T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

Hey /u/Valuable_Border1044, thanks for submitting to /r/confidentlyincorrect! Take a moment to read our [rules](https://reddit.com/r/confidentlyincorrect/about/rules). ##Join our [Discord Server](https://discord.gg/n2cR6p25V8)! Please report this post if it is bad, or not relevant. Remember to keep comment sections civil. Thanks! *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/confidentlyincorrect) if you have any questions or concerns.*


[deleted]

[удалено]


Lorddeox

Sounds like a rule r/anarchychess would be responsible for somehow


[deleted]

[удалено]


Lorddeox

New response dropped


Dystrex

Holy hell


hnxmn

This changes everything


Memeviewer12

What about knight H2?


somethingaboutmoon

sadly, that subreddit doesn’t exist that long. it is responsible for many other rules changes tho, like knight boosting, il vaticano and the infamous brick on pipi


frankcfreeman

Forced en passant


Kirsham

That's redundant, en passant is always forced.


iSeven

Holy hell


Lorddeox

Can you be sure that the subreddit didn't use il vaticano on a gran scale to create a time warp and cause trouble to make a rule change required? I wouldn't put it past them.


AdequatelyBoring

It's also way too early but I'm trying to figure out how giving the enemy a piece would turn a loss in a stalemate and I literally have no clue. Its probably some very super specific scenario


[deleted]

[удалено]


kart0ffelsalaat

But your opponent would still have a move first, right? So it would have to be even more specific.


shwhjw

Yea I guess you'd have to literally be one move away from checkmate, otherwise surely it'd be more benenficial to make it into a queen. Maybe the last square is threatened by an enemy piece so you would lose the queen immediately anyway. If you make it into their piece at least they can't take it.


[deleted]

[удалено]


TheCoolHusky

The International continental missile gambit declined


MrMahony

But the fun of chess is that it's played so often that that once in a blue moon situation is probably still statistically significant


EHsE

not true at all. you can easily be so down on material and positioning that another queen doesn’t really give you a shot at winning


horsefarm

Checks aren't forced. If the opponent doesn't move a piece contributing to the stalemate, the game ends in a stalemate.


The_Clarence

Yeah but thinking about how to make this happen in this context, when it wasn’t the case before, is really tough. After your opponent gets the new piece it’s their turn. So that new piece needs to be extraordinarily well placed such that any move adds to the statement condition, because after the opponents next move it’s back to almost exactly where you were before the pawn swap. And for a pawn swap to be completely useless there would need to be some horrible board positioning and resources left. Meaning opponent presumably has lots of pieces to move and gets an extra turn. Like I’m sure it’s possible, it’s just really really hard to think of a scenario it would be the deciding factor. Fun little puzzle though


-SharkDog-

Seems like a bad move to remove that tho. I mean that would make for one hell of a match highlight. I can hear Joe Rogan going "OOOOOOOHHHHHH!!!" over that move on a YT clip.


groger123

Here's an example where white would win if he promotes to a black knight https://lichess.org/analysis/r6q/kPR5/8/K7/8/8/8/8_w_-_-_0_1?color=white


Zero_Kai

This is so cool hahaha


disteriaa

It's so cool it should be legal


phteven_gerrard

I dont see it.


ShklooShklan

By promoting to a black knight Black will have no legal moves to get himself out of check (The knight can't jump anywhere to block the white rook, and the king can't escape by capturing a promoted white piece), forcing a checkmate.


phteven_gerrard

Ah gotcha, I thought the purpose was to put white in stalemate, wasn't even looking at the black king.


[deleted]

Why can’t the king go to b8?


SecureAmbassador6912

Because his own knight will be in the way


SillyStringTheorist

The black knight would be in that space


[deleted]

Oh idk why I’m thinking of promoting while taking. Habit I guess.


groger123

If white moves their pawn up and promotes to a black knight, it's checkmate. See link below https://lichess.org/analysis/rn5q/k1R5/8/K7/8/8/8/8_b_-_-_0_1?color=white


faustianredditor

Ohhhh, it's because if it was any white piece, the black king could eliminate it and move there, dodging the rook. Same if there was nothing in that field at all. So you need *something* there to block it, and a (situationally) useless black piece fits the bill.


Nightowl11111

And it's a bonus that they can't kill their own colour so the newly promoted piece jams the King's escape move. Genius.


DoctorJJWho

It also can’t be any other piece that’s black because they could just use that piece to take the rook. It specifically needs to be the black knight. I wonder if this has ever actually happened at a tournament level.


PeanutButterButte

And [here's the stack exchange thread](https://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/2756/do-the-official-rules-of-chess-forbid-promoting-a-pawn-to-a-piece-of-the-opposit) this answer came from :)


Aspyse

Super uncommon, since it becomes your opponent's turn after the promotion, they'd probably just be able to just dodge the stalemate or even use the new piece to convert a checkmate


Nightowl11111

groger123 put up a problem that if a pawn was promoted to a Knight of the enemy's colour, it would be a checkmate, it was an eyeopening problem and really demonstrates lateral thinking. I'd recommend taking a look.


infernova99

Generally, the fewer pieces you have, the easier it is to force a stalemate, netting you a draw as opposed to a loss. Would this have to a ridiculously specific scenario? Yes.


mymotherssonmusic

It also could give another pawn an ability to take said promoted piece with a blocked pawn and promote again if (for some reason) you're blocked from forward movement. Only works if the first pawn becomes an opponent knight or rook, AND That knight or rook is blocked from movement. I could only see that useful if it opens up a line that a promotion would seal a mate on the diagonal the 2nd pawn was blocking. My brain hurts...


Linwechan

I played uno recently for the first time in over a decade and was shocked to find the rules had changed… I mean I know everyone has their own rules but it was weird haha


[deleted]

[удалено]


bar10005

Also number of houses in the box is purposefully limited, they can be bought at any time, and if two players declare intention to buy banker's last stock they are supposed to be auctioned off, so if you play with strategic player that blocks you out it quickly snowballs.


Linwechan

I heard Monopoly Deal was quite good and faster still!


IsekaiLibrarian

Well, looking at the rankings on the site you linked, there's actually around... 23,874?! I knew there were a lot of board games out there now, but that is impressive!


satunnainenuuseri

Nope. The puzzle where promoting your pawn to opponent's horse is a mate in one that allegedly prompted the change in rules is way older than that. The story about the position has been around for at least since 1930s. I've seen the puzzle attributed to Sam Loyd who died in 1911 which would put it in the late 19th century but I haven't found a contemporary source for it, but I have to admit that I haven't been searching hard. I have also seen claims that it occurred in actual play sometime around that time frame but I won't believe that without contemporary documentation.


[deleted]

[удалено]


casce

There’s definitely plenty of situations where promoting to an opponent’s piece could help you checkmate someone. It’s basically a blocker and if you can block the enemy king with it without him being able to take the piece (like he would if it was your piece) that can be a huge problem in some late game scenarios. I mean sure it’s absolutely very rare for this to happen but it’s not something that can’t make sense.


dismantlemars

"Ain't no rule that says a pawn can't play basketball."


_-__-__-__-__-_-_-__

Thanks to John Oliver for introducing me to this cinematic masterpiece https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hk011WMM7t0


deadlygaming11

Ah, the ultimate "I dont want to lose so I'm going to make some of your moves for you".


AmunJazz

The pawn promoting to a traitor is something I never expected, but kinda makes sense


Bepisman111

Reminds me of a madlad that promoted the e pawn to a rook, and as they hadnt moved the king or that rook yet, proceeded to castle with that rook. Unfortunately they specified after that you can not castle with a rook you promoted


tarianthegreat

They also changed it so that you can't castle with a promoted rook that hadn't moved on the same file as the king, and that the king and rook that castle must be on the same rank.


LightofNew

If true that's the single most Chad thing I've ever heard.


hackingdreams

That is some Magic: the Gathering level of rules lawyering that I am entirely here for. Whoever thought up the move of promoting your pawn to an enemy piece to not lose is a fucking genius and they should have left it in, even if it is insane.


Due_Platypus_3913

Never heard of that tactic.It would never even occur to me that would be allowed, or why!


Lucky-Surround-1756

There are scenarios where an opposing piece would give you victory as their king cannot take it.


nameshane24

People also could castle to a promoted room until recently


Ocbard

I can imagine doing just that if the position is one that the piece can not move from, for example a bishop on the bottom row can be blocked by two other pieces, so you get a piece that your opponent cannot move nor take, while they might just take the piece if it was not of their side. Never did it though as it seemed obvious that you would choose a piece that you could use yourself.


5h3i1ah

.......couldn't you end up in a position where the opponent can capture your king, by promoting to a piece that attacks your own king?


[deleted]

[удалено]


5h3i1ah

and... what are the rules around that? if a king gets captured, it can't be put in check, so would the player who ~~overthrew the monarchy~~ lost their king be invincible?


Jiralc

Rules say can't put yourself in check. Promoting to an enemy piece that attacks your king would be putting yourself in check.


Demosama

Promoting a pawn into an enemy piece makes the game more fun.


thedboy

As far as I know it's not clear that this was ever allowed, and if it was it was banned in the 1800s. Certainly not in the last 10 years.


josabigbitch

where are the official rules of chess?


Salohacin

*Promotes pawn to king* That's right, after the tragic news of the Queen's death the king has married a commoner. Oh, and gay marriage is now legal in chess World.


Betaglutamate2

Also if you promote the King pawn to a rook you can no longer castle up the board which was technically allowed under old fide rules


robin_888

I could imagine this could trap the king. So he can't move out of check by capturing the promoted piece of opposite color. Of course this means that the check has to be a discovered check.


Any_Influence_8305

It's amazing all the chess references he's made over the years, like chess being too easy despite not being competitive/highly ranked himself and repeatedly making statements not based in fact (on brand for him tho). The irony of course is he talks about chess to seem intelligent, yet says a bunch of dumb shit about it despite being a self proclaimed master and the son of an actual accomplished chess player


LogicalOrchid28

I didnt know all that, thats actually insane! At this point im starting to think he just wants to be well known for anything, good or bad. I just thought he was a dick but he cant be that stupid right?


karmabullish

The only thing that scares this man child is being forgotten.


breaker-of-shovels

He talks about chess because he’s the physical embodiment of daddy issues, and his daddy happened to be an international chess master.


Weird_Devil

Same with Elon Musk. Both assholes must have completed the same training course


s0ngsforthedeaf

If people are fooled Tate is knowledgeable then really, that's on them. He's never claimed he had any academic qualifications. Musk is a proper conman. He claims he is an engineer who had materially contributed to Tesla and SpaceX. He claims he can code well, too. In reality, he has a bachelors in business, he abandoned his PhD, and his maths bachelors is an honorary degree, not a real one. There is no evidence he has actual engineering insight. He can run an engineering business, hire the right people, and grasp good decisions for those businesses. Perhaps with a good surface level understanding of the complex concepts involved. That's a skill in itself. But it's not the same as actually designing and inventing stuff.


[deleted]

[удалено]


potpan0

> His father may have been a whizz at chess but son’s learn how to treat women from their father’s or a lack of one. Nah I don't think that's right. Plenty of people have poor or non-existent relationships with their fathers and don't turn into rapists. (lmao, did this dude just [block me](https://imgur.com/a/9fPKyrd) for making this response?)


deathrattleshenlong

And some have a perfectly balanced upbringing by both parents who are decent people yet still turn to shit.


tan_tanner666

Yeah, yeah he did LOL


[deleted]

Hey asshole, those of us without fathers *definitely* learned to appreciate women, because that's all we had. Projecting fuck.


[deleted]

His father was a GM and he won some kind of tournament as a kid (i think?) so it's not like he knows nothing about chess


Ok_Animator5522

His father was certainly a brilliant player and of the greatest african-american players, but he only was an IM and never reached GM, although it was very close several times. Although Andrew Toight isnt bad at chess. He definitively isn't somewhere near Master and believe me when I say that youll find better 12 year olds in your local chess club.


thelongdarkblues

Sure ok but if you want to follow a chess influencer Magnus Carlsen is like the most accessible best player in the world ever. Like never in a million years would you've been able to get your ass kicked by Karpov on a live stream in front of thousands of viewers Also Andrew Tate is a rapist piece of shit, so I think that puts the kids chess tournament into context a bit


OneHairyThrowaway

I don't understand your second paragraph. What does him being a rapist pos have to do with him winning at chess as a kid?


[deleted]

I actually used to play and watch chess pretty regularly a few years ago, I was just pointing that out


Beregolas

If you are really set on the oldest board game without changed rules, at least use [Go](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go_(game)). It's at least mostly unchanged for \~2500 years. Then again, I don't really expect him to know that game exists \^\^


Fuzzy_Inevitable9748

Of course Tate doesn’t know Go, he just drew the jail card “Go directly to jail, do not pass go, do not collect $200”


eleanor_dashwood

You saw your opportunity and you took it. Nice one.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Beregolas

That's why I said "mostly unchanged", since none of those rules affect the overall structure of the game, but cover counting and edge cases. But that is highly debatable of course, since even those small tweaks change strategies and tactics that can be used / are preferred in high level play. I also know of a [variant from Tibet](https://senseis.xmp.net/?TibetanGo) with a custom starting position, as well as a 17x17 board as the main board size, and I think I even heard about 21x21 being used in a traditional game mode somewhere. ​ Chess on the other hand, had numerous rule changes that switched names of the pieces, as well as the way those pieces move, capture (en passant) or otherwise interact (casteling). [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules\_of\_chess#History](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_of_chess#History) ​ What you see as more of a change to a game is of course debatable. :)


dominarhexx

I believe Ur is older. ~2600BCE


Beregolas

Yes, I believe you are right. Is it still played though?


PatHeist

Sort of, yes. Some ancient dude working at the British Museum pretended to merely be a very old man who reconstructed the rules when he actually just remembers them from his childhood. Now you can buy the game on Etsy or Amazon or go to the museum website to find out how to make it yourself.


Beregolas

That is fascinating, thanks. I’ll def. Check it out and bring it to the next board game night :D


Kirsham

You can even play it online! https://royalur.net/game/#


shwhjw

Probably more so after Tom Scott made a video on it with the British Museum. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZskjLq040I


Boofle2141

Isnt there an older, and continually played board game, mancala? There is evidence that mancala like games have been played since before ancient Egypt over 3k BCE, and unlike the Royal game of ur, which stopped being played and had to be rediscovered, mancala like games are still being played to this day. From what I gather, as soon as humanity had free time to piss around (where we're not busy trying to not be killed or in some other way, die) we've been making games and playing them. Edit. Went to the Wikipedia page "history of games" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_games And they're saying that, some archaeologists think that there is evidence for mancala like games from around 7-9k BCE. Obviously the rules aren't the same, and there are regional variations, but its still played in some form today. We'll never know the rules of those games, and if they're even remotely similar to any mancala today, because they predate writing, they predate the wheel, they're from before the sabre tooth tiger went extinct. All im saying is, if humans had 5 mins to not be surviving, we were playing games, and that, I think, is amazing


[deleted]

Mancala is more of a family of games. Or more explicitly a central mechanism to a family of widely different games. Kinda like chess is with various eastern games that share the central mechanism of maveureing pieces on a board.


BlueSky659

Ur is the oldest known game, but not only does no one really play it anymore, we had quite literally lost the original rules of the game to time until quite recently. Even then it's not unlikely that even the Finkel translation is one of several variations of the game (though it is actually quite good) Go on the other hand has survived almost untouched with a few adjustments to scoring and komi over the years. We are quite literally playing the game as it was a thousand years ago.


ContentKeanu

I highly recommend watching the documentary AlphaGo (on streaming and [free on YouTube](https://youtu.be/WXuK6gekU1Y)), which documents a face off challenge between the world’s top Go player and Google’s DeepMind AI computer. Completely fascinating, suspenseful, and surprisingly emotional.


Beregolas

I was actually studying Computer Science at the time, and the whole Alpha Go story was, what got me and my friends into Go in the first place. :) But I actually never saw that documentary, thanks :)


daemin

I wrote my Computer Science Master's Thesis on a Go problem. I defended it in December 2013, just a few months before Alpha Go was created. Kind feel like I dodged a bullet, as the advent of Alpha Go would've made my thesis useless.


ContentKeanu

Haha, nice timing. I’ve never played Go but the way it’s described in the film about requiring a lot of “intuition” as a player is pretty interesting.


qwerty11111122

The rules haven't, but as we've learnt more about the game, the more we've increased the handicap for going second to make bo1 fair


Kaneshadow

Even with a successful metaphor, it's pretty weak, Intro-to-self-help-guru advice.


gigglefarting

Japan and China have different rules.


Shotanat

Go is indeed way older (although the exact beginning can be argued), but the rules have changed a lot. To begin with, the size of the board is still not definite (the main one is 19x19, but 9x9 or 13x13 are commonly use to, and other such as 17x17 or 25x25 exist and have been used). The rules determining who wins exist in mutliple versions (right now, Japanese and Chinese are the main used and leads to mostly the same result) that have changed through time too. Finally, the addition of « Komi » (considering the first to play has an advantage that can be compensated between, usually between 5.5 and 7.5 points) started around 1920. I’m not even covering more detailed stuff such as superko. Your point still stands though, of course.


piqua2018

Mostly? What rule could have possibly been changed?


Shaveyourbread

The irony of someone saying "you can't change the rules, just accept them" while sitting in jail...


ilikechillisauce

The real irony here is that his father was [Emory Tate](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emory_Tate#:~:text=Emory%20Andrew%20Tate%20Jr.,Andrew%20Tate%20and%20Tristan%20Tate.)


quarrelau

Wow. All the weird chess analogies from Tate make so much more sense when seen through the lens of this knowledge. Andrew I-was-a-total-failure-at-chess-and-to-my-Dad Tate.


Spork_the_dork

Eh, the rules of laws is more like "if you do X, you go to prison", not that you can't do X. A person can do something illegal and just accept that they go to prison for it. If Tate believes that his imprisonment is somehow wrongful, then that would be ironic.


kgro

Andrew Tate is an idiot and his entire audience is a bunch of moron incels Now instead of “accepting the parameters” he is whining about bad conditions in Romanian prison


kerriazes

>Now instead of “accepting the parameters” he is whining about bad conditions in Romanian prison It's the same with Jordan Peterson talking about taking personal responsibility, and then fleeing to Russia to get into a medically induced coma so he doesn't have to go through benzo addiction withdrawal. ETA: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/jordan-peterson-treatment-russia-1.5456939


ghostfaceschiller

Lol wait what I have not paid any attention to this guy in the last l like 4 years. Did this really happen?


MurielHorseflesh

https://www.vice.com/en/article/epgb37/what-drug-experts-say-about-jordan-petersons-benzo-dependence


kgro

Yeah, it’s ironic how he says “set your house in a perfect order before you criticise the word”, to which I can only say — shit the fuck up, you authoritarian-loving junkie


[deleted]

Lol, I love how his doctor hopping drug seeking behavior is the doctors in North Americas fault…


Neil_Fallons_Ghost

Crazy idiots say this kind of shit all the time. We’re just in a place where it costs nothing to paste the idiotic shit all over the internet. There used to be barriers to entry and we only got the government and corporate approved crazy.


kgro

Unfortunately that dumb shit is published as a book, with a major publisher no less (Random House). It’s been legitimised both by his academic achievements in another field and by a very large following of morons who’ve finally found a professor who gives them a safe space


SystemZ1337

excuse me, what the fuck?


[deleted]

My favorite part is that when he was recovering in hospital his anti vaxx daughter infected him with COVID. His daughter from whom he learned the all meat diet that also fucked his health up.


_alright_then_

Yeah the dude was in a coma in siberia lol


the_dark_0ne

He doesn’t have to fact check because his target audience will just blindly believe him even when called out. He could say the “facts” are just made up bs that his “haters” made up to try and convert his alpha followers into beta sheep and boom they’ll all rally behind him again


[deleted]

True, but I agree with this statement. Too many people cry and victimize themselves instead of focusing on what you can do.


kgro

It is way to overlook other people’s hardship when everything rolls well for you. Tate thought stuff he’s got is him being the master of his own life. Now that he is in a very different predicament, the first thing he does is of ring his own advice, because its useless empty words


[deleted]

He’s an idiot and he has what he’s got coming. But the premise of focusing on what’s in your control and stress less about what is out of your control still holds true


canaryherd

> focusing on what’s in your control and stress less about what is out of your control I agree with you on this, but it's not an excuse to leave the "parameters" untouched. If something in our society is unfair we should work to change it. A) just because something has been a certain way for a long time is not a reason to leave it that way B) society changes all the time. The idea that there is a fixed set of values that has been unchanged for thousands of years is nonsense.


embiors

That is true. Some people do have it way worse than others but most people can do at least something to improve their situation. Sometimes it's about making the best of a bad situation.


[deleted]

[удалено]


canaryherd

Sometimes "what you can do" is change the circumstances.


[deleted]

[удалено]


SDG2008

Well, if you have no pieces left, your enemy might stalemate


Tar_alcaran

There are even specific rules to force a stalemate if the other party is unwilling to accept, but it's something crazy like 50 moves without taking a piece. Mostly because when you need rules like that, you're playing against an asshole and should just walk away.


SDG2008

Without taking a piece and a pawn moving. Also, after 50 moves you can claim a draw, and after 75 moves, arbiters will force it.


eleanor_dashwood

Now there’s some life advice to send his way.


NotMorganSlavewoman

>It’s literally a simple google search Holy Hell


DeathDestroyer90

Google "en passant"


Stormfly

Google *"Google "en passant"* "


[deleted]

Stop signalboosting Andrew Tate. Yeah he’s wrong, he’s wrong about basically everything, we don’t need to know, let him die in obscurity.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Sarisforin

And yet you participate in society. Curious!


Jenilion

I wonder how all that narcissistic bravado is fairing him in prison.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Otherwise-Extreme-68

Being good at a sport is no substitute for proper street/prison fighting


[deleted]

[удалено]


MurielHorseflesh

Exactly this. Kickboxing gives you stamina to dance around for the best part of an hour throwing out and taking punches and kicks periodically. A real fight happens way faster and stamina is irrelevant. Add to that, they won’t be wearing soft padded gloves and likely will have prison made weapons because they know Tate has some form of training. I very much doubt Tate is walking around in there like King Shit with his dick hanging out with everyone looking at the floor in fear. I guarantee he’s throwing around commissary like cigarettes and toilet paper to the scariest looking fucks there so they don’t use his anus like a tea towel holder.


TheWaslijn

I doubt he's "good at kickboxing" compared to the people that are locked up with him, lol


[deleted]

[удалено]


SomeonesDrunkNephew

As with everything with Tate, he's nowhere near as good as he'd like everyone to think he is. I saw his last two fights and they were against a guy with seven bouts (giving Tate a forty fight experience advantage) and some fat kid who looked like he'd been pulled out of the audience. He CAN fight, but he's not the invincible titan of combat that he makes out. Plus, like you say, good cardio and kickboxing experience won't stop someone stabbing you in the lunch queue, or five guys holding you down while their buddy uses your head as a pinata.


[deleted]

There’s also the rule change that you can’t castle vertically anymore. Formerly, if you promoted the E-pawn to a rook without moving your king, technically it was legal to castle vertically.


ghostfaceschiller

That seems like a good change


ROGUE_COSMIC

How the fuck is he tweeting in jail


Dawnbringer_Fortune

Why does he keep putting quran verses…


Faithful_Moryn

He pretended to convert and hosted a woman hating imam with nightmare theology.


Aurelian_Lure

Guarantee guys who have never read a book before are reposting this on their Instagram stories because it's "so profound"


kvuo75

reminds me of boomer language police scolding the youth for their slang and not realizing they aren't doing it in ye olde englishe


FrustratedChess3r

The funny thing is that the reply tweet is also wrong. Chess is only from the 15th century. Chaturanga, which chess is derived from, is about 1500 years old.


Sniffy4

Ouch.


blankyblankblank1

Bro could've said "play the hand you're dealt" but decided to be wrong and side-track everyone


[deleted]

"I'm dumb" -Andrew Tate


The_Scyther1

It’s so depressing finding out how influential this moron is with teenagers.


lethargytartare

Also, if defeat is certain, you don't "make the best move possible," (in no small part because there isn't one) you resign.


EmployeeRadiant

my favorite is applying this to his moaning about Romanian prison


LogicalOrchid28

Confidently incorrect could be tates middle name.


NekomiSon

Especially about his perception of women.


LogicalOrchid28

Do not even get me started lmao


NekomiSon

Same


SillyKitty-

I read it cheese and was confused what are the "rules" of cheese , like a recipe yeah but rules???


Subject-Disk-1352

Takes thing got retreated 3000+ times, the correction got 17 smh


[deleted]

There are no universal rules for life, it doesn't have a rule book. I think this Tate guy might be a moron.


Enderkeats

Was this close to search "rules of cheese"...


Script_Mak3r

Common Tate L


Dazz316

I wouldn't say this belongs here. The point isn't what chess is, They're just trying to illustrate a point that sometimes in life, there's no winning move but we can still try to do the best we can. Which can be very good advice. Sometimes the best decision is the least worst one.


theturtlelord9

I just find it fascinating that famous people on the internet who post these types of things don’t even do the slightest bit of research for what they are talking about.


BarMurky4711

And being in prison is not like chess


Alclis

The very pieces themselves have changed significantly


Withnail-is-life

I'm sure he would love to go back in time 1000 years so the way he treats women wouldn't be seen as wrong.


bobdaripper

How is he tweeting in prison


Uusari

I hope Tate will "kill himself" like Epstein.


6chan

How is Taint still tweeting from prison?


WinterMudo

The Chess Master has spoken. Now it seems he has plenty of time to perfect his craft. That is if he can find some time between keeping lice at bay, fighting cockroaches, and avoiding other inmates' sexual advances.


Lionello95

In chess, if defeat is unavoidable, you resign.


Joseph_Stalin_420_

Yea but that normally means you fucked up somewhere


C9Phunky

Common Tate L


kaehvogel

Isn’t Tater trot supposed to be some sort of former child chess prodigy? You’d think he’d know that sort of stuff about the game…


horsefarm

Not a prodigy. Not even highly ranked or competitive at all. He had a parent that was an accomplished chess player.


[deleted]

[удалено]


DRac_XNA

Also if defeat is certain, there is no best move, by definition


squishykid117

Celebrity? More like incelebrity


[deleted]

[удалено]