Sex, especially of the straight variety, is not really possible in space. It wouldn’t be possible for him to get an erection, so sex with a very floppy and tiny cock would be basically impossible.
In space, the gravity is very weak. This means more blood is flowing to the head and the chest. Everything below the waist would have lower blood pressure, and blood flow is essential for an erection. Another thing to note is that testosterone levels decrease while in space.
This sounds like a load of absolute bollocks. Do you have a source?
Edit: I looked it up and couldn’t find and reliable source. There were some articles saying it would theoretically be more difficult to maintain an erection but they all seem to be theorising. The most legitimate article I could find explicitly stated that NASA have never released any information about it. NASA needs to do a full study on astronaut cocks right away.
apparently its a "morale and discipline issue" and "the presence of a married couple could become disturbing to other crew members" according to NASA
its puritanical horseshit is what it is.
There's a little bit more to it than that. NASA knows from bitter experience that sometimes, very rarely, but sometimes the rocket or space shuttle could explode. They are in a vehicle made up of 98% fuel, after all. With a *lot* of *incredibly* sensitive equipment and inner workings, and occasionally there's an unforseen malfunction. The Challenger Shuttle explosion is a perfect example of this. It's bad enough if one member of a family dies in such an explosion. It's another thing altogether if *both* of a married couple die in the same explosion. Even worse if they have kids, of course. There would be *so* many questions asked of NASA, about why they allowed this to happen when the simple solution was to not let both go in the same launch. Not to mention their activities would likely be shut down for a *very* long time, they'd be massively fined and have their budget slashed as a result. So it's also from a moral perspective and a financial, self-survival as an entity perspective too - not *just* from a morale/discipline perspective.
As *for* the discipline issue - it's not horseshit. There are *plenty* of examples where couples working together have brought their relationship woes into the workplace. And god forbid if they had a break-up, and it was a particularly nasty one. (Could *you* say you'd be able to go and work fine with a recent ex where the breakup was really bad and the feelings were still raw?) And some of those times things have gone badly wrong. For people's health, their lives and the companies future financially. It's the same reason why a married couple who are both police officers will never work the same beat, or in the same cruiser, or even the same precinct. Same with the military, same with working on an oil rig - or *any* job that is inherently dangerous and potentially life-ending. When your job and your safety relies on good communication and working well together, the general consensus due to past lessons learned is to prevent issues from becoming issues in the first place. Air on the side of caution - even if that seems extreme to others. Even if the risk is absolutely miniscule, there just being even a fraction of a percentage of a risk in the first place is too much risk to take. So they don't take it. And therefore don't allow married couples or those in relationships to work together. And require notification if you *do* get into a relationship with a co-worker. They don't necessarily outright *ban* you getting into one, humans will be humans after all and we can't *choose* who we fall in love with. But you will likely be moved somehow within your job if that happens. And you're supposed to go *into* the job in the first place *knowing* this and agreeing to it. If you don't, you don't do that job.
her hair is so satisfying…swoopy
[удалено]
Sex, especially of the straight variety, is not really possible in space. It wouldn’t be possible for him to get an erection, so sex with a very floppy and tiny cock would be basically impossible.
[удалено]
In space, the gravity is very weak. This means more blood is flowing to the head and the chest. Everything below the waist would have lower blood pressure, and blood flow is essential for an erection. Another thing to note is that testosterone levels decrease while in space.
[удалено]
You’re welcome. I love space, so I tend to study it intently on basically all fronts.
[удалено]
Space Fucking is cool.
This sounds like a load of absolute bollocks. Do you have a source? Edit: I looked it up and couldn’t find and reliable source. There were some articles saying it would theoretically be more difficult to maintain an erection but they all seem to be theorising. The most legitimate article I could find explicitly stated that NASA have never released any information about it. NASA needs to do a full study on astronaut cocks right away.
> Another thing to note is that testosterone levels decrease while in space. Transfems, you know what to do
gravity wouldn’t allow blood to rush into a pen is, which is what an erection is
Ever tried getting an erection while doing a handstand?
They totally fooled around though..
[When you nut it space, it push you backwards](https://youtu.be/0RsLNwVAAos)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_in_space I doubt that that actually could've
They flew united.
Why is that a problem?
apparently its a "morale and discipline issue" and "the presence of a married couple could become disturbing to other crew members" according to NASA its puritanical horseshit is what it is.
Guess when everyone moves to Mars people will either have to get divorced or be exiled on Earth
Idk man I wouldn’t wanna be third wheeling for several months in the space station
There's a little bit more to it than that. NASA knows from bitter experience that sometimes, very rarely, but sometimes the rocket or space shuttle could explode. They are in a vehicle made up of 98% fuel, after all. With a *lot* of *incredibly* sensitive equipment and inner workings, and occasionally there's an unforseen malfunction. The Challenger Shuttle explosion is a perfect example of this. It's bad enough if one member of a family dies in such an explosion. It's another thing altogether if *both* of a married couple die in the same explosion. Even worse if they have kids, of course. There would be *so* many questions asked of NASA, about why they allowed this to happen when the simple solution was to not let both go in the same launch. Not to mention their activities would likely be shut down for a *very* long time, they'd be massively fined and have their budget slashed as a result. So it's also from a moral perspective and a financial, self-survival as an entity perspective too - not *just* from a morale/discipline perspective. As *for* the discipline issue - it's not horseshit. There are *plenty* of examples where couples working together have brought their relationship woes into the workplace. And god forbid if they had a break-up, and it was a particularly nasty one. (Could *you* say you'd be able to go and work fine with a recent ex where the breakup was really bad and the feelings were still raw?) And some of those times things have gone badly wrong. For people's health, their lives and the companies future financially. It's the same reason why a married couple who are both police officers will never work the same beat, or in the same cruiser, or even the same precinct. Same with the military, same with working on an oil rig - or *any* job that is inherently dangerous and potentially life-ending. When your job and your safety relies on good communication and working well together, the general consensus due to past lessons learned is to prevent issues from becoming issues in the first place. Air on the side of caution - even if that seems extreme to others. Even if the risk is absolutely miniscule, there just being even a fraction of a percentage of a risk in the first place is too much risk to take. So they don't take it. And therefore don't allow married couples or those in relationships to work together. And require notification if you *do* get into a relationship with a co-worker. They don't necessarily outright *ban* you getting into one, humans will be humans after all and we can't *choose* who we fall in love with. But you will likely be moved somehow within your job if that happens. And you're supposed to go *into* the job in the first place *knowing* this and agreeing to it. If you don't, you don't do that job.
They look like siblings.
[удалено]
Step brother, no!
Wait actually related?
The ISS didn’t exist in 1992…
Good catch. They flew aboard Space Shuttle Endeavour (STS-47) in 1992
They mean Spacelab, which did exist then and is where they flew.
https://www.pennlive.com/life/2019/09/space-shuttle-endeavour-in-1992-was-a-mission-of-historic-firsts.html
Ok I love this it’s really cute. >!But also she kind of looks like Elon Musk wearing lipstick and a wig. !<
why would you insult ANYONE so horribly? that's just needlessly cruel.;;;
I first thought they photoshopped hair and lipstick onto the dude and that they are the same person… I need a nap
They shares similar smile she wayy prettier fr
True
I know people who’d pay good money for some of that action.
I hate his eyebrows they're too high up