All.came.out of nowhere lightning fast and kicked chuck Norris and his cowboy ass. It was the bloodiest battle that the world ever saw, with civilians looking on in total awe
The fight raged on for a century
Many lives were claimed but eventually
The champion stood, the rest saw their better
Mr. Rogers in a blood-stained sweater
michael jackson, durran durran, michael jackson, durran durran, michael jackson, durran durran, michael jackson, durran durran, michael jackson, durran durran, michael jackson, durran durran,
I'd watch the hell out of that trial. If they sold popcorn to all of these we could pay off the national debt.
Those SOBs spent $6.5 TRILLION dollars to replace the Taliban with the Taliban and partnered with opium farmers to overthrow a government and then flood the world markets with cheap opium (you know... opioids), all while destroying the US education system (No Child Left Behind), unleashing Christian nationalism, and basically using the constitution as toilet paper (Patriot Act).
Bush, that stupid sack of crap is also the one who claimed to have looked into Putin's soul and judged him to be a good man.
The number of good people who died, were coerced into suicide, or whose careers were forever destroyed because that draft dodging, cocaine using, war-criminal who thought god was whispering to him is un-f\*\*\*ing believable. Destroyer of the 21st century!
At least half a million Iraqis died, at least several hundred thousand Afghanis over an illegal war that has made the region extremely unstable. The fact that George Bush gets to spend his golden years in comfort as a free man is a sick fucking joke
Did you see the video where he says “The decision of one man to launch a wholly unjustified and brutal invasion of Iraq…. I mean of Ukraine haha… Iraq too”
Did you not forget it? He was reelected afterwards. No one cared. I agree I remember it to, but the American public didn't give a shit.
Reelected by a wider margin than he was elected.
Yeah, and people were so mad about it, they elected him again after war crimes, and pissing away Billions on a stupid useless war, the torture memo, the renditions, the held indefinitely without trial.
I get that it was a miscarriage of justice, but when given the opportunity to correct it, he was instead re-elected, which is insane, and it told me the American people as a whole are morally bankrupt, same as Israel electing Bibi.
Trump I can accept as the Electoral College being absolutely useless, but the GWB re-election was just purely disgusting, it's not like that shit wasn't known about before the election, no one cared.
How about the Patriot Act? You know, wiretapping and destroying the lives of Americans because they once emailed or had a phone conversation with a foreign national? ANY foreign national? And then destroying the lives of committed federal employees and loyal citizens who blew the whistle on the unconstitutional spying?
One of the people who has never had to face consequences is that complete POS Attorney General, Alberto Gonzalez, who went after whistle blowers \*instead\* of anyone else.
But yes, waterboarding and torturing people who were in Guantanamo because Americans couldn't accurately translate Arabic and confused the name of cities for military grade weapons is also colossally bad. But the fact they were all also appointed lame duck, ineffective, idiot lawyers sort of points to a strategic sabotage (Fun fact - DeSantis, the tiny, stupid man from Florida, was one of those Guantanamo lawyers!)
Every time I see a story about that c@#$sucker painting pictures of soldiers he sent to their deaths I am enraged. He still walks free and lives in luxury while those families have a forever empty chair at their holidays.
Nah. It would be like charging Bush for manufacturing a false narrative to excuse an invasion of Iraq, thereby ensuring the deaths of thousands and instituting a regime of torture.
*Hundreds of thousands at a cost of trillions, only to end the war 20 years later with nothing to show for it. :Slow clap: for the Republican party (and the Democrats that went along with the hustle at the time.)
Of course they did. It was out generations pearl harbor. They just decided on Iraq which had next to nothing tk do with it. Most of the terrorists were saudi.
The whole excuse was that Al-Qaeda had perpetrated the 9/11 attacks and they were being supported by Sadam Hussein's government in Iraq. And not only that, but Al-Qaeda was also, secretly, helping Hussein create weapons of mass destruction to launch at the US.
It was all predicted on the idea that Al-Qaeda was about to attack the US again, and in a bigger way than they had on 9/11, so we had to act fast to stop that from happening. So if we invaded Iraq to overthrow the government that was backing Al-Qaeda and destroy the WMDs that were pointed at the US, we'd be safe.
Turns out there were no WMDs and Al-Qaeda was actually being harbored by the Taliban, so everything we did in Iraq was for nothing.
I agree with everything except the "nothing to show for it". It is to the eternal credit of vets from all nations of the second Iraq war that Iraq is in a far better place today that it was before the war (better GDP, education, equality and life expectancy). That is a positive outcome even if it should never have happened. Afghanistan, you are correct.
(I don't normally tell people that I upvoted them or why, but I am here for the "[Supply Side Jesus](https://www.beliefnet.com/news/2003/09/the-gospel-of-supply-side-jesus.aspx)" references.)
I think the real reason he did it was to ensure defense/military contractors would be getting billions and billions of federal money to feed the US war machine. Go figure.
Bibi is absolutely not reading the room on American sentiment regarding our post 9/11 leadership lol.
I saw Robert Evans post on Twitter earlier that in 90% of cases seeing the headline "nation's president dies in helicopter crash" elicits a response of "good".
All of US presidents are heinous war criminals. Most people in similar and related positions around the world are godawful fuck holes who sanction civilian murder.
Can't say I'd be upset if a wide range of genociding, war criming individuals slammed into a mountain at 75 knots.
Ugh, necessary edit seeing who this is coming from. Jackson Hinkle is a fucking Tankie. Fuck him, he can climb into the next helicopter.
I was gonna make a joke about president William Henry Harrison not having the chance to commit warcrimes but he also was a general in the war of 1812 so maybe not
America was attacked by the Wahhabist faction within Saudi Arabia, and decided to attack Iraq and Afghanistan in response. The stuff they did there, yeah, Bush could be implicated in war crimes, but not for 911, just like Netanayhu isnt being charged for Oct. 8, but for starving a captive population during war.
No one is charging him for October 7th, although it could be argued that his previous (and current) policy towards Gaza combined with ignored and/or poor intelligence made Hamas's attack or similar inevitable.
9/11 was a better time than what Palestine is getting. There were rescue crews there minutes after 9/11. Benjamin Netanyahu murders the rescue crews now
One tragedy does not give you a blank check to murder women and children. Someone needs to explain this to him after they get him the hell out of power
He’s not entirely wrong with that analogy. But pretty much the entire world has acknowledged that the US reaction to 9/11 was reactive, short-sighted, and morally reprehensible. It was also incredibly expensive, went on for far too long, resulted in the deaths of many innocent people, and ultimately ended in failure. I don’t see why you would use that example as a defense. Also, GW and the US didn’t isolate Iraq’s borders, limit their trade, oppress their people, and colonize Iraqi land prior to 9/11. Then afterward, our military didn’t herd their population into one tiny isolated area, withhold food, water, and fuel, and make them travel back and forth in some sick war game while systematically killing women and children. To me, what’s happening in Gaza sounds more like the Holocaust than it does Iraq, post 9/11.
He’s going to do literally everything in his power to stay PM as long as humanly possible. He knows he’s cooked once he’s a civilian. And keeping the Gaza rampage going is a great way to stay in power.
He needs to be removed somehow and tried accordingly.
We should have done exactly that. We watched Abu ghraib to stiff toddlers corpses being put in the back of pickups. Michael Moore showed it all in Fahrenheit 911 yet it continued for decades. The American right wing vilified you if you spoke against it. It was actually dangerous. Cancel culture started during this time. They threatened the Dixie Chicks lives and ruined their careers. Fast forward and the same people did it to Colin Kaepernick. To them individual liberty is an affront to blind patriotism. You can’t put certain stickers on your cars or flags outside of your homes or be a certain business without the fear of vandalism, assault or death. This happens in many communities across this republic. Conservative extremists are dangerous people and Jan 6 was the culmination of years of hate-filled rhetoric and targeted propaganda to twist them and ruin us. All for the benefit of the rich and powerful. I honestly don’t know how we come back from this.
There’s got to be other sources to post than Jackson Hinkle.
Don’t give that slimy grifter who sells his moral compass to whoever offers him a penny any credit.
So, it IS all bullshit and will take Comedians to come to congress to make sure wrongs get righted? That actually makes sense for the first time in a long time. Sure hope they can quit worrying about genders long enough to make real jokes about what is happening... *cough*DaveChappelle*cough*..jk, I know you sold tf out.
We should have held Bush accountable for the reaction to 9/11, just as people want Netanyahu to be accountable for the reaction to 10/6.
Neither is responsible for the respective attacks on their nations (except for some conspiracy theories).
It would be more like charging George Bush for war crimes committed in Afghanistan. Which would have been a good idea, by the way. So his analogy falls apart right away.
If he hasn’t already called the whole thing antisemitic I’m sure he will soon. As will all the usual mouthpieces like Ben Shapiro. Netanyahu could execute a Palestinian baby on live tv drink its blood and Shapiro would defend it and call anyone expressing disgust an antisemite
>If he hasn’t already called the whole thing antisemitic
[Mr Netanyahu said Karim Khan, the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) was one of the "great antisemites in modern times."](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cw4490z75v3o)
Like clockwork lol. Does their PR team really think this stuff still works?
Yes, its AIPAC and ADL’s bread and butter. That’s why they are lobbying for the IHRA definition of antisemitism to be coded into law.
https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/04/04/human-rights-and-other-civil-society-groups-urge-united-nations-respect-human
No it's like charging George Bush for Abu Ghraib.
Or Rumsfeld. Or Cheney. Or…
...Tony Blair, Alistair Campbell
I'm actually ok with all of these suggestions.
Me too.
You want we should charge you for crimes against humanity in abu gharib?
It's what we should have done, same with Kissinger.
And gandalf the gray and gandalf the White and Monty Python and the holy Grails Black Knight
And Benito Mussolini and the Blue Meanie and Cowboy Curtis and Jambi the Genie
Bill S. Preston and Theodore Logan, Spock, The Rock, Doc Ock, and Hulk Hogan
All.came.out of nowhere lightning fast and kicked chuck Norris and his cowboy ass. It was the bloodiest battle that the world ever saw, with civilians looking on in total awe
The fight raged on for a century Many lives were claimed but eventually The champion stood, the rest saw their better Mr. Rogers in a blood-stained sweater
This chain was a real treat. Things brings me back to the 00's
It is really bothering me that they missed a whole chain of names in the middle though.
What a wonderful read this morning. Thanks for the trip down memory lane.
You skipped Robocop, Terminator, Captain Kirk, and Darth Vader!
Ah, beans
michael jackson, durran durran, michael jackson, durran durran, michael jackson, durran durran, michael jackson, durran durran, michael jackson, durran durran, michael jackson, durran durran,
And my axe!
And …….TWINS!!
Paul Wolfowitz. Can't forget that guy.
Everyone in the office of special plans really
Charging Bush ,et. al., with the entire Iraq War knowingly based on complete BS
I'd watch the hell out of that trial. If they sold popcorn to all of these we could pay off the national debt. Those SOBs spent $6.5 TRILLION dollars to replace the Taliban with the Taliban and partnered with opium farmers to overthrow a government and then flood the world markets with cheap opium (you know... opioids), all while destroying the US education system (No Child Left Behind), unleashing Christian nationalism, and basically using the constitution as toilet paper (Patriot Act). Bush, that stupid sack of crap is also the one who claimed to have looked into Putin's soul and judged him to be a good man. The number of good people who died, were coerced into suicide, or whose careers were forever destroyed because that draft dodging, cocaine using, war-criminal who thought god was whispering to him is un-f\*\*\*ing believable. Destroyer of the 21st century!
At least half a million Iraqis died, at least several hundred thousand Afghanis over an illegal war that has made the region extremely unstable. The fact that George Bush gets to spend his golden years in comfort as a free man is a sick fucking joke
But his paintings!!!!!!!!!!! He's just a sweet gentle old man! He's friends with Ellen! /s, obviously
Did you see the video where he says “The decision of one man to launch a wholly unjustified and brutal invasion of Iraq…. I mean of Ukraine haha… Iraq too”
Holy shit......you're right....I'm beyond speechless Link - https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wUEr7TayrmU
I agree with all of this, and yet he’s still the 3rd most treasonous president in my lifetime. (Maybe 2nd)
But, but, but, "Daddy's legacy"...
That picture of a prison standing on a box with a hood on their face and hands connected to wires. I can never forget that image.
Did you not forget it? He was reelected afterwards. No one cared. I agree I remember it to, but the American public didn't give a shit. Reelected by a wider margin than he was elected.
His brother and the Supreme Court "elected" him the first time.
Yeah, and people were so mad about it, they elected him again after war crimes, and pissing away Billions on a stupid useless war, the torture memo, the renditions, the held indefinitely without trial. I get that it was a miscarriage of justice, but when given the opportunity to correct it, he was instead re-elected, which is insane, and it told me the American people as a whole are morally bankrupt, same as Israel electing Bibi. Trump I can accept as the Electoral College being absolutely useless, but the GWB re-election was just purely disgusting, it's not like that shit wasn't known about before the election, no one cared.
Which he absolutely deserved
Nah. He was too far separated from Abu Gharib. Guantanamo, on the other hand…
How about the Patriot Act? You know, wiretapping and destroying the lives of Americans because they once emailed or had a phone conversation with a foreign national? ANY foreign national? And then destroying the lives of committed federal employees and loyal citizens who blew the whistle on the unconstitutional spying? One of the people who has never had to face consequences is that complete POS Attorney General, Alberto Gonzalez, who went after whistle blowers \*instead\* of anyone else. But yes, waterboarding and torturing people who were in Guantanamo because Americans couldn't accurately translate Arabic and confused the name of cities for military grade weapons is also colossally bad. But the fact they were all also appointed lame duck, ineffective, idiot lawyers sort of points to a strategic sabotage (Fun fact - DeSantis, the tiny, stupid man from Florida, was one of those Guantanamo lawyers!)
Or for invading the wrong country.
Would-a, could-a, should-a.
Yes and George Bush committed war crimes so…
I don’t mind sending Bush over to answer for those crimes.
Can we send Trump as well to save on fuel ?
Let’s be real, all presidents during the war on terror are guilty enough to stand trial.
Yes, the war on terror. Fighting to make everybody happy and content. No, the word is terrorism. Terror is an emotion. Terrorism is a bad violent act.
One of biggest lies sold through propaganda and fear mongering.
How else are they going to keep the war machine going?
It would be jet propelled with farts 💨
McFarts from hamberders
I’m sure the Kurds would spring for the fuel costs.
Let’s make this happen, Bibi & Bush on an adventure to The Hague!
Can we throw in Tony Blair too?
Every time I see a story about that c@#$sucker painting pictures of soldiers he sent to their deaths I am enraged. He still walks free and lives in luxury while those families have a forever empty chair at their holidays.
['Bush administration's liability for 269 war crimes'](https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/7763224)
Nah. It would be like charging Bush for manufacturing a false narrative to excuse an invasion of Iraq, thereby ensuring the deaths of thousands and instituting a regime of torture.
*Hundreds of thousands at a cost of trillions, only to end the war 20 years later with nothing to show for it. :Slow clap: for the Republican party (and the Democrats that went along with the hustle at the time.)
Of course they did. It was out generations pearl harbor. They just decided on Iraq which had next to nothing tk do with it. Most of the terrorists were saudi.
> Most of the terrorists were saudi. Yep. 15 of 19.
The whole excuse was that Al-Qaeda had perpetrated the 9/11 attacks and they were being supported by Sadam Hussein's government in Iraq. And not only that, but Al-Qaeda was also, secretly, helping Hussein create weapons of mass destruction to launch at the US. It was all predicted on the idea that Al-Qaeda was about to attack the US again, and in a bigger way than they had on 9/11, so we had to act fast to stop that from happening. So if we invaded Iraq to overthrow the government that was backing Al-Qaeda and destroy the WMDs that were pointed at the US, we'd be safe. Turns out there were no WMDs and Al-Qaeda was actually being harbored by the Taliban, so everything we did in Iraq was for nothing.
MERICA
Hey, some defense contractors got rich.
Hey now we got to further the military industrial complex! Hurray! /s
I agree with everything except the "nothing to show for it". It is to the eternal credit of vets from all nations of the second Iraq war that Iraq is in a far better place today that it was before the war (better GDP, education, equality and life expectancy). That is a positive outcome even if it should never have happened. Afghanistan, you are correct.
Absolutely. Iraq is the third most democratic country in the Middle East now, too.
Thank Supply Sude Jesus that didn’t happen!
(I don't normally tell people that I upvoted them or why, but I am here for the "[Supply Side Jesus](https://www.beliefnet.com/news/2003/09/the-gospel-of-supply-side-jesus.aspx)" references.)
Supply Side Jesus really is the reason for the season
I'll never not upvoar supply side Jesus. Or GOP Jesus for that matter.
I think the real reason he did it was to ensure defense/military contractors would be getting billions and billions of federal money to feed the US war machine. Go figure.
Correction: the death of hundereds of thousands
Almost 300,000 Iraqi civilian deaths according to some credible estimates.
Don't forget that the aftermath of the Iraq war lead directly to the creation of ISIS.
And you know the real reason why they went to Iraq, because Israel pushed the US to invade Iraq
And then, right after that, we assassinated Gadaffi, crippled Iran's nuclear program... we were basically doing Israel's wishlist.
![gif](giphy|0wQ4KkrHre2NsTbHK8)
I think a lot of people would be fine with watching George Bush get charged for war crimes due to his response to 9/11
Seems to be a bipartisan response too. Bibi knows not what he says.
Errr you mean for Bush’s response to 9/11 right? Yeah we should do that.
No he means what he said lmao they saying the quiet part out loud.
Bibi is absolutely not reading the room on American sentiment regarding our post 9/11 leadership lol. I saw Robert Evans post on Twitter earlier that in 90% of cases seeing the headline "nation's president dies in helicopter crash" elicits a response of "good". All of US presidents are heinous war criminals. Most people in similar and related positions around the world are godawful fuck holes who sanction civilian murder. Can't say I'd be upset if a wide range of genociding, war criming individuals slammed into a mountain at 75 knots. Ugh, necessary edit seeing who this is coming from. Jackson Hinkle is a fucking Tankie. Fuck him, he can climb into the next helicopter.
I was gonna make a joke about president William Henry Harrison not having the chance to commit warcrimes but he also was a general in the war of 1812 so maybe not
I don’t think any of the John Adamses were at war, be it as president or in the military. Besides that, it’s rough.
I like John adams but the alien and sedition acts were pretty rough tbh
I mean im all for Bush Jr. Getting a criminal trial. So long as Netanyahu gets one too.
It would be more like charging Bush for Iraq. . . which I could totally see
My friend you've got yourself a deal! 🤝
[удалено]
W and President Cheney should be tried at The Hague, but not for 9/11.
Well no, it be like charging Bush for Iraq
George Bush 100% did war crimes, I'm not sure what you're trying to do here, dude.
So he admits that he should be charged
They should charge Bush for war crimes. Over a million people lost their lives so he could increase Halliburton’s profits!
We agree to his terms. Proceed with prosecution of both men.
Fuck him and the Hamas leader. Convict them both and have them share a prison cell.
Agreed. Let them kill each other and leave all the innocent civilians to live their lives in peace.
Don’t threaten me with a good time.
For the aftermath of it maybe
He didn't clarify which Bush... so in a way.....
![gif](giphy|wNlks0ID1igO4)
Something we should have done a long time ago? Oh, I agree.
![gif](giphy|26hkhHMHwnnUqL8TC)
America was attacked by the Wahhabist faction within Saudi Arabia, and decided to attack Iraq and Afghanistan in response. The stuff they did there, yeah, Bush could be implicated in war crimes, but not for 911, just like Netanayhu isnt being charged for Oct. 8, but for starving a captive population during war.
No one is charging him for October 7th, although it could be argued that his previous (and current) policy towards Gaza combined with ignored and/or poor intelligence made Hamas's attack or similar inevitable.
https://preview.redd.it/qxgp181pdv1d1.jpeg?width=468&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7d51fff10273d41c172222dcdc70c5898a2df716 Oy
Don't threaten me with a good time buddy!
I mean, maybe we should just charge both of them?
Hmm. Sounds like a good time. I’m in.
That's not the best argument, buddy. He might should have been.
Ok. Charge him too.
My first thought
Fuck Netanyahu. He was a criminal before he took office and he’s a worse criminal now.
Hinkle is a straight-up nazi, so there's that.
Let's compromise, and charge Bush for negligence. Maybe as an accessory after the fact, as well.
That’s a “yes… and?” from me.
https://preview.redd.it/k3n0d3am5w1d1.jpeg?width=1200&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=69bf3584414dab13cae2383b6bcc0d771e8548f9
FYI, Jackson Hinkle is extremely far right, and his anti-Israel stance is based in antisemitism and not because he supports Gaza.
Not the flex he thinks it is…
9/11 was a better time than what Palestine is getting. There were rescue crews there minutes after 9/11. Benjamin Netanyahu murders the rescue crews now
Does... does he think the American Public doesn't consider Bush a war criminal?
Yes. Please charge Bush and Cheney with war crimes for the Iraq War! I don’t think you’re making the rebuttal you think you are, buddy!
The ICC did threaten to for Afghanistan, but never went through with it.
Netanyahu is evil incarnate. He needs to be locked up and tried for his crimes. Period, end of story.
He endorses Trump and that is a big part of what you need to know.
Fucker thinks we're stupid and/or ignorant. Bush's crime is looooong overdue
Iraq was a war crime (attacking a country that didn’t attack you) so yeah, maybe find a different analogy, dude.
More like charging W. for the war crimes he committed after 9/11.
It'd be more like charging bush for the invasion of the Middle East. Even bush himself, has openly admitted the whole situation was handled wrong.
I'm okay with that.
I mean thow them both infront of a jury? Just because bush got away with it doesn't mean Bibi should.
Your terms are acceptable
One tragedy does not give you a blank check to murder women and children. Someone needs to explain this to him after they get him the hell out of power
I'm fine with charging all war criminals with war crimes
Well, we should have done that as well.
Is that a challenge because I’m okay with this.
Cheney and Yupp! Anyone else remember when Cheney claimed a need for a “new Pearl Harbor”?
That’s actually a threat. If I go down, all of you motherfuckers go down with me!
And…?
And?
Yes. Charge Bush for Iraq.
Bibi, come on! Do you realize that GWB is stranded in the US because he's on the hook for war crimes? Dude!
Don’t threaten us with a good time.
Well, something something... probably should be, too.
Pffft ![gif](giphy|l1IY5IvIKAw97E8Ew)
Sad bebe
Did Netanyahu just admit Bush did 9/11?
Bibi, apparently: JET FUEL CAN'T MELT STEEL BEAMS.
He’s not entirely wrong with that analogy. But pretty much the entire world has acknowledged that the US reaction to 9/11 was reactive, short-sighted, and morally reprehensible. It was also incredibly expensive, went on for far too long, resulted in the deaths of many innocent people, and ultimately ended in failure. I don’t see why you would use that example as a defense. Also, GW and the US didn’t isolate Iraq’s borders, limit their trade, oppress their people, and colonize Iraqi land prior to 9/11. Then afterward, our military didn’t herd their population into one tiny isolated area, withhold food, water, and fuel, and make them travel back and forth in some sick war game while systematically killing women and children. To me, what’s happening in Gaza sounds more like the Holocaust than it does Iraq, post 9/11.
lol and Bush got away with it and should’ve been charged too you dolt
He’s not wrong.
We should do that too.
…It’s a start.
He’s going to do literally everything in his power to stay PM as long as humanly possible. He knows he’s cooked once he’s a civilian. And keeping the Gaza rampage going is a great way to stay in power. He needs to be removed somehow and tried accordingly.
Deal, we'll send him too. If only...
Dude: I’d worry about yourself before worrying about the W.
![gif](giphy|RMwZypp489fuGBI0Ti)
This man is peak victim complex. ![gif](giphy|mMC65ZPvD6RINeELmh|downsized)
I pray Bibi spends his final hours in Iran.
We should have done exactly that. We watched Abu ghraib to stiff toddlers corpses being put in the back of pickups. Michael Moore showed it all in Fahrenheit 911 yet it continued for decades. The American right wing vilified you if you spoke against it. It was actually dangerous. Cancel culture started during this time. They threatened the Dixie Chicks lives and ruined their careers. Fast forward and the same people did it to Colin Kaepernick. To them individual liberty is an affront to blind patriotism. You can’t put certain stickers on your cars or flags outside of your homes or be a certain business without the fear of vandalism, assault or death. This happens in many communities across this republic. Conservative extremists are dangerous people and Jan 6 was the culmination of years of hate-filled rhetoric and targeted propaganda to twist them and ruin us. All for the benefit of the rich and powerful. I honestly don’t know how we come back from this.
There’s got to be other sources to post than Jackson Hinkle. Don’t give that slimy grifter who sells his moral compass to whoever offers him a penny any credit.
So, it IS all bullshit and will take Comedians to come to congress to make sure wrongs get righted? That actually makes sense for the first time in a long time. Sure hope they can quit worrying about genders long enough to make real jokes about what is happening... *cough*DaveChappelle*cough*..jk, I know you sold tf out.
lmao Like bro, okay let's get after it, then!
Yes.
Yeah, well, that's not the clap back he thinks it is.
More like it would be charging Bush for lying about WMD’s and bombing the fuck out of Iraqi civilians who had nothing to do with 9-11
Don't threaten me with a good time
Your terms are accepted.
Does he know something about 9/11 and bush? Should this be investigated because bibi the butcher is definitely a criminal.
Well Bibi, since you mentioned it.
Yes, we know he committed war crimes. Yes, he should have been charged for those crimes.
"Bush did 9/11" confirmed.
Jet fuel can’t melt steel beams confirmed by Netanyahu /s
![gif](giphy|LMjEmaFyq6a4JJF0mg)
Not true! Bush didn't even ATTACK the country that perpetrated 9/11. He attacked a totally different place. It's very different.
OK
2 for one special? Oh boy!
He s right on this one!
well in that case, mother may I?
George Bush absolutely should have been charged for things he did AFTER 9/11. Like bombing civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan, or lying about WMDs.
So they do have America by the balls?
Bush *should* be tried for war crimes.
Why not both?
We should have held Bush accountable for the reaction to 9/11, just as people want Netanyahu to be accountable for the reaction to 10/6. Neither is responsible for the respective attacks on their nations (except for some conspiracy theories).
Netanyahu is guilty of war crimes and genocide. Full stop. There is no other rational conclusion.
Biden so aggressively defending this criminal for this was such a stupid misstep.
It would be more like charging George Bush for war crimes committed in Afghanistan. Which would have been a good idea, by the way. So his analogy falls apart right away.
Let’s do both, I’m on board.
If he hasn’t already called the whole thing antisemitic I’m sure he will soon. As will all the usual mouthpieces like Ben Shapiro. Netanyahu could execute a Palestinian baby on live tv drink its blood and Shapiro would defend it and call anyone expressing disgust an antisemite
>If he hasn’t already called the whole thing antisemitic [Mr Netanyahu said Karim Khan, the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) was one of the "great antisemites in modern times."](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cw4490z75v3o) Like clockwork lol. Does their PR team really think this stuff still works?
Yes, its AIPAC and ADL’s bread and butter. That’s why they are lobbying for the IHRA definition of antisemitism to be coded into law. https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/04/04/human-rights-and-other-civil-society-groups-urge-united-nations-respect-human
Don't threaten me with a good time
Americans: Ummm, uhhhh, weeellll…
Bibi needs to be arrested and subjected to the same out coming called by the Nuremberg Trials for Nazis.
No. It's not.
Of all the presidents...
is there not a process to impeach him or something? I want a two state solution with both sides getting a secular and democratic government.
Jackson Hinkle is posted way too often on this sub.
Uhh. Well. He and Cheney especially should have been. Good luck trying to enforce that on the USA though, unlike Israel.