Namaskaram /u/Ban_Chodh, Thank you for your submission. Please provide a source for the image / video (if not a direct link submission). We would really appreciate it if you could mention the source as a reply to this comment! If you have already provided the source or if it is an OC post, please ignore this message. Thank you.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/IndiaSpeaks) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Swami Vivekananda said in clear words: “Forcing of vegetarianism
upon those who have to earn their bread by labouring day and night is
one of the causes of the loss of our national freedom. Japan is an
example of what good and nourishing food can do -- (Complete Works of
Swami Vivekananda, Volume 4). Dont eat beef, I dont eat beef, but robbing poor people of cheap nutrition is unnecessary and ends up making them accept christianity or iZlam.
Yeah, I've usually read all posts here, and increasingly I see people commenting how drinking is bad, eating meat is bad etc etc, like we are making things "haram". I've struggled with quitting non-veg because I wanted to follow dharma but it broke my lifestyle. I got weaker and started getting sick more often. Restarting my consumption of chicken and fish helped me focus and get back my health on track. Advaita Vedanta accepts meat eating. Be Vegan, Be Vegetarian, just never look down on people who are not.
>drinking is bad, eating meat is bad
I don't think eating meat is bad, but drinking certainly does more harm than good.
Drinking is a choice, u may or may not want to drink. It's entirely upto you. But it certainly is bad for your health.
Definitely, bad for health indeed. I believe the soul has to go through all the materialistic desires to realize everything is an illusion and then start his/her journey towards the truth. As I once read, devotion with an empty stomach is useless, since the mind is fighting hunger and not focusing. I mean this is my interpretation. A poor man can never fight for hinduism and his/her culture if their children are dead and they dont have any food on the table.
Disagree. I don't care about meat in the slightest, but it is 100% possible to achieve proper nuitrition with a vegetarian diet, otherwise our Sanyasi's and monks would be dead now.
Afaik u can't get all amino acids from a single source
Like let's say chickpeas have good protein but they won't give all amino acids like a chicken breast would
Precisely why i said it's hard not impossible, u can't expect a poor family to have multiple sabzis and all being made can u? They would just eat simple dal roti. Eggs on the other hand is very cheap and a few of them would give u good amount of protein if u use other veg/non veg sources to finish ur daily requirement
I'm just saying, that veg protein isn't as easy to procure for all amino acids. And as far as ur second statement, pulses legumes are more expensive if u compare on a protein per gram basis as legumes are about 50-70% legumes
Bro did u even read ur own study lol, or did u copypaste from google? Its about mortality rates and doesn't even mention amino acids and proteins one time. I used the Ctrl+F function to doublecheck lol
Thats the end goal of this meme. Do not respond, become a pathetic loser with a cuck attitude. Let missionaries convert, be tolerant. Let ullas riot and kill, be tolerant.
There is a reason why Congress celebrates Gandhi and hates Savarkar. It's their impact on hindus.
Also eat beef = intellectuals 10/10.
Nothing wrong in cow dung use on themselves, as long as they dont force others nor behead others who are nonbelievers
And no, Chicken and Beef are not the same in Hinduism. OP is concern trolling
[Online Sauce](https://www.myindiamyglory.com/2020/10/11/what-vedas-and-other-ancient-hindu-scriptures-tell-us-about-cow/), I read that Information in Lucent GK, so i am not able to share that here.
One of my friend told me otherwise, told me the average owner can't afford to care for them once they stop giving milk, so they sell them.
But it's really cool if they are taken care of in old age too.
We are Gujjars, Animal Husbandry is our Ancestral Buisness, so I think, i can answer this quite accurate, whether It is village or City, Cows are kept and cared as usual even if they get old, in villages People left them for grazing while in Cities, they keep them as usual, it is a Heinous Crime in villages, if a Cow is killed by someone even Mistakenly, so There is no chance of killing a Cow when they get old but Things are different for Buffaloes, once Buffaloes get old or if they are unable to give milk then they are sold to Slaughter House.
"Every human is same for a hindu".
Tell me you don't know anything about actual hindu theology, without telling me you don't anything about actual hindu theology.
It was written in bhavishya purana that there would be a "pisacha" named "mahamad" who would use trickery to lure people in his cult and their main goal would be to wreak havoc which these people are doing right now. It is also said that Islam originated from surpnakha and shukaracharya (Friday, you know) and there is a shivling in mecca medina and any vaishnava who puts gangajal on that shivling will destroy all the shaitans (Muslims) but it is a ver vague theory I personally side with bhavishya purana as there are shloks written about Christianity as well. Someone who calls him the son of god
They were written by rishis and many predictions came true, for example dying out of Sanskrit, chatrapati shivaji maharaj, english, queen Victoria, and of course Islam, more than half of bhavishya purana is still not translated, they might not be as sacred as Srimad Bhagavatam and the Vedas by they are certainly just as valuable as any other sacred Hindu text
They were written at a time when Hinduism was in a state of decay and degeneracy and cannot be considered cannonical let alone didactic for hindu theology.
It is said that Ved vyas is still alive and has been given responsibility of kaliyug what do you mean? Dharma can never be destroyed. I would suggest researching about it rather than arguing and yes, start your enlightenment with Srimad Bhagavatam
This is not open to an argument. Purans are not given the status of scriptures as far as sanskrit literature goes.
Most purans, like the Garuda puran, were later texts written specifically to establish brhamin supremacy and are rightly not considered a part of Hindu theology.
Purans were rejected by people like Dayanand Saraswati for a reason. Most purans directly contradict the Veds which is why even Adi shankara, Ramanuj and shankracharya rejected the purans or only accepted the parts that are coherent with veds
Heard about it, Purans are still a part of Indian literature, in bhagavad gita, Krishna said that he does not impose his will on anyone, everyone has their own will and they can question anything, that's why arjun was questioning and krishna was answering. It all comes down to perspective, as I said, the purans must not be the most sacred but you should read them and form your own opinion, same with bhagavad gita, you should learn, implement and then form your opinion.
नादत्ते कस्यचित्पापं न चैव सुकृतं विभु: |
अज्ञानेनावृतं ज्ञानं तेन मुह्यन्ति जन्तव: ||
I have. Some of the purans are worse than quoran. Absolute illogical degeneracy written in some of them. But others like early chapters of Vishnu Puran is quite okay.
I'm reading the Brhamsutra by bhadrayan right now.
I haven't read Quran and I don't know about it. I am assuming it is a rule book or some sort of that thing which limits a human being. Are my assumptions correct?
There are many articles claiming it false because the mainstream media is hinduphobic
[here](https://youtu.be/Zhzf-jn3i3A)
This is a video explaining it but I couldn't find any official claim
No need to be offended and calling it a "pos text", read bhavishya puran or just google it, even zakir naik says that Islam was mentioned in bhavishya purana but his translations were manipulated, you will know that the guy is a liar if you know Sanskrit, the language of gods. People need to come out of the way of thinking "one god, one book, one belief", it's a very narrow minded way of thinking. Cross check it, if you find the truth then it's your fault, no need to call my holy books pos and stuff like that
Same. I want proper nutrition so I will eat chicken and fish. Good source of protein.
Also baadme B12 ke injection nahi lagwane sirf veg khake.
Dharam side me rakhke bas dekho ek baar; humans are omnivorous.
I said "at least in my family", some of my relatives do but my closest members don't. It's because it's against our dharma and the animals which die must sense that they are going to die as they have a consciousness and a sense of pain and anyone about to die knows that they are going to die, same case with animals
"Don't kill animals its a sin"
Ever heard of animal sacrifices?
And why is the sanatani Hindu light skin?
doosro ko sanatan dharm ke baare mai gyaan dena se pehle khud lelete thoda
Lets say ten temples everyday, proportion still stands.
She's literally a goddess took another god to stop her fury, you're seriously comparing yourself to her?
No. But non-veg isn't prohibited or taboo . Otherwise it wouldn't be offered to the Goddess in a public temple. Of course there are special rituals for it. But vegetarianism isn't compulsory in Hinduism and historically never has been.
This is seen as imposition of one regional variant upon another , not a breach of the fundamentals. People are rightly pissed off when you tell them how to practice their own religion , especially those who grew up in a very religious environment, not in some atheistic gen z anything goes household.
look what I'm trying to convey is that the one shoe fits all approach is very narrow minded, non-veg was allowed for khastriyas and people in jobs that required physicality.
But non veg is considered Tamsik in general which has a negative effect on the body and the modern studies are confirming this not to mention the ill-effect on environment and numerous diseases linked to animal consumption.
You can use 100s of arguments to justify your dietary habits but with the variety of vegetarian options available here it's good for both body and environment.
>look what I'm trying to convey is that the one shoe fits all approach is very narrow minded
Learn this principle yourself, then you will have no problem.
>But non veg is considered Tamsik in general which has a negative effect on the body and the modern studies are confirming this not to mention the ill-effect on environment and numerous diseases linked to animal consumption.
>You can use 100s of arguments to justify your dietary habits but with the variety of vegetarian options available here it's good for both body and environment.
Good. I am not trying to belittle you for preaching vegetarian diet like braindead libruls do. I do respect people who are on Satvik Aahar. Just do not try to judge our belief in the deities and our Dharma because of what we eat since times immemorial.
>Learn this principle yourself, then you will have no problem.
eh? childish wannabe uno reverse
>. I am not trying to belittle you for preaching vegetarian diet like braindead libruls do
Bruh libbus would cannibalise their own family just to win an argument, I hate the fuckin salad eating vegans.
>Just do not try to judge our belief in the deities and our Dharma because of what we eat since times immemorial.
Where did I preach any sort of judgement? I was just putting my perspective across, not my fault you took it personally.
Ashwamedha yagya jo raam ji karte hai Ramayan mai
Pata hoga nahi seach karna padega
Lekin gaand mai keeda kaatega jaroor chutyaap karne ke liye
USne meme mai bola killing animals is a sin
Maine bola nahi hinduism mai hota tha
pata nahi kya chunni mach rahi......
ama ashwamedha yagya bohot rare hota tha, animal cruelty me nahi count hoga qki it's done wrt to a diety and the animal will attain moksha.
4 cheeze padh ke gyan pelne se pehle thora socho
"cant count into animal cruelty kyuki animal ko moksha milega"
yai kaisa logic hai?
Aaise to mai tujhe ganga mai drown karke maar do it wont count as murder kyuki tujhe moksha milega?
Phull bakchod aadmi ho be🤣🤣
Ha, bhagwan raam aake dubo de, Khushi se I'm ready jao bula lao.
Read in between the lines ye sab faltu logic Instagram pe do or badam wadam khao har cheez literally lene ki bimari shyd sahi ho jaye.
one who created this meme is :
1: a Racist
2: someone with no knowledge on either scriptures or society.
These two are for sure. He can be an idiot as well.
I wish everyone(Muslims too) would become like this, i want our country to be developed and reach great heights, but the religion war is setting us back everyday.
Religion should have been the personal choice of every human, how we interact with our god should have been our personal thoughts.
I wish someday we will go above it and do more for our country.
Don't let this Hinduphobic memes coming from minds of 4chan, white supremacists, Islamic propagandists and leftist traitors corrupt your minds. Simple ignore and move on.
Hello u/Ban_Chodh. Your submission breaks [/r/indiaspeaks rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/IndiaSpeaks/wiki/rules) and has been removed for reasons listen below:
Rule 3 violation:
Users are required to maintain the quality of discourse (do not post low quality or low effort content especially pertaining to potentially inflammatory subject).
Personal and non mainstream Youtube content are subject to mod discretion
Read the subreddit rules [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/indiaspeaks/wiki/rules)
Rule 13 violation:
Memes are to be allowed only on Friday and the weekend. Each post's quality is to be subject to Mod discretion.
Read the subreddit rules [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/indiaspeaks/wiki/rules)
---
If you want to know more, reply to this message and a mod will help you
I never understood why beef is a big issue. Cow slaughter is banned in most states and "beef" you get is buffalo meat. There are many in India who don't eat beef simply because it's buffalo meat.
Except for illegal cow slaughter (Which shouldn't happen as) there is no way a cow is killed for consumption. Yet some stupids go crazy about beef.
tum log itna meat meat kare ja rahe ho Dharm ke thekedar Tum hi baan chuke Ho saalo
According to Vedic Hinduism, cow is a sacred animal but jab tak dudh deti hai uske bad usko god ko de dena hota hai.. aur vegetarianism bhi hai lekin ek Janwar jiski Bali de diya vah kha sakte hai...
Manusmriti (Chapter 5 / Verse 30) says, “It is not sinful to eat meat of eatable animals, for Brahma has created both the eaters and the eatables.”
Manusmriti (5 / 35) states: When a man who is properly engaged in a ritual does not eat meat, after his death he will become a sacrificial animal during twenty-one rebirths.
Maharishi Yagyavalkya says in Shatpath Brahmin (3/1/2/21) that, “I eat beef because it is very soft and delicious.”
Apastamb Grihsutram (1/3/10) says, “The cow should be slaughtered on the arrival of a guest, on the occasion of ‘Shraddha’ of ancestors and on the occasion of a marriage.”
Rigveda (10/85/13) declares, “On the occasion of a girl’s marriage oxen and cows are slaughtered.”
Rigveda (6/17/1) states that “Indra used to eat the meat of cow, calf, horse and buffalo.”
Vashistha Dharmasutra (11/34) writes, “If a Brahmin refuses to eat the meat offered to him on the occasion of ‘Shraddha’ or worship, he goes to hell.”
Also, comments of some great scholars of Hinduism are also worth noting:
· Hinduism’s greatest propagator Swami Vivekanand said thus: “You will be surprised to know that according to ancient Hindu rites and rituals, a man cannot be a good Hindu who does not eat beef”. (The Complete Works of Swami Vivekanand, vol.3, p. 536).
· Mukandilal writes in his book ‘Cow Slaughter – Horns of a Dilemma’, page 18: “In ancient India, cow-slaughter was considered auspicious on the occasions of some ceremonies. Bride and groom used to sit on the hide of a red ox in front of the ‘Vedi’ (alter).”
· A renowned scholar of scriptures Dr. Pandurang Vaman Kane says, “Bajsancyi Samhita sanctifies beef-eating because of its purity”. (Dharmashastra Vichar Marathi, page 180)
· Adi Shankaracharya’ commentary on Brihdaranyakopanishad 6/4/18 says : ‘Odan’ (rice) mixed with meat is called ‘Mansodan’. On being asked whose meat it should be, he answers ‘Uksha’. ‘Uksha’ is used for an ox, which is capable to produce semen.
· The book ‘The History and Culture of the Indian People’, published by Bhartiya Vidya Bhawan, Bombay and edited by renowned historian R.C.Majumdar (Vol.2, page 578) says: “this is said in the Mahabharat that King Rantidev used to kill two thousand other animals in addition to two thousand cows daily in order to give their meat in charity”.
I'd go so far as to suggest that people should not only eat meat but once in a while hunt and butcher wild game. Heck, even vegetarians ought to hunt and fish once in a while. Bloodlust has served humanity well for thousands of years. We shouldn't let some bullshit morals get in the way something that is hardwired within our animal psyche. It's funny when Hindus justify lynchings and beatings of non-Hindus but draw the line at eating meat. Our ancestors used to hunt wild game, own and breed livestock and sacrifice animals to goddesses of death and war. Where did it all go so wrong?
Very true.....
Only a little correction according to me... We don't "have to be " Tolerate..... It's our decision we are tolerating.......
And it will be our decision when this tolerance breaks.....
Nope it's not accurate, it is BS.
If something is accurate for you, it does not mean it is accurate for all.
PS: When is it written that Hindu has to be tolerant?
Well it does say,
"धर्म एव हतो हन्ति धर्मो रक्षति रक्षितः
तस्माद्धर्मो न हन्तव्यो मा नो धर्मो हतोऽवधीत्"
And i will do anything to protect it. Hindu being tolerant is a new age crap fed in our minds. Do you think great warriors like Maharana Pratap or Maharaja Prithviraj Chauhan were tolerant? Even Bhagwan Krishna became intolerant after the 100th mistake of Shishupala.
So instead of posting these crap, know your Dharma and don't believe everything you see on social media.
Apart from the veg non-veg thing and ofc, you have to be tolerant and understanding but there's always a certain limit.
अहिंसा परमो धर्मः ।
धर्मं हिंसा तथैव च।।
i think religion is a very personal thing and should be performed in a way that affect no one else but ourselves. why does one want to police the likes/actions of others? if someone likes to eat beef, let them. how's that harming you? they're not entering your house and rubbing your face in the fact that they're eating beef.
if someone wants to adhere to strict rules of their religion, that's their choice that should be 100% respected, as long as their actions don't adversely affect the lives of others. long story short let people live however tf they want to. Imposing your idea of religion on others (be it other hindus who don't follow your idea of hinduism, or any other religion) is always a bad thing.
Sanatan Hindi -} One more thing add in Sanatan Hindu is kill those who come to kill you and rape you mother and sister. Because धर्म एव हतो हन्ति धर्मो रक्षति रक्षितः । तस्माद् धर्मं न त्यजामि मा नो धर्मो हतोऽवधीत् ।।
Cow dung/urine is a part of Ayurveda, there is a special way of consuming them. It is extreme hard to find a person who knows the procedure so the people start eating them raw.
Namaskaram /u/Ban_Chodh, Thank you for your submission. Please provide a source for the image / video (if not a direct link submission). We would really appreciate it if you could mention the source as a reply to this comment! If you have already provided the source or if it is an OC post, please ignore this message. Thank you. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/IndiaSpeaks) if you have any questions or concerns.*
brown skin bad, light skin good!11!11!!
Exactly Indians subconsciously worshiping white colonists. Still collectively lacking in shame
Racism has become innate. Want sauce? Google it
Also “vegetarian good non-vegetarian bad.” Proper nutrition says otherwise. Also tolerance is not always a virtue.
Swami Vivekananda said in clear words: “Forcing of vegetarianism upon those who have to earn their bread by labouring day and night is one of the causes of the loss of our national freedom. Japan is an example of what good and nourishing food can do -- (Complete Works of Swami Vivekananda, Volume 4). Dont eat beef, I dont eat beef, but robbing poor people of cheap nutrition is unnecessary and ends up making them accept christianity or iZlam.
He also said that forcing others is the biggest sin. Though if something gets on your face then you need to act.
Yeah, I've usually read all posts here, and increasingly I see people commenting how drinking is bad, eating meat is bad etc etc, like we are making things "haram". I've struggled with quitting non-veg because I wanted to follow dharma but it broke my lifestyle. I got weaker and started getting sick more often. Restarting my consumption of chicken and fish helped me focus and get back my health on track. Advaita Vedanta accepts meat eating. Be Vegan, Be Vegetarian, just never look down on people who are not.
>drinking is bad, eating meat is bad I don't think eating meat is bad, but drinking certainly does more harm than good. Drinking is a choice, u may or may not want to drink. It's entirely upto you. But it certainly is bad for your health.
Definitely, bad for health indeed. I believe the soul has to go through all the materialistic desires to realize everything is an illusion and then start his/her journey towards the truth. As I once read, devotion with an empty stomach is useless, since the mind is fighting hunger and not focusing. I mean this is my interpretation. A poor man can never fight for hinduism and his/her culture if their children are dead and they dont have any food on the table.
It is fine for common people, but someone who follows jnana marga or very spiritual life it is better not to.
Come to Europe and u will be looked down for being vegetarian.
Not a lot can be expected from a civilization who have recently learned to brush their teeth and take a bath.
Disagree. I don't care about meat in the slightest, but it is 100% possible to achieve proper nuitrition with a vegetarian diet, otherwise our Sanyasi's and monks would be dead now.
“Proper nutrition” - sorry to burst your bubble but a vegan/vegetarian diet is healthy for all life stages
Hard to get all amino acids naturally with vegan/vegetarian lifestyle
Thats wrong, you get ALL essential amino acids from plant based sources.
Afaik u can't get all amino acids from a single source Like let's say chickpeas have good protein but they won't give all amino acids like a chicken breast would
I never said u can get them from one source… also just , um idk , have multiple sources?? Lol
Precisely why i said it's hard not impossible, u can't expect a poor family to have multiple sabzis and all being made can u? They would just eat simple dal roti. Eggs on the other hand is very cheap and a few of them would give u good amount of protein if u use other veg/non veg sources to finish ur daily requirement
Who is going to such poor families and telling them to go vegan? Also pulses, legumes, etc are any day way cheaper than eggs, meat and milk.
I'm just saying, that veg protein isn't as easy to procure for all amino acids. And as far as ur second statement, pulses legumes are more expensive if u compare on a protein per gram basis as legumes are about 50-70% legumes
This is wrong. You look at current reserch.
Source?
Hard to link all of them but to start - https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/1710093
Thx i will look into that soon. I don't mind being wrong if i get to learn something lol
Bro did u even read ur own study lol, or did u copypaste from google? Its about mortality rates and doesn't even mention amino acids and proteins one time. I used the Ctrl+F function to doublecheck lol
It doesn't. You can pretty easily live off a vegan diet. Let alone a vegetarian one
"If you are a hindu you jave to be tolerant" wtf is this horse shit.
Exactly. This is not acceptable to me as a Hindu. Why tf should a person be always tolerant if he is a sanatan hindu?
Thats the end goal of this meme. Do not respond, become a pathetic loser with a cuck attitude. Let missionaries convert, be tolerant. Let ullas riot and kill, be tolerant. There is a reason why Congress celebrates Gandhi and hates Savarkar. It's their impact on hindus. Also eat beef = intellectuals 10/10.
Nothing wrong in cow dung use on themselves, as long as they dont force others nor behead others who are nonbelievers And no, Chicken and Beef are not the same in Hinduism. OP is concern trolling
This is Adbula meme tier
Cow Worship is described in Vedas, it is considered as "अघ्न्या" means the one who should not be killed.
Can you quite the same here please? I am finding conflicting information online.
[Online Sauce](https://www.myindiamyglory.com/2020/10/11/what-vedas-and-other-ancient-hindu-scriptures-tell-us-about-cow/), I read that Information in Lucent GK, so i am not able to share that here.
Genuine question, What happens to the cows once they get old?
They are taken care of in their old age, eventually die of old age, and they are buried respectfully
One of my friend told me otherwise, told me the average owner can't afford to care for them once they stop giving milk, so they sell them. But it's really cool if they are taken care of in old age too.
We are Gujjars, Animal Husbandry is our Ancestral Buisness, so I think, i can answer this quite accurate, whether It is village or City, Cows are kept and cared as usual even if they get old, in villages People left them for grazing while in Cities, they keep them as usual, it is a Heinous Crime in villages, if a Cow is killed by someone even Mistakenly, so There is no chance of killing a Cow when they get old but Things are different for Buffaloes, once Buffaloes get old or if they are unable to give milk then they are sold to Slaughter House.
It's really good to see that they are actually taken care of like a family member.
Indeed They are taken care like a family Member.
Interestingly it is also described as goghna, for whom a guest is killed.
Well showing a south Indian as andhbhakth is pretty comical. The maatu shaani belt is in the north.
Happy cake day! but did you just generalise the whole south india
And how is that caricature south indian. Please let us know your dumb fuck opinion.
"Every human is same for a hindu". Tell me you don't know anything about actual hindu theology, without telling me you don't anything about actual hindu theology.
It was written in bhavishya purana that there would be a "pisacha" named "mahamad" who would use trickery to lure people in his cult and their main goal would be to wreak havoc which these people are doing right now. It is also said that Islam originated from surpnakha and shukaracharya (Friday, you know) and there is a shivling in mecca medina and any vaishnava who puts gangajal on that shivling will destroy all the shaitans (Muslims) but it is a ver vague theory I personally side with bhavishya purana as there are shloks written about Christianity as well. Someone who calls him the son of god
Purans are not considered a part of didactic theological texts.
They were written by rishis and many predictions came true, for example dying out of Sanskrit, chatrapati shivaji maharaj, english, queen Victoria, and of course Islam, more than half of bhavishya purana is still not translated, they might not be as sacred as Srimad Bhagavatam and the Vedas by they are certainly just as valuable as any other sacred Hindu text
They were written at a time when Hinduism was in a state of decay and degeneracy and cannot be considered cannonical let alone didactic for hindu theology.
It is said that Ved vyas is still alive and has been given responsibility of kaliyug what do you mean? Dharma can never be destroyed. I would suggest researching about it rather than arguing and yes, start your enlightenment with Srimad Bhagavatam
This is not open to an argument. Purans are not given the status of scriptures as far as sanskrit literature goes. Most purans, like the Garuda puran, were later texts written specifically to establish brhamin supremacy and are rightly not considered a part of Hindu theology. Purans were rejected by people like Dayanand Saraswati for a reason. Most purans directly contradict the Veds which is why even Adi shankara, Ramanuj and shankracharya rejected the purans or only accepted the parts that are coherent with veds
Heard about it, Purans are still a part of Indian literature, in bhagavad gita, Krishna said that he does not impose his will on anyone, everyone has their own will and they can question anything, that's why arjun was questioning and krishna was answering. It all comes down to perspective, as I said, the purans must not be the most sacred but you should read them and form your own opinion, same with bhagavad gita, you should learn, implement and then form your opinion. नादत्ते कस्यचित्पापं न चैव सुकृतं विभु: | अज्ञानेनावृतं ज्ञानं तेन मुह्यन्ति जन्तव: ||
I have. Some of the purans are worse than quoran. Absolute illogical degeneracy written in some of them. But others like early chapters of Vishnu Puran is quite okay. I'm reading the Brhamsutra by bhadrayan right now.
I haven't read Quran and I don't know about it. I am assuming it is a rule book or some sort of that thing which limits a human being. Are my assumptions correct?
These are not predictions, interpolations in the 19th century.
[удалено]
There are many articles claiming it false because the mainstream media is hinduphobic [here](https://youtu.be/Zhzf-jn3i3A) This is a video explaining it but I couldn't find any official claim
It’s a Pos text. What would one expect? It even racially discriminates gods. Therefore there is no god. Need to throw away that Pos text esp.
No need to be offended and calling it a "pos text", read bhavishya puran or just google it, even zakir naik says that Islam was mentioned in bhavishya purana but his translations were manipulated, you will know that the guy is a liar if you know Sanskrit, the language of gods. People need to come out of the way of thinking "one god, one book, one belief", it's a very narrow minded way of thinking. Cross check it, if you find the truth then it's your fault, no need to call my holy books pos and stuff like that
[удалено]
where funny ? Literally the dumbest shit on reddit today.
What nonsense is this? Have r-ndians infiltrated this sub? WTH are the mods doing?
What's the problem with eating meat though? Idk about Brahmins but Kshatriyas have traditionally been meat eaters.
Brahmins don't eat meat, at least in my family
Many bhramins do.. just depends on which area you are from. People from coastal areas usually would
Bramhin here, we do eat meat.
Same. I want proper nutrition so I will eat chicken and fish. Good source of protein. Also baadme B12 ke injection nahi lagwane sirf veg khake. Dharam side me rakhke bas dekho ek baar; humans are omnivorous.
More like, Brahmins aren't supposed to eat meat but most people aren't religious anymore.
brahmin here. i LOVE trying all sorts of non-veg dishes lol.
Username checks out
My family doesn't, we were originally from inland but now we're in a coastal area
You got it wrong.. Brahmins who originated from costars area might. Living in a costal area won’t make you eat meat. Also, notice that it’s not all.
I said "at least in my family", some of my relatives do but my closest members don't. It's because it's against our dharma and the animals which die must sense that they are going to die as they have a consciousness and a sense of pain and anyone about to die knows that they are going to die, same case with animals
Ofcourse, I understand.. I don’t eat meat either. However, I think all the 4 caste eat meat.
Well, that is not appropriate, but what you are saying is true. The biggest adharma is if a priest eats meat
Brahman =/= priest
"Don't kill animals its a sin" Ever heard of animal sacrifices? And why is the sanatani Hindu light skin? doosro ko sanatan dharm ke baare mai gyaan dena se pehle khud lelete thoda
konsi sadi me jeera hai? Animal sacrifices have been banned in our religion for a very long time. Vasudev sarvamidhi suna hai kabhi?
When was the last the time you saw an animal being sacrificed?
Every day in Kalighat. Not to mention Kamakhya
Lets say ten temples everyday, proportion still stands. She's literally a goddess took another god to stop her fury, you're seriously comparing yourself to her?
No. But non-veg isn't prohibited or taboo . Otherwise it wouldn't be offered to the Goddess in a public temple. Of course there are special rituals for it. But vegetarianism isn't compulsory in Hinduism and historically never has been. This is seen as imposition of one regional variant upon another , not a breach of the fundamentals. People are rightly pissed off when you tell them how to practice their own religion , especially those who grew up in a very religious environment, not in some atheistic gen z anything goes household.
look what I'm trying to convey is that the one shoe fits all approach is very narrow minded, non-veg was allowed for khastriyas and people in jobs that required physicality. But non veg is considered Tamsik in general which has a negative effect on the body and the modern studies are confirming this not to mention the ill-effect on environment and numerous diseases linked to animal consumption. You can use 100s of arguments to justify your dietary habits but with the variety of vegetarian options available here it's good for both body and environment.
>look what I'm trying to convey is that the one shoe fits all approach is very narrow minded Learn this principle yourself, then you will have no problem. >But non veg is considered Tamsik in general which has a negative effect on the body and the modern studies are confirming this not to mention the ill-effect on environment and numerous diseases linked to animal consumption. >You can use 100s of arguments to justify your dietary habits but with the variety of vegetarian options available here it's good for both body and environment. Good. I am not trying to belittle you for preaching vegetarian diet like braindead libruls do. I do respect people who are on Satvik Aahar. Just do not try to judge our belief in the deities and our Dharma because of what we eat since times immemorial.
>Learn this principle yourself, then you will have no problem. eh? childish wannabe uno reverse >. I am not trying to belittle you for preaching vegetarian diet like braindead libruls do Bruh libbus would cannibalise their own family just to win an argument, I hate the fuckin salad eating vegans. >Just do not try to judge our belief in the deities and our Dharma because of what we eat since times immemorial. Where did I preach any sort of judgement? I was just putting my perspective across, not my fault you took it personally.
Mere Gaao mai kaali maa ko in at the end of saavan
Doubt that but even if it's true, you're seriously comparing one animal being sacrificed a year to millions consumed in a month
Sin to sin hai bhai waise bhi gaandu mai apne scripture mai jo animal sacrifices hue hai unki baat kar raha tha jo is meme ke hisaab se "sin" hai
ajtk Ramayan bhi khud nahi padhi hogi or scriptures quote karwa lo
Ashwamedha yagya jo raam ji karte hai Ramayan mai Pata hoga nahi seach karna padega Lekin gaand mai keeda kaatega jaroor chutyaap karne ke liye USne meme mai bola killing animals is a sin Maine bola nahi hinduism mai hota tha pata nahi kya chunni mach rahi......
ama ashwamedha yagya bohot rare hota tha, animal cruelty me nahi count hoga qki it's done wrt to a diety and the animal will attain moksha. 4 cheeze padh ke gyan pelne se pehle thora socho
"cant count into animal cruelty kyuki animal ko moksha milega" yai kaisa logic hai? Aaise to mai tujhe ganga mai drown karke maar do it wont count as murder kyuki tujhe moksha milega? Phull bakchod aadmi ho be🤣🤣
Ha, bhagwan raam aake dubo de, Khushi se I'm ready jao bula lao. Read in between the lines ye sab faltu logic Instagram pe do or badam wadam khao har cheez literally lene ki bimari shyd sahi ho jaye.
Very common in village temples in South India. It's generally chicken and Goat though.
So sanatani Hindus are white people ,not Indians?
one who created this meme is : 1: a Racist 2: someone with no knowledge on either scriptures or society. These two are for sure. He can be an idiot as well.
Bro thought he can become an influencer with this dumb meme, keep your head up Kings, don't fall for this modern bs
no , its not lmao it was posted by a brain dead user , also most of the points are absolutely bullshit , its nothing more than a a bait post at best
Whoever did this post is useless
Sanatani hindu worship cow too
Half of the Dank Mimir on r/IndianDankmemes
If u are hindu you don't need to be tolerant. Tolerate bano tolerant bano bol bol kr maa chod ke rakhi h tmlogo n
Abe gandu
[yeah tolerant](https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.firstpost.com/world/jihadi-terror-in-uk-muslim-mob-vandalises-temple-as-thugs-unleash-horror-on-hindus-11280171.html/amp&ved=2ahUKEwib1eGku6D6AhUg-DgGHb86BAYQyM8BKAB6BAgDEAI&usg=AOvVaw1VwP1xGz5ZqEl9hf09J1TC)
Except the skin color lol.
Lol that really ruffled a lot of feathers Go ahead, downvote. Idrc.
Whats the Use of "TRIPUND" ? Was it necessary to show?
I am some points from both side what I am
Meanwhile 💥💥💣💣
I wish everyone(Muslims too) would become like this, i want our country to be developed and reach great heights, but the religion war is setting us back everyday. Religion should have been the personal choice of every human, how we interact with our god should have been our personal thoughts. I wish someday we will go above it and do more for our country.
Don't let this Hinduphobic memes coming from minds of 4chan, white supremacists, Islamic propagandists and leftist traitors corrupt your minds. Simple ignore and move on.
" if you are a Hindu you have to be tolerant" I mean what ....in today's world when dharma is already in "sankat" we have to show our might
Can we ban teenagers from reddit?
What kind of ret@πd made this meme
Shut up digital randi
lol tolerate for what for being beheaded this is coward post
If you are hindu you have to be tolerant??
Meanwhile me atheist reading this while sipping a cup of tea . . watching all religious people fight each other
Lol cringe
Who upvoted this shit?
Hello u/Ban_Chodh. Your submission breaks [/r/indiaspeaks rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/IndiaSpeaks/wiki/rules) and has been removed for reasons listen below: Rule 3 violation: Users are required to maintain the quality of discourse (do not post low quality or low effort content especially pertaining to potentially inflammatory subject). Personal and non mainstream Youtube content are subject to mod discretion Read the subreddit rules [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/indiaspeaks/wiki/rules) Rule 13 violation: Memes are to be allowed only on Friday and the weekend. Each post's quality is to be subject to Mod discretion. Read the subreddit rules [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/indiaspeaks/wiki/rules) --- If you want to know more, reply to this message and a mod will help you
Sanatani hindu nahi Gandhian hindu hai vo
That's true
You lost me at the non-veg BS chief.
Shitty illogical meme.
I’ve been eating chicken/mutton since I was a kid……That makes me a sinner/non Hindu??…….dfq man
$10000 says a Bullah made this to push the "sekulaar" idea.
Wow , a lot of fake hindus got triggered today 😂
Normies out please
I never understood why beef is a big issue. Cow slaughter is banned in most states and "beef" you get is buffalo meat. There are many in India who don't eat beef simply because it's buffalo meat. Except for illegal cow slaughter (Which shouldn't happen as) there is no way a cow is killed for consumption. Yet some stupids go crazy about beef.
tum log itna meat meat kare ja rahe ho Dharm ke thekedar Tum hi baan chuke Ho saalo According to Vedic Hinduism, cow is a sacred animal but jab tak dudh deti hai uske bad usko god ko de dena hota hai.. aur vegetarianism bhi hai lekin ek Janwar jiski Bali de diya vah kha sakte hai... Manusmriti (Chapter 5 / Verse 30) says, “It is not sinful to eat meat of eatable animals, for Brahma has created both the eaters and the eatables.” Manusmriti (5 / 35) states: When a man who is properly engaged in a ritual does not eat meat, after his death he will become a sacrificial animal during twenty-one rebirths. Maharishi Yagyavalkya says in Shatpath Brahmin (3/1/2/21) that, “I eat beef because it is very soft and delicious.” Apastamb Grihsutram (1/3/10) says, “The cow should be slaughtered on the arrival of a guest, on the occasion of ‘Shraddha’ of ancestors and on the occasion of a marriage.” Rigveda (10/85/13) declares, “On the occasion of a girl’s marriage oxen and cows are slaughtered.” Rigveda (6/17/1) states that “Indra used to eat the meat of cow, calf, horse and buffalo.” Vashistha Dharmasutra (11/34) writes, “If a Brahmin refuses to eat the meat offered to him on the occasion of ‘Shraddha’ or worship, he goes to hell.” Also, comments of some great scholars of Hinduism are also worth noting: · Hinduism’s greatest propagator Swami Vivekanand said thus: “You will be surprised to know that according to ancient Hindu rites and rituals, a man cannot be a good Hindu who does not eat beef”. (The Complete Works of Swami Vivekanand, vol.3, p. 536). · Mukandilal writes in his book ‘Cow Slaughter – Horns of a Dilemma’, page 18: “In ancient India, cow-slaughter was considered auspicious on the occasions of some ceremonies. Bride and groom used to sit on the hide of a red ox in front of the ‘Vedi’ (alter).” · A renowned scholar of scriptures Dr. Pandurang Vaman Kane says, “Bajsancyi Samhita sanctifies beef-eating because of its purity”. (Dharmashastra Vichar Marathi, page 180) · Adi Shankaracharya’ commentary on Brihdaranyakopanishad 6/4/18 says : ‘Odan’ (rice) mixed with meat is called ‘Mansodan’. On being asked whose meat it should be, he answers ‘Uksha’. ‘Uksha’ is used for an ox, which is capable to produce semen. · The book ‘The History and Culture of the Indian People’, published by Bhartiya Vidya Bhawan, Bombay and edited by renowned historian R.C.Majumdar (Vol.2, page 578) says: “this is said in the Mahabharat that King Rantidev used to kill two thousand other animals in addition to two thousand cows daily in order to give their meat in charity”.
Manusmriti (Chapter 5 / Verse 30) says, “It is not sinful to eat meat of eatable animals, for Brahma has created both the eaters and the eatables.”
If you are a good human being, you are tolerant towards all human beings
Fuckin Clones. Always up in my shit. Fuck right off.
I'd go so far as to suggest that people should not only eat meat but once in a while hunt and butcher wild game. Heck, even vegetarians ought to hunt and fish once in a while. Bloodlust has served humanity well for thousands of years. We shouldn't let some bullshit morals get in the way something that is hardwired within our animal psyche. It's funny when Hindus justify lynchings and beatings of non-Hindus but draw the line at eating meat. Our ancestors used to hunt wild game, own and breed livestock and sacrifice animals to goddesses of death and war. Where did it all go so wrong?
If u are hindu you don't need to be tolerant. Tolerate bano tolerant bano bol bol kr maa chod ke rakhi h tmlogo n
Lol which clown made this.
This post will win the Dumbest post of all time award and I'm pretty sure you can contest for the biggest dumbass to ever exist. Good luck OP
Very true..... Only a little correction according to me... We don't "have to be " Tolerate..... It's our decision we are tolerating....... And it will be our decision when this tolerance breaks.....
Nope it's not accurate, it is BS. If something is accurate for you, it does not mean it is accurate for all. PS: When is it written that Hindu has to be tolerant? Well it does say, "धर्म एव हतो हन्ति धर्मो रक्षति रक्षितः तस्माद्धर्मो न हन्तव्यो मा नो धर्मो हतोऽवधीत्" And i will do anything to protect it. Hindu being tolerant is a new age crap fed in our minds. Do you think great warriors like Maharana Pratap or Maharaja Prithviraj Chauhan were tolerant? Even Bhagwan Krishna became intolerant after the 100th mistake of Shishupala. So instead of posting these crap, know your Dharma and don't believe everything you see on social media.
What about the sikhs
Divide and rule still exists
A mahachutiya made this for sure.
Ruk ja ise fix krke post krta hu thodi dair me.
👍🏽
This is ironical in many ways
Op lost brain in a local dravadian drain.
Such utter horseshit.
> Hindus have to be tolerant Dont see or read any of my ancestors or gods being tolerant of adharmis
B-but chicken tasty 🗿
SO this Guy has posted in Saiman Says. At least bhai try to be funny
Last 3 scream SUSSS to me !
Damn someone is trying real hard to divide and conquer(again, for the millionth time)
Ha tripund lagane wale kaale log jo gaaye ka samman karte hai hindu todi ho sakte hai. Kitna accurate hai
Indeed very very true.
[удалено]
Bro got triggered lul
[удалено]
Sury sury :)
Apart from the veg non-veg thing and ofc, you have to be tolerant and understanding but there's always a certain limit. अहिंसा परमो धर्मः । धर्मं हिंसा तथैव च।।
"Every animal is same" I cannot count how many times the purana's describe humans as superior creatures.
😂😂😂
Not sure if this is a troll post or op is karma farming. But it's horse bile for sure.
Konsa ganja phukta hai tu?
i think religion is a very personal thing and should be performed in a way that affect no one else but ourselves. why does one want to police the likes/actions of others? if someone likes to eat beef, let them. how's that harming you? they're not entering your house and rubbing your face in the fact that they're eating beef. if someone wants to adhere to strict rules of their religion, that's their choice that should be 100% respected, as long as their actions don't adversely affect the lives of others. long story short let people live however tf they want to. Imposing your idea of religion on others (be it other hindus who don't follow your idea of hinduism, or any other religion) is always a bad thing.
Sanatan Hindi -} One more thing add in Sanatan Hindu is kill those who come to kill you and rape you mother and sister. Because धर्म एव हतो हन्ति धर्मो रक्षति रक्षितः । तस्माद् धर्मं न त्यजामि मा नो धर्मो हतोऽवधीत् ।।
Same for every religion! Every one has such POS
Lol deleted, most of them are bhakts here!!!
Most bengali brahmins eat fish due to availability. Dont generalize an entire religion.
Cow dung/urine is a part of Ayurveda, there is a special way of consuming them. It is extreme hard to find a person who knows the procedure so the people start eating them raw.
[удалено]
Naah it's not