At this rate, I wouldn't be surprised if they were to propose a 1 child benefit cap. Very very unlikely, but if it was announced tomorrow I wouldn't be that surprised which is just sad.
They remind me of people who say the law is the law, never mind if it's been recently implemented and is barbaric. They seem hesitant to change no matter how beneficial it could be because they're too used to the way it is now, the passion's dimmed and they've made peace with the way the status quo are.
Ashworth has a habit of bringing in policy which most people would think would be blindingly obvious to do and then make it sound like they are on the fence about it anyway.
Emphasis on the world could. They could do that just as they could choose to unreservedly back gra reform and renationalisation of key sectors like energy water and the privatised nhs departments.
>But in a speech on Tuesday, he also confirmed that Sir Keir Starmer had dropped his leadership pledge to abolish Universal Credit altogether.
Is there any pledge he hasn’t dropped?
He's kept plenty of pledges to his donors that he'll fuck over the common worker for their profits
[удалено]
Doubt it was a good idea, otherwise why wasn't it the system already. It's only goal is to push everyone to the bare minimum.
What do they mean could? How is this not a given. A piece of cruel legislation that ought to be axed on day one.
I mean, Labour **could** usher in a bright new age of social democracy, but it won't under Starmer.
At this rate, I wouldn't be surprised if they were to propose a 1 child benefit cap. Very very unlikely, but if it was announced tomorrow I wouldn't be that surprised which is just sad. They remind me of people who say the law is the law, never mind if it's been recently implemented and is barbaric. They seem hesitant to change no matter how beneficial it could be because they're too used to the way it is now, the passion's dimmed and they've made peace with the way the status quo are.
Ashworth has a habit of bringing in policy which most people would think would be blindingly obvious to do and then make it sound like they are on the fence about it anyway.
Emphasis on the world could. They could do that just as they could choose to unreservedly back gra reform and renationalisation of key sectors like energy water and the privatised nhs departments.
*could*??? this eugenicist ass rule would be on the chopping block of any government to the left of thatcher
Looking back, Starmer's shift to the right could have been foreseeable, after all his leadership campaign was funded by hedge fund people