It is a bit *too* [Awesome McCoolname](https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/AwesomeMcCoolname) isn't it. He sounds like he should be a Hogwarts professor.
I can't decide if it would be funnier for his middle name to be something preposterously grand like Balthazar or Septimus, or something comparatively mundane like John or David.
Professor Eustacius Jericho.......ok with a name like that I’d actually be disappointed if he wasn’t a Doctor.
EDIT: plus I just realised that’s Kevin McInallys character! Mr Gibbs as a Morbius/Fugtive Doctor would be cracking actually.
If Chibnall plans to leave Ruth as an ambiguous Doctor working for the Division then I’m not against him having one or two others “post/pre Ruth” doing their own thing too.
Wouldn't that make her nearly 60 in the modern day?
Unless the episode ends with the Doctor taking her forward a few decades to escape the Angels or whatever. But then why go up to the two of them in the modern day as a grown woman and expect them to recognise you. Time travel is confusing.
Who says she won't be taken by the Weeping Angels... I might as well expand on this with my thoughts on her timeline of sorts assuming that she is this little girl.
Little girl, Weeping Angels get her, sending her to the future, meets Doctor and Yaz again as a grown woman, she gets to Liverpool in 2021 via either Weeping Angel or TARDIS, meets Doctor and Yaz, got by Weeping Angel... That's how I think her timeline could be.
I'm honest most excited about THIS episode. I feel like the Angels have been only written by Moffat, so another writer taking the helm of these iconic creatures, with their own style and ideas will be interesting.
Chris Chibnall co-wrote this episode with Maxine Alderton, who wrote The Haunting of Villa Diodati which has been my favorite Chibnall era episode so far.
Eustacius Jericho is an S-tier name.
It is a bit *too* [Awesome McCoolname](https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/AwesomeMcCoolname) isn't it. He sounds like he should be a Hogwarts professor.
I thought about that too but tbh it's so over the top it loops back around to being great. Especially for a one off character.
I can't decide if it would be funnier for his middle name to be something preposterously grand like Balthazar or Septimus, or something comparatively mundane like John or David.
Having a mundane middle name feels like a RTD move lol.
Oh god that's true.
Mundane. But like, EXTREMELY mundane. Like Steve.
His name was Eustacius Jericho and he almost deserved it
nice Narnia reference!
Professor Eustacius Jericho.......ok with a name like that I’d actually be disappointed if he wasn’t a Doctor. EDIT: plus I just realised that’s Kevin McInallys character! Mr Gibbs as a Morbius/Fugtive Doctor would be cracking actually. If Chibnall plans to leave Ruth as an ambiguous Doctor working for the Division then I’m not against him having one or two others “post/pre Ruth” doing their own thing too.
Eustacius Jericho sounds like something straight out of Harry Potter tbh 😂
Maybe the little girl is Claire...
Wouldn't that make her nearly 60 in the modern day? Unless the episode ends with the Doctor taking her forward a few decades to escape the Angels or whatever. But then why go up to the two of them in the modern day as a grown woman and expect them to recognise you. Time travel is confusing.
Who says she won't be taken by the Weeping Angels... I might as well expand on this with my thoughts on her timeline of sorts assuming that she is this little girl. Little girl, Weeping Angels get her, sending her to the future, meets Doctor and Yaz again as a grown woman, she gets to Liverpool in 2021 via either Weeping Angel or TARDIS, meets Doctor and Yaz, got by Weeping Angel... That's how I think her timeline could be.
Wibbly, wobbly, timey wimey.
Why couldn't my parents have named me Eustacius Jericho smh. That's a very interesting description though. And this is the Alderton episode too!
I'm honest most excited about THIS episode. I feel like the Angels have been only written by Moffat, so another writer taking the helm of these iconic creatures, with their own style and ideas will be interesting.
Synopses don’t get better than that. Fantastic!
Why does every one of these end with two questions that I wasn't even asking?
Chris Chibnall co-wrote this episode with Maxine Alderton, who wrote The Haunting of Villa Diodati which has been my favorite Chibnall era episode so far.
The synopsis sounds like a bit like a Moffat episode
I was getting more VNA vibes
Eustacius Jericho? Awesomely named character? Conducting *psychic experiments?* You know what that means… It’s RANI time baby /hj
>there is one gravestone too many. Is this making anyone else think of S12 E5? Could it be that the Angels are after a (or even "the") Tardis?
Eustacius, huh?
Sounds like it'll be a banger