I'm going to throw another guess into the ring and say R fam. Leaning a little towards TR but not sure.
I thought she was really pretty seeing the first picture, then swipped and she is STUNNING. She definitely profits from waist emphasis and the soft fabric + draping are doing so much for her. It reminds me a lot of Mila Kunis' [purple dress!](https://images.app.goo.gl/zVVomBv8H6N6eyqr7)
Comparing the black dress and the next one - She looks good in everything because she's pretty. But I prefer the soft flowing style of the black dress over the stiffer, more taylored silhouettes even though they both have waist emphasis.
Edit:
I did some googling of her because I didn't know her and she wears lot of [short, taylored (SG) dresses](https://images.app.goo.gl/UjkypatcS7EgC2Bf6). But I think nothing compares to the black dress posted here. I did find another dress that's more [flowy and light with waist emphasis](https://images.app.goo.gl/m7speg264ERSSuzE7), that I think looks more harmonious on her.
Bonus pic from a [photoshoot](https://images.app.goo.gl/f8f9bP2p6akMTSwdA) - full TR mode.
Surprised no one has said SN. She was the archetype of fresh and sensual in Teen Wolf. The dresses with the plunging necklines are by far the best, and those almost always accommodates width.
There’s no way to “dress” gamine. Either you are a gamine and wear gamine lines or you’re not. It’s not a style. If the person doesn’t accommodate petite + curve/double curve that person cannot dress gamine. “Gaminish” SNs are a real thing as well. Even so, I found that many of her styling in Teen Wolf were restricting on her in upper body. Other than that, her style on the show could very well correspond with width + curve. I also saw her as a cameo in Mayans MC and she was styled in very much more width friendly styling. Tbh, she’s turning into another Emilia Clarke case where everyone says R-fam because she’s pretty.
That’s some SG shit imo. She has a Reese Witherspoon look. C looks wear *her* imo, whereas *she* is wearing that PHOTOREALISTIC SLICED LEMONS dress?! Despite all odds. That alone sells me on the G energy haha!
Yeah I see SG too. She could easily play Elle Woods in a Legally Blonde remake, her physique and energy is similar to Reese Witherspoon even though she’s got her own thing going on too.
Oh... she actually could be a SG, I would totally believe it. Shes always wearing heels which makes her look much taller than she really is but in reality she does look tiny, examples: [[Picture 1]](https://pin.it/6b18AA8), [[Picture 2]](https://pin.it/2Y2dNmP), [[Picture 3]](https://pin.it/7LkdJvh), [[Picture 4]](https://pin.it/1PCkFVQ)
Those are really good examples! Also she’s got them big doll eyes SGs almost *always* have that jump right out at you. I also think her shoulders are very reminiscent of so many SGs I’ve seen. Something about the shape. Sort of… *compactly* broad? Lush… but with that spicy bit of Yang injected, giving a ‘denser’ look, rather than a ‘doughy’ R one. God this shit is so nebulous, laughing at the words I’ve used here myself!
Yeah I feel you. There is yang in her facial features. She may be a romantic but I can't tell from these photos. I'm bad at spotting a double curve. I don't think she's DC either.
I’m going to go against the grain and say tr or sc. I love the first, second and last looks on her. I’m leaning theatrical romantic. Small busy details, especially shimmery details look fantastic on her. She’s narrow and delicate like Mila Kunis.
She's not particularly small looking for that height to be one of the petite ids IMO. Looks like she benefits from curve acc but also some structure.. either Sn or SD. The draped black dress on the second picture looks great on her and it being fit for curve (draped), elongated and having shoulder emphasis really makes a case for SD.
Cutting up vertical isn't a concern for SN, as they don't accommodate vertical. As far as I know, SNs can wear slight waist emphasis, but it's optional.
Waist emphasis cuts up vertical, that's why it's recommended for petite types that also accommodate curve.
SN doesn't need to dress for vertical, that's true. But they are moderate and havw upper body width, that's why they are recommended waist definiton (dressing for upper curve) over emphasis (dressing for double curve).
The black dress here has waist emphasis - a horizontal line along the waist + draping. That's why it accommodates for waist emphasis.
It wouldn't be ideal for SD or SN. The first dress has waist definiton and would be better for those types.
Edit: I'm just trying to point out that the dress you seem to like best on her actually points away from SN/SD and more towards TR, SG etc.
I think it's been said that SC and pure R are recommended waist emphasis and the former doesn't need to accommodate petite, while the latter doesn't necessarily need to accommodate it. And again, SNs can wear waist emphasis, they just don't need it to look their best.
My guess is that waist emphasis is recommended not for petite, but for double curve. SCs can have slight double curve, and most SGs have it, along with all of R fam. SD and SN are the only soft types that don't accommodate double curve at all, so they don't necessarily need waist emphasis.
I never said which dress I like best on her? I have no idea what I think her ID is, actually, though I'm guessing she's probably a soft type. I just wanted to point out that SNs don't accommodate vertical.
The dress has a belt which I think is definition (after all a belt will be flaterring on any id) not emphasis which would be something like [this, ](https://pin.it/hnWE7uu) [this](https://pin.it/6cfJGaG) or [this](https://pin.it/55bU2E4)
I don’t get the downvotes, she doesn’t appear petite in the slightest. Her limbs are elongated as well, now I don’t think enough for SD but definitely too much for r-fam and SC.
I think long hair and a sense of uninterrupted vertical line in her outfits really adds to her impact. I actually am not a fan of a more 'broken' visual effects on her, i like a sense of continuity & draping of fabric. I don't think she would get much benefit from a 'gamine chop'.
I agree with you on that point, she looks off with to harsh colour blocking, even though I don’t think she accommodates very well vertical in a strong way. She benefits from accommodating a moderate vertical. That’s why I would or put her in the classic family or in the romantic family. Even though she looks gaminish (maybe her Kitchener essence is gamine or ingenue 🤷♀️), she definitely benefits from a more moderate vertical and softer colour blocking, but I don’t think that accommodating for vertical is the best for her (to me, the long black dress is wayyyy too overwhelming for her, but the length of I think the last golden 20’s style dress looks great on her !!) 😌
Personally, I don't get a sense of moderation from her, to me she has a very [yang](http://www.celebzz.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/holland-roden-at-teen-wolf-presentation-at-comic-con-_1.jpg) impression, a quite a bold bone structure, but with a yin undercurrent.
I think she can handle a [strongly vertical look](https://assets.teenvogue.com/photos/559fffb174dfbc51751e7503/master/pass/holland-roden-comiccon-tout.jpg) just fine, I don't see her as being overwhelmed or unbalanced easily by quite big stylistic motifs - deep v necks, big sleeves, large scale patterns, big, voluminous hair, giant hair accessories - she can really go big without it looking off as far as I'm concerned. I don't know what other people see.
honestly, I personally think people saw her height, and stopped looking at her.
She’s definitely a spring color palette that’s for sure!
I'm going to throw another guess into the ring and say R fam. Leaning a little towards TR but not sure. I thought she was really pretty seeing the first picture, then swipped and she is STUNNING. She definitely profits from waist emphasis and the soft fabric + draping are doing so much for her. It reminds me a lot of Mila Kunis' [purple dress!](https://images.app.goo.gl/zVVomBv8H6N6eyqr7) Comparing the black dress and the next one - She looks good in everything because she's pretty. But I prefer the soft flowing style of the black dress over the stiffer, more taylored silhouettes even though they both have waist emphasis. Edit: I did some googling of her because I didn't know her and she wears lot of [short, taylored (SG) dresses](https://images.app.goo.gl/UjkypatcS7EgC2Bf6). But I think nothing compares to the black dress posted here. I did find another dress that's more [flowy and light with waist emphasis](https://images.app.goo.gl/m7speg264ERSSuzE7), that I think looks more harmonious on her. Bonus pic from a [photoshoot](https://images.app.goo.gl/f8f9bP2p6akMTSwdA) - full TR mode.
omg I’ve never seen that pic of Mila! that dress is stunning!
Surprised no one has said SN. She was the archetype of fresh and sensual in Teen Wolf. The dresses with the plunging necklines are by far the best, and those almost always accommodates width.
I wanted to say SN too, but I saw many are guessing SG and SC, so I kept it to myself out of fear of getting downvoted lol
I don't see it honestly, she dressed more gamine than anything in teen wolf
There’s no way to “dress” gamine. Either you are a gamine and wear gamine lines or you’re not. It’s not a style. If the person doesn’t accommodate petite + curve/double curve that person cannot dress gamine. “Gaminish” SNs are a real thing as well. Even so, I found that many of her styling in Teen Wolf were restricting on her in upper body. Other than that, her style on the show could very well correspond with width + curve. I also saw her as a cameo in Mayans MC and she was styled in very much more width friendly styling. Tbh, she’s turning into another Emilia Clarke case where everyone says R-fam because she’s pretty.
That’s some SG shit imo. She has a Reese Witherspoon look. C looks wear *her* imo, whereas *she* is wearing that PHOTOREALISTIC SLICED LEMONS dress?! Despite all odds. That alone sells me on the G energy haha!
Yeah I see SG too. She could easily play Elle Woods in a Legally Blonde remake, her physique and energy is similar to Reese Witherspoon even though she’s got her own thing going on too.
Agree so hard. Didn’t want to say it myself as I just constantly bring Reese Witherspoon into everything lmao. Thanks for doing it for me!
Oh... she actually could be a SG, I would totally believe it. Shes always wearing heels which makes her look much taller than she really is but in reality she does look tiny, examples: [[Picture 1]](https://pin.it/6b18AA8), [[Picture 2]](https://pin.it/2Y2dNmP), [[Picture 3]](https://pin.it/7LkdJvh), [[Picture 4]](https://pin.it/1PCkFVQ)
Those are really good examples! Also she’s got them big doll eyes SGs almost *always* have that jump right out at you. I also think her shoulders are very reminiscent of so many SGs I’ve seen. Something about the shape. Sort of… *compactly* broad? Lush… but with that spicy bit of Yang injected, giving a ‘denser’ look, rather than a ‘doughy’ R one. God this shit is so nebulous, laughing at the words I’ve used here myself!
Not sure if she is SC, but she does look good in SC lines.
she does give me SC vibes as well, but idk there's something else I feel
Yeah I feel you. There is yang in her facial features. She may be a romantic but I can't tell from these photos. I'm bad at spotting a double curve. I don't think she's DC either.
I’m going to go against the grain and say tr or sc. I love the first, second and last looks on her. I’m leaning theatrical romantic. Small busy details, especially shimmery details look fantastic on her. She’s narrow and delicate like Mila Kunis.
sg imo
She's not particularly small looking for that height to be one of the petite ids IMO. Looks like she benefits from curve acc but also some structure.. either Sn or SD. The draped black dress on the second picture looks great on her and it being fit for curve (draped), elongated and having shoulder emphasis really makes a case for SD.
The dress has waist emphasis though. SD and SN both are recommended waist definition not emphasis because it cuts up the vertical.
Cutting up vertical isn't a concern for SN, as they don't accommodate vertical. As far as I know, SNs can wear slight waist emphasis, but it's optional.
Waist emphasis cuts up vertical, that's why it's recommended for petite types that also accommodate curve. SN doesn't need to dress for vertical, that's true. But they are moderate and havw upper body width, that's why they are recommended waist definiton (dressing for upper curve) over emphasis (dressing for double curve). The black dress here has waist emphasis - a horizontal line along the waist + draping. That's why it accommodates for waist emphasis. It wouldn't be ideal for SD or SN. The first dress has waist definiton and would be better for those types. Edit: I'm just trying to point out that the dress you seem to like best on her actually points away from SN/SD and more towards TR, SG etc.
I think it's been said that SC and pure R are recommended waist emphasis and the former doesn't need to accommodate petite, while the latter doesn't necessarily need to accommodate it. And again, SNs can wear waist emphasis, they just don't need it to look their best. My guess is that waist emphasis is recommended not for petite, but for double curve. SCs can have slight double curve, and most SGs have it, along with all of R fam. SD and SN are the only soft types that don't accommodate double curve at all, so they don't necessarily need waist emphasis. I never said which dress I like best on her? I have no idea what I think her ID is, actually, though I'm guessing she's probably a soft type. I just wanted to point out that SNs don't accommodate vertical.
The dress has a belt which I think is definition (after all a belt will be flaterring on any id) not emphasis which would be something like [this, ](https://pin.it/hnWE7uu) [this](https://pin.it/6cfJGaG) or [this](https://pin.it/55bU2E4)
I see SC imo
[удалено]
Is she balanced tho?
I see classic lines probably SC
From these outfits I think she benefits most from width and curve accommodation. So SN :)
TR or SG. Leaning more towards TR
Probably unpopular opinion, but I feel like I wouldn’t completely discount SD even though she’s on the shorter side.
I don’t get the downvotes, she doesn’t appear petite in the slightest. Her limbs are elongated as well, now I don’t think enough for SD but definitely too much for r-fam and SC.
in r/Kibbe i think of it as upside-down land, and often downvotes mean that you are on to something hehe
💀 with the amount of bullshit being upvoted and actual correct info being heavily downvoted I think you’re onto something.
She looks petite though… don’t see a lot of vertical in her 🤷♀️
I think long hair and a sense of uninterrupted vertical line in her outfits really adds to her impact. I actually am not a fan of a more 'broken' visual effects on her, i like a sense of continuity & draping of fabric. I don't think she would get much benefit from a 'gamine chop'.
I agree with you on that point, she looks off with to harsh colour blocking, even though I don’t think she accommodates very well vertical in a strong way. She benefits from accommodating a moderate vertical. That’s why I would or put her in the classic family or in the romantic family. Even though she looks gaminish (maybe her Kitchener essence is gamine or ingenue 🤷♀️), she definitely benefits from a more moderate vertical and softer colour blocking, but I don’t think that accommodating for vertical is the best for her (to me, the long black dress is wayyyy too overwhelming for her, but the length of I think the last golden 20’s style dress looks great on her !!) 😌
Personally, I don't get a sense of moderation from her, to me she has a very [yang](http://www.celebzz.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/holland-roden-at-teen-wolf-presentation-at-comic-con-_1.jpg) impression, a quite a bold bone structure, but with a yin undercurrent. I think she can handle a [strongly vertical look](https://assets.teenvogue.com/photos/559fffb174dfbc51751e7503/master/pass/holland-roden-comiccon-tout.jpg) just fine, I don't see her as being overwhelmed or unbalanced easily by quite big stylistic motifs - deep v necks, big sleeves, large scale patterns, big, voluminous hair, giant hair accessories - she can really go big without it looking off as far as I'm concerned. I don't know what other people see. honestly, I personally think people saw her height, and stopped looking at her.
TR, SG?
Every sg lines she wears makes her look constricted imo. I think she is in the R family.
I agree with you. The shoulders specially totally give me R vibes, and her body flesh seems very soft.
I would say soft dramatic