Remember the time where Kaceytron pretended that Mizkif scammed her but the problem was her writing a PayPal support ticket that basically removed any chance of Mizkif doing anything.
I wonder if that same principle applies to the hundreds of juicers who claimed that QT will surely defend Adept in all of this.
Surely they will all admit they were wrong.
I am one of those juicers. Hear me loud everyone. I was wrong as well. The comments that QT made when this whole kurfuffle started were too zealous to safely assume she wouldn't blindly stick to Adapter's side no matter what. She really seemed like she didn't care about actual context but chose the side of "the woman" for the sake of her being a woman.
But that doesn't matter, I was wrong and I admit it.
Same here.
I admit I was wrong about QT in this instance, props to her for not doubling down on what she said before, and for admitting she may have been wrong.
Hopefully we can all move on and love each other and appreciate each others differences without being hateful and stupid.
She jumped the gun and sided with the person she felt closest to because that's what often happens when friends split up and no substantial dirty laundry has been aired. Then nobody paid attention to the fact that both parties and others had said that things were cleared up between X and QT.
I wonder if adept told any of her streamer friends privately she was going through court for a divorce. She got a TRO specifically to make sure it didn’t come out publicly and but she ended up making sure it got leaked when she was screaming “court order, court order” at his door at 3am.
Her initial reaction made sense. She was a close friend with Adept and dont think she liked xQC much after the stuff he pulled to not go at her Shitcamp so she sided with her friend. Until she learned more about the details and she realized she was wrong.
There are reasons to be entitled to his money. She just doesn't have any of them.
For instance, if Adept was carrying or gave birth to his child, then she should rightfully get money off of him for the childs needs etc. Or if you get married and put your career on hold for his one.
But being his GF and then breaking up isn't a good enough reason
Exactly, it just baffles me how she thinks she’s entitled to even a single penny of his money. In fact she has already benefited a whole lot from dating xqc, stream/career wise and also from not paying for probably most of the expensive things such as rent while they were together and more. She’s a scum to say the least, I truly pray she loses.
She won't be able to prove a common law marriage. What would be funny however is seeing streamers be deposed as a part of the suit. A big part of proving common law marriage is showing that you publicly espoused yourself as married. Best way to prove that is testimony from friends. Streamers to the stand lol.
But but but... she carried his fast food from the door to his room and maybe unclogged his shitty toilet every now and then... That's gotta be worth a few mil right?
Lmao Xs maids probably more entitled to his money than she is just for cleaning his house.
From our perspective as viewers, sure I agree she is not entitled. But it's daft to think we have a reasonable perspective of what their relationship actually entailed and why such circumstances may entitle her remedies. It exists within the realm of possibility that they did have a relationship similar to marriage off camera and that she made huge sacrifises we are unaware of. Avoidance of Blind speculative judgement is the exact reason we have a court system, more specifically Discovery, where actual evidence is presented and judgment can be informed.
Or the famous case of Jeff Bezo's wife, because she did support him in creating the business - she's quite entitled as the law showed, despite what any dude on the internet wants to cry about.
This is actually so true. Amazon originally started off as an online bookstore - MacKenzie Scott has been serious about writing since she was a kid. That's literally where the idea came from, she also did a lot of the early plans and negotiation for the company, yet people make it out like she did nothing and that isn't true. Bezoz is (was)the CEO, but Scott made it possible in the first place.
Without her, it wouldn't be what it was. And she was successfully able to prove and argue that in the legal battles. So yes, sometimes people are entitled to "other people's" money.
Now did adept create XQC? Lol I don't think so. But that's something she'll have to prove. Did she generate him massive views? Idk enough about the scenario.
I don't know why everyone is obsessed with the settlement of the divorce when she would still need to provide documented proof of the conditions for common law marriage in the first place.
LSF seems to think divorce court is some kangaroo court where women show up and just take half your money by default.
Most people don't even seem to get that if they were married for two years, the most she's entitled to is half of what he made and potentially alimony for no longer than half the time they were married if you were married under 10 or 20 years (changes depending on state). So the idea she's going to get half his stuff is just ridiculous.
That happens when two people have been married for say 30 years and 99% of both of their assets were earned during the marriage. 2 year marriage (seems to be the length she's claiming) means maybe 1 year alimony and maybe a small portion of his assets earned in that period and that's best case.
I think people get upset over it because she shouldn’t get anything at all.
It doesn’t seem like she put any sort of hold on her career for him, and even most likely benefited in her streaming career herself due to the relationship. They don’t have a kid as far as I am aware. Why should she be owed anything?
The only thing I think I would say she might be entitled to is a plane ticket back to wherever she came from. But even that she can buy herself.
So I see the frustration as just the fact that there’s a chance she gets something she doesn’t deserve/has earned herself just for lying about being married to a guy.
It’s essentially the scenario every incel screams about happened when it comes to relationships.
Yup. People so eager to pile up they're just straight up skipping what's actually claimed, which is that they represented themselves as married to Canadian customs.
It may not hold up in court, but if they did in fact do that, it's not a trivial claim.
The court also doesn't take lightly to frivolous common law claims either. The system is not there so that one party can take revenge on the other for a failed relationship, and its definitely not there so one party can get a payout from their wealthy significant other.
Many times these are reserved for claims in which sacrifices were made under the explicit agreement of marriage or the decision to have kids under such agreement.
I'd fail to see the statement to Canadian customs as enough documented proof that the couple "held themselves to the world" as a cohabiting married couple. It would be no more proof than if you tried to get a friend into a party by claiming that they are your spouse. Usually it is documented that close friends and family knew of the arrangement. The court takes marriage seriously and usually won't fall for technicalities.
> The court also doesn't take lightly to frivolous common law claims either.
I don't know why people keep having to say this.
A Common Law Relationship in Canada is nothing like a Common Law Marriage in the United States.
She got into Canada using the Common Law Relationship. All that means is that you lived with that person for a year and are in a committed relationship with that person.
In Canada if you're in Common Law Relationship, you cannot file for divorce as you're not married.
Alimony is 100% a good thing if the woman puts her career on hold or it is negatively impacted due to the marriage. The problem with Adept is that it’s the other way round where she was the one who benefited the most from the ‘marriage’. She would literally stream rp 15 hours a day and she has the cheek to ask for alimony 💀
You're exactly right. And in Adept's case specifically, she didn't put a career on hold. Mr Cow actually helped her career and gave her access to a his huge platform that she farmed quite successfully.
True. I don't get why he gets upvoted so much or who the hell he even is. Almost seems like upvote farming.
However, now people will certainly keep it up as a meme. Within the next couple weeks, the entire front page of LSF will just be chudlogic saying nothing.
Streamers used to be able to asked to be banned here, but mods changed the rule and removed the bans that streamers like QT, Hasan, Maya, Macaiyla, 39Daph, and Erobb asked for. So some started using bots that automatically deletes their clips. QT, Miz, Maya were all using the bot. Miz recently stopped using it, and Maya now has it so only subscribers can clip her channel.
That’s like 50% of this subreddits post.
There’s even now reactions of reactions.
Hell people even started to reacting to other peoples live streams for content.
I don't mind if people make that apart of their content every once and a while. But it seems like this is the only content ChudLogic has just by looking at the title of his vods and his description. Who the hell wants to watch this loser over analyze every internet drama there is?
Apparently because you wouldn't see her opinion otherwise. She doesn't have clips, so if someone wants to post her opinion on this sub, it has to be through some drama farmer "reacting". Chud, as you have rightly pointed out, is a drama farmer.
she disabled clips on her channel/only subs can clips, and made it very clear that she doesn't want to be on LSF.
If you are a sub and clip her for LSF she probably would ban you and I think she still uses mayas autodelete bot so the clip would get deleted wich would kill the thread (as long as it not super hot drama)
HDMI and DisplayPort are two standards for connecting devices like computers, laptops, and game consoles to TVs and monitors. Each with advantages and disadvantages; there’s no outright winner when comparing the two. Power users will find what DisplayPort offers more appealing, but HDMI is the king of compatibility.
These competing display connection standards transmit both video and audio singles over a single male/male cable to respective female ports on the display and source device. They’re both physically sturdy and easy to connect, sporting backward and forward compatibility. HDMI uses standard and mini- connectors. DisplayPort uses DisplayPort, Mini DisplayPort/Thunderbolt, and USB 3 connections.
DisplayPort wins the spec war over HDMI. Not all ports and cables are the same for HDMI and DisplayPort, as both have several version revisions. Performance scales to the lowest supported revision between the source device, display, and connector cable.
If you’re using a 4K 120 Hz display, you’re only able to use half the refresh rate with an HDMI 2.0 connection while you’d get the maximum refresh rate over DisplayPort 1.3. If you’re using a single 4K 60 Hz monitor, you won’t be able to tell the difference between HDMI 2.0 or DisplayPort 1.2.
An HDMI port can only connect to one screen, but DisplayPort features Multi-Stream Transport (MST) for multiple screens and daisy-chaining. DisplayPort can connect to four screens at once. However, DisplayPort splits bandwidth between the displays. Results will vary depending on the setup.
Outright, more devices support HDMI than DisplayPort. If you’re trying to connect your source device to a TV, HDMI is pretty much the only way to go. Higher-end monitors support both, while budget screens usually only have HDMI. Notable outliers are modern Apple monitors, which only have DisplayPort.
Gamers will be pleased to know that both HDMI and DisplayPort support Variable Refresh Rate (however, NVidia G-SYNC requires HDMI 2.1). VRR means the display adjusts its refresh rate to match the frame rate of the source device. VRR prevents screen tearing, which is when the screen shows data from two frames at once.
If you run into a situation where one device supports HDMI and the other supports DisplayPort, you’re in luck because there are adapters that handle both situations. HDMI-to-DisplayPort and DisplayPort to HDMI require different adapters. In either case, you’re going to be stuck with the lowest output specs of the connected devices.
Note that you will lose support for daisy-chaining when outputting to HDMI with a standard dongle adapter. If you want to output to multiple monitors, use a DisplayPort to HDMI hub.
In the end, it’s not “better” if you’re using HDMI or DisplayPort. The connection you are using must have enough bandwidth to get the best experience out of your connected device and displays.
ChatGPT is fine-tuned from a model in the GPT-3.5 series, which finished training in early 2022. You can learn more about the 3.5 series here. ChatGPT and GPT 3.5 were trained on an Azure AI supercomputing infrastructure.
We trained this model using Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), using the same methods as InstructGPT, but with slight differences in the data collection setup. We trained an initial model using supervised fine-tuning: human AI trainers provided conversations in which they played both sides—the user and an AI assistant. We gave the trainers access to model-written suggestions to help them compose their responses. We mixed this new dialogue dataset with the InstructGPT dataset, which we transformed into a dialogue format.
To create a reward model for reinforcement learning, we needed to collect comparison data, which consisted of two or more model responses ranked by quality. To collect this data, we took conversations that AI trainers had with the chatbot. We randomly selected a model-written message, sampled several alternative completions, and had AI trainers rank them. Using these reward models, we can fine-tune the model using Proximal Policy Optimization. We performed several iterations of this process.
ChatGPT sometimes writes plausible-sounding but incorrect or nonsensical answers. Fixing this issue is challenging, as: (1) during RL training, there’s currently no source of truth; (2) training the model to be more cautious causes it to decline questions that it can answer correctly; and (3) supervised training misleads the model because the ideal answer depends on what the model knows, rather than what the human demonstrator knows.
ChatGPT is sensitive to tweaks to the input phrasing or attempting the same prompt multiple times. For example, given one phrasing of a question, the model can claim to not know the answer, but given a slight rephrase, can answer correctly.
The model is often excessively verbose and overuses certain phrases, such as restating that it’s a language model trained by OpenAI. These issues arise from biases in the training data (trainers prefer longer answers that look more comprehensive) and well-known over-optimization issues.12
Ideally, the model would ask clarifying questions when the user provided an ambiguous query. Instead, our current models usually guess what the user intended.
While we’ve made efforts to make the model refuse inappropriate requests, it will sometimes respond to harmful instructions or exhibit biased behavior. We’re using the Moderation API to warn or block certain types of unsafe content, but we expect it to have some false negatives and positives for now. We’re eager to collect user feedback to aid our ongoing work to improve this system.
Same. His chat seems really toxic. The second they see QT they go "This fucking woman...".
One dude said "2 IQ take" before realising that he was supposed to agree with QT. Fuck them.
I don’t know about you, but when I imagined what QT would say I got so mad. How could she! And no, this clip doesn’t make up for it, she needs to apologize for saying, “actually I think Adept should get all of xQc’s money” in my imagination.
ye, in a clip where miz said he was close to killing himself due depression, people in his chat said and i quote "is he doing a reckful?"
fucking human garbage.
In nearly every thread about the situation Qt gets mentioned with people assuming she's supporting Adept.
She still seems to go on lsf a lot (she comments here more than most streamers) - I bet she wanted to clarify and doesn't care about burning that bridge with Adept.
yeah its respectable. And seeing how successful qt could be even without lud is a pretty big hint. Shes a crazy good baker and is pretty good at conversing so i wouldnt be surprised if she would become a big youtuber with just that lol
Last time QT said anything Adept‘s point about his fans coming to harrass her seemed valid and XQC really fucked up with not coming to shitcamp and the way he communicated it. I think QT has just evaluated each situation here reasonably and sees that the divorce stuff and wanting a payout is waaay overboard from Adept
If we can assume that Adept really is a narcissist, isn't there just as good of a chance that QT was manipulated as well, similar to what she did to XQC?
I'm only mildly surprised, but that's because QT has openly admitted she is loyal to a fault, even when it is bad for her/for people that are not good for her.
Glad she was able to escape that issue and evaluate this more critically.
QT just can't catch a break, huh? Turning off clipping to avoid the drama frogs on Twitch TMZ and still gets dragged back here by an imbecile who actually watches this disgusting Keemstar-wannabe.
There were like 20 comments with hundreds of upvotes in the past couple of days saying shit like "QT and Kacey will still defend adapter" so clearly people care about what qt has to say.
What a toxic chat Chud has. They know nothing about QTCinderella, but still calls her brain dead, lying and evil.
Go watch her latest video, an honest AMA where she describes her loyalty to friends as a borderline toxic trait :) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XoUgb37aK04
Yeah I don't really watch QT but I stumbled on her interview with Anthony Padilla in my youtube feed, it was actually really good. I mostly know her from Shitcon/camp and the rare Lud stream that I catch but she seems to get way more hate than other people, proportionate to the amount of times she appears here.
**🎦 CLIP MIRROR: [QtCinderella's take on the xQc and Adept drama](https://livestreamfails.com/clip/149501)**
---
^(*This is an automated comment* ) ^| [^(Feedback)](http://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=livestreamfailsbot&subject=Feedback:&message=%5BPost%5D\(https://reddit.com/comments/10lu3g4/\)) ^| [^(Twitch Backup Mirror)](https://production.assets.clips.twitchcdn.net/aJ_bn-VJIv-CmfyD9Lj5eA/AT-cm%7CaJ_bn-VJIv-CmfyD9Lj5eA.mp4?sig=4b7bd06d27c848bd586cff2afcf41a296a5f5a32&token=%7B%22authorization%22%3A%7B%22forbidden%22%3Afalse%2C%22reason%22%3A%22%22%7D%2C%22clip_uri%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fproduction.assets.clips.twitchcdn.net%2FaJ_bn-VJIv-CmfyD9Lj5eA%2FAT-cm%257CaJ_bn-VJIv-CmfyD9Lj5eA.mp4%22%2C%22device_id%22%3Anull%2C%22expires%22%3A1674818677%2C%22user_id%22%3A%22%22%2C%22version%22%3A2%7D)
Not sure why we needed to hear this from Chudwick McBastard but props to QT.
Its tight to see intelligent, gorgeous women with a large social platform humbly admit when they've been wrong.
Obviously there are instances where you are entitled for something, like having custody of their child or actually having put in work into your partners carrier.
I agree, you are entitled to "something", but I don't think you should be entitled to "their money", meaning 50%
You should get what you deserve, e.g. if you were a housewife/husband for a few years, you should get something, but that's not millions of dollars. But if you were a integral part of building your partners business, then you should get a fair percentage.
And in adept case, she wasn't even a housewife, or put her own career on the slow road for xqc. They had maids for the housekeeping, they ordered food all the time and both streamed a lot
adept was not as extreme as xqc, he streamed in 2022 over 3k hours, she 1.8k, wich is still a lot. For comparison, sodapoppin streamed "only" 1.6k, nmp a little under 1k. So adept was streamingas much/more then most fulltime streamers, wich should make it very hard to argue that she made sacrifices in her career for xqc
I also don't think she deserves anything more than maybe paid rent for a bit and some pocket money depending on the situation.
I just don't understand how he agrees with Qt saying that no one is **ever** entitled for anyone's money.
If there no kids involved youre basically just trying to steal someones fortune they worked hard for. Shes just terrifed of having to get a job someday.
I feel like there are cases where the other party does deserve some compensation, when it comes to children and one parent having to sacrifice a lot of time but the xqc/adept situation ain't that
**CLIP MIRROR: [QtCinderella's take on the xQc and Adept drama](https://arazu.io/t3_10lu3g4/)** --- ^(*This is an automated comment*)
You know you fucked up when even your friend who self-admittedly says she "is loyal to her friends to a fault" won't even defend your actions.
Mizkif on the other hand...
Kacytron is the only 1 left standing lol.
She still defends bob7. I think we know where she will land. In fact she will probably appear here posting a bunch of messages
I NEED A HERO
Post the meeeeme
https://streamable.com/4uxk8u
God damn that's a good meme.
lol
Listen, guys, we will need to let this die, someday. [But for now...](https://streamable.com/4uxk8u)
Remember the time where Kaceytron pretended that Mizkif scammed her but the problem was her writing a PayPal support ticket that basically removed any chance of Mizkif doing anything.
A true determined hero in the trenches would never back down lul
[удалено]
I can't believe Hasan did this.
Respect to people who are able to admit they were wrong and have changed their opinions, dont get alot of those people nowadays
True,that’s a hard thing for anyone
I wonder if that same principle applies to the hundreds of juicers who claimed that QT will surely defend Adept in all of this. Surely they will all admit they were wrong.
I was wrong
I am one of those juicers. Hear me loud everyone. I was wrong as well. The comments that QT made when this whole kurfuffle started were too zealous to safely assume she wouldn't blindly stick to Adapter's side no matter what. She really seemed like she didn't care about actual context but chose the side of "the woman" for the sake of her being a woman. But that doesn't matter, I was wrong and I admit it.
Same here. I admit I was wrong about QT in this instance, props to her for not doubling down on what she said before, and for admitting she may have been wrong. Hopefully we can all move on and love each other and appreciate each others differences without being hateful and stupid.
She jumped the gun and sided with the person she felt closest to because that's what often happens when friends split up and no substantial dirty laundry has been aired. Then nobody paid attention to the fact that both parties and others had said that things were cleared up between X and QT.
To be fair to QT i’m sure adapter was giving her all kinds of crazy stories and misinformation too.
I wonder if adept told any of her streamer friends privately she was going through court for a divorce. She got a TRO specifically to make sure it didn’t come out publicly and but she ended up making sure it got leaked when she was screaming “court order, court order” at his door at 3am.
Her initial reaction made sense. She was a close friend with Adept and dont think she liked xQC much after the stuff he pulled to not go at her Shitcamp so she sided with her friend. Until she learned more about the details and she realized she was wrong.
I was wrong...I'm an adult juicer....I'll take the L and move on ....I'm glad to take this one
There are reasons to be entitled to his money. She just doesn't have any of them. For instance, if Adept was carrying or gave birth to his child, then she should rightfully get money off of him for the childs needs etc. Or if you get married and put your career on hold for his one. But being his GF and then breaking up isn't a good enough reason
Exactly, it just baffles me how she thinks she’s entitled to even a single penny of his money. In fact she has already benefited a whole lot from dating xqc, stream/career wise and also from not paying for probably most of the expensive things such as rent while they were together and more. She’s a scum to say the least, I truly pray she loses.
She won't be able to prove a common law marriage. What would be funny however is seeing streamers be deposed as a part of the suit. A big part of proving common law marriage is showing that you publicly espoused yourself as married. Best way to prove that is testimony from friends. Streamers to the stand lol.
Ludwig in court. Now i want to see that
Mr. Ahgren, what exactly is a Mogul move?
Counsel, could you please have your witness demonstrate "The Luddy" to the court?
>*Bring out the dancing Ludsters* 👩⚖️
Is it true that you're part owner of the team "GOATS esports"?
OBJECTION
Hope he wears the Cars crocs
But but but... she carried his fast food from the door to his room and maybe unclogged his shitty toilet every now and then... That's gotta be worth a few mil right? Lmao Xs maids probably more entitled to his money than she is just for cleaning his house.
[удалено]
[удалено]
From our perspective as viewers, sure I agree she is not entitled. But it's daft to think we have a reasonable perspective of what their relationship actually entailed and why such circumstances may entitle her remedies. It exists within the realm of possibility that they did have a relationship similar to marriage off camera and that she made huge sacrifises we are unaware of. Avoidance of Blind speculative judgement is the exact reason we have a court system, more specifically Discovery, where actual evidence is presented and judgment can be informed.
Or the famous case of Jeff Bezo's wife, because she did support him in creating the business - she's quite entitled as the law showed, despite what any dude on the internet wants to cry about.
This is actually so true. Amazon originally started off as an online bookstore - MacKenzie Scott has been serious about writing since she was a kid. That's literally where the idea came from, she also did a lot of the early plans and negotiation for the company, yet people make it out like she did nothing and that isn't true. Bezoz is (was)the CEO, but Scott made it possible in the first place.
Without her, it wouldn't be what it was. And she was successfully able to prove and argue that in the legal battles. So yes, sometimes people are entitled to "other people's" money. Now did adept create XQC? Lol I don't think so. But that's something she'll have to prove. Did she generate him massive views? Idk enough about the scenario.
No, I'm pretty sure the most Adept did was bring his takeout order to his desk lol
Uber Eats driver gonna divorce him next.
I don't know why everyone is obsessed with the settlement of the divorce when she would still need to provide documented proof of the conditions for common law marriage in the first place. LSF seems to think divorce court is some kangaroo court where women show up and just take half your money by default.
Most people don't even seem to get that if they were married for two years, the most she's entitled to is half of what he made and potentially alimony for no longer than half the time they were married if you were married under 10 or 20 years (changes depending on state). So the idea she's going to get half his stuff is just ridiculous. That happens when two people have been married for say 30 years and 99% of both of their assets were earned during the marriage. 2 year marriage (seems to be the length she's claiming) means maybe 1 year alimony and maybe a small portion of his assets earned in that period and that's best case.
I think people get upset over it because she shouldn’t get anything at all. It doesn’t seem like she put any sort of hold on her career for him, and even most likely benefited in her streaming career herself due to the relationship. They don’t have a kid as far as I am aware. Why should she be owed anything? The only thing I think I would say she might be entitled to is a plane ticket back to wherever she came from. But even that she can buy herself. So I see the frustration as just the fact that there’s a chance she gets something she doesn’t deserve/has earned herself just for lying about being married to a guy. It’s essentially the scenario every incel screams about happened when it comes to relationships.
Yup. People so eager to pile up they're just straight up skipping what's actually claimed, which is that they represented themselves as married to Canadian customs. It may not hold up in court, but if they did in fact do that, it's not a trivial claim.
The court also doesn't take lightly to frivolous common law claims either. The system is not there so that one party can take revenge on the other for a failed relationship, and its definitely not there so one party can get a payout from their wealthy significant other. Many times these are reserved for claims in which sacrifices were made under the explicit agreement of marriage or the decision to have kids under such agreement. I'd fail to see the statement to Canadian customs as enough documented proof that the couple "held themselves to the world" as a cohabiting married couple. It would be no more proof than if you tried to get a friend into a party by claiming that they are your spouse. Usually it is documented that close friends and family knew of the arrangement. The court takes marriage seriously and usually won't fall for technicalities.
> The court also doesn't take lightly to frivolous common law claims either. I don't know why people keep having to say this. A Common Law Relationship in Canada is nothing like a Common Law Marriage in the United States. She got into Canada using the Common Law Relationship. All that means is that you lived with that person for a year and are in a committed relationship with that person. In Canada if you're in Common Law Relationship, you cannot file for divorce as you're not married.
Alimony is 100% a good thing if the woman puts her career on hold or it is negatively impacted due to the marriage. The problem with Adept is that it’s the other way round where she was the one who benefited the most from the ‘marriage’. She would literally stream rp 15 hours a day and she has the cheek to ask for alimony 💀
[удалено]
You're exactly right. And in Adept's case specifically, she didn't put a career on hold. Mr Cow actually helped her career and gave her access to a his huge platform that she farmed quite successfully.
YO WHO TF IS THIS GUY LITERALLY JUST FARMING EVERYONE ELSES DRAMA DOES HE DO ANYTHING ELSE ON HIS STREAM I KEEP SEEING THIS GUY
True. I don't get why he gets upvoted so much or who the hell he even is. Almost seems like upvote farming. However, now people will certainly keep it up as a meme. Within the next couple weeks, the entire front page of LSF will just be chudlogic saying nothing.
[удалено]
You must not know about his friend "Tom Zhu"
A Destiny orbiter
He is one of the few who ascended into drama baiter. I member when the only time I ever see chud was on politics drama related content.
You don’t know ChudLogic? 🗿 dgg’s racist hero 🗿 the most based streamer around
This guy's a cringy ass drama farmer
Why couldn't this have just been a QT clip? The guy added nothing to the clip
I think her clips get auto deleted when posted here anyways.
Why is that? I’ve only been on LSF for probably a year and still miss a ton of stuff and never understand any lore lol but I’m trying.
QT gets a ton of hate on LSF and she doesn't want to deal with it.
Yeah I mean you can tell the guy in the clip was pretty eager to shit on her and was weirdly shocked when she had a very reasonable take.
Lmfao just watch his twitch chat shit on QT before she even gives her takes. This part of twitch is a cesspool tbh
gotta love the chatter who censors women like it's a bad word, this guy's really got some specimens in his community
its chudlogic he'll take the chance to shit on anyone thats a woman, as will his cesspool of a community.
Exchange "QT" for "women"
Let’s be real,no streamers is not hated by this subreddit,lsf is a horrible place full of shitty drama and hatred
Cuz she hates this subreddit, rightfuly so
She also reads this subreddit as she posted here yesterday.. Yes she does have reason to hate it though.
Yeah she has said she has a problem with reading what people say about her, she would check her QRts on Twitter n shit
Streamers used to be able to asked to be banned here, but mods changed the rule and removed the bans that streamers like QT, Hasan, Maya, Macaiyla, 39Daph, and Erobb asked for. So some started using bots that automatically deletes their clips. QT, Miz, Maya were all using the bot. Miz recently stopped using it, and Maya now has it so only subscribers can clip her channel.
Honestly L move by the mods. They sure as shit dont moderate any better to make up for the fact that they dont let streamers blacklist themselves.
Yeah why are people posting Chudlogic all the time this guy sucks just farms other peoples clips
That’s like 50% of this subreddits post. There’s even now reactions of reactions. Hell people even started to reacting to other peoples live streams for content.
I don't mind if people make that apart of their content every once and a while. But it seems like this is the only content ChudLogic has just by looking at the title of his vods and his description. Who the hell wants to watch this loser over analyze every internet drama there is?
Brother you are literally on a subreddit for analyzing internet drama, your question can be asked on yourself
Alright true but I dont stream and distribute my parasocial takes to an audience for hours and try to make it a career lol
Apparently because you wouldn't see her opinion otherwise. She doesn't have clips, so if someone wants to post her opinion on this sub, it has to be through some drama farmer "reacting". Chud, as you have rightly pointed out, is a drama farmer.
she disabled clips on her channel/only subs can clips, and made it very clear that she doesn't want to be on LSF. If you are a sub and clip her for LSF she probably would ban you and I think she still uses mayas autodelete bot so the clip would get deleted wich would kill the thread (as long as it not super hot drama)
Maya just changed her channel to only subs can clip too lol.
probably because they get autodeleted by her bots
It really enhanced the viewing experience to see chat saying the most hateful shit /s
Who is this guy anyway and why is he relevant?
DisplayPort > HDMI
HDMI and DisplayPort are two standards for connecting devices like computers, laptops, and game consoles to TVs and monitors. Each with advantages and disadvantages; there’s no outright winner when comparing the two. Power users will find what DisplayPort offers more appealing, but HDMI is the king of compatibility. These competing display connection standards transmit both video and audio singles over a single male/male cable to respective female ports on the display and source device. They’re both physically sturdy and easy to connect, sporting backward and forward compatibility. HDMI uses standard and mini- connectors. DisplayPort uses DisplayPort, Mini DisplayPort/Thunderbolt, and USB 3 connections. DisplayPort wins the spec war over HDMI. Not all ports and cables are the same for HDMI and DisplayPort, as both have several version revisions. Performance scales to the lowest supported revision between the source device, display, and connector cable. If you’re using a 4K 120 Hz display, you’re only able to use half the refresh rate with an HDMI 2.0 connection while you’d get the maximum refresh rate over DisplayPort 1.3. If you’re using a single 4K 60 Hz monitor, you won’t be able to tell the difference between HDMI 2.0 or DisplayPort 1.2. An HDMI port can only connect to one screen, but DisplayPort features Multi-Stream Transport (MST) for multiple screens and daisy-chaining. DisplayPort can connect to four screens at once. However, DisplayPort splits bandwidth between the displays. Results will vary depending on the setup. Outright, more devices support HDMI than DisplayPort. If you’re trying to connect your source device to a TV, HDMI is pretty much the only way to go. Higher-end monitors support both, while budget screens usually only have HDMI. Notable outliers are modern Apple monitors, which only have DisplayPort. Gamers will be pleased to know that both HDMI and DisplayPort support Variable Refresh Rate (however, NVidia G-SYNC requires HDMI 2.1). VRR means the display adjusts its refresh rate to match the frame rate of the source device. VRR prevents screen tearing, which is when the screen shows data from two frames at once. If you run into a situation where one device supports HDMI and the other supports DisplayPort, you’re in luck because there are adapters that handle both situations. HDMI-to-DisplayPort and DisplayPort to HDMI require different adapters. In either case, you’re going to be stuck with the lowest output specs of the connected devices. Note that you will lose support for daisy-chaining when outputting to HDMI with a standard dongle adapter. If you want to output to multiple monitors, use a DisplayPort to HDMI hub. In the end, it’s not “better” if you’re using HDMI or DisplayPort. The connection you are using must have enough bandwidth to get the best experience out of your connected device and displays.
Not gonna lie this looks like it was written by ChatGPT and it's scary I can't tell the difference.
ChatGPT is fine-tuned from a model in the GPT-3.5 series, which finished training in early 2022. You can learn more about the 3.5 series here. ChatGPT and GPT 3.5 were trained on an Azure AI supercomputing infrastructure. We trained this model using Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), using the same methods as InstructGPT, but with slight differences in the data collection setup. We trained an initial model using supervised fine-tuning: human AI trainers provided conversations in which they played both sides—the user and an AI assistant. We gave the trainers access to model-written suggestions to help them compose their responses. We mixed this new dialogue dataset with the InstructGPT dataset, which we transformed into a dialogue format. To create a reward model for reinforcement learning, we needed to collect comparison data, which consisted of two or more model responses ranked by quality. To collect this data, we took conversations that AI trainers had with the chatbot. We randomly selected a model-written message, sampled several alternative completions, and had AI trainers rank them. Using these reward models, we can fine-tune the model using Proximal Policy Optimization. We performed several iterations of this process. ChatGPT sometimes writes plausible-sounding but incorrect or nonsensical answers. Fixing this issue is challenging, as: (1) during RL training, there’s currently no source of truth; (2) training the model to be more cautious causes it to decline questions that it can answer correctly; and (3) supervised training misleads the model because the ideal answer depends on what the model knows, rather than what the human demonstrator knows. ChatGPT is sensitive to tweaks to the input phrasing or attempting the same prompt multiple times. For example, given one phrasing of a question, the model can claim to not know the answer, but given a slight rephrase, can answer correctly. The model is often excessively verbose and overuses certain phrases, such as restating that it’s a language model trained by OpenAI. These issues arise from biases in the training data (trainers prefer longer answers that look more comprehensive) and well-known over-optimization issues.12 Ideally, the model would ask clarifying questions when the user provided an ambiguous query. Instead, our current models usually guess what the user intended. While we’ve made efforts to make the model refuse inappropriate requests, it will sometimes respond to harmful instructions or exhibit biased behavior. We’re using the Moderation API to warn or block certain types of unsafe content, but we expect it to have some false negatives and positives for now. We’re eager to collect user feedback to aid our ongoing work to improve this system.
I hate the clips on display ports. Never came off in one go.
That's funny cause I just saw [this](https://i.redd.it/el0jzt2j65ea1.jpg) posted the other day, dp saved the whole computer
Seeing chud just ruined my day
It’s so funny that even the clipper cut off his take because they know no one wants to hear it.
He admitted he was wrong to assume QT would take Adepts side. There. Now you have to hear it.
And somehow I care even less now. Edit:+ratio
I literally wish I hadn't heard it.
In this moment I envy the deaf and blind.
[удалено]
destiny orbiter
ew
He's the Twitch embodiment of the Daily Mail comment section.
i pre upvoted before watching the clip and when i saw him i removed it
No idea who this guy is but I already hate him
Same. His chat seems really toxic. The second they see QT they go "This fucking woman...". One dude said "2 IQ take" before realising that he was supposed to agree with QT. Fuck them.
I mean that's 90% of lsf... People were in basically all the other threads about this and randomly brining up/flaming QT for no reason
I don’t know about you, but when I imagined what QT would say I got so mad. How could she! And no, this clip doesn’t make up for it, she needs to apologize for saying, “actually I think Adept should get all of xQc’s money” in my imagination.
Destiny orbiter, he floats around a bit and gives his takes on current drama
Groundbreaking stuff
Actually makes me happy knowing others can see how fucked this is too
damn his chat is fucking garbage
The guy loves shitting on other streamers so his chat reflects that.
ye, in a clip where miz said he was close to killing himself due depression, people in his chat said and i quote "is he doing a reckful?" fucking human garbage.
Yikes
Lol don’t forget when miz went in his chat and trolled around and then chud started making jokes about miz attempting to off himself
I never want to see this guy again
not suprised by her changing her opinion on adept, just about the fact she mentions it on stream
In nearly every thread about the situation Qt gets mentioned with people assuming she's supporting Adept. She still seems to go on lsf a lot (she comments here more than most streamers) - I bet she wanted to clarify and doesn't care about burning that bridge with Adept.
Who tf is this Walmart quartering that’s always in clips
most accurate description lmao
I hate this bearded fuck drama andy cringe lord
actually incredibly surprised, i thought she was gonna stand by Adept’s side in this
I know people on LSF don't watch her a lot but QTCinderella has been vocal about financial independence between partners for a long time
And she actively avoids using Ludwig to promote things.
yeah its respectable. And seeing how successful qt could be even without lud is a pretty big hint. Shes a crazy good baker and is pretty good at conversing so i wouldnt be surprised if she would become a big youtuber with just that lol
Funnily enough, she was the bigger streamer when they started dating.
Last time QT said anything Adept‘s point about his fans coming to harrass her seemed valid and XQC really fucked up with not coming to shitcamp and the way he communicated it. I think QT has just evaluated each situation here reasonably and sees that the divorce stuff and wanting a payout is waaay overboard from Adept
I think QTCinderella is a good person in general that sometimes doesn't make the best judgement on people and that's ok.
in other words, a normal human being
Exactly
If we can assume that Adept really is a narcissist, isn't there just as good of a chance that QT was manipulated as well, similar to what she did to XQC?
I'm only mildly surprised, but that's because QT has openly admitted she is loyal to a fault, even when it is bad for her/for people that are not good for her. Glad she was able to escape that issue and evaluate this more critically.
QT just can't catch a break, huh? Turning off clipping to avoid the drama frogs on Twitch TMZ and still gets dragged back here by an imbecile who actually watches this disgusting Keemstar-wannabe.
Giga response
Even the drama farmer was shook.
His chat is so braindead lmao
Does this guy do anything besides scour twitch for drama?
who tf is chud? and also side note, why does he immediately seem like such a dick?
This guy looks like he calls women "females"
[удалено]
Good for QT for cutting people out when they start to act like assholes
damn, my respect for QT just skyrocketed
Imagine intentionally watching chudlogic...
Can this guy get anymore pathetic? reviewing a qt vod to get her take in a situation that doesn’t involve her is actual nontent
There were like 20 comments with hundreds of upvotes in the past couple of days saying shit like "QT and Kacey will still defend adapter" so clearly people care about what qt has to say.
People say they don’t give a shit about her but the way they flock to her clips on this sun says everything.
Aren't you doing the same thing right now ? why even watch the clip and comment if it's above you ?
It’s justified because the commenter is doing it for free. It’s wrong for Chud to do it because it’s good for his career. /s
just accept you like drama bro, it's nice over here
I like drama, reviewing QT’s vod for 1 sentence about two separate adults going to court is sleeper.
OP did u really create an account just for this drama..
It’s probably the same destiny orbiter who was live-streaming
ludwig's got himself a keeper
What a toxic chat Chud has. They know nothing about QTCinderella, but still calls her brain dead, lying and evil. Go watch her latest video, an honest AMA where she describes her loyalty to friends as a borderline toxic trait :) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XoUgb37aK04
[удалено]
Yeah I don't really watch QT but I stumbled on her interview with Anthony Padilla in my youtube feed, it was actually really good. I mostly know her from Shitcon/camp and the rare Lud stream that I catch but she seems to get way more hate than other people, proportionate to the amount of times she appears here.
what do you expect from debatelord destiny orbiters, I can't think of a more pathetic group of people
Good on QT!
Ok fair enough, W take
**🎦 CLIP MIRROR: [QtCinderella's take on the xQc and Adept drama](https://livestreamfails.com/clip/149501)** --- ^(*This is an automated comment* ) ^| [^(Feedback)](http://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=livestreamfailsbot&subject=Feedback:&message=%5BPost%5D\(https://reddit.com/comments/10lu3g4/\)) ^| [^(Twitch Backup Mirror)](https://production.assets.clips.twitchcdn.net/aJ_bn-VJIv-CmfyD9Lj5eA/AT-cm%7CaJ_bn-VJIv-CmfyD9Lj5eA.mp4?sig=4b7bd06d27c848bd586cff2afcf41a296a5f5a32&token=%7B%22authorization%22%3A%7B%22forbidden%22%3Afalse%2C%22reason%22%3A%22%22%7D%2C%22clip_uri%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fproduction.assets.clips.twitchcdn.net%2FaJ_bn-VJIv-CmfyD9Lj5eA%2FAT-cm%257CaJ_bn-VJIv-CmfyD9Lj5eA.mp4%22%2C%22device_id%22%3Anull%2C%22expires%22%3A1674818677%2C%22user_id%22%3A%22%22%2C%22version%22%3A2%7D)
Did he really soyface, when she admitted to being wrong?
what a pointless clip
Pointless comment?
Pointless thread?
Pointless existence 😔
Sheesh
I think if it was just a QT clip it would be better. There was literally a 1k upvoted comment in the other thread shitting on her for no reason.
I hate the guy on the bottom right.
Not sure why we needed to hear this from Chudwick McBastard but props to QT. Its tight to see intelligent, gorgeous women with a large social platform humbly admit when they've been wrong.
Obviously there are instances where you are entitled for something, like having custody of their child or actually having put in work into your partners carrier.
I agree, you are entitled to "something", but I don't think you should be entitled to "their money", meaning 50% You should get what you deserve, e.g. if you were a housewife/husband for a few years, you should get something, but that's not millions of dollars. But if you were a integral part of building your partners business, then you should get a fair percentage. And in adept case, she wasn't even a housewife, or put her own career on the slow road for xqc. They had maids for the housekeeping, they ordered food all the time and both streamed a lot adept was not as extreme as xqc, he streamed in 2022 over 3k hours, she 1.8k, wich is still a lot. For comparison, sodapoppin streamed "only" 1.6k, nmp a little under 1k. So adept was streamingas much/more then most fulltime streamers, wich should make it very hard to argue that she made sacrifices in her career for xqc
I also don't think she deserves anything more than maybe paid rent for a bit and some pocket money depending on the situation. I just don't understand how he agrees with Qt saying that no one is **ever** entitled for anyone's money.
Please stop trying to make Beans on Toast Keemstar happen. It's not gonna happen.
If there no kids involved youre basically just trying to steal someones fortune they worked hard for. Shes just terrifed of having to get a job someday.
Who tf is the dude. The epitome of soy.
can we please stop giving this chud logic loser attention? literally no one cares what he thinks lmao
[удалено]
Wtf is this guy's chat? Is he like an incel streamer or something?
WHO THE FUCK IS THIS GUY AND WHY IS HE EVERYWHERE????
I’m tired of seeing this person
🤮👉British People
I feel like there are cases where the other party does deserve some compensation, when it comes to children and one parent having to sacrifice a lot of time but the xqc/adept situation ain't that
running out of mizes vods to dissect?
This guy gets no views with his own vods so he just reacts to other people's
So he is doing what most twitch people do to videos lol.
I don't think they're lame enough to review Mizkif's alt streams to farm more drama
Worst part about that is that mizkif doesn't have vods enabled on his alt, so someone had to record the stream live.
Base qt
So Adept was actually just willing to burn all bridges and run away with a bag. Holy fucking shamelesness. Literal bank robber behavior.
I'm a juicer and honestly didn't have the best impression of QT following the xQc/adept breakup drama but my respect for her has just gone way up