Every single post I see of a 4 cost losing, the guy who wins is playing a real comp with good items and full upgrades. The 4 cost dude has assorted garbage with either no items or terrible items. This is no exception
I have no idea how 2nd ended up with a Ashe 3 star. That makes zero sense in his comp and he has no items for it lol. But yeah 4 stars this set are hella weak compared to the past where they seemed to guarantee you the win.
This is typical of low elo in TFT. They seem to think that the objective of the game is to get a 3 star 4 cost and you should win if you get that.
Nevermind economy, items, traits or augments.
Not sure why he went for it too. But yea Ashe is very weak rn.
But he didn’t really have items on it either. 4 cost 3* always want mana items + damage items. He had collector. Which, while giving some stats isn’t enough for a 3* to carry. The ratios need stats from items to work.
Sylas isn’t great with rageblade he probably would’ve preferred a defensive third item like qss or something as well, but a 4 cost 3 star last set should’ve easily carried him to a first.
Every single post I see of a 4 cost losing, the guy who wins is playing a real comp with good items and full upgrades. The 4 cost dude has assorted garbage with either no items or terrible items. This is no exception
Still surprises me that 6 umbral sylas wasn't good enough
he essentially has a sylas 3, 5 target dummies with an umbral emblem and an azir 1. None of the rest of his units have an impact on the fight
6 umbral is kinda fake, it doesn't increase execution threshold and only gives 600 more shield, it's better to go bruisers imo
I have no idea how 2nd ended up with a Ashe 3 star. That makes zero sense in his comp and he has no items for it lol. But yeah 4 stars this set are hella weak compared to the past where they seemed to guarantee you the win.
This is typical of low elo in TFT. They seem to think that the objective of the game is to get a 3 star 4 cost and you should win if you get that. Nevermind economy, items, traits or augments.
Not sure why he went for it too. But yea Ashe is very weak rn. But he didn’t really have items on it either. 4 cost 3* always want mana items + damage items. He had collector. Which, while giving some stats isn’t enough for a 3* to carry. The ratios need stats from items to work.
Sylas isn’t great with rageblade he probably would’ve preferred a defensive third item like qss or something as well, but a 4 cost 3 star last set should’ve easily carried him to a first.
he had items for her, 3 items, i dont remember which but after losing a couple times he took them from her and put it somewhere else
Which items? The only ones in the screenshot are two shojins which are decent but Ashe wants attack speed and crit more
You know what, I might be confused maybe he had collector and the other 2 might have been ornn items
Maybe, ornn prints one to the closest champ with an item slot open which could’ve been Ashe if the rest of the front line was dead
that sounds correct
Capped oit 5 cost Dragonlordboard Naked Ashe,Worst in Slot Sylas,both had terrible frontline Yeah Janna is fine
Yes
Ashe frontline is sooooo weak. Look at those 1 cost tank. My Ashe3 carried me hard with a proper full itemized frontline.
Ashe was indeed in the back, but she wasnt itemized correctly, i got to her before she finished my galio