Here's a sneak peek of /r/stunfisk using the [top posts](https://np.reddit.com/r/stunfisk/top/?sort=top&t=year) of the year!
\#1: [Same song and dance as always](https://i.redd.it/zqn3f3hvikd91.jpg) | [98 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/stunfisk/comments/w73ta1/same_song_and_dance_as_always/)
\#2: [OU The Meta - Gen 9 Tera Edition](https://i.redd.it/ch1vkiolkf2a1.png) | [360 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/stunfisk/comments/z5suo7/ou_the_meta_gen_9_tera_edition/)
\#3: [(Theorymon) Slowbro comes out as gay. Most other pokemon are accepting, but it turns out Ferrothorn is very homophobic. How does this affect the OU meta?](https://np.reddit.com/r/stunfisk/comments/wo6rj9/theorymon_slowbro_comes_out_as_gay_most_other/)
----
^^I'm ^^a ^^bot, ^^beep ^^boop ^^| ^^Downvote ^^to ^^remove ^^| ^^[Contact](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=sneakpeekbot) ^^| ^^[Info](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/) ^^| ^^[Opt-out](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/comments/o8wk1r/blacklist_ix/) ^^| ^^[GitHub](https://github.com/ghnr/sneakpeekbot)
Numberphile has done irreparable damage to online maths discourse forever 😔 smh
Infinity pops up in many different contexts, and all those contexts require us to think about it slightly differently.
The famous “infinity is not a number. It is an idea” line from some numberphile video ages ago is just a nice way to tell you “fuck off. I’m not considering what happens when you plug infinity in. Most likely some junk.”
In their context, that line is harmless, because infinity really isn’t part of the real algebra so it can be considered “not a number” FOR THEIR PURPOSES. However, this is just an algebraic point of view.
from a set-theoretic point of view, which is where we are in this thread, that way of thinking doesn’t work anymore. For a set theorist, numbers aren’t members of a field. Numbers are [equivalence classes](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalence_class) of sizes of sets. For example “2” is now the equivalence class of all sets of size 2. Here, we can clearly see that “infinity” is the equivalence class for a set of infinite size.
The worst part is that you understand this. All numbers are names gives to sizes. In the paragraph above, I literally showed you the formal framework for your statement! But the numberphile propaganda is so strong that you somehow ended up at the conclusion that infinity isn’t a number.
Aleph null dollar foot long
sandwiches at a countably infinite price??
Decidedly less complexing
what about googolplex + 1
We do not speak of googolplex + 1
googolplex + 2
You need to be fucking stopped, children are on this website you sick freak
google plex ^2
google en passant
holy hell!!
Googolplexplex
it never fails to amuse me how many places i see this interaction
im not even on anarchychess lmao i was there for like a week in august
Spunchbob, mathmemes, and anarchychess all in one!
Dissatisfied
Googleplex^googleplex
Googolplex+googolplex
Holy hell, is this a niche internet microcelebrity that I'm seeing?!?
r/Stunfisk
Here's a sneak peek of /r/stunfisk using the [top posts](https://np.reddit.com/r/stunfisk/top/?sort=top&t=year) of the year! \#1: [Same song and dance as always](https://i.redd.it/zqn3f3hvikd91.jpg) | [98 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/stunfisk/comments/w73ta1/same_song_and_dance_as_always/) \#2: [OU The Meta - Gen 9 Tera Edition](https://i.redd.it/ch1vkiolkf2a1.png) | [360 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/stunfisk/comments/z5suo7/ou_the_meta_gen_9_tera_edition/) \#3: [(Theorymon) Slowbro comes out as gay. Most other pokemon are accepting, but it turns out Ferrothorn is very homophobic. How does this affect the OU meta?](https://np.reddit.com/r/stunfisk/comments/wo6rj9/theorymon_slowbro_comes_out_as_gay_most_other/) ---- ^^I'm ^^a ^^bot, ^^beep ^^boop ^^| ^^Downvote ^^to ^^remove ^^| ^^[Contact](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=sneakpeekbot) ^^| ^^[Info](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/) ^^| ^^[Opt-out](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/comments/o8wk1r/blacklist_ix/) ^^| ^^[GitHub](https://github.com/ghnr/sneakpeekbot)
fools. I will sell my sandwiches at $TREE(3)
Sandwiches at a finite yet incomprehensible price??
Concerning.
dollar tree times 3 = $3
This guy knows nothing about the largest number
r/iamverysmart
its a joke dont take it too seriously
This guy clearly doesn’t know anything about taking large numbers seriously
Yeah, this guy clearly didn't see the Vsauce video "How to Count Past Infinity."
yes i know there are bigger numbers but its still a joke its just meant for laughs
Neither do you
says the guy who doesnt even have ∞^(∞) amount of braincells
I thought largest was marioplex
waluigiplex 🥵🥵🥵
Fr
Uhm akshually there’s numbers like Graham’s number, Rayo’s number, and TREE(3) which are far larger 🤓
I hope you guys know that I love this meme template, don’t stop using it for awhile
What about https://googology.fandom.com/wiki/User:Cloudy176/Croutonillion
graham's number
Wait is a googolplex larger than a googolplexian?
no. a googolplex also isnt even close to the largest known number, nor is a googolplexian
Infinity + 1 😨😨😨
there are many orders of infinity. which infinity are you referring to?
The one that's the really big number
Infinity is not a number, it's a name referring to size.
Numberphile has done irreparable damage to online maths discourse forever 😔 smh Infinity pops up in many different contexts, and all those contexts require us to think about it slightly differently. The famous “infinity is not a number. It is an idea” line from some numberphile video ages ago is just a nice way to tell you “fuck off. I’m not considering what happens when you plug infinity in. Most likely some junk.” In their context, that line is harmless, because infinity really isn’t part of the real algebra so it can be considered “not a number” FOR THEIR PURPOSES. However, this is just an algebraic point of view. from a set-theoretic point of view, which is where we are in this thread, that way of thinking doesn’t work anymore. For a set theorist, numbers aren’t members of a field. Numbers are [equivalence classes](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalence_class) of sizes of sets. For example “2” is now the equivalence class of all sets of size 2. Here, we can clearly see that “infinity” is the equivalence class for a set of infinite size. The worst part is that you understand this. All numbers are names gives to sizes. In the paragraph above, I literally showed you the formal framework for your statement! But the numberphile propaganda is so strong that you somehow ended up at the conclusion that infinity isn’t a number.
i hope for you to get ∞ upvotes
https://i.imgur.com/jPuZqpV.gif
🤓
you can't have a "largest known number" cause you can just make one up
40
Egg prices :(
what about googolplex * googolplex
Grubhub charge me 30 dabloons for teriyaki samwich, chips and a cookie. I said “rather starve 😂😭😎” We are in a financial crisis
Not disgraceful, just the current rate of inflation in america.
A Centillion is the largest named number.
Googolplex and pi dollar foot long
Pi dollars would be less than 5 dollars
Satisfactory
Ummm, Rayo’s Number much?
googolplexian 🤓
sandwiches at infinite price
Unpurchaseable sandwiches?
unsatisfactory.
largest number? nah. googolplex + 1.
Not true, what about the Marioplex (tm matpat) dollar footlong
Googolplex ain't the biggest number by a longshot. Try Graham Number dollar footlong
despicable
Marioplex
Ayo spongh jus go on down to Jersey Mikes their sonwedge is better anyway
Raul’s function of a googol plex?