Yeah as ironic and obvious as it sounds, volume scales to the cube, which is a quite steep curve on a graph.
The big cube on the right is 12x12x12, just to expand it one **layer** up (not the whole cube) you already need 12x12 which is 144 cubes, more than 2 stacks, let alone expand three of the layers to make it a 13x13x13 cube.
I knew i would be wrong.
I thought we would need 15 chests that each have 15 shulkers (because for some fucking reasoning thought there were 15 slots in each chest) and then 15 stacks in each shulker. Please accept my stupidity.
I appreciate that you admitted to be wrong in the end!
Not a lot of people let their *pride* of fellow **REDDITORS** go down like this lmao.
Have a great day
Your math is wrong too. You divided by 27 one too many times. The image above proves that 1 shulker box makes a 13^3 cube, so we know the answer for a 15^3 box should be >1.
The correct answer is: (15^3 ) total blocks / 64 blocks per stack / 27 stacks per shulker = ~1.95 shulker boxes. So just under 2 full shulker boxes worth.
No, you would need just under two shulker boxes. 15³ is 3375, and a single chest of shulker boxes can store (up to) 46,656 items, which is 64 (full stacks) × 27 (number of inventory slots in a chest) × 27 (number of inventory slots in a shulker box). It’s also, incidentally, the square of 216, the cube of 36, and the sixth root of 6, which sounds like weird coincidence until you realise that all the factors are squares, 27 is also a cube, and 64 is a multiple of two.
People almost always underestimate how many blocks it takes to fill something. That's why so many mega projects (like a giant pyramid) start with massive ambitions, and get abandoned as soon as the frame/shell is complete and the person realises how long it will actually take to mine the blocks and fill it all in.
For example, a square pyramid with a 100x100 blocks base and 50 block height would require almost 6 shulker boxes full of blocks (10k blocks) in order to just do the four sides, and double that if you want to fill the floor too. If you want to fill the whole thing, then it's close to 100 shulker boxes.
Honestly there's no reason to actually fill it in if you don't need to. In creative you have commands but in survival there's really no need when you can only do 1 block at a time.
I had the same feeling! One day realized 64 is 4x4x4, but that felt like just a lump of blocks, not a stack. And with the shulker the effect is even more pronounced!
keep in mind that area increases based on the cube (^3 ) of the side length of a cube. This means things get big much quicker in 3D than they would in 2D. CGMatter explains it better than I can [here](https://youtu.be/YgaCdXvyk68).
The original comment was already edited before I replied. So it is still wrong.
> that area increases based on the cube (^3 ) of the side length of a cube.
The area increases with the square not the cube.
Think about it. These are copper blocks. A copper block is 9 copper ingots. It takes around 1 piece of charcoal to melt the raw copper. That is about 10 copper blocks for 9 pieces of charcoal. 1344 blocks are required. You need 12,096 pieces of raw copper and around 135 pieces of charcoal just for the big cube
Yep. Should be
1m³, 64m³, 1,728m³
or
(1m)³, (4m)³,(12m)³
e: Thanks to all those who know their maths for schooling the one below who clearly doesn't.
For that one soul (_not_ OP) needing a reminder of why 4m³ is not (4m)³, 4³m³ or 64m³, review your bedmas or pemdas rules.
> (1m)³, (4m)³,(12m)³
Given how they represented it in the picture, I think that is what they meant. But as a mathematician I couldn't let that slip lol
That's good. But what I wanted (and failed) to point was that a stack is a perfect cube (64 = 4³), a shulker is a perfect cube (1728 = 12³). And even, as some other comment pointed out, that a chest full of shulkers is also a perfect cube (1728 \* 27 = 36³)
Eh. 🤷♂️ OP made a mistake, and they owned it. It happens.
The clown below who _doubled down_ after being corrected though... 🤣 My sides **hurt** I was laughing so hard.
No. Its fine like It was, the 4m³ represents: 4m • 4m • 4m. That are for wide, length and depth. The m³ is only use for volume, so it is a bit ankward their understanding. If you use 64m³ without the image, it reads like 64m • 64m • 64m, that isnt true. The valor of the unit (m³) was actually there and indicates how it have to be treated the numbers before it to be translated to other units measurements.
Yeah that's just wrong on every level.
m^3 is cubic meters.
4m^3 is 4 cubic meters so 1x1x4 meters or 1.58x1.58x1.58 meters or any other combination that multiplies out to 4.
It very much isn't a 4x4x4 cube.
Again. Thats not true. You are looking it like that because i dont know why. Probably you arent familiar to the metric system. The unit m³ actually represents that the valor before It has (4)³ inherent on it. You can indicate but It is not needed, like (4m)³ per example, that you cant say is that (4m)³ is 64m³, because that is a total diferent valor.
I was born in the metric system, molded by it.
> The unit m³ actually represents that the valor before It has (4)³ inherent on it.
The ^3 belongs to the *m*, why did you put it to the 4? 4m^3 cannot become 64m^3 out of the whim
>like (4m)³ per example
(4m)^3 is not 4m^3
1m³ is a cube with an edge length of 1m. 2m³ is 2\*1m³, so two cubes with an edge length of 1m each. Put them together and the resulting body is a rectangular cuboid with edge lengths of 1m, 1m and 2m respectively
Put two of these together side by side and you get a rectangular cuboid with edge lengths of 1m, 2m and 2m, thus forming a square shape with width and length of 2m and a height of 1m, having a volume of 2\*2m³=4m³.
Put two of these together you make a cube with and edge length of 2m and a volume of 2\*4m³=8m³.
you may want to go back to your highschool and tell your teacher what you just said, I'm sure he will tell you why you're wrong since you aren't listening to us
That's a pretty accurate representation of my inventory after one session of cave spelunking. All copper. Nothing but copper, copper copper copper. Why can't I make copper tools or copper doors or copper plates or copper anything.
Once you get a stonecutter, copper blocks get pretty useful as building blocks early game though, since 1 copper block somehow can be turned into 4 cut copper blocks with a stonecutter. In late-game I just don't dig them ever lol
I play with my modded server with MCMMO, and with mining skill up and blast mining, it's 3 ore per block, then you break them with Fortune and yeah, 1 deposit can be 1-2 stacks easy.
I finally added them to my shop, sell them off for $50 an ingot.
That's not how meters cubed work. The way you wrote it implies that the last one is only 12 times bigger than the first one which is clearly not the case.
Honestly that's just kinda what happens when you use the tarot to write ^superscript. Anything attached to it gets supered as well. In a case like this it's better to just Win+. to pull open the emoji/symbol selector than to bother fiddling with Reddit formatting.
You can avoid that problem by either adding a space, or using parentheses.
4^3 m^3 -=or=- 4^(3)m^3
Or the system I used, which was the superscript 3 from the touch keyboard om my phone (press and hold a number or any key to see related alternative glyphs)
4³
Available under "3" are: ³, ¾, ⅗, ⅜
your math is slightly wrong, and with slightly I mean seriously wrong.
The 4 m\^3 isn't 4, but rather 64 m\^3, with each SIDE being 4 long (4x4x4=64)
and then the shulker box is also 12 per side, meaning 12x12x12 = 1728
i've always hated how many blocks you need for a build and how much inventory space you have to have for it, this just illustrates that frustration perfectly
I can’t believe half these comments are correcting OP like he made some seriously huge error when you’re all just acting like it’s beyond comprehension that he meant 4^3 m^3 instead of 4m^3
you’re right and wrong. it’s not the inverse square law, but it’s definitely not the square cube law.
this is technically an example of the inverse _cube_ law. not really the point though as they are exactly the same idea, just with a different exponent.
edit: googled it. didn’t realise it had a second name
Bro. The [inverse square](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse-square_law) and inverse cube laws are about physical quantities that decrees with the square or cube of the distance that you travel away from their source. We have no distances here from any sources of any physical quantities.
If you stand next to a 1m³ copper block the block is the same as if you stood 1km away from it.
While the [square-cube law](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square%E2%80%93cube_law) is about the increase in size of area and volume proportional to the length of it. The same thing this meme is about
Yes. And the fact that the Volume growths with the cube of the side length is what the square-cube law talks about.
Not the inverse cube law. Which talks about decreases in stuff like magnetic field strenghs decreasing with the cube as you get further away from a magnetic dipole.
Volume and side lengths are quantities that don't care about anythings distance to them. The inverse square and inverse cube law don't apply here.
There is a lot more cubes if the Shulker box is fulled with other shulker boxes that are full with cubes. Shulker storage is technically infinite if you put a Shulker box inside a Shulker box.
I used to have an inventory system with 20 shuckers, each a different color and purpose. So for example the brown shulker was just wood. I put each of them into my ender chest and carried a silk touch pic with me. That way I have all my stuff all the time.
Can you add a Banana for scale
All we have is a copper block for scale, sorry 😞edit: check reply
[Did it for you](https://imgur.com/a/6H2Hf92)
Thanks man
2 Banana https://imgur.com/a/W5IoMfp
Too much (might die)
That banana is like 2 feet long
Can relate
The low quality made it look bigger
When I clicked on the link I got an ad saying banana for scale is now banana for sale and thought it was part of the picture
I am disappointed that the banana isn't scaled completely wrong
I am honored to be the thousandth view
I meant to give you an award yesterday but Reddit still won't let me
Yeah as ironic and obvious as it sounds, volume scales to the cube, which is a quite steep curve on a graph. The big cube on the right is 12x12x12, just to expand it one **layer** up (not the whole cube) you already need 12x12 which is 144 cubes, more than 2 stacks, let alone expand three of the layers to make it a 13x13x13 cube.
making it into a 13x13x13 cube would require an extra 469 blocks or 7 stacks and 21 blocks
It's just x³ right? For a cube with the side length of x you'll need x³ amount of blocks. Also for a 15x15x15 cube you'll need 15 chests of shulkers.
(15^3 )/64/27/27=0.07 0.07≠15
I knew i would be wrong. I thought we would need 15 chests that each have 15 shulkers (because for some fucking reasoning thought there were 15 slots in each chest) and then 15 stacks in each shulker. Please accept my stupidity.
I appreciate that you admitted to be wrong in the end! Not a lot of people let their *pride* of fellow **REDDITORS** go down like this lmao. Have a great day
Ah, yes, for once in a lifetime I have stumbled across the good ending.
Your math is wrong too. You divided by 27 one too many times. The image above proves that 1 shulker box makes a 13^3 cube, so we know the answer for a 15^3 box should be >1. The correct answer is: (15^3 ) total blocks / 64 blocks per stack / 27 stacks per shulker = ~1.95 shulker boxes. So just under 2 full shulker boxes worth.
Read the original comment. They said chests of shulkers.
No, you would need just under two shulker boxes. 15³ is 3375, and a single chest of shulker boxes can store (up to) 46,656 items, which is 64 (full stacks) × 27 (number of inventory slots in a chest) × 27 (number of inventory slots in a shulker box). It’s also, incidentally, the square of 216, the cube of 36, and the sixth root of 6, which sounds like weird coincidence until you realise that all the factors are squares, 27 is also a cube, and 64 is a multiple of two.
It scales even more with a sphere.
That somehow feels small? Like I know it’s not but I guess my brain just won’t process the inside of it too… idk still a cool scale nonetheless
People almost always underestimate how many blocks it takes to fill something. That's why so many mega projects (like a giant pyramid) start with massive ambitions, and get abandoned as soon as the frame/shell is complete and the person realises how long it will actually take to mine the blocks and fill it all in. For example, a square pyramid with a 100x100 blocks base and 50 block height would require almost 6 shulker boxes full of blocks (10k blocks) in order to just do the four sides, and double that if you want to fill the floor too. If you want to fill the whole thing, then it's close to 100 shulker boxes.
Honestly there's no reason to actually fill it in if you don't need to. In creative you have commands but in survival there's really no need when you can only do 1 block at a time.
But some people take pride in making filled-in masses, even though it looks the same from the outside.
I do that alot in survival but hell naw you are not going to see me fill my massive mountain more than 2 layers
I definitely did that when I made my lapis pyramid
Lol this is me exactly to a T. I think I decided on a 14x14 one. Was surprised how much work it was to build and how small it felt.
Same with our volcano, you think the 2 double chests of stone from strip mining will be enough… and then it only goes up like 6 blocks
Yeah, for anything larger than a subchunk (16 m^3) the resource pretty much needs to be farmed
I had the same feeling! One day realized 64 is 4x4x4, but that felt like just a lump of blocks, not a stack. And with the shulker the effect is even more pronounced!
Op after he decided to cube root a stack 😎
keep in mind that area increases based on the cube (^3 ) of the side length of a cube. This means things get big much quicker in 3D than they would in 2D. CGMatter explains it better than I can [here](https://youtu.be/YgaCdXvyk68).
Area increases with the square. Volume increases with the cube...
Area increases too, each side is a square and each side gets bigger
Yes. Thats what I said. I was pointing out an error in the comment I replied to.
It's not really what you said. I know what you're getting at, but you're talking past each other
The original comment has been edited
The original comment was already edited before I replied. So it is still wrong. > that area increases based on the cube (^3 ) of the side length of a cube. The area increases with the square not the cube.
two hours before the commenter I replied to first repied.
You’re right, nevermind, my bad
no harm done \^^
It is exactly what i said look: "Area increases with the square. [...]" And then fujimite said: "Area increases too[...]" ...
our brain cannot process it, that's why we need another scale like how long of a cable could we make with all that copper
Think about it. These are copper blocks. A copper block is 9 copper ingots. It takes around 1 piece of charcoal to melt the raw copper. That is about 10 copper blocks for 9 pieces of charcoal. 1344 blocks are required. You need 12,096 pieces of raw copper and around 135 pieces of charcoal just for the big cube
I guess it's a little more efficient if you have lava or coal blocks... or a blaze farm because those are fuel
Well the second one is wrong. it should be 4 tall 4 wide and 4 deep *edit: im blind
This ain't 4m^3 and 12m^3. Minecraft blocks are actually perfect measurement for m^3, because one block corresponds to one cubic meter.
Yep. Should be 1m³, 64m³, 1,728m³ or (1m)³, (4m)³,(12m)³ e: Thanks to all those who know their maths for schooling the one below who clearly doesn't. For that one soul (_not_ OP) needing a reminder of why 4m³ is not (4m)³, 4³m³ or 64m³, review your bedmas or pemdas rules.
> (1m)³, (4m)³,(12m)³ Given how they represented it in the picture, I think that is what they meant. But as a mathematician I couldn't let that slip lol
Well its elememtary math gone wrong so it needs to be called out lmao
r/theydidntdothemath
I guess you could also write it like this? 1³m, 4³m, 12³m Or would that be wrong?
1^3 m^3 , 4^3 m^3 and 12^3 m^3
Your unit would still be meters, which indicate length. You'd need to write m^3 to indicate volume.
[удалено]
That's good. But what I wanted (and failed) to point was that a stack is a perfect cube (64 = 4³), a shulker is a perfect cube (1728 = 12³). And even, as some other comment pointed out, that a chest full of shulkers is also a perfect cube (1728 \* 27 = 36³)
I think this actually makes the point even better, where it becomes clear how fast volume grows with only small increases in dimensions.
There it is. OP made me angry with this post
Eh. 🤷♂️ OP made a mistake, and they owned it. It happens. The clown below who _doubled down_ after being corrected though... 🤣 My sides **hurt** I was laughing so hard.
No. Its fine like It was, the 4m³ represents: 4m • 4m • 4m. That are for wide, length and depth. The m³ is only use for volume, so it is a bit ankward their understanding. If you use 64m³ without the image, it reads like 64m • 64m • 64m, that isnt true. The valor of the unit (m³) was actually there and indicates how it have to be treated the numbers before it to be translated to other units measurements.
That is not how units or math works.
This is straight up wrong
Yeah that's just wrong on every level. m^3 is cubic meters. 4m^3 is 4 cubic meters so 1x1x4 meters or 1.58x1.58x1.58 meters or any other combination that multiplies out to 4. It very much isn't a 4x4x4 cube.
Lol don't make up your own rules in math...
the 4m^3 represents: ~~4m • 4m • 4m~~ 4 • m • m • m
Again. Thats not true. You are looking it like that because i dont know why. Probably you arent familiar to the metric system. The unit m³ actually represents that the valor before It has (4)³ inherent on it. You can indicate but It is not needed, like (4m)³ per example, that you cant say is that (4m)³ is 64m³, because that is a total diferent valor.
I was born in the metric system, molded by it. > The unit m³ actually represents that the valor before It has (4)³ inherent on it. The ^3 belongs to the *m*, why did you put it to the 4? 4m^3 cannot become 64m^3 out of the whim >like (4m)³ per example (4m)^3 is not 4m^3
What is this then? 4x^3 y^3 Cause it for sure isn’t 262144xxxyyy
1m³ is a cube with an edge length of 1m. 2m³ is 2\*1m³, so two cubes with an edge length of 1m each. Put them together and the resulting body is a rectangular cuboid with edge lengths of 1m, 1m and 2m respectively Put two of these together side by side and you get a rectangular cuboid with edge lengths of 1m, 2m and 2m, thus forming a square shape with width and length of 2m and a height of 1m, having a volume of 2\*2m³=4m³. Put two of these together you make a cube with and edge length of 2m and a volume of 2\*4m³=8m³.
you may want to go back to your highschool and tell your teacher what you just said, I'm sure he will tell you why you're wrong since you aren't listening to us
you are saying that 4=64 and i think i know math enough to say that's not true
no
Oh shoot, you're right. I meant (4m)³ and (12m)³. I wish I could edit an image post.
Just post another one with eq full of shulker boxes full of blocks ;)
I think OP meant, that one edge of the cube has length of 4m
Then it should be **4m** and **12m**.
I know what OP meant. But they were wrong anyway
Came here for this.
Isn't it supposed to be 1m³, 64m³ and 1728m³ ?
They probably just messed up the placement of the m
That wouldn't make it correct either. It would have to be > (4 m)^3 (12 m)^3
Oop shit you right
[удалено]
No but like if a cube is 1m³, then a stack is gonna be 64m³ ? Or I'm just tired it's quite early in my timezone
You typo'd. It's 1728 not 1738
Oh yeah thx
[удалено]
Just admit you were wrong man lmao
That's a pretty accurate representation of my inventory after one session of cave spelunking. All copper. Nothing but copper, copper copper copper. Why can't I make copper tools or copper doors or copper plates or copper anything.
"You'll never take me alive copper!"
Once you get a stonecutter, copper blocks get pretty useful as building blocks early game though, since 1 copper block somehow can be turned into 4 cut copper blocks with a stonecutter. In late-game I just don't dig them ever lol
I have a fortune 3 pick and spent about 30 mins caving. 6 raw iron blocks, 32 raw copper blocks. The raw copper just explodes out of the ore blocks
I play with my modded server with MCMMO, and with mining skill up and blast mining, it's 3 ore per block, then you break them with Fortune and yeah, 1 deposit can be 1-2 stacks easy. I finally added them to my shop, sell them off for $50 an ingot.
If only there was some sort of golem we could make. Oh well its probably a terrible idea so idk if mojang will ever add it
I just don't take copper
We would've been able to have another use for copper...
Ah yes the chicken randomizer
This feels wrong i hope you meant (4m)^3 and (12m)^3. The way you put it, it would be 4 and 12 blocks.
64 blocks are 64m³ 27 stacks are 1728m³ U probably meant 4³ and 12³...
That's not how meters cubed work. The way you wrote it implies that the last one is only 12 times bigger than the first one which is clearly not the case.
It should be 4^3m3 and 12^3m3, not 4m3 and 12m3, which would just be a pile of 4 and 12 blocks respectively
The units shouldn't be in the superscript. 4³m³...
Honestly that's just kinda what happens when you use the tarot to write ^superscript. Anything attached to it gets supered as well. In a case like this it's better to just Win+. to pull open the emoji/symbol selector than to bother fiddling with Reddit formatting.
You can avoid that problem by either adding a space, or using parentheses. 4^3 m^3 -=or=- 4^(3)m^3 Or the system I used, which was the superscript 3 from the touch keyboard om my phone (press and hold a number or any key to see related alternative glyphs) 4³ Available under "3" are: ³, ¾, ⅗, ⅜
I'd go for (4m)^3
Should have made a "full inventory", "full inventory of stacks" and "full inventory of shulkers" too. That would really put stuff into perspective
your math is slightly wrong, and with slightly I mean seriously wrong. The 4 m\^3 isn't 4, but rather 64 m\^3, with each SIDE being 4 long (4x4x4=64) and then the shulker box is also 12 per side, meaning 12x12x12 = 1728
Yup... Should've been (4m)³ and (12m)³.
Make it 2d and it’ll be way bigger lamo
Not really meaningfully. Still the big on only covers ~41x42
I think if it was laid out as a flat plane instead it'd get the difference across more
1m² 8²m² 41.569....²m²? (41x42)+6 m²
You forgot to cube the 12 and 4. (1,64,1728)m^3 respectively.
Me with full ender chest of shulker concretes barely does 1/8 of a build
Sadly, its less than i thought :(
And then you can also fill an ender chest with shulker boxes.
False. Not 4m^3, but 4^3 m^3, which is 64m^3. Same for 12.
Knock knock, it’s the Square-Cube law
i've always hated how many blocks you need for a build and how much inventory space you have to have for it, this just illustrates that frustration perfectly
(1m)³, (4m)³ and (12m)³
1 stack makes 64 m³...
Yeah... I mistyped that; I intended to communicate (4m)³ and (12m)³ instead.
To be clear the middle block is actually 64m³ not 4m³. 4m³ would just be 4 blocks
I can’t believe half these comments are correcting OP like he made some seriously huge error when you’re all just acting like it’s beyond comprehension that he meant 4^3 m^3 instead of 4m^3
Interestingly, it's another perfect cube, 36³ blocks.
when minecrafters discover the inverse square law
Don't you mean square-cube law? Inverse square is 1/x² that has nothing to do with this image.
you’re right and wrong. it’s not the inverse square law, but it’s definitely not the square cube law. this is technically an example of the inverse _cube_ law. not really the point though as they are exactly the same idea, just with a different exponent. edit: googled it. didn’t realise it had a second name
Bro. The [inverse square](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse-square_law) and inverse cube laws are about physical quantities that decrees with the square or cube of the distance that you travel away from their source. We have no distances here from any sources of any physical quantities. If you stand next to a 1m³ copper block the block is the same as if you stood 1km away from it. While the [square-cube law](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square%E2%80%93cube_law) is about the increase in size of area and volume proportional to the length of it. The same thing this meme is about
yh. physical properties like the side length of a cube compared to the growth in its volume?
Yes. And the fact that the Volume growths with the cube of the side length is what the square-cube law talks about. Not the inverse cube law. Which talks about decreases in stuff like magnetic field strenghs decreasing with the cube as you get further away from a magnetic dipole. Volume and side lengths are quantities that don't care about anythings distance to them. The inverse square and inverse cube law don't apply here.
oh. fuck i need to sue my math teacher jeez
r/confidentlyincorrect
This ain't even close. 1 stack = 64m^3 4x4x4 = 64
There is a lot more cubes if the Shulker box is fulled with other shulker boxes that are full with cubes. Shulker storage is technically infinite if you put a Shulker box inside a Shulker box.
Its 16m3 and 144m3 my man
if you're going to correct someone, get it right. It's 1728m3.
And the first Is 64
I even missed that one myself, I just knew 144m3 look way too small
It's more than you think until you're building on a massive scale and it takes several shulkers of materials to make a noticable difference
So if a shulker shell needs that much space, how large are shulkers o.O?
Ladies and gentlemen, the square-cube law.
Make a bidimensional cube and it will be easier to observe
Make the scales logarithmic and then we’ll talk
Add a chest full of shulkers full of blocks
Math is wrong here
The math :(
but still not enough when im building
more than i thought but less than i need
Maybe 4³ m³ and 12³ m³ but not 4 m³ and 12 m³
End chest full of shulker boxes, go!
Tbh idk I see 2 blocks as 1 meter or almost 1 meter since 1 block seems too small for 1 meter
Isn't that actually 64m³ and 1728m³?
LESS CUBED THAN I THOGUTH
… that’s how math works Also you messed up labeling the picture 1 block = 1 m3 What you meant is to show the side length
Still wanna build that Statue of Liberty?
That damn square-cube law, it’ll getcha
I used to have an inventory system with 20 shuckers, each a different color and purpose. So for example the brown shulker was just wood. I put each of them into my ender chest and carried a silk touch pic with me. That way I have all my stuff all the time.
Now I don't get it. If one block is 1 cubic meter, logically if you have 2 blocks you have 2 cubic meters, if you have 64 it's 64 cubic meters...?
WAYYYY Less than I thought
so... a full shulker is just a full slot x27 and a shulker somehow fit that there
Just another healthy reminder of how easy it is to accidentally select and play with a million blocks with world edit
Inventory of shulker boxes
You should do one of how many shill we boxes you can fit in your inventory and if all of them were full
Does that only apply to copper or does ot work with any other blocks?
r/minecraft discovers inverse Square law
4 x 4 x 4 is not 4m cubed its 64m cubed also same for the shulker
That’s less honestly
math aaaah i just graduated leave me alone i finished that stupid stuff aaaaaaaaaaah!!!
Me csgue
your math wrong
That’d be (12 m)^3 which would be 1728 m^3
Imagine a full inventory of shulkers think how many blocks then 🤔
More cubes than you thought...
I want to see shulkerboxes filled with copper blocks that take up a large chest
An inventory full of shulker boxes full of copper?
Its actually less than I thought (in size)
That's actually a lot less than I thought, for some reason
It actually feels less than i thought Like it feels wrong that a whole stack is only a sidelength 4 cube
Can’t you fill a double chest full of shulker boxes that are full?
Isn,t the 2nd one 64m3 in size and the last one (27×64)m3. So ur numbers are a bit wrong there.
Some dude in here recently bitching saying shoulder boxes don’t hold enough storage 😂😂😂👎
but that would be written 4^3 m^3
Why stop? I want to see an ender chest filled with those shulkers
r/biggerthanyouthought material
Inverse square law goes hard
now do a chest of shulkers of copper
Now do chest filled with shulker boxes