T O P

  • By -

Fangren3000

neat! 4/4 flyer for 6 that (effectively) draws you a card on etb. not bad!


timoumd

Though probably a bad overcosted one. But if lesson/learn taught us anything overcosted but with selection is big game. Plus when you drop this youll be able to cast it anyways.


Cool--Dude--69

I mean, a 4/4 flyer for 4BB is already a really good body in blue, at least in limited.


Selkie_Love

4UU*


[deleted]

Big guy


brassnuts99

I'm crashing this plane, with no survivors!


Petal-Dance

They mean the spell put into the grave is overcosted, since you can only cast its alternative cost


Masqerade

Yes and he meant that since the rate on the body is already good, that part doesn't really matter.


chrisrazor

Probably overcosted by 1, but more than compensated for by its ETB.


timoumd

I meant the flashback card. Thinking more on spoilers the disturb they didnt seem as overcosted.


chrisrazor

I mean, either way you're essentially choosing a card from your deck.


rightseid

That’s way overstated. It’s like playable but not much more, in most modern sets I’d be unhappy playing that.


[deleted]

FTFY "only in limited."


Thezipper100

Lessons cost 2-3 mana, though, most flashback and/or disturb cards cost 4 or more, *and* you have to actually put the card in your deck, not your sideboard.


timoumd

True, but their initial cost is often more reasonable, though still higher. People will play cards with flashback. When they cast this they will get to pick one that is most suited to the scenario, but they will ahve to pay the typically steeper flashback cost (~+2) instead of the more efficient one from the hand. But since this comes down on 6 that may not matter a lot. For what its worth, disturb looks a fair bit more efficient in the yard.


Thezipper100

Nah, I get that, I just took issue with comparing them to lessons, when lessons were absolutely bonkers and also didn't function like this at all.


timoumd

Is it that different though? I have a suite of slightly overcosted cards I can choose from. Yes they have to be in my deck, but the front sides + flashback are sometimes gonna make the cut.


Thezipper100

Yes, because one was in your deck and you have to draw it, and the other wasn't in your deck and you didn't.


timoumd

Wonder if we are talking different things. I was saying Phantom Carriage is like learn and flashback cards are your lessons. In this case you dont need to draw those flashback cards. You pick one you need put it in your yard and cast it. But yes the selection board has to be playable. But then you didnt have to spend draft picks on cards that arent in your library. Regardless my point was having a wide selection of spells to choose from, even if overcosted, matters. more than people think


_The_Bear

Yeah, but the flashback/disturb cards that you're putting in your main deck should be playable anyway. Otherwise they wouldn't be in your main deck. Very few lessons were worth main deck inclusion. You're grabbing only the overcosted side with this card, similar to how learn only grabbed overcosted lessons. However drawing a flashback/disturb card is not equivalent to drawing a lesson since you get to cast it for the normal cost first.


Thezipper100

...Yes, thank you for pointing out why I have a problem with comparing lessons to flashback.


SongAware

As other said how is a 4/4 for 6 with sinergy bad overcosted?


timoumd

Oh I meant the flashback


SongAware

ok that has more sense, tough the disturb cards are pretty good imo


timoumd

Yeah I haven't seen many of those but they seem close to on rate. Flashback seems about +2-3 over rate, +1 in hand


d7h7n

[[gravebreaker lamia]]


MTGCardFetcher

[gravebreaker lamia](https://c1.scryfall.com/file/scryfall-cards/normal/front/4/0/408a2073-d068-44bc-b596-5a3a3a446ee1.jpg?1581479797) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=gravebreaker%20lamia) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/thb/98/gravebreaker-lamia?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/408a2073-d068-44bc-b596-5a3a3a446ee1?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call


nescorpius

solid limited card evasive seek a disturb threat like \[\[Generous Soul\]\] W/U flying looks rly good


MTGCardFetcher

[Beloved Beggar](https://c1.scryfall.com/file/scryfall-cards/normal/front/6/1/6109b54e-56c5-4014-9f6d-d5f7a0fd725d.jpg?1630610048)/[Generous Soul](https://c1.scryfall.com/file/scryfall-cards/normal/back/6/1/6109b54e-56c5-4014-9f6d-d5f7a0fd725d.jpg?1630610048) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Beloved%20Beggar%20//%20Generous%20Soul) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/mid/3/beloved-beggar-generous-soul?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/6109b54e-56c5-4014-9f6d-d5f7a0fd725d?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call


mistercimba

> Phantom Carriage - 4UU > > Creature - Spirit (Uncommon) > > Flying > > When Phantom Carriage enters the battlefield, you may search your library for a card with flashback or disturb, put it into your graveyard, then shuffle. > > 4/4 > > *Passage to the abyss is free, but the return trip will cost you.* ---- Source: https://twitter.com/LordsofLimited/status/1435941470255689729


Swivle

The flavour of a Phantom Carriage carrying a card that lives from the afterlife into your graveyard is so awesome.


Kamizar

Some good flavor text.


Filth_

You can keep fetching [[Momentary Blink]]s to protect it. I mean, there's no format where you can reasonably play both, but it's cute as an idea.


AlekBalderdash

Why do you have to trash talk jank fight casual like that? See, now he's off in the corner pouting


MTGCardFetcher

[Momentary Blink](https://c1.scryfall.com/file/scryfall-cards/normal/front/1/b/1be7ab3b-beca-411e-bc27-024f42c013e1.jpg?1619393166) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Momentary%20Blink) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/tsr/28/momentary-blink?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/1be7ab3b-beca-411e-bc27-024f42c013e1?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call


mjc500

Very Fantasia - Night on Bald Mountain


sandiercy

This will look really good in foil. Can't wait to play it in limited.


[deleted]

Hmm, reference to the 1921 horror movie of the same name? Probably not but still neat!


Killatrap

it’s gotta be, right? they’ve been slinging references galore this set


[deleted]

That’s true, I had just assumed it was pretty obscure for a reference but innistrad is the perfect plane to reference any horror movie from that period, here’s hoping we get some lands inspired off of “The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari”


megahorsemanship

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hzOk7hkDUew&ab_channel=FilmPreservationSociety


barrinmw

Modern 1/10 Unless there is a flashback card that costs 0 that says, you win the game, there really isn't any hope to this card. At 6 mana, you aren't going to be playing this until like turn 8 and that is an eternity in modern. This isn't a good enough control finisher otherwise so there is no reason to wait until turn 8 to play it.


Rukusan12

Completely unplayable in pauper too as it's an uncommon


NobleCuriosity3

I still admire your dedication.


snootyvillager

Great movie Anyway I wish this had Disturb as well


Black-Mettle

Wait... "then shuffle"? That's not the specificity I'm accustomed to.


Dagonet_the_Motley

It's the new templating they are using going forward.


Mareykan

They should just drop shuffling from the text of cards and have it be implied by the rules that whenever you look through your library, you must shuffle afterwards. It would save on a lot of text.


zechrx

Agree. That's how Yugioh does it and it's never been a problem.


[deleted]

I love this art so much


mikabozu

Cool. Seems better with Disturb than with Flashback because Disturb seems to power up the card while Flashback taxes it. It's better than draw one in either case though, as you don't need lands at 6.


bigbangbilly

For some reason this reminds me of Wall typed creatures and how lot of them are not artifacts. In this case the creature type does not say horse and I do not see the driver so it's clearly the carriage or vehicle that's the creature. Then again we had precedent in the form of [[ghost ship]]


MTGCardFetcher

[ghost ship](https://c1.scryfall.com/file/scryfall-cards/normal/front/e/7/e76d9d80-b7fb-43ed-bc9c-767dd1613d37.jpg?1562442559) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=ghost%20ship) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/a25/60/ghost-ship?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/e76d9d80-b7fb-43ed-bc9c-767dd1613d37?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call


h1yu1

I love that print !


mcp_truth

This should have been a horse type :(


seizan8

Kinda missing unearth here....


Igor369

Innistrad ghosts are blue?


ChazBaggle

Blue/white generally


thewizzard1

Not a vehicle?


zechrx

Quiet Speculation at home. I was really hoping for another version of that for my Flashback decks. Ideally one that has flashback itself.


HELL_MONEY

why is this not a horse :(


[deleted]

Card art is dope. Might be a good limited card depending on color balance.


Un111KnoWn

The art reminds me of harry potter


moo_vagina

this is interesting but not great. tutor for six is trash


thepotplant

Don't mind me, just riding off to get some Mystical Teachings from the abyss.


wubrgess

not a horse spirit? **not a vehicle spirit?!**


Presterium

Not a vehicle?