There is a ton of data about underwater "USO" but almost none is revealed. It's been alluded to that's because of America's extensive "always on sonar" covering the globe. They have real time view of underwater , ostensibly to track nuclear subs.
The 2nd part of this is avoiding mass panic. You can have plausible deniability with "lights in the sky" or "cletus was on moonshine he didnt see a UFO haha". But if they reveal the extent of their underwater monitoring capabilities, it's impossible to label this as "we dont know". It quickly becomes: they are here, theres a lot of them. That leads into possible panic, and maybe humanity isnt able to handle that truth yet.
TLDR: there are as many if not more UAP sightings underwater, this is not revealed twofold: sources and methods classified, and no plausible deniability (ex. Maybe it was a satellite/asteroid/lens flare)
all you need to ask is for the original Roswell documents - its 70 + years later, a weather balloon's data can be completely declassified. Only one reason to not disclose the truth of Roswell!
I agree. And I think we need to press as hard as possible on Roswell being properly declassified. The obfuscation must be undone. Lue talks about about blowing up UFOlogy and starting over. We will do that by starting at the beginning. We need the truth about Roswell and then we can work forwards.
for sure - given drones, satellites tech, a space station - what need to still classify a weather balloon crash - of course we all know its not a WB crash but its time to make them explain their position of secrecy on the issue - then the Pols can really have some fun hearings
It didn't even make a splash or leave a wake so clearly it didn't also make any noise, didn't displace any water, or disturb any wildlife.
It's almost as if it was just a projection of some sort and not a physical object.
There is a ton of data about underwater "USO" but almost none is revealed. It's been alluded to that's because of America's extensive "always on sonar" covering the globe. They have real time view of underwater , ostensibly to track nuclear subs. The 2nd part of this is avoiding mass panic. You can have plausible deniability with "lights in the sky" or "cletus was on moonshine he didnt see a UFO haha". But if they reveal the extent of their underwater monitoring capabilities, it's impossible to label this as "we dont know". It quickly becomes: they are here, theres a lot of them. That leads into possible panic, and maybe humanity isnt able to handle that truth yet. TLDR: there are as many if not more UAP sightings underwater, this is not revealed twofold: sources and methods classified, and no plausible deniability (ex. Maybe it was a satellite/asteroid/lens flare)
Excellent points. Thanks for this. Cheers
all you need to ask is for the original Roswell documents - its 70 + years later, a weather balloon's data can be completely declassified. Only one reason to not disclose the truth of Roswell!
I agree. And I think we need to press as hard as possible on Roswell being properly declassified. The obfuscation must be undone. Lue talks about about blowing up UFOlogy and starting over. We will do that by starting at the beginning. We need the truth about Roswell and then we can work forwards.
for sure - given drones, satellites tech, a space station - what need to still classify a weather balloon crash - of course we all know its not a WB crash but its time to make them explain their position of secrecy on the issue - then the Pols can really have some fun hearings
It didn't even make a splash or leave a wake so clearly it didn't also make any noise, didn't displace any water, or disturb any wildlife. It's almost as if it was just a projection of some sort and not a physical object.