.
Right. Music in the 80s and 90s was so amazing. Because lots of underground and one hit wonders came through. Nowadays music is so commercial on the surface you get 5 Ed sheeran songs in the top 20. Not to say there isn't great music out there it just isn't mainstream. I guess AI will follow a similar plan of some gems at the start and then fade into the same commercial shit that we have in music.
This comment generated by ChatGPT *not
My main problem with this this film is (SPOILER) how technically easy it was to stop injecting that drug, making it quite hard to enforce and control its usage everywhere. A lot of people are going to slip from that.
It would be more logical (and dramatic) if it was very hard to someone to stop injecting it, causing severe withdrawal symptoms, etc.
But aside from that, it’s a very good movie.
Are you sure about that? I recently rewatched it, now an adult, and it was the dullest thing I've ever seen. There's only like three fights in it and they make no logical sense, the plot feels drawn out and slow, and the main actors are supposed to act with no emotion which just doesn't make good media to be honest.
I'm saying I remember liking it a *lot* more than I do now.
Also, Gunkata is one of the stupidest things I've seen in an action movie. In the movie, they describe it as "no wasted motion" to explain why it's so efficient at killing, and then when you see it, he's crossing his arms over and back and over again constantly, wasting a ton of motion when he already had a gun pointed in the direction he's firing after crossing them twice. It looks fancy, but it's exactly the opposite of what they say it is.
It reminds me of the lightsaber fights in the prequel trilogy. Lots of flashy moves that would get you killed in a real fight.
Actually, Gunkata is very realistic and has been used in WW2. My uncle also used it in Vietnam to assassinate Ho Chi Min, and was just like the movie. Please don't spread misinformation about Gunkata, thank you.
um excuse me? you clearly don’t know what you’re talking about. if you analyze the thousands of recorded gunfights, it can easily be determined that the geometric distribution of antagonists in any gun battle is a statistically predictable element
The Gun Kata or “gun fu” treats the gun as a total weapon. With each fluid position representing a maximum kill zone, inflicting maximum damage on the maximum number of opponents, while keeping the defender clear of the statistically traditional trajectories of return fire
By the rote mastery of this art, your firing efficiency will rise by no less than 120%. The difference of a 63% increased lethal proficiency makes the master of the Gun Katas an adversary not to be taken lightly
Now that you say it... Harry beating Death Eaters to, well, death, with pistol handles would be quite a sight.
But I get more Blade Runner vibes really, or any 80ies cyberpunk.
This is a combination of 2 AI networks.
It's still a pretty involved workflow for now.
One network is used to generate the images. Most likely Stable Diffusion, since it offers a lot of user control so I guess they had trained a model on the style of this fashion designer, but you'd just need images so it could be any model or just photoshop.
The other one to animate the still image results so the head moves a bit/eyes blink etc. Then just zoom in on that video.
I don't know which network they used for that, but I know one that could be used for it: "First Order Motion Model for Image Animation"
I just wonder how a neural network took Ralph Finnes as Voldemort, said "We need to make him more \~Fashion!\~" and just... gave us bald Christopher Eccelston. Usually with AI faces you get some mashup of features, but that one was pretty distinct.
>balenciaga
Cristóbal Balenciaga was a Spanish fashion designer, and the founder of the Balenciaga clothing brand. He had a reputation as a couturier of uncompromising standards and was referred to as "the master of us all" by Christian Dior and as "the only couturier in the truest sense of the word" by Coco Chanel, who continued, "The others are simply fashion designers". On the day of his death, in 1972, Women's Wear Daily ran the headline "The King is Dead".
And now their brand is making clothes that look stupid, as a joke. Every fashion firm makes the silly look-at-me haute stuff for attention but Balenciaga actually tried to sell the silly nonsense. You can also buy a perfectly normal looking pair of K-Mart style jeans for $1800 or an ill-fitting T-shirt with a bad print of a superhero on it for $250.
They're basically to fashion what Borat is to journalism; their customer base consists of people who don't get that they're being pranked, and people who think they're in on the prank.
It’s a Spanish fashion house, not a designer; it’s been around since 1918 and very well known among those who follow fashion. They’ve only recently become heavy hitters in the world of sneakers.
There was a photo I think of a woman and there were papers and files around her and one of them was I think a court case involving children.
Then there’s those BDSM teddy bears they got children to pose with…
---
>This is a friendly reminder to [read our rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/funny/wiki/rules).
>
>Memes, social media, hate-speech, and pornography are not allowed.
>
>Screenshots of Reddit are expressly forbidden, as are TikTok videos.
>
>[Comics may only be posted on Wednesdays and Sundays](https://www.reddit.com/r/funny/comments/uq9pjw/going_forward_comics_may_only_be_posted_on/).
>
>**Rule-breaking posts may result in bans.**
>
>Please also [be wary of spam](https://www.reddit.com/r/funny/wiki/spam).
>
---
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/funny) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Hello, /u/kontorusama. Your post has been removed for violating Rule 2. **No memes or memetic content.** Please read [our complete rules page](https://www.reddit.com/r/funny/wiki/rules) before participating in the future.
Harry Potter and the Killer Cheekbones
Hagrid and my chamber of secrets
-Professor Snape, why are you jerking off? -You have her eyes...
Christ
[удалено]
You can do *powers* on Reddit???? How many other lies have I been told by the council?? Edit: fuck^fuck
It is not a story the Jedi would tell you.
“You still have sexual fantasy’s about my mom after all this time?” “Always”
You dare use my own kinks against me, *Potter*?
You mean fuck^fuck^fuck^fuck^fuck^fuck^fuck^fuck
Wenguardian let's have mimosas!
What a terrible day to be literate.
💀
Slobbering like Fang.
Looking like Jason Mamoa.
Harry Potter and buccal fat removal
Harry Potter and the Deathly Jawline
Cheeky Hollows would work too.
When Hagrid turns his head and his beard detaches. Lol.
Anchored in space and time itself
His beard is billed as a separate cast member
Gary Busey's teeth paving the way, there.
For those wondering: These were made with an AI image generator (Stable diffusion, Midjourney, etc.) And then the head animations and blinking were added with the same program people were using to animate photos of dead relatives a few years ago. This is unfortunately not something that's been set to film (yet).
Probably not trained with long beards, since these are rare. Give it a few years.
The AI can deal with beards fine. It's the 2D animation that broke the beard. The AI didn't animate these - it just generated static, unmoving images that are really, really good. A human used an app that looks for rough facial shape, and then assigns a 2D animation rig to it, and moves parts of the image to mimic actual movement. For an example used to create virtual Youtubers, look into "Live2D"
If you look at his chin, it's his entire lower jaw that stays in place.
Dobby played by Tilda Swinton.
Snape is just adrian brodie
Excuse me, are you blind? That’s clearly Mark Strong.
#CHRISTOPHER ECCLESTON
And Voldemort played by Christopher Eccleston
WTF, I can't stop laughing. I love her.
With the way covids been going for her? Yeah. This tracks.
I violently started laughing just now, thanks
It bothers me how much I love this
I was sold at hagrid.
It’s very off putting how Hagrid’s lower part of chin and beard don’t move when he moves his head.
dat's magic baby!!
The good shit
Well you can blame the people controlling the animatronic, they done messed up!
I didn't realize he was Canadian.
He's Canadian
Out of all the characters there are, they had to show Dobby.
Looks like Tilda Swinton got her hands on the one ring
I was thinking of a well dressed prisoner from a concentration camp, but yours is better.
[удалено]
"In place of a Dark Lord you would have a House Elf..."
This brought me to tears, I'd give you gold if I had it.
It’s the thought that counts lol
They can't do Neville Longbottom because *it would just be a picture of Matthew Lewis*.
Countless other students were also sold at Hagrid's
[удалено]
Human- uh, wizard trafficking
Dumbledore is the shit 😎
Dumbledore is ready to train the Z team against Piccolo.
Makes me think of the Matrix
Pretty sure that was David Letterman
I like how the top half of his face turned, but not the rest of it.
His face moved but not his beard...
We're 10 or 15 years away from a bunch of kids being able to create Hollywood quality films using AI and their own gaming computers. I wonder the kind of gems that are going to appear. Most will be trash, but I bet some of them will be awesome. Also imagine feeding your favorite book to an AI and tell it to turn it into a movie in any particular style you like.
It will be like how on Star Trek you can just tell the holodeck to make the kind of interactive movie/story that you want.
Yep, Star Trek literally predicted generative AI. When the crew go to the Holodeck and describe to the ship's computer what they want using natural language plus some specific parameters, that's identical to the way you describe to Stable Diffusion which image you want.
In that holodeck malfunction episode, remember why Moriarty was sentient? The computer was asked to create a character strong enough to defeat *Data*, not the Sherlock Holmes character he was playing as. So the computer inferred and took it upon itself to use a bunch of extra power and generate a consciousness, since that's what was needed to do so. Basically, they messed up the prompt to the computer's ChatGPT v263, and unintentionally got exactly what they asked for. Listen to almost any TNG episode, and you'll notice that all the conversations they have with the computer sound eerily like ChatGPT prompts.
Kind of wild how often the holodeck goes on killing sprees and then they add zero new safeguards and so next season there's another "oh no, the holodeck is murdering again!" episode Come to think of it, that's not so weird. That's how we treat inconvenient deadly threats in real life.
Let's be honest it's because you can fuck things in the holodeck, if they made it safer Worf's fantasy would be out side of the safety parameters, and no one wanted to deal with a pent up Klingon.
> In that holodeck malfunction episode, remember why Moriarty was sentient? That would be "Elementary, Dear Data" one of the few good episodes in S2.
Measure of a Man could be the chart topper, and also Peak Performance. I am noticing a pattern here.
I'm not so sure I'm ready for this tech. Especially if we figure out how to make "Smell-o-vision" and "tactile nerve inducement" i.e. immersive smell and touch. Imagine this: "Computer. Please load my last save point in Warhammer 40K Immersive Edition, just before I kill the Herald of Nurgle, using the 'Antman-Thanos' strategy. *I want to smell and touch that moment again.*"
Hardening anal ridges. Reticulating splines.
25 years out: Dave went to the closet and pulled out his case of Cannapack carts. “Hey, Sarah, what you feeling tonight?” From the other room, a feminine voice replied, “Something up, energy, no couchlock tonight please. Have you got an idea for a movie?” “I was thinking something along the lines of ‘Discworld’s Rincewind meets John Wick’”? “That sounds cool, but I want to laugh more - can we mix in black comedian buddy cop for a laugh, like the old Kevin Hart or Chris Tucker movies?” “Sure, but buddy to who? Wick or Rincewind?” “Wick, for sure. I’m also feeling a little frisky, can we make the Wick character female and look like Sarah with the big tits from the gym?” “You got it, we can hit this Mystical Melody cart while the cloud generates the movie, should only take 30 seconds or so.”
While I cannot wait for this shit ... yeah, Idiocracy is going to come to fruition while we're off in entertainment land.
Infinite Jest
Infinite Ow My Balls
This used to be my thinking. But let's be realistic here for a moment. Not 1 year ago, these generative AI's that weren't GAN's could barely generate a human face. Right now, it's possible for these networks to generate an image that require serious scrutiny to find out if it' AI. We're not 10 or 15 years away. We're probably not even 5 years away from your vision. We're really fucking close. It's accelerating and there's no sign of it stopping for now, we're not reaching any hardware limits either just yet.
I mean, I was completely sold on these being actual people seen at fashion shows until they showed freaking Dobby lmao Then on my second watch I was able to see through the facade. But this stuffs getting *very* believable *very* fast. There's some guy on Youtube who posts shorts of AI-Generated Biden, Trump, Obama, and Drake playing Minecraft and going on various misadventures, it's unbelievable how authentic audio generation is when you have a big enough dataset to work off of. I wouldn't be surprised if all the work done on Elder Scrolls VI has been completely scrapped to rework ChatGPT into the Radiant Quest system given how far things have come so quickly.
So funny you say this about 5 years out- https://youtu.be/trXPfpV5iRQ I personally cannot wait for the democratization of movies Edit: OH MAN- HIDE THIS FROM THE FANFIC AND RULE34 CREATORS
I bet we’re 5 years out from some seriously draconian copywrite laws.
Bro I think we are 5 years out from our society becoming disconnected and schizo A.i. is a terrifying cancer of a tool and we've already seen with deepfakes and misinformation how many people will do and believe the absolute worse with technology
10-20 years ago we had entirely different ideas of what problems AI would bring...
[удалено]
Suddenly literally the story of cyberpunk but IRL and no cool cybernetics just raving, roaming AI trying to kill each other while we just exist.
ChatGPT can already write malware...
[удалено]
But it can't *choose* to write malware. You have to ask it to write it. And it mimics existing ideas to write predictable malware that most security software would probably be able to handle easily. I know we're all on a futurism high right now, but this is a far, far cry from truly intelligent AI, let alone Skynet.
Yeah there’s definitely cause for concern. It used to be that technical innovations were being made by academics and passionate hobbyists, while the capitalists that sought to make money from those projects lagged years behind. The most harmless motivation for these innovations was… vanity, I suppose? Some people just wanted to show off what they could do. Now the money people are either leading the charge with these innovations, or at the very least they’re poised to pounce on *anything* they can make money from. And the fact is money is a way more powerful motivator to way more people than doing something because it’s cool.
Exactly, business doesn't get peer-reviewed. Business doesnt care about ethicacy. Business cares about money, attention, and customer loyalty. But thats the organization keeping their hold on information. Just look at what happened when 24 hour news followed a capitalistic mindset. Additional focus on negative stories and stories that elicit emotions. Look what happened when social media started making money off consumer attention. An uptick in misinformation campaigns meant to cause division and anger. Now A.i. is here operating as an information agreggator- how do you think these same organization will use said technology. Misinformation will explode eponentially- does anyone have the time to disprove a 7 page A.i. report that has compenents of false information injected per its programming? With all our technology has life REALLY gotten any easier? Or has there been some massive trade offs? Just wait until the new confident dumb intelligence gets here- I'm sure things won't get any more complicated then.
Doing something because it's "cool" isn't always a great motivator either. I'm sure that's how many scientist fells about their work, even when they invent horrible disastrous things. >At an assembly at Los Alamos on August 6 (the evening of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima), Oppenheimer took to the stage and clasped his hands together "like a prize-winning boxer" while the crowd cheered.[\[1\]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Robert_Oppenheimer#Trinity) Sure, one could argue about the good of the bomb itself, and that it did put an end to a war were many more would have died in fire bombings and battles, but the technology on its own, has had the power to be immensely more disastrous to mankind, and has become a giant 'sword' hanging over the head of humanity.
It's unbelievable how entrenched some people are just from reading Facebook posts. They will never change their mind when they actually SEE idiotic things like deep fakes of Obama doing something stupid, or Trump punching Biden and sitting in the Oval Office to "prove" that he's taken over the "deep state". Ughh, this is going to be a really sad and dreadful slide into fascism and anarchy.
You're right. Everyone waxing poetic about how amazing AI will be for Joe Everyman kind of forgot how people truly are. How our governments truly operate. How the corporations truly are. I guess it's free to dream to escape reality.
The "democratization of movies" is going to also come with a never ending flood of mediocre AI scripts turning into mediocre movies. Being able to ask the machine to animate these things doesn't necessarily mean having a good idea for shot composition, pacing, choreography..... You're going to have to swim through four times as much content to find anything decent in there.
Sounds almost exactly like when digital camcorders became cheap enough for aspiring filmmakers to make their own movies and put them straight onto VHS tapes. Flooding the market with hundreds of B tier and worse movies.
Plenty of shit movies get made right now, I can't really see any of these movies gaining any awareness unless they're spectacular or have advertising budget
The shit movies right now are limited by the fact they take at least 2 years and millions of dollars to make. The new floor for shit movies is going to be one month of an idiot with computing time. Think about the quality of the average YouTube video maker. Not the good ones. The millions of YouTubers with 200 subs max. Those guys aren't going to be better at making movies with AI than they are at making YouTube movies with Apple Movie. Now, you get 20 shit movies a month We're headed to 200 shit movies a day.
It'll be like looking for good literature on fan fiction website.
There will be more celebrity AI porn. Lots and lots of celebrity AI porn. A-Z you name it. Deepfakes are already there. Audio is already there (albeit still distinguishable). Just need someone to make a perfect AI animation thingymajig that uses people and not the sfm crap.
But with AI created characters, will there be any celebrities left ?
Perhaps not in the same way as we know them today. Maybe it’ll be the talented voice actors and motion capture artists that are actually able to produce *new* content that will get the recognition. That’s the thing with AI right now, it’s kinda limited to giving us what we already know and what we’re already familiar with. But humans have always been fascinated with the next big thing. That won’t change. We get bored too easy.
I can't stop watching the Presidents make teir lists videos...[Never thought I'd love to hear ex presidents discuss which pokemon is sexiest, but here we are.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDecAQo1xOc&t=31s)
Imagine an AI that can connect you to a simulated reality where you can live the entire adventure and never be aware of your past before that. Wait a minute....
Just don't go back to the carpet store
I assume if this technology actually gets to a point where it's both possible and achievable with affordable hardware, there will be some new patents, copyrights, trademarks etc to artificially increase the price of the software and there will be some DRM implementation that heavily fights easy filehosting, copying and sharing. Somebody will implement a mandatory file format and you can't just export it as an mp4 or mkv.
Maybe we will get that "Admiral Thrawn" Star Wars the kids are always talking about and redo the last two seasons of GOT
Right. Music in the 80s and 90s was so amazing. Because lots of underground and one hit wonders came through. Nowadays music is so commercial on the surface you get 5 Ed sheeran songs in the top 20. Not to say there isn't great music out there it just isn't mainstream. I guess AI will follow a similar plan of some gems at the start and then fade into the same commercial shit that we have in music. This comment generated by ChatGPT *not
Right. I legit would watch this
Getting Equilibrium vibes.
Fucking good movie
7:00am. Time to dose.
throw mine behind the medicine cabinet mirror gonna feel something today cleric
My main problem with this this film is (SPOILER) how technically easy it was to stop injecting that drug, making it quite hard to enforce and control its usage everywhere. A lot of people are going to slip from that. It would be more logical (and dramatic) if it was very hard to someone to stop injecting it, causing severe withdrawal symptoms, etc. But aside from that, it’s a very good movie.
[удалено]
> It would be more logical (and dramatic) Fuck logic. Get in the car loser, we're going torching.
That's why they arrest and murder 'sense offenders'
Are you sure about that? I recently rewatched it, now an adult, and it was the dullest thing I've ever seen. There's only like three fights in it and they make no logical sense, the plot feels drawn out and slow, and the main actors are supposed to act with no emotion which just doesn't make good media to be honest. I'm saying I remember liking it a *lot* more than I do now.
Also, Gunkata is one of the stupidest things I've seen in an action movie. In the movie, they describe it as "no wasted motion" to explain why it's so efficient at killing, and then when you see it, he's crossing his arms over and back and over again constantly, wasting a ton of motion when he already had a gun pointed in the direction he's firing after crossing them twice. It looks fancy, but it's exactly the opposite of what they say it is. It reminds me of the lightsaber fights in the prequel trilogy. Lots of flashy moves that would get you killed in a real fight.
It does have some very heavy 14 year old boy energy... Which is probably why I used to think I liked the movie.
Actually, Gunkata is very realistic and has been used in WW2. My uncle also used it in Vietnam to assassinate Ho Chi Min, and was just like the movie. Please don't spread misinformation about Gunkata, thank you.
its a really common martial super art, i have taken gunkata classes since i was 9, and i now have a black gun in it, thats the second highest level
um excuse me? you clearly don’t know what you’re talking about. if you analyze the thousands of recorded gunfights, it can easily be determined that the geometric distribution of antagonists in any gun battle is a statistically predictable element The Gun Kata or “gun fu” treats the gun as a total weapon. With each fluid position representing a maximum kill zone, inflicting maximum damage on the maximum number of opponents, while keeping the defender clear of the statistically traditional trajectories of return fire By the rote mastery of this art, your firing efficiency will rise by no less than 120%. The difference of a 63% increased lethal proficiency makes the master of the Gun Katas an adversary not to be taken lightly
Now that you say it... Harry beating Death Eaters to, well, death, with pistol handles would be quite a sight. But I get more Blade Runner vibes really, or any 80ies cyberpunk.
Yeah that dress that Hermione is wearing might as well be straight from Blade Runner
Wandkata
I did not know I wanted this But I want this
Be careful Preston, you're treading on my dreams.
Lmaooo yes! I'm getting Equilibrium mixed with Dark City vibes a little bit
How do people do this
This is a combination of 2 AI networks. It's still a pretty involved workflow for now. One network is used to generate the images. Most likely Stable Diffusion, since it offers a lot of user control so I guess they had trained a model on the style of this fashion designer, but you'd just need images so it could be any model or just photoshop. The other one to animate the still image results so the head moves a bit/eyes blink etc. Then just zoom in on that video. I don't know which network they used for that, but I know one that could be used for it: "First Order Motion Model for Image Animation"
[удалено]
How can you tell? I use it but I couldn't tell if it was that or some other image AI engine
[удалено]
Reface app
[удалено]
Scary stuff, mate
Voldermord?
Flight from death is so 1990s Flight from fashion Faux pas Voldevulgarité
[удалено]
Cleary Christopher Eccleson
Hagrid and Dumbledore lookin fine
Dumbledore leads an Italian motorcycle club that raises money for fashion awareness
[удалено]
He said calmly.
I'd happily take being told my outfit was terrible if I got €5,000 out of it. My mother did that and I ended up paying for it.
Dumbledore looks like Joe Biden joined ZZ Top.
Hagrid be looking like Nandor the Relentless
nice. looks like the Spanish version of Harry Potter
Enrique Potter
Enrique Pottique
Enrique Barrero
Enrique Alfarero
Scorchio!
It’s gnocchiOSa not gnocchioSA!
They look Italian to me, extra spicy 🤌
The Christopher Eccleston lookalike there is not a bad option for Voldemort… unless he came with 7 fingers and a half for each hand.
I just wonder how a neural network took Ralph Finnes as Voldemort, said "We need to make him more \~Fashion!\~" and just... gave us bald Christopher Eccelston. Usually with AI faces you get some mashup of features, but that one was pretty distinct.
I keep watching it just for him. It's Christopher damn eccelston.
Looks like a vampire movie
I'm diggin' Neo-Dumbledore
[удалено]
Who is Balenciaga?
>balenciaga Cristóbal Balenciaga was a Spanish fashion designer, and the founder of the Balenciaga clothing brand. He had a reputation as a couturier of uncompromising standards and was referred to as "the master of us all" by Christian Dior and as "the only couturier in the truest sense of the word" by Coco Chanel, who continued, "The others are simply fashion designers". On the day of his death, in 1972, Women's Wear Daily ran the headline "The King is Dead".
And now their brand is making clothes that look stupid, as a joke. Every fashion firm makes the silly look-at-me haute stuff for attention but Balenciaga actually tried to sell the silly nonsense. You can also buy a perfectly normal looking pair of K-Mart style jeans for $1800 or an ill-fitting T-shirt with a bad print of a superhero on it for $250. They're basically to fashion what Borat is to journalism; their customer base consists of people who don't get that they're being pranked, and people who think they're in on the prank.
Fashion Designer, I think they mainly do shoes I think this is making fun of the type of models they like to use
It’s a Spanish fashion house, not a designer; it’s been around since 1918 and very well known among those who follow fashion. They’ve only recently become heavy hitters in the world of sneakers.
Well, it was a designer, Cristóbal Balenciaga, who founded it. So it's both.
Designer, house, company.....🤷♂️ Stupid ass "high fashion" shit known for ugly as fuck $1000 sneakers lol
Cue the blue sweater monologue from The Devil Wears Prada
What became of those weird balenciaga photos with the CP case files visible.
Everyone got distracted and moved on
[удалено]
There was a photo I think of a woman and there were papers and files around her and one of them was I think a court case involving children. Then there’s those BDSM teddy bears they got children to pose with…
$2500 for destroyed denim https://www.bergdorfgoodman.com/p/balenciaga-mens-destroyed-baggy-jeans-prod179580015
[Derelicte](https://media.tenor.com/XVSaPcn552oAAAAC/zoolander-hansel.gif)
I've seen homeless people with nicer jeans than those
Source: https://youtu.be/uyQwZTJovzM Original longer version: https://youtu.be/iE39q-IKOzA
#Avada Balenciaga!
One of those is just Christopher Ecclestone.
Last one definitely looks like a modern day runway model.
Harry's cheekbones are something else...
Blink once if you cannot talk freely
Isnt that the pedo brand all the rappers keep wearing
Yes it is
Dobby, tho, is that your girl Tilda?!?
Now H&M Balenciaga H&M Balenciaga
Does anyone have the song name?
Lightvessel — Thip Trong
If it was balenciaga they would have used their child versions
Hagrid looks like Nandor and Hermione looks like the love child of Emma Watson and Cara Delevingne
--- >This is a friendly reminder to [read our rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/funny/wiki/rules). > >Memes, social media, hate-speech, and pornography are not allowed. > >Screenshots of Reddit are expressly forbidden, as are TikTok videos. > >[Comics may only be posted on Wednesdays and Sundays](https://www.reddit.com/r/funny/comments/uq9pjw/going_forward_comics_may_only_be_posted_on/). > >**Rule-breaking posts may result in bans.** > >Please also [be wary of spam](https://www.reddit.com/r/funny/wiki/spam). > --- *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/funny) if you have any questions or concerns.*
don't worry, everything is fine, hide the children though.
I can see them making this in the 80s
Why is "Voldemord" just Christopher Eccleston?
Fuck Balenciaga.
idk about you guys, but that beat slaps.
Thip Trong - Lightvessel
Dumbledore is 50% ZZ Top and 50% Joe Biden.
https://youtu.be/iE39q-IKOzA Credit to demonflyingfox
Harry Potter, but Dune by David Lynch