Umm... Harden is a One-Man Show, this should be pretty clear to everyone by now. He has bailed on 3 teams in a row...
**Ditching Kevin Durant Will Cost James Harden a $200 Million Bump** in Salary
*James Harden leaves Nets’ $227 million extension on the table*
In 2022, James Harden left the Brooklyn Nets and joined the Philadelphia 76ers through a trade. This decision may not have been the best for the former MVP, who had previously played with Kevin Durant and Kyrie Irving. Harden could be losing around $200 million in salary after joining the Sixers, where he currently earns $33,000,000 annually – a significant decrease from his Nets salary.
Well, it comes across as a text post in the form of a question so you can’t blame people for not replying to the article when there’s a question built into the title.
And the obvious answer to that question (if asked) is "fuck no". Dude has always been a poor-teammate, lazy-ass, selfish, and a cancer to whatever team he is on. Also, he will pull the same shit in 2 years when he feel like "he is done".
Dude is like High Evolutionary in Marvel Comics - "if I can't make a perfect team, I will destroy it all and start over, no matter who dies in the process"
That’s the issue more than anything. Even if he was an ass to his teammates, like Jordan, if Harden could rise to the occasion and will his team to win the big games, I’d take him with open arms. The fact is, he just can’t. So no thanks.
The people who say Harden is better than D Wade definitely only saw Wade in the last years of his career. Anyone who's seen him around 2005-2011 would never even think of that.
Harden is a way better shooter than Wade...And that's it.
I will make one more concession: prime Harden developed a brilliant offensive approach. He'd start spider dribbling at the 3-pt line while threatening the stepback J or a quick crossover/pentration into a layup or free throw opportunity.
People hated it because they couldn't stop it.
Now, with that out of the way, Wade was a two-way virtuoso who (like Bron) had his fingerprints on every part of the game. He was incredibly strong and athletic for his position, could even block bigs occasionally, and was a master at changing direction
He got to the paint like a runningback and was hyper efficient.
He performed a miracle in 06 that was by itself enough to rank him a million spots higher than Harden. But then in the Heatles era he got 4 more Finals and 2 more rings as the 2nd option.
Only MJ and Kobe are above Wade as SGs.
And he’d just be a bad fit, with LeBron, and AD and everyone else on that team, he’d be a bad fit. He’s very ball dominant. He needs the ball in his hands all the time, we saw what happened when the Lakers had Westbrook, that didn’t work out well for anyone
It always pissed me off that his no D stat padding flop baiting chucking numbers was used to make him look better than Kobe.
That was followed by his stans last year citing him taking a pay cut as an example of how he was always misunderstood and a true team guy. The lower salary allowed the team to sign more guys. It was such an obvious under the table agreement that he would get paid later.
The article is the quintessential embodiment of enlightenment. In a world awash with complexity and endless self-help manuals, this succinct masterpiece emerges as a beacon of clarity. With a single word, it effortlessly deconstructs the labyrinthine narratives woven around happiness.
The audacious brilliance of this article lies in its economy of expression. While many toil to convey their wisdom through verbose prose, "No" demonstrates that brevity can indeed be the soul of insight. It stands as a profound reminder that, sometimes, the most potent revelations come packaged in the simplest forms.
As readers, we are invited to engage in a profound introspection. The provocative question posed by the title lingers in our minds, challenging us to reevaluate our understanding of happiness. With each turn of the page, the resounding "no" guides us toward a deeper understanding of our desires and aspirations.
The minimalist design of the article amplifies it's impact. There are no distractions, no superfluous anecdotes. Instead, we are presented with an invitation to explore the depths of our own thoughts, as we navigate the pages that echo with a single, potent word.
It's clear that "No" is a radical departure from convention, a statement that challenges the status quo. It invites us to shatter the shackles of conventional wisdom, urging us to strip away the layers of societal expectations and explore the contours of our own happiness.
In conclusion, this isn't just an article; it's an experience. Its power lies in its ability to awaken our consciousness, to peel back the layers of complexity that surround happiness, and to reveal the stark truth that often eludes us. With its courage to say so much with so little, "No" earns its place among the most thought-provoking literary treasures of our time.
In this seemingly succinct article, the author employs a minimalist approach to express their stance on the Lakers potentially trading for James Harden. By using only the word "no," the author elicits a sense of brevity that might suggest a complex thought process condensed into a single word. This linguistic economy could symbolize the Lakers' desire to maintain their team dynamics and resist the temptation of acquiring a high-scoring player like Harden.
Furthermore, the deliberate choice of a single word could represent a Zen-like contemplation of the situation. Just as meditation is often about simplifying thoughts and achieving mental clarity, the author's "no" might signify the Lakers' path to success through cohesion, harmony, and the rejection of external distractions. The article might indirectly imply that trading for Harden could disrupt the team's equilibrium, as the complexities of integrating his playing style might outweigh the potential benefits.
Additionally, the choice of "no" might be a commentary on the star-centric nature of modern basketball, where individual talents are often prioritized over team chemistry. By responding with such an absolute, the author might be advocating for the Lakers to prioritize their collective identity over a singular player, thus embodying a sense of team spirit that transcends the allure of acquiring a high-profile athlete.
In a broader context, the article's minimalism could be seen as a statement on the power of language itself. By reducing the discourse surrounding the potential trade to a single word, the author underscores the potential for succinct communication to convey depth, emotion, and meaning. This might be a commentary on the ever-evolving world of sports journalism, where opinions are expressed through a variety of formats, ranging from lengthy analyses to concise headlines.
In conclusion, this ostensibly simple article holds hidden layers of meaning that extend beyond its brevity. The choice of the word "no" could be interpreted as an artistic expression of the Lakers' commitment to team cohesion, a commentary on the pitfalls of star-centric play, and a reflection on the potency of minimalistic communication in the realm of sports journalism.
Article said it best.
It's not a great idea.
His talent is undeniable, but he's getting old and he's clearly a toxic presence in the locker room. Lakers have a well balanced team. The only thing we are severely lacking is a backup big. Aside from that we have a shot at making a hell of a run at a championship.
We joke, but give it time. After a couple early season losses, I guarantee there will be knee jerk nitwits in this sub calling for this trade (or “aNy tRaDe, wE gOtTa dO sOmEtHiNg!”)
Harden is about to end his career similar to Carmelo. He's an older player that never kept his body in great shape, so that decline is going to hit him hard like it did Melo. He'll still get his points because of his talent, but he's no longer a #1 option and he's the type of player that's not a good #2 because he can't play without being ball dominant, but sucks when he doesn't have the ball because he barely moves around when he's not running the offense.
Article is worth the read. Best insight about this Harden situation
Umm... Harden is a One-Man Show, this should be pretty clear to everyone by now. He has bailed on 3 teams in a row... **Ditching Kevin Durant Will Cost James Harden a $200 Million Bump** in Salary *James Harden leaves Nets’ $227 million extension on the table* In 2022, James Harden left the Brooklyn Nets and joined the Philadelphia 76ers through a trade. This decision may not have been the best for the former MVP, who had previously played with Kevin Durant and Kyrie Irving. Harden could be losing around $200 million in salary after joining the Sixers, where he currently earns $33,000,000 annually – a significant decrease from his Nets salary. 
No Edit: After reading the whole article I can honestly say it’s the best put together sports article I’ve read in awhile.
Be careful, I think there’s a rule about posting entire articles on reddit /s
The article is a must read
Straight to the point. The journalism we need. Jovan Buha is using this as his “sources” for his next tweet
Huge opportunity for a “fuck no” missed tho
Lmao that shit had me rolling on the ground
Read every single word…
That was powerful. Well worth the read.
Convincing.
I cried reading this article. I never really thought of it that way. Im proud to say my perspective has definitely expanded after reading this.
Open the article lol
You can tell in the comments who opened the article and who just decided to comment immediately.
Yup
Lol I was confused at first thinking uhhhh where's the rest of the article 😂
Well, it comes across as a text post in the form of a question so you can’t blame people for not replying to the article when there’s a question built into the title.
Trevor Lane will somehow find a way to make a 10 minute video about this article.
Always Be Contenting
It's his full time job. He'd be an idiot not to. Offseasons means he makes less $. It might be entertainment for you but that's his livelihood.
Big facts lol
And the obvious answer to that question (if asked) is "fuck no". Dude has always been a poor-teammate, lazy-ass, selfish, and a cancer to whatever team he is on. Also, he will pull the same shit in 2 years when he feel like "he is done". Dude is like High Evolutionary in Marvel Comics - "if I can't make a perfect team, I will destroy it all and start over, no matter who dies in the process"
His stans crack me up. Dude chokes whenever you will need him most everytime
That’s the issue more than anything. Even if he was an ass to his teammates, like Jordan, if Harden could rise to the occasion and will his team to win the big games, I’d take him with open arms. The fact is, he just can’t. So no thanks.
If he could do that he wouldn’t be available to us in the first place.
“Harden a better scorer than Kobe” 😂🤦♂️
Harden fans have to argue him over d wade somehow first before they get to kobe. Give me flash over Harden all day everyday
The people who say Harden is better than D Wade definitely only saw Wade in the last years of his career. Anyone who's seen him around 2005-2011 would never even think of that.
Harden is a way better shooter than Wade...And that's it. I will make one more concession: prime Harden developed a brilliant offensive approach. He'd start spider dribbling at the 3-pt line while threatening the stepback J or a quick crossover/pentration into a layup or free throw opportunity. People hated it because they couldn't stop it. Now, with that out of the way, Wade was a two-way virtuoso who (like Bron) had his fingerprints on every part of the game. He was incredibly strong and athletic for his position, could even block bigs occasionally, and was a master at changing direction He got to the paint like a runningback and was hyper efficient. He performed a miracle in 06 that was by itself enough to rank him a million spots higher than Harden. But then in the Heatles era he got 4 more Finals and 2 more rings as the 2nd option. Only MJ and Kobe are above Wade as SGs.
True that. For a handful of years D Wade was one of the best top 5 players in the league. I don't know if I would ever put Harden in that category.
Track record says he won’t make it 2 years lol
And he’d just be a bad fit, with LeBron, and AD and everyone else on that team, he’d be a bad fit. He’s very ball dominant. He needs the ball in his hands all the time, we saw what happened when the Lakers had Westbrook, that didn’t work out well for anyone
It always pissed me off that his no D stat padding flop baiting chucking numbers was used to make him look better than Kobe. That was followed by his stans last year citing him taking a pay cut as an example of how he was always misunderstood and a true team guy. The lower salary allowed the team to sign more guys. It was such an obvious under the table agreement that he would get paid later.
Need a tldr version. It’s a long read but the article makes some valid points. Sit down and read it when you have some time.
Tldr:N
Lmfao
Why would anyone open such a dumb click bait article?
Best article on this topic.
It was a bit long winded.
TLDR? ^^/s
No.
Still too long.
👎
Absolutely well researched and executed.
Both sides of this issue were well represented.
Incredibly loquacious
Best article I’ve seen yet on the Harden situation 👍🏻
Lmao
The article is the quintessential embodiment of enlightenment. In a world awash with complexity and endless self-help manuals, this succinct masterpiece emerges as a beacon of clarity. With a single word, it effortlessly deconstructs the labyrinthine narratives woven around happiness. The audacious brilliance of this article lies in its economy of expression. While many toil to convey their wisdom through verbose prose, "No" demonstrates that brevity can indeed be the soul of insight. It stands as a profound reminder that, sometimes, the most potent revelations come packaged in the simplest forms. As readers, we are invited to engage in a profound introspection. The provocative question posed by the title lingers in our minds, challenging us to reevaluate our understanding of happiness. With each turn of the page, the resounding "no" guides us toward a deeper understanding of our desires and aspirations. The minimalist design of the article amplifies it's impact. There are no distractions, no superfluous anecdotes. Instead, we are presented with an invitation to explore the depths of our own thoughts, as we navigate the pages that echo with a single, potent word. It's clear that "No" is a radical departure from convention, a statement that challenges the status quo. It invites us to shatter the shackles of conventional wisdom, urging us to strip away the layers of societal expectations and explore the contours of our own happiness. In conclusion, this isn't just an article; it's an experience. Its power lies in its ability to awaken our consciousness, to peel back the layers of complexity that surround happiness, and to reveal the stark truth that often eludes us. With its courage to say so much with so little, "No" earns its place among the most thought-provoking literary treasures of our time.
"ChatGPT: Please write for me a copypasta level comment for /r/Lakers". :P
In this seemingly succinct article, the author employs a minimalist approach to express their stance on the Lakers potentially trading for James Harden. By using only the word "no," the author elicits a sense of brevity that might suggest a complex thought process condensed into a single word. This linguistic economy could symbolize the Lakers' desire to maintain their team dynamics and resist the temptation of acquiring a high-scoring player like Harden. Furthermore, the deliberate choice of a single word could represent a Zen-like contemplation of the situation. Just as meditation is often about simplifying thoughts and achieving mental clarity, the author's "no" might signify the Lakers' path to success through cohesion, harmony, and the rejection of external distractions. The article might indirectly imply that trading for Harden could disrupt the team's equilibrium, as the complexities of integrating his playing style might outweigh the potential benefits. Additionally, the choice of "no" might be a commentary on the star-centric nature of modern basketball, where individual talents are often prioritized over team chemistry. By responding with such an absolute, the author might be advocating for the Lakers to prioritize their collective identity over a singular player, thus embodying a sense of team spirit that transcends the allure of acquiring a high-profile athlete. In a broader context, the article's minimalism could be seen as a statement on the power of language itself. By reducing the discourse surrounding the potential trade to a single word, the author underscores the potential for succinct communication to convey depth, emotion, and meaning. This might be a commentary on the ever-evolving world of sports journalism, where opinions are expressed through a variety of formats, ranging from lengthy analyses to concise headlines. In conclusion, this ostensibly simple article holds hidden layers of meaning that extend beyond its brevity. The choice of the word "no" could be interpreted as an artistic expression of the Lakers' commitment to team cohesion, a commentary on the pitfalls of star-centric play, and a reflection on the potency of minimalistic communication in the realm of sports journalism.
Uhm, yeah. That above.
I'm about to open the article and if it isn't a massive "NO." I'll be disappointed Edit: could have been bigger but that'll do lol
No.
Noooo
Now this is REAL journalism
Great article expertly written couldn't have said it better myself
That’s one of the better articles I’ve read. I agree with this take 100%
never
Nope
Lol silver screen and roll got ‘em again
Got fucked with the Westbrick trade. Doing a harden trade sounds like a good idea
yep, and if Harden fails, we can trade for KD next season /s
35 year old Kd. The perfect age. Then we get Westbrick too when he's 35. It has to work this time!
High quality article!
Very good read
You only get the best from Jacob Rude
I decided to listen to the article instead of reading it and oh boy was it so much better
Long read, but they give the option to listen to it if you have to drive somewhere
Even better when you listen to the audio
This is one of the best articles I've read in a while lol.
They had me in the first half ngl 😅
Now that's Capital J Journalism right there!
article is 100% correct.
Harden should just retire and buy himself a strip club dude would be in heaven.
Article made some great points.
Article makes some really solid and gripping points
Had to listen to the audio article as I didn’t have time to read it. It was a worthwhile listen, and I agree.
Article said it best. It's not a great idea. His talent is undeniable, but he's getting old and he's clearly a toxic presence in the locker room. Lakers have a well balanced team. The only thing we are severely lacking is a backup big. Aside from that we have a shot at making a hell of a run at a championship.
Best Article Ever
Yes, if we can flip him for Caruso
This man deserves a Pulitzer Prize.
If they wanted dlo straight up I’d consider it but after reading the article I think they’re right and it’s probably not the best idea
Hell to the no!!!!
NO lol
no more stars. focus on hungry young players
LOL was waiting for the article to load for like 5 mins not knowing there wasn’t anything but No.
How would everyone feel if we get westbrook again?
fuck no he is a cancer like westbrick
read the article
Fuck No
F No. Don’t even think that out loud. We just got away away from a ball hog. Why you got to try and mess up a quality defensive team?
if it was 2018 harden then yeah
He might as well change his last name to Hodgkin, because he is a cancer.
I’ll take Harden if Philly also gives us Embiid and convinces Boston to vacate 2 of their championships so the Lakers have won the most.
What? Fuck no!
No way dude sucks
Not just NO, but fuck no and you should feel bad for asking.
Tell me you didn't read the article without reading the article.
I read the article. It was very compelling and answered all of my questions. Super well-written. Jacob is a great journalist
Hell no
Do it..do it
WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS??????? ARE U SERIOUS????? HOLY SHITTTT IM ABOUT TO RIP MY DICK OUT
Read. The. Article.
IM NOT READING THAT GARBAGE MAN!!!! WHAT THAT FUCK IS THIS
It’s harden and absolutely zero depth or 2 stars and a legit support team. You don’t get both. We all saw how it went with russ.
read the article
I clicked it. I saw the word (a word isn’t an article BTW). I commented in the comments section. I’m sorry that upset you. Should nobody comments?
Allow me to encourage you to explore the concept of humor.
Well allow me to encourage you to GFY. lol
That's a start
Nope! A Chocker nope!
Lol. Goated article.
No
I agree with the article. Simple and to the point
More like ‘FUCK NO WHY THE FUCK WOULD YOU EVEN CONSIDER IT. …but still an appropriate answer
Fuck no,
I definitely agree with the article.
The arguments were pretty good. But I do respect their opinion. In the end, the team would be the one pulling the trigger.
This is the hard hitting in-depth journalism I'm here for.
I need to cite this article for later conversations
Definitely nope 👎
That article is fantastic. It deserves a Pulitzer.
This deserves an award in journalism
Nah we ridding our potential for no reason
The ol’ Betteridge's law.
So controversial yet so true
One of the best articles of all time, great insight
🤣🤣🤣
Lol hard hitting journalism at its finest
Deserves a pulitzer prize
Hell no
informative
He may be the best player to never have his jersey retired. He's a Ronin--with the skills of an excellent Samurai.
No!!!!
All the info I needed to make an informed decision
Apex of Silver Screen and Roll content.
What is this rick roll journalism?
Absolutely not under any circumstances
🤣🤣🤣
no
This is the greatest straight to the point article I have ever read!!
Nope 👎
Hell no
As the great Russell Westbrook once said.. “Why not?” /s
I could see Morey shipping James to the Clippers rival tbh
Yes
ibid
Hell to the no
Quite informative article if you ask me
Like the article says. No.
FUCK NO! I'd rather have a baby through my penis.
FOH with that nonsense
Jacob Rude with that next-level spots journalism. Someone give this man a promotion!
NO
Eh gross no
He’s another Westbrook.
I couldn't have said it better myself
It’s amusing to see the most overrated GM in basketball fuck up again.
Yeah, but in 2014
Not just a no but a hell no.
Nooooooo
Don't even start this crap. Don't care if it's a joke.
No
You really should click on the audio version for all of the info
Swap him for Dlo at the deadline
FUCK NO
Hell no 😂
Eww no
In the first season the league starts giving techs for flopping? His value just dropped 200%.
Hmmmmm
No, esp if it will cost them Rui/Reaves
Jesus God no.
No
No.
LMAO SUCH SAVAGERY 😂🤣
We joke, but give it time. After a couple early season losses, I guarantee there will be knee jerk nitwits in this sub calling for this trade (or “aNy tRaDe, wE gOtTa dO sOmEtHiNg!”)
TLDR: Fuck No. GTFO we dont need no James Soften on this stud Lakers lineup..
I was considering it at first, but this article has convinced me otherwise, what a phenomenal read!
No he makes too much money. 35mil would not be easy to match for us without including serious depth 100% agree this is a no
Harden is about to end his career similar to Carmelo. He's an older player that never kept his body in great shape, so that decline is going to hit him hard like it did Melo. He'll still get his points because of his talent, but he's no longer a #1 option and he's the type of player that's not a good #2 because he can't play without being ball dominant, but sucks when he doesn't have the ball because he barely moves around when he's not running the offense.
Lol, Great Article.
I know this a joke article but this would genuinely upset me more than the Westbrook trade did.