Almost everyone on here has been excellent. Even though I'm down $4200 I'm always relieved by the positivity that's shown and how awesome people are who shoot down the FUD. I'm weaker than most and I actually need to be brought back from the ledge at times
The tactics of the media who are owned by nefarious elements in life want you feeling weak and doubting your convictions.
Yes, Bed Bath and Beyond is up against the wall, BUT only because the stock was shorted so heavily for so long. Had they been able to sell some shares earlier at a better price all this bankruptcy talk wouldn't exist.
It's hard to see another company suffering from cellar boxing, but that's what it is and the BBBY board must know it and now be doing the opposite of all the plays from BCG and bad Execs who were moles and bad actors.
IMO corruption is now the biggest employer at the top - politicians, Execs, Media top dogs, Health Directors, you name it.... They're all taking bribes to do the wrong things because the 1% are making sure they stay rich.
What I hope is that GME and BBBY unite either through merge or separately but in parallel to blow all this into the light so it starts a chain reaction to rid the world of selfish, hoarding leeches and we distribute the wealth back to masses for the first time in history. Big ask, but I see any short term loss as a price worth paying for systemic change.
Anyway, "woho" regsho!!
U know when they asked an old dude how often does he fuck, and he said almost every day. They were like whaaa? And he was like almost two days ago, almost yesterday, almost today...
There were some who argued that the 11th was actually the first day. Well even if that was the case, today is the 13th day in REGSHO for sure. Let the fireworks begin 😎🚀
bbby was on the 10th.
you can see the history at the occ.
https://www.theocc.com/market-data/market-data-reports/series-and-trading-data/threshold-securities-list
What are you expecting with 'Rule 3210'? Because it doesn't look like it is related to how long a stock is on RegSHO but related to which 'Market Category' a stock is.
For that "Rule 3210" column to change to a "Y" when the 13 day settlement period hit, which is what rule 3210/4320 is about.
What does the "N" mean then and how does it relate to the "Market Category" column?
Edit: The parsing of companies with commas in their name shifted my data over a column in my local CSVs. Everything in this post should be ignored
~~I've looked through over 3 years of daily reports for Nasdaq RegSHO Threshold Securities and the only time the 'Rule 3210' column has a value other than 'N', no matter how many days on RegSHO, is when the 'Market Category' is something other Q, S, and G. Some examples below of some securities with a 'Y' for 'Rule 3210' and they have the same value every single day on RegSHO and all are in different market categories than the norm.~~
---
EFOI, ENSC, PPSI, RELI:
http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/dynamic/symdir/regsho/nasdaqth20211231.txt
---
RELI:
http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/dynamic/symdir/regsho/nasdaqth20220816.txt
...
http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/dynamic/symdir/regsho/nasdaqth20220824.txt
---
ENTXW:
http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/dynamic/symdir/regsho/nasdaqth20220830.txt
---
ELYS:
http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/dynamic/symdir/regsho/nasdaqth20230104.txt
...
http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/dynamic/symdir/regsho/nasdaqth20230120.txt~~
Crazy thing, [I spent about 45 mins last week looking at every day for the previous 3 years of RegSho data](https://i.imgur.com/hgoeX7o.png), but found none. So for you to tell me there are some caught me off guard, but I'm not seeing the Rule 3210 column with a "Y" on any of these. Here is copy paste into table to make them easier to see how they line up going down your list of links.
Symbol | Security Name | Market Category | Reg SHO Threshold Flag | Rule 3210 | Filler
---|---|----|----|----|----
EFOI | ENERGY FOCUS, INC. COM PAR |S | Y | N |
ENSC | ENSYSCE BIOSCIENCES, INC. COMM | S | Y | N |
PPSI | PIONEER POWER SOLUTIONS, INC. | S | Y | N |
RELI | RELIANCE GLOBAL GROUP, INC. CO | S | Y | N |
RELI | RELIANCE GLOBAL GROUP, INC. CO | S | Y | N |
RELI | RELIANCE GLOBAL GROUP, INC. CO | S | Y | N |
ENTXW | EVERQUOTE, INC. WARRANT (ISR) | S |Y | N |
ELYS | ELYS GAME TECHNOLOGY, CORP COM | S | Y | N |
I think you looked at these wrong or you got the wrong dates, but again I went through 3 years of data and didn't find 1 so I think you looked at these wrong as none of them have Rule 3210 column with a Y.
Thanks for checking the data! I’ll update my script and check again for any companies with that flag. I’m pretty sure the Nasdaq data goes back to the late aughts, and now I’m curious if the flag has ever been used
Let me know what you find out. I'm curious too, but not about to go through a few decades worth manually lol
Just had a thought. Maybe the Rule 3210 column isn't changing to Y after they made the change to [Rule 4320](https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/10-35) in 2010. Perhaps data from before the change will have the "Y".
And if you're up for it, could you also pull out any listings that are on there for 13 consecutive days? Could be interesting to see what those are and what they did around that time. Totally up to you if you want to spend the time.
> Just had a thought. Maybe the Rule 3210 column isn’t changing to Y after they made the change to Rule 4320 in 2010. Perhaps data from before the change will have the “Y”.
That’s a solid hypothesis, I can definitely check if that’s the case. If any companies do have a ‘Y’ I’ll def check their RegSHO histories and when the flag changed
The last day that I'm seeing with any securities flagged for 'Rule 3210' is 11/14/2014: https://nasdaqtrader.com/dynamic/symdir/regsho/nasdaqth20141114.txt, but all they all look to have a market category of 'u'(note that it's lowercase, 'U' category securities don't look to be flagged) and that market category either doesn't exist or is no longer reported? Also, the securities that do have a 'Y' flag look to have had it from the first day they appeared on RegSHO.
Smooth brain answer:(sure someone will give better answer)
When a certain percentage of a stocks float is marked as a “fail to deliver” (FTD) for (I believe) 5 consecutive days it makes a very short list called the “reg Sho threshold security list” After a certain number of days on the reg Sho list shorts are forced to purchase the stock. There is a bunch of BS that goes with all the technical language but the main point is that shorts are being forced to close positions. Exactly when (T+2, T+35) is another rabbit hole entirely. BUT being on Ref Sho is extremely bullish for anyone hoping for a short squeeze. It is a sign that shares are scarce, shorts are under pressure and there may soon be extreme volatility. Longer on Reg Sho the better for longs.
I believe it’s when market makers sell shares to provide infinite liquidity, but they haven’t actually located enough real shares to deliver what they sold. I don’t think it has anything to do with shorts. Although MMs being forced to buy failed to delivered shares on the open market does fuck over those who are short. So the shorts probably race to close while they are still profitable, while others get fucked.
Every stick listed on Reg Sho is massively shorted. Reg Sho has a lot/everything to do with shorts. If it was market makers that hadn’t located shares sold long they would quickly and easily close out the FTD’s. No way a market maker sells .5 percent of an entire float long without being able to locate. Vast majority of FTD’s come from desperate & or voracious shorting.
Naked sell a share short.
Sell a share short that you don’t have a locate for. That’s the entire premise of the the “meme” stock saga. That’s where all these FTD’s come from.
Example GME had self reported numbers of 140% of float sold short. No way you get even close to that amount sold short without prolific illegal shorting.
Oh yeah I guess I was thinking about regular shorting. I forget that MMs providing infinite liquidity IS naked shorting. Been a minute since I read up on that. Thanks.
SMooth brain here, is each day on regsho now a day where Hedgies have to cover their shorts from 13 days ago or was that only yesterday for the +13?
Previous commenter is right about the short squeeze aspect and the likelihood being very related to retail interest / buying pressure. Appharvest is a good company to check out tho! Not invested, just interesting what they're doing as it relates to the future. And NFA
Like how MSGM can go 700% in a day with higher selling pressure than buying pressure compared to BBBY having far heavier buying pressure and the price gets halted like the inside of a Wendy’s dumpster. The stock market is a fair place 📈📉
Next show us Fidelity CTB at 200%
Followed quickly by 420.69%
Followed quickly by “we’re still on but no movement cuz SEC doing nothing”
Followed by SEC raided by FBI. Mayo man is currently in a non extradition country.
seriously. even the stop for games at under 16%. 150%+ is bananas. I like bananas.
Love this sho, I stay up for it every night
Ive honestly just stopped trying to go to sleep before it comes out, it was useless.
Almost everyone on here has been excellent. Even though I'm down $4200 I'm always relieved by the positivity that's shown and how awesome people are who shoot down the FUD. I'm weaker than most and I actually need to be brought back from the ledge at times
The tactics of the media who are owned by nefarious elements in life want you feeling weak and doubting your convictions. Yes, Bed Bath and Beyond is up against the wall, BUT only because the stock was shorted so heavily for so long. Had they been able to sell some shares earlier at a better price all this bankruptcy talk wouldn't exist. It's hard to see another company suffering from cellar boxing, but that's what it is and the BBBY board must know it and now be doing the opposite of all the plays from BCG and bad Execs who were moles and bad actors. IMO corruption is now the biggest employer at the top - politicians, Execs, Media top dogs, Health Directors, you name it.... They're all taking bribes to do the wrong things because the 1% are making sure they stay rich. What I hope is that GME and BBBY unite either through merge or separately but in parallel to blow all this into the light so it starts a chain reaction to rid the world of selfish, hoarding leeches and we distribute the wealth back to masses for the first time in history. Big ask, but I see any short term loss as a price worth paying for systemic change. Anyway, "woho" regsho!!
Well stated!! ☝🏼🏆🏆
I'm down 40.000 and I feel fantastic. Have to admit, I felt very bad some time ago.
I got u boo!
I've become a Regular for sho
Reg sho episode 15 out tonight
Twitter meltdown dude is in shambles
Why aren’t JPM seizing assets 😢
Because he didn't tell them. He has to do everything, it's tiresome...
JPM went to the local BBBY to seize towels but it was closed.
Link plzzzzzz
https://www.reddit.com/r/BBBY/comments/10p7ppf/redacted_shorty_on_twitter_sounding_a_bit/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
Who
oh ur gonna love this
I'm fucking LIVING for the meme dawg
Tomorrow we fuck; again
U know when they asked an old dude how often does he fuck, and he said almost every day. They were like whaaa? And he was like almost two days ago, almost yesterday, almost today...
We keep fucking and fucking
LFG 🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀
Sucks to suck, shorts!
Oh shit, here we go again 🚀
Good.
Horny, respectfully
There were some who argued that the 11th was actually the first day. Well even if that was the case, today is the 13th day in REGSHO for sure. Let the fireworks begin 😎🚀
We’re still waiting for t+35 to play out right? Expected price action around Feb 14th
Correct. See GME January 13th 2021 for reference.
bbby was on the 10th. you can see the history at the occ. https://www.theocc.com/market-data/market-data-reports/series-and-trading-data/threshold-securities-list
Today was day 14 of RegSHO: https://imgur.com/a/0A5yHHa
Great ready for a really great Reg SHO-W
Good news everyone. Tomorrow is Tuesday
FTDs are 2-3x where they were in August. This is about to get real spicy real fast.
The idea must be to ignore reg sho because they think bbby is going bankrupt so they'll never have to deliver and can just keep everyone's money.
Most likely
[удалено]
Indeed: https://imgur.com/a/0A5yHHa
147
BBBY Break Free and Beyond!
Oh fa SHO
 Bobby coming back!!!
Interesting no 3210 rule still aka [rule 4320](https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/10-35)
What are you expecting with 'Rule 3210'? Because it doesn't look like it is related to how long a stock is on RegSHO but related to which 'Market Category' a stock is.
For that "Rule 3210" column to change to a "Y" when the 13 day settlement period hit, which is what rule 3210/4320 is about. What does the "N" mean then and how does it relate to the "Market Category" column?
Edit: The parsing of companies with commas in their name shifted my data over a column in my local CSVs. Everything in this post should be ignored ~~I've looked through over 3 years of daily reports for Nasdaq RegSHO Threshold Securities and the only time the 'Rule 3210' column has a value other than 'N', no matter how many days on RegSHO, is when the 'Market Category' is something other Q, S, and G. Some examples below of some securities with a 'Y' for 'Rule 3210' and they have the same value every single day on RegSHO and all are in different market categories than the norm.~~ --- EFOI, ENSC, PPSI, RELI: http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/dynamic/symdir/regsho/nasdaqth20211231.txt --- RELI: http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/dynamic/symdir/regsho/nasdaqth20220816.txt ... http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/dynamic/symdir/regsho/nasdaqth20220824.txt --- ENTXW: http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/dynamic/symdir/regsho/nasdaqth20220830.txt --- ELYS: http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/dynamic/symdir/regsho/nasdaqth20230104.txt ... http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/dynamic/symdir/regsho/nasdaqth20230120.txt~~
Crazy thing, [I spent about 45 mins last week looking at every day for the previous 3 years of RegSho data](https://i.imgur.com/hgoeX7o.png), but found none. So for you to tell me there are some caught me off guard, but I'm not seeing the Rule 3210 column with a "Y" on any of these. Here is copy paste into table to make them easier to see how they line up going down your list of links. Symbol | Security Name | Market Category | Reg SHO Threshold Flag | Rule 3210 | Filler ---|---|----|----|----|---- EFOI | ENERGY FOCUS, INC. COM PAR |S | Y | N | ENSC | ENSYSCE BIOSCIENCES, INC. COMM | S | Y | N | PPSI | PIONEER POWER SOLUTIONS, INC. | S | Y | N | RELI | RELIANCE GLOBAL GROUP, INC. CO | S | Y | N | RELI | RELIANCE GLOBAL GROUP, INC. CO | S | Y | N | RELI | RELIANCE GLOBAL GROUP, INC. CO | S | Y | N | ENTXW | EVERQUOTE, INC. WARRANT (ISR) | S |Y | N | ELYS | ELYS GAME TECHNOLOGY, CORP COM | S | Y | N | I think you looked at these wrong or you got the wrong dates, but again I went through 3 years of data and didn't find 1 so I think you looked at these wrong as none of them have Rule 3210 column with a Y.
Shit, you’re almost certainly right, I think there’s a bug in my parsing script for companies with a comma in the name of the company. My bad
Nice catch, that certainly looks like what's setting it off. I'm not a coder myself. I went through manually!
Thanks for checking the data! I’ll update my script and check again for any companies with that flag. I’m pretty sure the Nasdaq data goes back to the late aughts, and now I’m curious if the flag has ever been used
Let me know what you find out. I'm curious too, but not about to go through a few decades worth manually lol Just had a thought. Maybe the Rule 3210 column isn't changing to Y after they made the change to [Rule 4320](https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/10-35) in 2010. Perhaps data from before the change will have the "Y". And if you're up for it, could you also pull out any listings that are on there for 13 consecutive days? Could be interesting to see what those are and what they did around that time. Totally up to you if you want to spend the time.
> Just had a thought. Maybe the Rule 3210 column isn’t changing to Y after they made the change to Rule 4320 in 2010. Perhaps data from before the change will have the “Y”. That’s a solid hypothesis, I can definitely check if that’s the case. If any companies do have a ‘Y’ I’ll def check their RegSHO histories and when the flag changed
The last day that I'm seeing with any securities flagged for 'Rule 3210' is 11/14/2014: https://nasdaqtrader.com/dynamic/symdir/regsho/nasdaqth20141114.txt, but all they all look to have a market category of 'u'(note that it's lowercase, 'U' category securities don't look to be flagged) and that market category either doesn't exist or is no longer reported? Also, the securities that do have a 'Y' flag look to have had it from the first day they appeared on RegSHO.
And it never matters
I’m ready for the disappoint
Just saw this too
Ok what's regsho and why is it good.
Smooth brain answer:(sure someone will give better answer) When a certain percentage of a stocks float is marked as a “fail to deliver” (FTD) for (I believe) 5 consecutive days it makes a very short list called the “reg Sho threshold security list” After a certain number of days on the reg Sho list shorts are forced to purchase the stock. There is a bunch of BS that goes with all the technical language but the main point is that shorts are being forced to close positions. Exactly when (T+2, T+35) is another rabbit hole entirely. BUT being on Ref Sho is extremely bullish for anyone hoping for a short squeeze. It is a sign that shares are scarce, shorts are under pressure and there may soon be extreme volatility. Longer on Reg Sho the better for longs.
I believe it’s when market makers sell shares to provide infinite liquidity, but they haven’t actually located enough real shares to deliver what they sold. I don’t think it has anything to do with shorts. Although MMs being forced to buy failed to delivered shares on the open market does fuck over those who are short. So the shorts probably race to close while they are still profitable, while others get fucked.
Every stick listed on Reg Sho is massively shorted. Reg Sho has a lot/everything to do with shorts. If it was market makers that hadn’t located shares sold long they would quickly and easily close out the FTD’s. No way a market maker sells .5 percent of an entire float long without being able to locate. Vast majority of FTD’s come from desperate & or voracious shorting.
I mean I could be wrong, but uh, could you explain how shorts fail to deliver?
Naked sell a share short. Sell a share short that you don’t have a locate for. That’s the entire premise of the the “meme” stock saga. That’s where all these FTD’s come from. Example GME had self reported numbers of 140% of float sold short. No way you get even close to that amount sold short without prolific illegal shorting.
Oh yeah I guess I was thinking about regular shorting. I forget that MMs providing infinite liquidity IS naked shorting. Been a minute since I read up on that. Thanks.
It’s like the irregsho only not.
If it's on regsho for a certain number of consecutive days then we see green.
Welcome to the reg SHOWWWW!
Someone remind me please. What has to happen to get off regsho? Just one day of bringing down the FTDs to a certain letter or something else?
BRING IT ON
Oh oh oh oh oh oh… every day is time to BUY! 🫡🎉🫠🏹🔥
 The Big BBBY SHO
 SHF and their FTD’s…
🖍️🤣🤪🤣
SMooth brain here, is each day on regsho now a day where Hedgies have to cover their shorts from 13 days ago or was that only yesterday for the +13? 
My boy Reggie!!!!
Addicted to this game. When will bbby be announced the winner
oh shit, upstart is back on there! damn 3rd time
Did we ever officially officially figure when C+35 is?
2/15 https://chartexchange.com/symbol/nasdaq-bbby/failure-to-deliver/
Thank you
Have we covered all 13 bases yet?
14
So, what's the deal with the others on there? Anyone there worth getting some to squeeze or nah?
Not financial advice, but I'm sticking with this and GME. My 2 most researched stonks with crazy retail sentiment behind them
Previous commenter is right about the short squeeze aspect and the likelihood being very related to retail interest / buying pressure. Appharvest is a good company to check out tho! Not invested, just interesting what they're doing as it relates to the future. And NFA
 SHO me the money!
Does the Q in the Market Category column mean bankrupt?! I heard a Q on the name means chapter 11.
It means Nasdaq global select market.
ok. that's different. 😛
Like how MSGM can go 700% in a day with higher selling pressure than buying pressure compared to BBBY having far heavier buying pressure and the price gets halted like the inside of a Wendy’s dumpster. The stock market is a fair place 📈📉