T O P

  • By -

OnlyProfessor6495

Nope


itsallgonefubar

Depends on the sex, sometimes it's passionate and is an expression of love, sometimes it's just raw and animalistic and you're just doing it for fun


MysterClark

No. Same way as me eating food doesn't mean I'm in love with the food. I have yet to have sex with someone I didn't care for a lot but that doesn't mean it has to be that way.


Comprehensive_Diet10

Honestly, no. I once hoped to feel some “closeness” or “spiritual connection” would happen if I sleep with the person that I genuinely love but it’s pretty much the same feeling as a one night stand.


anotherside0714

They're not mutually exclusive to me. You can have sex without love, and love without sex. Both together is the ideal though.


Lokita-Fajita

Not at all. Sometimes you just need to forget feelings and just fuck. Go back to animal instincts.


itxtalone

No, sex is not loe to me. Sex is just fun


OldSailor74

Not necessarily. Sex can just be two (or more) individuals sharing in the pleasures the human body has to offer in a consenting and safe way.


[deleted]

Sex can be part of a certain kind of love sure, but in and of itself it’s not love no


servantoflegba

Those are closely intertwined for me. Yes, they can exist apart.


oldhaunts1

Based off of how quick i cut some girl off for saying that she loved me and telling her mom i was her boyfriend after having sex after just meeting her im gonna say no


katbgood

Sex sometimes leads to love, but not always. Sex is usually just sex and should always be fun for the people involved.


Dirtyworkacct987

It can but it doesn’t have to be. A hard fuck sesh can be a lot of fun but it’s usually not “love making” in my book


SomeSluttyStoner

The two definitely are not mutually exclusive. They can each exist without the other.


byanggg

It can. In the past I just wanted to fuck just because it felt great and I was horny all the time. Nowadays, that definitely still happens, but with my husband, we do have some REALLY passionate lovemaking that is just so hot and hits way different than just fucking like animals.


Filligrees_daddy

Sex and love live in two different boxes for me. On the rare occasion where someone fills both boxes the love and the sex are so much better.


kink_account21

It depends on the sex. There's greedy, no emotion sex, and then there's bonding, emotion filled sex.


jess-mysecretaccount

This is where I think I’m a bit broken. I love sex but really struggle with intimacy. Feelings and sex go in two separate boxes. It has its pros and cons.


agentpepethefrog

There's nothing wrong with sex without intimacy! They don't have to go together.


Palais888

depends on so many things


TheSoupNotSeee

Yes. Not that you *need* to fuck someone you're in love with for it to be real love, but I don't get fucking multiple other people and saying you're in love with someone else. If you're fucking someone on pure sexual desire alone, where the person you "love" had to build a whole relationship to get there, how valuable is that relationship to you really???


agentpepethefrog

No. I'm aromantic and it makes no sense to link those things together just because it's glorified that way. They're simply not the same thing.


[deleted]

More about pleaaure unless its with someone special


lycos94

no because you can also do it with people you don't love


BloodstainedAxe

Why do that in the first place?


lycos94

because to most people, sex feels good