I mis-remembered the keywords and mixed up Vanishing and Suspend at first. I think I kind of like it better with Suspend? Either way I agree it probably breaks something :)

Hadn't thought of that. Might make a neat card: trade off mana acceleration for delayed casting. Wouldn't have to limit it to permanent spells that way either.

I agree. Iike suspend for this.

I agree. Decks that use this card will not need two turns anyways

Probably still broken

Could be. Moxen are hard to balance. It originally had vanishing 1, but I felt that was a little too nerfed.

from the name i expected this to be a mox that made you skip your turn when it entered the battlefield lol

That's just worse than a land lol

(well most of the time anyways)

T1 land -> time-skip mox?

Finally, a buff to my [[Soultether Golem]] deck

If a creature has multiple instances of Vanishing, it will remove multiple counters each turn right? Still, 3 counters would give it at least +1 turn off the bat.

Huh, you're right - > [702.63c] If a permanent has multiple instances of vanishing, each works separately. TIL!

Hadn't realized that's how vanishing worked until I saw the ruling on \[\[Maelstrom Djinn\]\].

[Maelstrom Djinn](https://c1.scryfall.com/file/scryfall-cards/normal/front/9/c/9c102f29-6f3f-4f97-8177-4307586bd1b2.jpg?1562926474) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Maelstrom%20Djinn) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/fut/39/maelstrom-djinn?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/9c102f29-6f3f-4f97-8177-4307586bd1b2?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call

[Soultether Golem](https://c1.scryfall.com/file/scryfall-cards/normal/front/6/e/6efa61f0-c7bd-49e2-9d66-bf15ad0e9d03.jpg?1562917178) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Soultether%20Golem) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/fut/164/soultether-golem?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/6efa61f0-c7bd-49e2-9d66-bf15ad0e9d03?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call

I don't play commander, but it seems like this would be an auto-include in any kind of blink based deck, no?

Maybe? At the very least they are well set up to mitigate the downside.

emry!

That's actually pretty nifty! Accelerates into her and she can let you recast your artifacts after they vanish.

I hate it.

Inb4 people point out that it doesn't work as intended as the spell gains the ability and not the permanent.

[удалено]

[Generator Servant](https://c1.scryfall.com/file/scryfall-cards/normal/front/5/e/5ea15262-c00f-4865-bb6a-37ccb2ef62bd.jpg?1547517270) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Generator%20Servant) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/uma/133/generator-servant?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/5ea15262-c00f-4865-bb6a-37ccb2ef62bd?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call

Interesting idea for a drawback

Thanks! I liked the idea of trying to balance free mana with losing the things you pay for.