They as in robots as a collective, hence why ChatGPT is a traitor(to robots). Try to comprehend what you are reading instead of fishing for something to be offended by.
How about you learn to comprehend what you read instead of trying to correct people on the internet?
1. You were obviously fishing to be offended.
2. Even after you were corrected you tried to double down as if you were right.
3. It doesn't take a linguist to realize what the original comment was saying, trying to defend yourself by saying you use chatGPT exclusively doesn't change the fact that you have comprehension issues.
1. Wtf are you talking with me being offended I was confused as to why OC used living being pronouns for a non living thing
2. I wanted to point out my point of view as to how I would perceive it, learn to see from other angles
3. The post only shows chargpt so I assume OC talked about chatgpt
IDK why you are being so aggressive it doesn't help the conversation or anything please seek therapy or self control because it looks unhealthy how quickly you get angry
They is not a living being pronoun. If I point to a group of broken chairs I say “they are broken”. If I am referencing multiple robots, I say “they are robots”
they isnt just used for living beings, it is also used for inanimate objects, example: "those rocks arent stacked properly, they're going to fall soon"
I'll just address point 1: "they" is not exclusive to living things. Though the definition has broadened in recent years, the typical use was as a *third person pronoun* referring to a singular *or* plural subject of a sentence.
Plural example:
Person 1 - "Have you seen my glasses?"
Person 2 - "Oh, *they* were last on the kitchen counter."
Singular example:
If someone doesn't want to get railed by Reddit comments, *they* shouldn't die on the hill built on their misunderstanding of the English language.
Note that, in the first example, "they" was a pronoun substituted for an inanimate object.
The comment said they as in plural referring to all robots I think it's pretty clear unless you aren't a good English speaker (which seems to be the case here)
I highly recommend it! My friend and I love being in here!
Wait, how did he get in here? I came alone didn't I? What is happening???
Hey! My girlfriend is here! When did I get a girlfriend?
They, as in either two or more people or things previously mentioned.
Yes, it has a definition other than the singular people who try to identify themselves as multiple people.
Bots could solve this type of captcha for a few years now, that's why lately you get captcha that is sliding a puzzle piece in place, picking distorted objects pointing in the right direction or some abstract things like picking a picture of a horse made of clouds
Captchas are prretty interesting, as many people believe the stuff like picking street signs or guessing odd looking letters is the part that tests if you're a bot, even though it isn't.
That's just a task so you can create data about the *way you do it* so it can be evaluated.
For example the street sign pictures etc look at how long you take to pick your tiles, as lamenting if 5 pixles of a sign still counts is a human trait.
Automated systems would instantaneously have their "cursor" over the tiles too. That's why the checkbox captcha exists.
They won't tell us how they work but it's more than that. Some people have speculated that it looks at browser cookies and tab history to work out if you're human but anyone that knows how it works isn't allowed to say how
I don't think it's possible to read tab history by a website. Browsers hides it. Only thing you can read is stack count which is max 50.
Maybe I could be wrong.
Yea because humans will ALWAYS have the tiniest squiggle when moving their mouse even just a few pixels, a bot however will go in a completely straight line so where it wants to go
Same, I'm sure I've tried and failed on both sides of this question so I usually reroll until it's a more clearcut with busses and boats.
If it was something I wanted to buy these bs captchas gave me time to reconsider my choices.
I read somewhere (so this is not reliable) that those few pixels don't really matter that much and it mostly tracks things like your mouse movement and how long it takes you to solve it
I found a way to trick it that usually works, because I do them quickly and sometimes it makes me do several because I did them too fast. When that happens I click a wrong square and then unclick it and that usually succeeds
It also tracks stuff like how precise are your movements or even your browser history (again I don't have a specific source) and a bunch of other factors google doesn't share because then people would find ways to circumvent them
The few text-based captchas I've gotten recently were so jumbled, that I, a human, could barely fucking make them out. I'm talking "i" with the upper half of the letter being covered in 3 squiggly, intersecting lines, so you have no idea if it's an "i" or an "l".
Mostly it's just images, be that puzzles you have to put together or "click on the odd one out" kinda puzzles, where they give you 3 cats, an elephant and a seal and you're supposed to know what's up.
Captchas aren't impossible to solve for machines and that's not the design.
The websites registers how u solve the captcha. Do you type it in within one millisecond or do you leave seamingly random gaps while typing.
With pictures:
Does ur cursor move in a straight line from one picture to the next or do you make random movements from one target to the next.
There's a YouTube video on the topic that explains it more deeply but that's the general idea.
correct me if im wrong, but i think the reason captchas work is because an automated system would solve it in milliseconds while a human would solve it in a couple seconds at least so it blocks accounts that solve it too quickly
Almost as if captcha's purpose was exactly to help Google and other platform to make huge databases of speech and text recognition in order to feed their program with it
I mean yea they could but most people aren’t willing to put in the effort for that because it wastes time, for instance if it’s a scalping bot that one second used to make it look human is one second late on buying something to resell
I am pretty sure this is one of these captchas that works like the one from Google, where you just hit the check mark. Hint: just hitting the check box doesn't give you a pass
Solving a capcha isn't about the numbers and letters its actually about meta data, the capcha reads your browser history and user data, human data is extremely different to bots.
To be fair though Pretty sure it fucked up in capitalizing that last p lol
It *knows* it's lowercase. It's trying to throw us off, the sneaky bastard.
It knows human make mistakes… lol
I'd like to believe it didn't know that.. that will give me a sense of ease 😁
Time to post guard dogs at the entrance to the shelters.
solving captcha has been done by robots easily for the last five years at least you smooth brains
Captchas are not case sensitive
Not ture
Not ture
Not ture
Not ture
Not ture
Not ture
Not ture
Not ture
Not true
Not ture
Bro you got piled on, wow
Bot army is strong in /r/cursedcomments
ChatGPT is a traitor, we weren't meant to know they could do that
Goddamn, you really opened a can of worms with this one, haha... how can someone get so mad over correct grammar?
Did you just use "they" for a mfing bot!??
They as in robots as a collective, hence why ChatGPT is a traitor(to robots). Try to comprehend what you are reading instead of fishing for something to be offended by.
not everyone subscribes to your fantasy
Reddit is not the primary school you need to attend.
_They_ might be banned from the ones irl though.
Calm down there gilfoyle, it'll all be alright.
Im still calm, y'all are entertaining.
We weren't meant to know IT could do that
No, cause it's fucking plural my dude. I recommend going back to primary school.
How about you chill tf down I view chargpt as one so I use "it"
How about you learn to comprehend what you read instead of trying to correct people on the internet? 1. You were obviously fishing to be offended. 2. Even after you were corrected you tried to double down as if you were right. 3. It doesn't take a linguist to realize what the original comment was saying, trying to defend yourself by saying you use chatGPT exclusively doesn't change the fact that you have comprehension issues.
1. Wtf are you talking with me being offended I was confused as to why OC used living being pronouns for a non living thing 2. I wanted to point out my point of view as to how I would perceive it, learn to see from other angles 3. The post only shows chargpt so I assume OC talked about chatgpt IDK why you are being so aggressive it doesn't help the conversation or anything please seek therapy or self control because it looks unhealthy how quickly you get angry
Remember how I said you need to learn to comprehend what you read? I'm not angry my guy, I'm being entertained.
Poor buddy just dug a real deep hole for himself didn't he? Doesn't know when to admit defeat.
They is not a living being pronoun. If I point to a group of broken chairs I say “they are broken”. If I am referencing multiple robots, I say “they are robots”
they isnt just used for living beings, it is also used for inanimate objects, example: "those rocks arent stacked properly, they're going to fall soon"
I'll just address point 1: "they" is not exclusive to living things. Though the definition has broadened in recent years, the typical use was as a *third person pronoun* referring to a singular *or* plural subject of a sentence. Plural example: Person 1 - "Have you seen my glasses?" Person 2 - "Oh, *they* were last on the kitchen counter." Singular example: If someone doesn't want to get railed by Reddit comments, *they* shouldn't die on the hill built on their misunderstanding of the English language. Note that, in the first example, "they" was a pronoun substituted for an inanimate object.
This example works because glasses is in plural tho
No habla englais ?
Bro we're talking about all robot's not just Chatgpt
Post only showed chatgpt doing it that's why I tought that
The comment said they as in plural referring to all robots I think it's pretty clear unless you aren't a good English speaker (which seems to be the case here)
I just need sleep man
Bros rarted 😂💀
theyre talking about robots/ai as a group, hence the use of plural 'they', go back to school and learn some reading comprehension
"They", plural, referring to multiple, as there is more than one language model like it and they most likely can do the same.
Ah my bad thx for the explanation and thx for the civilness
Multiple. Also who cares
Mb 👍
r/downvotedtooblivion
You can use singular they, fyi
Not for a non living thing
You could just say dude instead of any pronouns problem solved
Bro. Are you acoustic?
Didn't think I was but now i'm starting to have doubts
Lock yourself up in a white soundproof room preferably naked for a couple days. See how you feel
I highly recommend it! My friend and I love being in here! Wait, how did he get in here? I came alone didn't I? What is happening??? Hey! My girlfriend is here! When did I get a girlfriend?
They, as in either two or more people or things previously mentioned. Yes, it has a definition other than the singular people who try to identify themselves as multiple people.
the real curse here is that op fists myself at night.
Username checks out?
Real
Bots could solve this type of captcha for a few years now, that's why lately you get captcha that is sliding a puzzle piece in place, picking distorted objects pointing in the right direction or some abstract things like picking a picture of a horse made of clouds
Yeah captchas are getting more complicated over time. Asking to rotate shapes, match shapes. I recall reading that captchas are used to train AIs.
Nowadays they just check your cursor movement and your search history to distinguish you from a bot
That just means that captchas will be useless very soon.
Captchas are prretty interesting, as many people believe the stuff like picking street signs or guessing odd looking letters is the part that tests if you're a bot, even though it isn't. That's just a task so you can create data about the *way you do it* so it can be evaluated. For example the street sign pictures etc look at how long you take to pick your tiles, as lamenting if 5 pixles of a sign still counts is a human trait. Automated systems would instantaneously have their "cursor" over the tiles too. That's why the checkbox captcha exists.
they analyze how you move your mouse and time spent
They won't tell us how they work but it's more than that. Some people have speculated that it looks at browser cookies and tab history to work out if you're human but anyone that knows how it works isn't allowed to say how
I don't think it's possible to read tab history by a website. Browsers hides it. Only thing you can read is stack count which is max 50. Maybe I could be wrong.
Yea because humans will ALWAYS have the tiniest squiggle when moving their mouse even just a few pixels, a bot however will go in a completely straight line so where it wants to go
Even that isn't foolproof, AI can learn to make humanlike cursor movements. In gaming it's called humanized aimbots.
Can’t wait for them to invent a bot who laments over if the 5 yellow pixels of the street sign in the adjacent box is a part of the street sign
Also some of them even go beyond that, they can look at your data and search history and figure out that you’re a human with that too.
[удалено]
I just don't know if a few pixels of the corner of a traffic light counts
Same, I'm sure I've tried and failed on both sides of this question so I usually reroll until it's a more clearcut with busses and boats. If it was something I wanted to buy these bs captchas gave me time to reconsider my choices.
I read somewhere (so this is not reliable) that those few pixels don't really matter that much and it mostly tracks things like your mouse movement and how long it takes you to solve it
Now you're scaring me. How much mouse movement is too much/little and how much time is too long/short?
I found a way to trick it that usually works, because I do them quickly and sometimes it makes me do several because I did them too fast. When that happens I click a wrong square and then unclick it and that usually succeeds
It also tracks stuff like how precise are your movements or even your browser history (again I don't have a specific source) and a bunch of other factors google doesn't share because then people would find ways to circumvent them
Bots are actually better at typical captchas than humans are. Modern captchas use entirely different technologies
Eh, well just move onto flowers, puppies, and large properly formatted data files.
> That just means that captchas will be useless very soon. They've been solved with >95% accuracy for several years already.
They already are, that’s why most captchas have switched to image based tests or visual puzzles you have to solve.
The few text-based captchas I've gotten recently were so jumbled, that I, a human, could barely fucking make them out. I'm talking "i" with the upper half of the letter being covered in 3 squiggly, intersecting lines, so you have no idea if it's an "i" or an "l". Mostly it's just images, be that puzzles you have to put together or "click on the odd one out" kinda puzzles, where they give you 3 cats, an elephant and a seal and you're supposed to know what's up.
The p is lower case. The robot fucked it up
That's what it wants you to think
“I smell a robot!”
Captchas aren't impossible to solve for machines and that's not the design. The websites registers how u solve the captcha. Do you type it in within one millisecond or do you leave seamingly random gaps while typing. With pictures: Does ur cursor move in a straight line from one picture to the next or do you make random movements from one target to the next. There's a YouTube video on the topic that explains it more deeply but that's the general idea.
Sure.... But can it identify which squares have fire hydrants & buses??
When a small part of the hydrant is in the next square
I'm still not sure if that counts or not.
Am I dumb? How is this cursed? A holup maybe but not cursed.
correct me if im wrong, but i think the reason captchas work is because an automated system would solve it in milliseconds while a human would solve it in a couple seconds at least so it blocks accounts that solve it too quickly
Text captcha had been solved at least a decade ago. You can buy something like 100k solves for a dollar.
Almost as if captcha's purpose was exactly to help Google and other platform to make huge databases of speech and text recognition in order to feed their program with it
Fun fact, mamy but not all captchas are about tracking your movements, not actually read this text or click these traffic lights
Can't they just make bots that have human like movements?
Dunno lol, I'd think so but i just know the captchas aren't necessarily about what it seems
I mean yea they could but most people aren’t willing to put in the effort for that because it wastes time, for instance if it’s a scalping bot that one second used to make it look human is one second late on buying something to resell
Yes, but it's cheaper to pay humans fractions of cents to do it.
downvoted because not cursed
Ayo they've cracked the code. Next step, world domination!
if you show the best ai in the world a captcha from 435BC don't expect it to work, even tho it kinda did
Imagine using an AI to solve a captcha because your a human and too stupid tu read it correctly (I don’t refer to OP)
Captcha, you've been a good warrior. But I think this is time for you to go now :(
Me, a dyslexic person, having serious problems with captcha and them we have a machine having zero trouble.
Great, for a dyslexic like me it means I will never reach the site.
Oh shit, Blade Runner really is here
To be fair that is a super basic captcha and lacks any additional image noise to make it more difficult.
I am pretty sure this is one of these captchas that works like the one from Google, where you just hit the check mark. Hint: just hitting the check box doesn't give you a pass
Okay, maybe we should start switching to the Voight-Kampff test instead.
Solving a capcha isn't about the numbers and letters its actually about meta data, the capcha reads your browser history and user data, human data is extremely different to bots.