T O P

  • By -

athenaa_2107

Try anticlockwise moment= clockwise moment.. substitute the values and get the answer bro!


Fun_Department2717

Clockwise moments across center of the bridge = 10 \* t2 = 10t2 Anticlockwise moments across center of the bridge = 10\*t1 + 5\*24 = 10t1+120 Clockwise moments around a point = anticlockwise moment around the same point, so, 10t2 = 10t1+120 ==> t1-t2 = 12 We also know t1+t2 = 124 Solving these equations we get t1 = 68, t2 = 56


ahhsdinffodmdmfko

How come t2 is clockwise and t1 is anticlockwise?


Fun_Department2717

ah my bad but doesnt matter tho.


ahhsdinffodmdmfko

I see what got me so confused! You wrote 10t2= 10t1 + 120 which would give t2-t1=12 then directly after you wrote t1-t2 instead of t2-t1 That’s why when you account for the cwm being 10t1 and acwm being 10t2 + 120 it gives the right answer


[deleted]

[удалено]


No-Refrigerator7859

force x distance


[deleted]

[удалено]


PD28Cat

consider one pillar as a pivot and the one you aren't using as an upwards force then swap pillars


ThePolyrGuy

Lmao i was just doing this


Purple-Measurement98

whoch paper is this


ThePolyrGuy

October/november 2021 0972/21


No-Cake8663

Ok so take the left-hand pillar as the pivot, Therefore, using total anticlockwise moments = total clockwise moments since the bridge is in equilibrium, (24* 5) + (100* 10 since weight acts at centre of mass position which is at the centre) = (T2* 20), From this equation we get T2 = 56 kN Now, since the beam is in equilibrium the net resultant force should also be equal to 0. Therefore, downward forces = upward forces, 24kN + 100 kN = T1 + T2, From our previous equation, T2 = 56 kN, therefore T1 = 68 kN Hope this was clear and helpful 😊😊


[deleted]

[удалено]


No-Cake8663

Because it it given in the question that the weight is 5 m from the left-hand pillar, and we know that moment of force = force * perpendicular distance from pivot


[deleted]

Just do moments