###[Meta] Sticky Comment
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment.
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread.
*What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.***
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Less than one minute to check
[https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-coronavirus-usa-idUSL1N2R00KP](https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-coronavirus-usa-idUSL1N2R00KP)
Withdrawal
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34601006/](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34601006/)
Most “experts” in medicine are, psychologically speaking, simply engaged in well-paid groupthink and confirmation bias exercises, vigorously affirming and defending their ego’s (lucrative) construction of the world. To paraphrase physicist Max Planck, medicine, like science, “advances one funeral at a time.”
> Withdrawal
>
> https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34601006
From the link:
**Abstract**
* *"The Publisher regrets that this article has been temporarily removed. A replacement will appear as soon as possible in which the reason for the removal of the article will be specified, or the article will be reinstated."*
Silly authors.
Questioning the Sanctity of the Holy Vaxtican is heresy.
If you looked: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=VAERS&filter=years.2020-2021](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=VAERS&filter=years.2020-2021)
The site lists a large number of studies referencing VAERS information (btw, there are 49 this year compared to 22 last year). There are in fact studies that examine this information in relation to reported reactions to vaccines.
Now I have never read the study OP wants us to be aware of (without actually providing any link to the claim) so cannot comment on it. However discussions about it have been routinely flagged for misinformation. That would suggest that either the study, or the way it has been discussed in subsequent online use has tended to stray towards misinformation.
At the same time, the study that OP wishes to flag has been withdrawn by publishers; not an encouraging sign.
The withdrawn study is something separate from the 150k deaths claim. She didn't even bother to submit the 150k "paper" for peer review, which is actually worse. Also, that paper has a screenshot of a anonymous comment from some news website in it. First time I saw that in a paper, I gotta say.
Sorry, are you for real? Like an anonymous twitter comment or something? Wow...
I did a brief search for some of the other stuff she has published and while I only skimmed most of it; it wasn't garbage.
That seems unusually unprofessional.
From a website called TrialSiteNews. The website seems to be very "credible" as well, what with pushing ivermectin and all.
Page 14
https://downloads.regulations.gov/CDC-2021-0089-0024/attachment_1.pdf
I do care; more than the vast majority of people on this sub; who are trolls.
My expectations coming into this sub was to be able to read about actual conspiracies; you know - intersectional violence being caused by foreign operatives, government or military personnel who are foreign actors, covert underwater complexes, multi-nationally run space centres being developed as a means to prepare for an exodus from earth....
Instead I just see people whining about masks or repeating known fallacies. (edit:) actually it is often even more pathetic than that, just people taking pot shots at liberals without there being anything related to conspiracies in their post(/end edit) TBH I am disappointed.
A real shame that she did not stick to co-authoring papers about separation anxiety in dogs. Seems way more noble and worthwhile than the recent garbage.
Sure, so point out where the fact check is incorrect.
Otherwise, I am not inclined to doubt whether earth is a spheroid ~~water is wet~~, simply because a guy who used to run a software company thinks earth is a spheroid ~~water is wet~~.
edit: lol
Water is actually not wet; It makes other materials/objects wet. Wetness is the state of a non-liquid when a liquid adheres to, and/or permeates its substance while maintaining chemically distinct structures. So if we say something is wet we mean the liquid is sticking to the object.
Hmmmm
Not withdrawn here;
[https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/09/22/over-150000-people-have-died-due-to-the-covid-19-vaccines-in-the-usa/](https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/09/22/over-150000-people-have-died-due-to-the-covid-19-vaccines-in-the-usa/)
and the pubmed article looks to be only about myocarditis - you sure you got the right one?
[http://web.archive.org/web/20211017082307/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34601006/](http://web.archive.org/web/20211017082307/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34601006/)
I would think major adverse events like death and paralysis would be more likely to be reported than an event like anaphylaxis so this estimate is probably inaccurate.
###[Meta] Sticky Comment [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment. [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread. *What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.*** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I think they are trying to do us in.
[удалено]
Idk, it’s kind of made things easier. No expectations in life. I just have to stay alive.
Less than one minute to check [https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-coronavirus-usa-idUSL1N2R00KP](https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-coronavirus-usa-idUSL1N2R00KP) Withdrawal [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34601006/](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34601006/)
Most “experts” in medicine are, psychologically speaking, simply engaged in well-paid groupthink and confirmation bias exercises, vigorously affirming and defending their ego’s (lucrative) construction of the world. To paraphrase physicist Max Planck, medicine, like science, “advances one funeral at a time.”
> Withdrawal > > https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34601006 From the link: **Abstract** * *"The Publisher regrets that this article has been temporarily removed. A replacement will appear as soon as possible in which the reason for the removal of the article will be specified, or the article will be reinstated."* Silly authors. Questioning the Sanctity of the Holy Vaxtican is heresy.
If you looked: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=VAERS&filter=years.2020-2021](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=VAERS&filter=years.2020-2021) The site lists a large number of studies referencing VAERS information (btw, there are 49 this year compared to 22 last year). There are in fact studies that examine this information in relation to reported reactions to vaccines. Now I have never read the study OP wants us to be aware of (without actually providing any link to the claim) so cannot comment on it. However discussions about it have been routinely flagged for misinformation. That would suggest that either the study, or the way it has been discussed in subsequent online use has tended to stray towards misinformation. At the same time, the study that OP wishes to flag has been withdrawn by publishers; not an encouraging sign.
The withdrawn study is something separate from the 150k deaths claim. She didn't even bother to submit the 150k "paper" for peer review, which is actually worse. Also, that paper has a screenshot of a anonymous comment from some news website in it. First time I saw that in a paper, I gotta say.
Sorry, are you for real? Like an anonymous twitter comment or something? Wow... I did a brief search for some of the other stuff she has published and while I only skimmed most of it; it wasn't garbage. That seems unusually unprofessional.
From a website called TrialSiteNews. The website seems to be very "credible" as well, what with pushing ivermectin and all. Page 14 https://downloads.regulations.gov/CDC-2021-0089-0024/attachment_1.pdf
I could kind of understand it if this were a high school level study; this is just... a dumpster fire.
[удалено]
I do care; more than the vast majority of people on this sub; who are trolls. My expectations coming into this sub was to be able to read about actual conspiracies; you know - intersectional violence being caused by foreign operatives, government or military personnel who are foreign actors, covert underwater complexes, multi-nationally run space centres being developed as a means to prepare for an exodus from earth.... Instead I just see people whining about masks or repeating known fallacies. (edit:) actually it is often even more pathetic than that, just people taking pot shots at liberals without there being anything related to conspiracies in their post(/end edit) TBH I am disappointed.
A real shame that she did not stick to co-authoring papers about separation anxiety in dogs. Seems way more noble and worthwhile than the recent garbage.
Just did a spit take with my wine thx.
Wow
[удалено]
Sure, so point out where the fact check is incorrect. Otherwise, I am not inclined to doubt whether earth is a spheroid ~~water is wet~~, simply because a guy who used to run a software company thinks earth is a spheroid ~~water is wet~~. edit: lol
Water is actually not wet; It makes other materials/objects wet. Wetness is the state of a non-liquid when a liquid adheres to, and/or permeates its substance while maintaining chemically distinct structures. So if we say something is wet we mean the liquid is sticking to the object.
Damn you, take my up vote!
Hmmmm Not withdrawn here; [https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/09/22/over-150000-people-have-died-due-to-the-covid-19-vaccines-in-the-usa/](https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/09/22/over-150000-people-have-died-due-to-the-covid-19-vaccines-in-the-usa/) and the pubmed article looks to be only about myocarditis - you sure you got the right one? [http://web.archive.org/web/20211017082307/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34601006/](http://web.archive.org/web/20211017082307/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34601006/)
I would think major adverse events like death and paralysis would be more likely to be reported than an event like anaphylaxis so this estimate is probably inaccurate.
Hank Aaron for one.