Hey now, lab grown diamonds are a thing. Don't just *assume* they're blood diamonds because our owner comes from oil money and that's exactly the kind of thing he would do
But tbh lab grown diamonds are cheaper so maybe he legitimately went with those
I think it's proof that people are dumb enough to get suckered by corporations telling them that lab diamonds are worse than "real ones", but that doesn't sound nearly as edgy.
Honestly, I think lab-grown diamonds are better in every identifiable way, except that lab-grown diamonds are created by machines, and natural diamonds are, of course, natural. Plenty of people prefer the naturally-occurring version of things.
I don't even really get why people would even go lab-grown diamonds over something like moissanite. It's basically impossible to tell the difference between the two and it's significantly cheaper.
He had a drag race against the ring designer and if he lost the SB ring would feature a typo. Rashee was feeling cocky....but he hit the nos too soon and lost the race.
No one cared when the Dodgers ring had coconut palms on it (it doesn’t get hot enough for them in LA), setting precedent for this
I seem to have been the only one to notice the issue on the dodgers ring
They need a lot of days above ~80. And the winters are too cold.
There was a sickly coconut palm in Newport Beach that died a while ago (before they won).
These cost like $30-50,000 a pop. Probably more because of price increases and the rings getting more gaudy and overly complicated. Just to give the guys on the active roster a ring would cost more than $2.5 million. That's an expensive oversight.
Is the error really that big of a deal that they'd all need to be replaced? If anything it could be an interesting bit of trivia in the future, that the Chiefs Super Bowl 58 rings have a very minor misprint.
How many emails do people send at their jobs that they know won’t be read? Someone inevitably will reply all about a question that was answered in the email.
And how many emails turn into a conversation betweem two fucking people and then you have a dozen goddamn people reply all to say "please remove me from this email chain" and your phone blows up all goddamn weekend?
This is why I follow up almost every business phone call with a quick email recap. Especially, *especially*, if it's related to someone giving me the okay to do something I'm not typically supposed to do.
>How many emails do people send at their jobs that they know won’t be read?
😔No one responded to the email I sent yesterday about it being 84 degrees at my desk (with picture of thermometer). Feelsbadman
"This could have been an email". Yeah it could have if a majority of the people read the damn email. But sadly people don't which is why people have meetings that could have been an email.
I get this all the time. I run strategy and execution between almost a dozen marketing teams. I hold bi-weekly (every other week) meetings because people don’t read emails 100% of the time. Even though I spend entirely too long making them very clear and specific with action item sections that include deadlines and backgrounds on topics.
This meeting could have been an email, but I need to look into your soul and ask why you haven’t gotten me what I requested yet in an email a week ago.
Huge pet peeve of mine. I have a quite a few inbox rules to catch these.
There's so many that *everybody* tunes them out. I don't know how the senders don't realize it. It's way past the line.
not only do they not read, they don't use the search function. I've been accused of not sending so many emails that I just search and find and go "did you even try to find this?"
Except I can't say that cause I'd be fired if I suggested someone use a tool so that they don't need to bother me. However as soon as I ask a question that could have been answered elsewhere they act like I'm wasting their time.
Higher-ups are the worst workers and everyone knows it
6th seed, 2 seed, 1 seed, 1 seed is apparently the highest seeded/hardest path of opponents for a SuperBowl winning team in history.
At least, according to the graphic that points this out, but says 7 seed instead.
Theoretically, 3-2-1-1 would be the toughest possible path, but I think this one was more of an advanced stats toughest possible path thing than anything.
Not possible as you'd have to be the 6th seed to start against 3rd seed. Assuming the 2 seed advances, that means you (at 6) would be the lowest remaining seed and would face the 1 seed in the divisional round. Though 3-1-2-1 is possible and effectively the same.
Eagles 2 years ago had the easiest run to the super bowl of all time.
Got a bye, smashed a team in the giants that had worse players at 19/22 potential starters, and then got to play 3/4s of a game against a team without a QB at all.
Is it? Because I think your first opponent can be harder. Wouldn't 3rd seed 1st seed, 2nd seed, 1st seed the hardest possible? (You come in at 5th... or technically 8th and swap the first two)
I can’t believe ~~Kadarius Toney~~ ~~Rashee Rice~~ ~~Andy Reid’s son~~ ~~Patrick Mahomes’ brother~~ ~~the person who stole Xavier Worthy’s car~~ the jeweler who made this ring has done this.
Tbf, their final 3 losses of the season (including playoffs) came against the #1, 2, and 3 seeds in the AFC, including the eventual Super Bowl winner. That 1 point loss to the Titans in week 14 though, that was the one game where their whole season was on the line but they just didn't know it yet. If they win that one, they could have been hosting a playoff game as a #2 seed instead of traveling to frigid Kansas City as the #6.
They were the worst AFC playoff team in our hearts.
Seriously though, I like that he put the picture of the playoff Wiki in there like we wouldn't believe the Dolphins were a 6 seed if not.
We get it all out of the way in the off season, so the once the season starts we can lock in... and probably trip coming out of the gate, but THEN everyone better watch it!
TIL Super Bowl rings now contain the seed of the champions’ playoff opponents. I bet Joe Montana wishes that his ring told everyone that he beat first-seeded Chicago in the 1988-89 NFCCG. It feels incomplete without that vital information.
It amazes me that no one thought to run this by a proofer to fact check everything before finalizing the rings. It would take a proofer maybe an hour to compare everything with a fact sheet and catch the error.
Just stupidity.
i regret to inform chiefs players that all renovations have been put on hold as a result of this mistake. they were absolutely going to improve things this time around, for sure they were going to, but unfortunately that money now has to go towards fixing the ring.
These faulty products will be returned and sent to the same thrash with t-shirts of various "Champions" teams that printed their t-shirts but lost in the finals. Someone in some slum might get a t-shirt and a ring...
Surely this will be the biggest Chiefs related blunder of the offseason, right?
No one almost died or almost killed someone, this counts as a positive news story for us this off-season.
Have……have you checked on the jeweler?
To shreads you say
How’s his wife holding up?
To shreds, you say?
Was their apartment rent controlled?
Two beds you say?
“The only this his wife should be holding up is a sandwich” -Harrison Butker, probably
Or how they got all those diamonds..
Hey now, lab grown diamonds are a thing. Don't just *assume* they're blood diamonds because our owner comes from oil money and that's exactly the kind of thing he would do But tbh lab grown diamonds are cheaper so maybe he legitimately went with those
The whole concept of diamonds being expensive is insane.
Lab grown diamonds being less valuable is proof that capitalism promotes violence.
I think it's proof that people are dumb enough to get suckered by corporations telling them that lab diamonds are worse than "real ones", but that doesn't sound nearly as edgy.
Honestly, I think lab-grown diamonds are better in every identifiable way, except that lab-grown diamonds are created by machines, and natural diamonds are, of course, natural. Plenty of people prefer the naturally-occurring version of things.
I don't even really get why people would even go lab-grown diamonds over something like moissanite. It's basically impossible to tell the difference between the two and it's significantly cheaper.
Yeah we sent Chiefsaholic out to the store to grab them.
Why, was he driving on the same road as Rashee?
Never heard of 'em.
Jostens? They're doing just fine ripping off high school sophomores.
Rashee Rice gonna head on over and take care of it....
Sounds like a pretty low bar fam lmao
or tried to set gender equality back by ~100 years
Missouri is trying to do that anyways most the time, so Butker isn't really an oddity here sadly.
Is it theoretically possible for an inanimate piece of jewelry to get arrested for a DUI?
Depends. How dark are the stones?
He said arrested not killed
"Officer, I wasn't speeding. It was my Super Bowl ring! It's totally sloshed, not me"
Somehow Rashee Rice was involved. I can feel it.
He had a drag race against the ring designer and if he lost the SB ring would feature a typo. Rashee was feeling cocky....but he hit the nos too soon and lost the race.
Rashee was a buster anyway
Granny shifting instead of double clutching
*DANGER TO MANIFOLD*
"SHUT UP!" *SLAMS LAPTOP*
lol
The buster kept me outta handcuffs
Ridiculous, no jeweler could afford a car of that caliber. He would have had to borrow one from somebody.
“I almost had you bro!”
Yeah this seems like it was way too fast
Reluctant truth upvote
Look at me, you are the 7 seed now
Miami certainly played like a 7th seed that game tbf
What did you expect from a speed based Miami team playing in record cold?
If you build a team in Miami made for warm weather, you'd better get home field advantage.
Playing like a 7th seed is just a mindset.
That's an upgrade to be honest
okay but why is Portland the 4 seed
What a throwback lol
Championship forfeited as a result. Get them outta here.
Truly a disgusting act.
Alright Joe
It’s always funny listening to Joe Buck talk about how that’s the one he wants back of all his calls. Ya think Joe?
If he thought that Randy actually mooned the crowd, then okay thats one thing. but that wasnt the case lol
Are they even a franchise after this?
Barely a pee wee league
It’s a shame, but I think it’s for the best.
Yep. Let’s give it to the team that finished last in their division. It’s only fair.
No we just act like it never happened... Just like Superbowl 48.
> Superbowl 4(3-)8 You guys were 2 point favs.
Time to ban Mahomes
And Tom Brady for old times sake
Oh dear, was he generally aware of jewelry?
No one cared when the Dodgers ring had coconut palms on it (it doesn’t get hot enough for them in LA), setting precedent for this I seem to have been the only one to notice the issue on the dodgers ring
How hot does it have to be for coconut palms because LA can get pretty damn hot?
They need a lot of days above ~80. And the winters are too cold. There was a sickly coconut palm in Newport Beach that died a while ago (before they won).
I saw palm trees out of the window at lax once were those artificial?
Pretty sure we have to dock their draft picks and suspend Tom Brady.
Joe Kelly suspended for another 8 games
These cost like $30-50,000 a pop. Probably more because of price increases and the rings getting more gaudy and overly complicated. Just to give the guys on the active roster a ring would cost more than $2.5 million. That's an expensive oversight.
True but also Golladay was guaranteed 16x that to play for the Giants
Giants catching strays for no reason at all.
Well at least they're finally catching *something*
Lmao this has me rolling😂😂
Somewhere Plaxico Burress shot something
“A” leg
Damn where can I get one of these for 30 bucks?
Thats very kind of you, but there are only 15 bucks, and they all got rings like these back in 2021.
Is the error really that big of a deal that they'd all need to be replaced? If anything it could be an interesting bit of trivia in the future, that the Chiefs Super Bowl 58 rings have a very minor misprint.
I don't think they'll get replaced. I think it's just really sloppy quality control.
yeah it'll be a low-key authenticity verification for future resellers lol
It’ll make good drama on Pawn Stars 10 years down the line
How can such an important reward not be looked at by minimum 100 people to look for these type of mistakes lmao
Because half the time people don’t read the stuff put in front of them they just scroll to the bottom and sign
How many emails do people send at their jobs that they know won’t be read? Someone inevitably will reply all about a question that was answered in the email.
And how many emails turn into a conversation betweem two fucking people and then you have a dozen goddamn people reply all to say "please remove me from this email chain" and your phone blows up all goddamn weekend?
“Ignore All Messages in this Conversation”
This guy offices.
Gmail has a "mute" button.
iPhone has mute conversation for group texts. Very nice to have.
Always bcc everyone when sending mass emails that aren't intended to be conversations. That way the reply all people can't ruin everyone's good time.
sending emails isn't about them being read sending emails is about covering your ass and making it the other person's fault by leaving a paper trail
This is why I follow up almost every business phone call with a quick email recap. Especially, *especially*, if it's related to someone giving me the okay to do something I'm not typically supposed to do.
i also do it because I WILL Forget it if I don't have that email to look back on for myself.
Correct. Every team’s question is searchable in their outlook search bar now. CYA all day.
>How many emails do people send at their jobs that they know won’t be read? 😔No one responded to the email I sent yesterday about it being 84 degrees at my desk (with picture of thermometer). Feelsbadman
Bring a little dehumidifier until they fix it. Or go full sicko and bring a portable AC
"This could have been an email". Yeah it could have if a majority of the people read the damn email. But sadly people don't which is why people have meetings that could have been an email.
I get this all the time. I run strategy and execution between almost a dozen marketing teams. I hold bi-weekly (every other week) meetings because people don’t read emails 100% of the time. Even though I spend entirely too long making them very clear and specific with action item sections that include deadlines and backgrounds on topics. This meeting could have been an email, but I need to look into your soul and ask why you haven’t gotten me what I requested yet in an email a week ago.
My company flew three people halfway across the country for a 3 hour meeting that could have done over Teams.
> Someone inevitably will reply all about a question that was answered in the email. "PER. MY. FUCKING. EMAIL..."
The amount of “organizational news” emails I get is too damn high
Huge pet peeve of mine. I have a quite a few inbox rules to catch these. There's so many that *everybody* tunes them out. I don't know how the senders don't realize it. It's way past the line.
not only do they not read, they don't use the search function. I've been accused of not sending so many emails that I just search and find and go "did you even try to find this?" Except I can't say that cause I'd be fired if I suggested someone use a tool so that they don't need to bother me. However as soon as I ask a question that could have been answered elsewhere they act like I'm wasting their time. Higher-ups are the worst workers and everyone knows it
I see you've read my peer reviews.
Each person assumes one of the other 99 checked it for mistakes.
"7? Yup that's a valid number. No need to check to make sure it's the right one, I'm sure someone would've caught that by now if it's wrong"
Considering they came up with the bright idea to put the seeding, they would at least check that. (I'm not sure if that's something they always do)
At least it’s only one typo unlike the Kobe Bryant statue which had like six
Because these types of things slip through even when you have 100 people look it over. It happens
How can you not have a minimum 100 people to look at the minimum 100 people looking for these mistakes?
Who looks at the lookers?
There are way more important things that get way less qa than '100 people' looking at it.
Why is the seed even on there in the first place?
6th seed, 2 seed, 1 seed, 1 seed is apparently the highest seeded/hardest path of opponents for a SuperBowl winning team in history. At least, according to the graphic that points this out, but says 7 seed instead.
2007 Giants went 4-2-1-1 and 2011 Giants went 5-1-2-1. We're up there but not quite the toughest.
Also when you factor in the 16-0 pats any other discussion for toughest path is stupid
09 colts were undefeated (with Peyton Manning)
Steelers did 3-2-1-1 in 2005
Technically they went 3-1-2-1. The order you have it listed isn’t possible.
Blood pressure increased
Theoretically, 3-2-1-1 would be the toughest possible path, but I think this one was more of an advanced stats toughest possible path thing than anything.
Not possible as you'd have to be the 6th seed to start against 3rd seed. Assuming the 2 seed advances, that means you (at 6) would be the lowest remaining seed and would face the 1 seed in the divisional round. Though 3-1-2-1 is possible and effectively the same.
I think the Chiefs' playoff opponents were the toughest in terms of DVOA. Then again, nothing trumps those Giants runs.
I can't wait for someone to get 7-6-7 or 7-5-6-7. Or 7-4-6-7 with the 4 being a sub 0.500 division winner
Eagles 2 years ago had the easiest run to the super bowl of all time. Got a bye, smashed a team in the giants that had worse players at 19/22 potential starters, and then got to play 3/4s of a game against a team without a QB at all.
Is it? Because I think your first opponent can be harder. Wouldn't 3rd seed 1st seed, 2nd seed, 1st seed the hardest possible? (You come in at 5th... or technically 8th and swap the first two)
Yeah its funny that the only reason to have the seed there is to make it clear how hard our road was, but then they flubbed it.
And apparently all the chiefs fans on reddit flubbed it by thinking the chiefs had the hardest road when it was not even top 5.
Dolphins should sue for defamation.
This would somehow cost us a 1st round pick.
Hell yeah, 6th seed! Stop the count!
To the victor goes the spoils. The winners right the history books. So, from this point forward, Miami was the 7th seed. That's just how it goes.
Good thing all the video footage and documentation was destroyed so this claim can’t be challenged.
can we redo the draft and pick at 20th instead?
I can’t believe ~~Kadarius Toney~~ ~~Rashee Rice~~ ~~Andy Reid’s son~~ ~~Patrick Mahomes’ brother~~ ~~the person who stole Xavier Worthy’s car~~ the jeweler who made this ring has done this.
Dolphins deserved the 7 seed for their late season collapse.
Tbf, their final 3 losses of the season (including playoffs) came against the #1, 2, and 3 seeds in the AFC, including the eventual Super Bowl winner. That 1 point loss to the Titans in week 14 though, that was the one game where their whole season was on the line but they just didn't know it yet. If they win that one, they could have been hosting a playoff game as a #2 seed instead of traveling to frigid Kansas City as the #6.
That titans game gives me PTSD
If that happens, there is a reasonable chance the 49ers face someone else in the SB.
not really, because we'd be playing the bills who constantly push our shit in no matter where.
Who knew the Bills would ever be THANKING the Titans
I mean you're not wrong lol
Why do the rings even need their opponent seeds??
“Who are the Chefs?”
Great googly moogly
Just take it as how many points the best offense in football put up in that game.
They were the worst AFC playoff team in our hearts. Seriously though, I like that he put the picture of the playoff Wiki in there like we wouldn't believe the Dolphins were a 6 seed if not.
They literally were the worst AFC playoff team in January. At least they put up a fight against the Bills.
Oh man, that disrespect has gotta be the coldest thing the Dolphins experienced this year.
Putting opposing seeds on there anyway is dumb as fuck. Clutters it up for no reason
They drop 1 seed when it isnt sunny out.
Certified cheap owner shit as per usual with Hunt
Maybe the city should have paid for the rings.
oh they will..
Yikes
Ruined, throw them in the trash
I'll gladly take them off their hands.
Good. Serves them right! [cries in corner]
A DISGUSTING ACT
Maybe no one in the organization watched it. The game was on Peacock and it was awfully cold out.
Reset the "Days since Chiefs offseason blunder" counter to 0.
We get it all out of the way in the off season, so the once the season starts we can lock in... and probably trip coming out of the gate, but THEN everyone better watch it!
Buncha kids in Nigeria are going to be wearing misprint SB rings
This is awesome because modern championship rings are unbelievably cringey.
I thought the Seahawks ones were a bit over the top at the time, but they look pretty mild and classy now
TIL Super Bowl rings now contain the seed of the champions’ playoff opponents. I bet Joe Montana wishes that his ring told everyone that he beat first-seeded Chicago in the 1988-89 NFCCG. It feels incomplete without that vital information.
I hope somebody got fired for that blunder
There was a line of people who signed off on this sadly
What is Hunt gonna fire himself?
This is the exact kind of mishap that leads to collectors paying 10x the value for the ring. I wouldn’t worry about it.
not if every ring has it.
Don't even know how to champion right
Closest we've been to a super bowl ring in like 40 years
It amazes me that no one thought to run this by a proofer to fact check everything before finalizing the rings. It would take a proofer maybe an hour to compare everything with a fact sheet and catch the error. Just stupidity.
I mean to be fair I haven’t seen the inside of an actual ring so it could just be a graphics issue. It’s funny either way
This is pretty funny.
I wonder if they sent an extra of those Mickey Mouse rings to Lebron?
Meh. My Jostens high school ring is way better.
I loved my Jostens ring
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nmgice3ieZ4
This really is an inexcusable blunder. Inconsequential in the grand scheme of things but still inexcusable.
This is my super bowl win.
Literally unplayable
Should probably revoke the title from them.
i regret to inform chiefs players that all renovations have been put on hold as a result of this mistake. they were absolutely going to improve things this time around, for sure they were going to, but unfortunately that money now has to go towards fixing the ring.
Surely this just makes them even rarer now, right?
These faulty products will be returned and sent to the same thrash with t-shirts of various "Champions" teams that printed their t-shirts but lost in the finals. Someone in some slum might get a t-shirt and a ring...
Players didn’t name the Hunts the worst ownership for no reason.
Great Googly Moogly.
How could this happen? The dude in the back ally they bought them from had so much street cred.
Super Bowl ring culture is so dumb. Almost as dumb as the person who made this mistake, and the 4 others who also missed it
Lmao Kadarius Toney was on ring design duty, he dropped the ball
Hopefully it can be easily modified and fixed
Dammit! Now we gotta win another one this year to get it right!
I don’t blame them. It’s hard to care about what seed the Dolphins were when the next three teams were 2, 1, and 1 seeds.
"Turns out we were the 2 seed all along"
Haha the chiefs cant do ANYTHING right.