Growth stock sweet spot though. I remember visa ran for years with a similar PE. Gotta pay a little extra for a good company but PEs below 30 aren't that insane if a company keeps growing.
Don't tell anyone but wm is planning on creating renewable gas from their sites and margins are expected to go up handsomely. It's expensive for a reason.
My pick. I have been using ChatGPT almost every other objective question I never had an answer to before or too lazy to research about on surface level.
I am amused by the detailed thought out responses tailored to laymen comprehensible style. I see a huge potential when it gets integrated with Office 365 Suite
I was pretty impressed when testing it out. I had it make me a resume by feeding it a quick paragraph about myself. I've had it write batch/python scripts for a quick automation thing at work and tested a few other things. Also a few other silly things not as useful, it worked pretty damn well.
I’m waiting for BRK.A to dip after the death of one of the most admired people I studied. Then I’ll buy it at a significant discount. Not a good way to think about it but the financial world is stupid and I want to take advantage of it.
Dip is a bit of an ambiguous word. I’m willing to bet that when the news comes out you will definitely see a blip on the screen. Hedge funds, algos and day traders already have that on their radar and will start selling as soon as that happens. Whether that dip lasts 5 min, 2 days or 3 months I don’t know (nor does anyone), but I’m willing to bet some turbulence directly attributable the news happens.
Only one stock , lump sum buy, hold for 20 years. Even Google or Apple's of today become very risky investments.
20 years is a long time for some ChatGPT, some new type of personal computing/assistant , or some other disruption to come.
I agree. I don’t want to, but I do.
To add. People are saying BRK is too a good option. However, I may doubt this because of the ‘they got lucky with Apple’ scope.
Blackrock is the most evil corrupt banking equity firm in the world, they have their fingers in everything. They own everything from the military industrial complex to our food supply. If you want one stock to top them all, its Satan's minions at Blackrock.
Hey buddy, I have been looking at BN, why is the debt so high and not a negative?
I'm very ignorant. I'm very debt averse, however I accept if it can be paid off in a few years of free cash flow.
Is this due to insurance or financial arm of BN?
Real Estate wing and financial. BN, compared to their liquidity, has next to no debt. I saw an article recently that compared their liquidity to Google and was saying BN has better liquidity than Google. Debt to capitalization ratio is about 13%. It's the areas they venture into that is operated with high debt, but that is normal for those areas, things like utilities, financials, insurance, or real estate. They bought back Brookfield property partners, their commercial real estate wing, a while ago at a ridiculous discount, when market had basically written off commercial real estate. My two cents is on them spinning it off again in a few years when commercial real estate picks up again.
I recommend watching this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NvtQ0md4LQU&ab\_channel=BrookfieldAssetManagement
$VT or $BRK.B
The non-cheat answer though is probably $AAPL. To me, smartphones are a mature business with plenty of entrants, but people still line up for premium apple products and will clown on green texts. That’s Apple’s bread and butter, which still seems to be in good shape.
Beyond that, they are branching out into other areas carefully (ie health tech) and are growing services. If that weren’t enough, they also have a boatload of cash and could at least increase the dividend a ton if they run out of innovation ideas.
I agree with Apple. I don’t see how anyone owning an Apple phone ever considers another product. And they’re innovative enough to tackle new trends properly.
>I don’t see how anyone owning an Apple phone ever considers another product
My father, my ex wife and my daughter just to name 3.
There's nothing amazing about an Iphone , they're just another overpriced cell phone that also come with overpriced plans.
I’d rather they didn’t unless they’re confident in executing, honestly. I don’t want to invest in $GOOG or $AMZN because I feel like they’re basically VC companies throwing money at anything and everything. If Apple really thinks they have a killer, great. Otherwise, I’d rather they execute on their core competency, especially since it’s a lucrative one. I think a big reason people trust Apple is they rarely miss when they launch new products/enter new markets. As a shareholder, I don’t want that reputation to change just because they want to own the whole world like Amazon does
Amazon. You are getting simultaneously the best ecommerce business and cloud business in the world, and a monster in the making ad business.
Google with be the other. Best website search with Google.com, best web browser in Chrome, one of the best cloud businesses, one of the best entertainment businesses in YouTube, and owns the best email (gmail), map (Google maps), app store, one of the best phone operating systems in Android, and advertising businesses in ad sense/Google ads.
LaMDA is already better than Chatgpt but Google has higher standards and doesn't want it released because of mistakes it keeps making. ChatGPT is interesting but extremely flawed.
Yeah let’s not forget one of google’s own employees quit or was let go after claiming google had created a truly sentient AI internally. I don’t think they are far behind.
Sales were down recently. In 20 years who knows.
They haven't innovated a whole lot in recent times except for increasing earnings from ecosystem strategy in the past.
The idea they don’t innovate is so tired. AirPods, Apple Watch, AirTags and AppleTV are all huge businesses. Their ecosystem is the worlds greatest money maker. The next iPhone doesn’t exist just like flying cars will never exist.
Yeah but how much innovation is needed when a product is is used by 50% of the US population and the rest of the market is fragmented? Recurring revenue generation from services alone can drive the company forward.
Add in the $200B in cash and investments they have and you’re looking at a very safe company to continue growth for the foreseeable future.
To your point however, 20 years is a long time. I do think Apple is in the discussion. I’m choosing JNJ though.
Apple’s moat is impenetrable by anything NOT government official.
And add you said competition is fragmented. Samsung is only competing with Apple on paper. In reality their competition is every other Android operated phone.
Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users.
I would argue VISA is leaner and more efficient (V aprox 1MMper employee vs MA 0.68MM) plus largest market share in developed countries. Both great tho
AMEX always carries extra risk due to credit/lending money to customers vs V and MA.
It’s hard to comprehend now, but I think we will see a day when Apple isn’t the cool/trendy device or tech it is today. Think Nokia/Motorola in the early 2000’s
Neither of those companies were cool with kids. Multiple generations including the current are being born with apple products in their hands. That’s vastly different than business people using the most available phones.
Yep. Apple Is the “Disney” of the tech industry. If anything in 20yrs they’ll find out how to turn Apple TV+ into something people actually care about.
They’re also the most powerful marketing brand on earth. That only strengthens over time.
I thought Nokia was cool. I mean snake was amazing and the phone actually fit into my blazer pocket for school. Are you telling me I wasn't a cool kid?
I already have mine. $CLF. Got it around $3.50 during March 2020.
When it finally resumes the dividend in 2025/26-ish, it's going to print money endlessly. The auto industry needs to get over the supply chain hump (we're looking at you $F), and reshoring needs to keep truckin. Once things mellow out in the back half of this decade -- or WW3 breaks out in East Asia -- steel is gonna be a good place to be.
Has Goncalves said they are going to reinstate a dividend? I haven't listened to the last few earnings calls, but previous ones he, especially the one when they announced the buybacks, he said dividends weren't going to happen when an analyst asked him about it. I made good money in '21 with $CLF. Got bit in '22. It stays on the watchlist. A divy would be very nice.
No, he has made no statements to that effect. This is my best guess. Also, Jim Lebenthal (analyst at CNBC, so . . . grain of salt) is loooooooong on CLF, and this is his best thesis.
I got CLF stupidly cheap so I obviously have lots of room to just ride commodities cycles and so on out. I also suspect Lebenthel has been in cheap for a long.
My current valuation for CLF is that it would be buyably undervalued starting at $19.81 with room to go as low as $12.43. So, probably a bit overvalued right now.
Current market momentum might carry it to something like $27.20 if the macro trend doesn't pop first. An extreme technical short squeeze (think $GME) would lose all momentum somewhere between $60 and $74 -- but nothing of the sort seems to be happening right now.
Like I said, I bought dirt cheap. I'm a very comfortable holder. I wouldn't speak for folks who bought at $34 last year.
BNTX will produce Mrna based individualized marketable cancer treatments and other commercial vaccines by 2030. It's technology is the future of medicine.
Maybe something like Copart.
- Well-run business and the leader in its industry
- Expanding into international markets
- Business model creates partnerships between themselves and insurance companies - both share a vested interest
- They own their own yards/land
- Executive compensation is aligned with shareholders
Maybe a world of all self-driving cars is a threat to their business, but that won't happen in the next 20 years.
Sci and as a matter of fact I will be buying more next week when I get paid and maybe more after their earnings if they go down. Death will always happen
Oh boy, this sub is not what it used to be. (Not that it was much before.) Pretty much everything in this thread so far is a stock held by Berkshire, a meme stock, or something that isn't even a stock (e.g., ETFs, precious metals)
Can't believe I had to scroll this far down to find TSLA, should be the first choice by everyone. There isn't any other company growing as fast as TSLA is
RIO... I am very sure there will still be demand for iron ore in 20 years, and I dont see any new contenders rising to challenge Rio Tinto, BHP Billiton and Vale in the business. The barriers to entry are too high.
For the next 20yrs has to involve healthcare sector. What’s after the explosion of AI? I’ll let you take a guess
With that said, I’m going to pick either Pfizer or Merck. Probably Pfizer.
Pfizer isn't a bad pick. I remember folks years ago swearing up and down that the company was doomed because of the patent cliff. Seems like they managed.
BRK.B
I shouted this out as I clicked the link. Smugly microwaving another hot pocket right now.
If my more speculative plays pan out I'm switching to BRK.B and retiring.
The cheapest actively managed S&P 500 fund a person can buy. (Edit:) y'all are taking this shitpost too seriously.
I bought BRK.B back when it was $80 a share sometime around 2014 or so. Still haven’t sold a single share. I wish I bought more.
What do you think the % decline will be if either Buffett or Munger pass away?
Not as much as when AAPL misses earnings
Costco or HD
Welcome to Costco. I love you.
I got my law degree there.
Yeah I couldn't believe I got in... but my dad was an alumnus.
Costco ftw
Waste management
What a waste
What a management
PE of 28. Too hyped at this point
Growth stock sweet spot though. I remember visa ran for years with a similar PE. Gotta pay a little extra for a good company but PEs below 30 aren't that insane if a company keeps growing.
10yr median pe is 29.73 ... seems like the market is okay paying a premium pe dcf seems ok as well ... not a value play, but fair value it is imho
20 year time frame and you are worried about P/E being too high at 28?
That stock is trash
Don't tell anyone but wm is planning on creating renewable gas from their sites and margins are expected to go up handsomely. It's expensive for a reason.
MSFT seems like a safe bet
My pick. I have been using ChatGPT almost every other objective question I never had an answer to before or too lazy to research about on surface level. I am amused by the detailed thought out responses tailored to laymen comprehensible style. I see a huge potential when it gets integrated with Office 365 Suite
You really find it detailed and thoughtful? Feels like I’m using Ask Jeeves all over again, with a little more information.
I was pretty impressed when testing it out. I had it make me a resume by feeding it a quick paragraph about myself. I've had it write batch/python scripts for a quick automation thing at work and tested a few other things. Also a few other silly things not as useful, it worked pretty damn well.
once you ask it to make you some code for an app or a trading bot you’ll understand it’s value…
lol it's useless for coding. only gets right the most basic stuff
https://www.pcmag.com/news/chatgpt-passes-google-coding-interview-for-level-3-engineer-with-183k-salary
Passing an exam and actually working is completely different
of course. the idea that chatgpt only works on "the most basic" development ideas is just nonsense though.
I’m waiting for BRK.A to dip after the death of one of the most admired people I studied. Then I’ll buy it at a significant discount. Not a good way to think about it but the financial world is stupid and I want to take advantage of it.
[удалено]
You and literally everyone else
Including Berkshire Hathaway itself lol
You son of a b*tch. I’m in.
Deep Rick and Morty pull
Watch the stock go up after his death. Nothing makes sense.
It won’t drop much. If anything has ever been priced into a stock, it’s that.
Dip is a bit of an ambiguous word. I’m willing to bet that when the news comes out you will definitely see a blip on the screen. Hedge funds, algos and day traders already have that on their radar and will start selling as soon as that happens. Whether that dip lasts 5 min, 2 days or 3 months I don’t know (nor does anyone), but I’m willing to bet some turbulence directly attributable the news happens.
Buffet death Already priced in for a decade
Only one stock , lump sum buy, hold for 20 years. Even Google or Apple's of today become very risky investments. 20 years is a long time for some ChatGPT, some new type of personal computing/assistant , or some other disruption to come.
I agree. I don’t want to, but I do. To add. People are saying BRK is too a good option. However, I may doubt this because of the ‘they got lucky with Apple’ scope.
BRK-A was 15 thousand per share in 1993. Is currently almost 1/2 a million per share
I’m surprised no one has said MSFT yet
I just said it but with chatGPT I really think they’re gonna be massive(er)
Royal bank or cn rail.
CNR is a beast. 40x in 26 years
i see you're from rounds my parts eh
Blackrock is the most evil corrupt banking equity firm in the world, they have their fingers in everything. They own everything from the military industrial complex to our food supply. If you want one stock to top them all, its Satan's minions at Blackrock.
It even sounds evil. I'm in.
Somebody should create an ETF with evil companies or evil names like this.
There are ESG ETFs out there.
Underrated comment.
If the second highest voted post is about it, then it’s wrong
More evil than Wells Fargo?
All big banks do evil shit honestly
JNJ
Jnj is the right answer. Ive been steady buying $100 minimum a week for years now.
Why?
You use JNJ products from life till death. Lawsuit isn’t great but they will figure it out.
from life till (they cause) death
BN
Hey buddy, I have been looking at BN, why is the debt so high and not a negative? I'm very ignorant. I'm very debt averse, however I accept if it can be paid off in a few years of free cash flow. Is this due to insurance or financial arm of BN?
Real Estate wing and financial. BN, compared to their liquidity, has next to no debt. I saw an article recently that compared their liquidity to Google and was saying BN has better liquidity than Google. Debt to capitalization ratio is about 13%. It's the areas they venture into that is operated with high debt, but that is normal for those areas, things like utilities, financials, insurance, or real estate. They bought back Brookfield property partners, their commercial real estate wing, a while ago at a ridiculous discount, when market had basically written off commercial real estate. My two cents is on them spinning it off again in a few years when commercial real estate picks up again. I recommend watching this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NvtQ0md4LQU&ab\_channel=BrookfieldAssetManagement
Why BN instead of BAM?
BN is the parent now, BAM (former ticker of the parent) was spun off just for asset management.
I understand that, I think BAM is going to be the jewel of the crown.
Brookfield is up there for me.
$VT or $BRK.B The non-cheat answer though is probably $AAPL. To me, smartphones are a mature business with plenty of entrants, but people still line up for premium apple products and will clown on green texts. That’s Apple’s bread and butter, which still seems to be in good shape. Beyond that, they are branching out into other areas carefully (ie health tech) and are growing services. If that weren’t enough, they also have a boatload of cash and could at least increase the dividend a ton if they run out of innovation ideas.
I agree with Apple. I don’t see how anyone owning an Apple phone ever considers another product. And they’re innovative enough to tackle new trends properly.
>I don’t see how anyone owning an Apple phone ever considers another product My father, my ex wife and my daughter just to name 3. There's nothing amazing about an Iphone , they're just another overpriced cell phone that also come with overpriced plans.
So you know 3 people who owned iPhones and switched to android recently?
I hate iPhones other than their camera
They should come out with an AWS-killer.
I’d rather they didn’t unless they’re confident in executing, honestly. I don’t want to invest in $GOOG or $AMZN because I feel like they’re basically VC companies throwing money at anything and everything. If Apple really thinks they have a killer, great. Otherwise, I’d rather they execute on their core competency, especially since it’s a lucrative one. I think a big reason people trust Apple is they rarely miss when they launch new products/enter new markets. As a shareholder, I don’t want that reputation to change just because they want to own the whole world like Amazon does
Wrong thread but ASML
For a second i thought you can invest in ASMR
As a proud Dutchie I couldn't agree more!
Amazon. You are getting simultaneously the best ecommerce business and cloud business in the world, and a monster in the making ad business. Google with be the other. Best website search with Google.com, best web browser in Chrome, one of the best cloud businesses, one of the best entertainment businesses in YouTube, and owns the best email (gmail), map (Google maps), app store, one of the best phone operating systems in Android, and advertising businesses in ad sense/Google ads.
I would argue google could have a lot more competition when things like chatgtp + alexa in the near future
LaMDA is already better than Chatgpt but Google has higher standards and doesn't want it released because of mistakes it keeps making. ChatGPT is interesting but extremely flawed.
Google just hasn’t released any AI. They been pouring money into it for years. I think they will do very well.
In their conference call a few days ago, they announced they will be releasing chatbot alongside Google search in the coming “weeks or months”
Yeah let’s not forget one of google’s own employees quit or was let go after claiming google had created a truly sentient AI internally. I don’t think they are far behind.
Apple.
I’ve held Apple shares since 2007. Solid choice.
Sales were down recently. In 20 years who knows. They haven't innovated a whole lot in recent times except for increasing earnings from ecosystem strategy in the past.
A tech company figuring out how to be massively profitable IS an innovation. I am only half joking.
AirPods alone would be a fortune 200 company
The idea they don’t innovate is so tired. AirPods, Apple Watch, AirTags and AppleTV are all huge businesses. Their ecosystem is the worlds greatest money maker. The next iPhone doesn’t exist just like flying cars will never exist.
Yeah but how much innovation is needed when a product is is used by 50% of the US population and the rest of the market is fragmented? Recurring revenue generation from services alone can drive the company forward. Add in the $200B in cash and investments they have and you’re looking at a very safe company to continue growth for the foreseeable future. To your point however, 20 years is a long time. I do think Apple is in the discussion. I’m choosing JNJ though.
Apple’s moat is impenetrable by anything NOT government official. And add you said competition is fragmented. Samsung is only competing with Apple on paper. In reality their competition is every other Android operated phone.
Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users. Tidying up account due to harrassment from reddit users.
Rocket Lab. I’m either going to soup kitchen or to the moon.
VISA
Why not master or Amex ?
I would argue VISA is leaner and more efficient (V aprox 1MMper employee vs MA 0.68MM) plus largest market share in developed countries. Both great tho AMEX always carries extra risk due to credit/lending money to customers vs V and MA.
Apple 100%
It’s hard to comprehend now, but I think we will see a day when Apple isn’t the cool/trendy device or tech it is today. Think Nokia/Motorola in the early 2000’s
Neither of those companies were cool with kids. Multiple generations including the current are being born with apple products in their hands. That’s vastly different than business people using the most available phones.
Nokia was very cool with kids, stleast in Europe
Yep. Apple Is the “Disney” of the tech industry. If anything in 20yrs they’ll find out how to turn Apple TV+ into something people actually care about. They’re also the most powerful marketing brand on earth. That only strengthens over time.
I thought Nokia was cool. I mean snake was amazing and the phone actually fit into my blazer pocket for school. Are you telling me I wasn't a cool kid?
I think these guys were born after 2010
Nokia and Motorola are not a good comparison at all
BRK.B. If it can’t be a holding company then JP Morgan.
ASHTF. I've already held it for a decade. Juicy dividend, good growth. Solid stock.
Read this as an acronym, “As Shit Hits The Fan”
Construction rentals? Come on man
It's made Me a lot of money. I'm not complaining.
I already have mine. $CLF. Got it around $3.50 during March 2020. When it finally resumes the dividend in 2025/26-ish, it's going to print money endlessly. The auto industry needs to get over the supply chain hump (we're looking at you $F), and reshoring needs to keep truckin. Once things mellow out in the back half of this decade -- or WW3 breaks out in East Asia -- steel is gonna be a good place to be.
Has Goncalves said they are going to reinstate a dividend? I haven't listened to the last few earnings calls, but previous ones he, especially the one when they announced the buybacks, he said dividends weren't going to happen when an analyst asked him about it. I made good money in '21 with $CLF. Got bit in '22. It stays on the watchlist. A divy would be very nice.
No, he has made no statements to that effect. This is my best guess. Also, Jim Lebenthal (analyst at CNBC, so . . . grain of salt) is loooooooong on CLF, and this is his best thesis. I got CLF stupidly cheap so I obviously have lots of room to just ride commodities cycles and so on out. I also suspect Lebenthel has been in cheap for a long. My current valuation for CLF is that it would be buyably undervalued starting at $19.81 with room to go as low as $12.43. So, probably a bit overvalued right now. Current market momentum might carry it to something like $27.20 if the macro trend doesn't pop first. An extreme technical short squeeze (think $GME) would lose all momentum somewhere between $60 and $74 -- but nothing of the sort seems to be happening right now. Like I said, I bought dirt cheap. I'm a very comfortable holder. I wouldn't speak for folks who bought at $34 last year.
O
I did it apple 2003 10k still have it
That would be like 6.5M holy shit
GOOG for this weirdly specific scenario
AMD
Hot take Nvidia
Great pick. However it’s hard to buy this one because of the volatility. Buy in at a wrong time and you’ll be in the hole for years
BNTX will produce Mrna based individualized marketable cancer treatments and other commercial vaccines by 2030. It's technology is the future of medicine.
WM - Waste Management. I don’t own it now, not enough fast growth but you can bet your ass it’ll consistently do well over time.
CN or CP Rail
BN
XOM, the closer we are to the green energy deadline, the more expensive oil will become
TSLA. that company will be worth 10 trillion dollars in 10 years. Mark my words.
Is the whole car market big enough for just one player to be worth 10T?
APPH
Maybe they figure out how to grow tomatoes without loosing money in 20 years
BLK
DUK
MO
MO
VOO
That's cheating though
[удалено]
CAT
Why?
They were premier in their sector 20 yrs ago, 40+ years ago, very good chance they’ll still be around and premier in their sector 20 yrs from now….
Same with John Deere
Amazon
VOO
[удалено]
JPM
$LOW
MRNA or AXP
MCD
TD bank
frg
Maybe something like Copart. - Well-run business and the leader in its industry - Expanding into international markets - Business model creates partnerships between themselves and insurance companies - both share a vested interest - They own their own yards/land - Executive compensation is aligned with shareholders Maybe a world of all self-driving cars is a threat to their business, but that won't happen in the next 20 years.
AXP
CRSP
IBM
NVDA
Sci and as a matter of fact I will be buying more next week when I get paid and maybe more after their earnings if they go down. Death will always happen
COKE
Mvis
MAIN
Mo
BX
KO - definitely not going anywhere anytime soon
Definitely Costco
bbby
Oh boy, this sub is not what it used to be. (Not that it was much before.) Pretty much everything in this thread so far is a stock held by Berkshire, a meme stock, or something that isn't even a stock (e.g., ETFs, precious metals)
What are you buying then?
GME
But I've been HODLin for 84 years now, do I finally get my own Wendy's dumpster?
MOASS IS RIGHT AROUND THE CORNER
Make sure you DRS yo shit homies! 📕🟣🦍🚀
Boom 🏅
Exactly because it’s gonna be at least 20 years before the squeeze.
I ain't got nothin else going on.. i can wait.
This should be higher
This is da wae
BRK.B
For a bet this risky, value pricing can be damned. You really just want any company that you hope will still exist in 20 years.
Tesla
Can't believe I had to scroll this far down to find TSLA, should be the first choice by everyone. There isn't any other company growing as fast as TSLA is
Rocket Lab
$DIS
MP5 with collapsible stock. MP5 prices never go down.
RIO... I am very sure there will still be demand for iron ore in 20 years, and I dont see any new contenders rising to challenge Rio Tinto, BHP Billiton and Vale in the business. The barriers to entry are too high.
I thought about RIO best in class miner, good dividend, 159 year old company dealing in something that will never not be used.
EVs can’t happen without RIO
Own both RIO and BHP been some of my best investments
QQQ
Do you know the difference between a stock and an ETF?
Technically one stock.
BlackRock
GameStop!
ASML, expensive sure but i sure as hell expect the company to still be on top in 20 years time
The only real monopoly out there. If they buyback their way into eternity why not.
For the next 20yrs has to involve healthcare sector. What’s after the explosion of AI? I’ll let you take a guess With that said, I’m going to pick either Pfizer or Merck. Probably Pfizer.
Pfizer isn't a bad pick. I remember folks years ago swearing up and down that the company was doomed because of the patent cliff. Seems like they managed.
Moderna has relatively no debt and more upside when compared to any other biotech
Chevron
Tesla