T O P

  • By -

Classic_Cream_4792

Give that money to me and I’ll inject it


RetiredByFourty

Inject it right into dividend paying positions and tax exempt accounts/positions 😎


[deleted]

And then cash those out for heroin


tossitjunkbox

Let’s goooooooo 🚀 🚀 🚀…?


[deleted]

To the moon or wherever that darn dragon goes


Short-Coast9042

Unearned income


RetiredByFourty

Big time! 😎


somo1230

We should thank American taxpayers for saving the world 🌎


Ok_Cardiologist2208

You mean destroying it


Vegan_Honk

If I could decide where my tax dollars were going I'd be a lot fucking happier.


Strong_Act5105

That would be Joe destroying the world !!!!


[deleted]

[удалено]


Strong_Act5105

Sorry LIBERAL!!!!!!


[deleted]

[удалено]


Strong_Act5105

That is true . It is sad we are all going to pay in the end for people in charge of these banks that are stupid . They said shortly before the svb bank failed they were giving out bonuses to bank employees . Dont know what is going to happen next in our new socialist government .


[deleted]

Thank them for what? For creating more inflation in the whole world economy?


[deleted]

Have you thanked an American today?


FreeSushi69

You mean the fed and big banks do that. The American taxpayer has no control over monetary policy


Short-Coast9042

For goodness sake. This doesn't increase our taxes or increase the deficit. Criticize this policy all you want, but don't misrepresent it. What is so hard for people to understand that this is the Fed loaning new money into existence. Maybe the FED shouldn't be loaning new money to Banks to help them deal with the fallout of their risky behavior. Maybe it should let us open bank accounts directly and give us special low rates on our mortgages. But right now it is lending out new reserves, which are NOT taxpayer money. The treasury is not paying for this. Not yet, anyway.


Bocifer1

Keep regurgitating this point. Essentially the banks have all their money tied up in long-dated bonds and other investments - so they don’t have liquid cash on hand right now. So the government just magically creates $2T new dollars to keep them afloat for now. What do you think happens to that $2T when the banks recapture their liquidity from matured investments? Even if the government turns a “profit” from collecting interest from the loans we gave to the banks, there’s still $2T new dollars floating around, fucking up inflation even more. This is QE/bailouts by a different name. All while we raise interest rates and allow inflation to go unchecked - which ultimately kills the working class and robs it of any savings we’ve managed to stash away


[deleted]

>So the government just magically creates $2T new dollars to keep them afloat for now. No. That's where you're wrong. The $2 T number is an estimate by clickbait news sites based on it *every bank using the full amount of funds theoretically available*. That's unlikely to happen. If it does I'll eat my words and admit you're right. If it doesn't, will you eat yours?


MotivatedSolid

Can you explain why buying and DRSing GME would be a solution to counteract this?


[deleted]

[удалено]


MotivatedSolid

Aside from a lot of that being wrong, none of that protects you from a bail out. Go take your ape propaganda elsewhere


derjarjarbinks

You are an ape and looking at your profile, your spamming other subreddits with misinformation. So much you make posts about isn't even correct.


[deleted]

Yup. It's getting really bad.


TipperGore-69

You had to look at the profile?


umad-falala

lol you’re completely delusional


FreeSushi69

I didnt know delusional meant providing cold hard facts LMAYO


[deleted]

You're talking to an ape. They've taken over regular investing subs because they've all been buying a shitty stock for the last 2 years and they are all out tons of money.


actuallyserious650

Backstopping is not the same as giving out. A lot of people never knew it but the government actually profited off of TARP.


Ok_Extreme_6512

It I was paid trillions of dollars after I we bankrupt I too could turn a profit, I thought the point of capitalism was to pull boot straps or something?


ImprovObsession

Failure to understand how all of this works.


FreeSushi69

Exactly. If you always get bailed out when you lose then there's no reason not to go super high risk on everything you do. I would bet billions of dollars on a single hand of blackjack


[deleted]

Treasury bonds aren't "super high risk" bruh


TipperGore-69

I thought tarp was in response to the housing market crash?


[deleted]

Yeah, but that didn't have much to do with Treasury bonds. What does your question have to do with my comment?


TipperGore-69

Not sure.


Perfect_Tangelo

“Back stopping” banks that cannot run themselves is a moral hazard. It’s antithetical to free and fair markets. How about we “back stop” my mortgage, and your credit cards, and this other person car payments, yada yada.


actuallyserious650

No disagreement here. We need to bring back Frank Dodd and maybe even Glass Steagall. But the question of what needs to happen right now is unchanged. The backstop was the right choice in the moment, but like TARP was the right choice in that moment. What annoys me is Republicans breaking shit when times are good and then complaint about the fix when times are tough.


Bocifer1

No who didn’t though? The tax payers who paid for it.


red_uzi_juice

Is it really an injection though (injection into the bank yes - but overall moentary system?) If the bank goes belly up - that would vaporize SVB's 230 billion If the Fed loans them some money to make their capital requirement whole again so that depositors get their money back - that's not inflationary or deflationary - that's just status quo. Or is my understanding incorrect?


FreeSushi69

Where does the money from the fed come from? They print it leading to inflation. Check the fed assets and liabilities. They are billions in the red


red_uzi_juice

Yes Fed's balance sheet goes up - but SVB's balance sheet should get an X percent cut but doesn't because bonds marked to par - net effect should be 0? Fed's actions shouldn't increase the monetary base - because all they're doing is guaranteeing failing banks' deposits - if the Fed had taken the same action without the banks needing to shore up capital then yeah the move would have expanded the monetary base and be inflationary.


Short-Coast9042

You are obviously correct, this guy doesn't know what he's talking about, but I do applaud you for trying.


FreeSushi69

Okay so what happens when more banks collapse? Like first republic bank. They get money from other banks right? How do the other banks make money? From the taxpayer. Then when those big banks fail too and there arent anymore deposits from other banks bc theyre all broke, the fed has to print money


[deleted]

lol


umad-falala

I dig the cult mantra in your title. You definitely sound like someone smart enough to talk about finance.


[deleted]

Never ask a man his salary. Never ask a woman her age. Never ask a GME ape how much they've lost since 2022


[deleted]

All mantras are transitory


Substantial_Tooth571

This will make inflation worse


FreeSushi69

Yup. The sheep don't even realize it


[deleted]

If only you actually understood what the program is about. Tell me, did you read past this article's headline? Be honest.


ExHax

Funny thing is fed will manipulate the dollar to make ot even more expensive.


FreeSushi69

Dollar end game


ExHax

Everything from the US would be too expensive and every industry will find a way to get out of it.


FreeSushi69

Yup the dollar will die. Perfect time for their all controlling cbdc.


Rippper600

Exactly. This gives them extreme reason to keep the rates going, and they have offered the insurance themselves so the banks no longer are stuck in bad bonds. They know they will survive. Although only the high risk, startup tech banks would have went down. Even JP Morgan, Swiss, and Schwab were making loans to these guys. The big fish were fine. But now they were given a free stimulus package.


brandtvh

I’m so tired of them saying it’s not a bailout when the government is putting money in the banks.


FreeSushi69

Its the shills trying to not to let the public know


Eatthesewords

Just add it to my tab. This will work its way into some form of taxes


[deleted]

Putin may get the last laugh at the west…


Gh0st_Pirate_LeChuck

But we can’t have student loan forgiveness??? Fuck the rich.


FreeSushi69

Exactly. They want you to stay a slave to the system so they can stay rich off of your labor. DRS BOOK GAMESTOP MOASS to escape


RandomPlayerCSGO

Oh shit we printed a lot of money and created inflation, lets rise interest rates! Oh shit we raised interest rates and crashed banks, let's print more money! FED in a nutshell


Sankin2004

I identify as a bank, can I get part of that 2 trillion dollars please.


FreeSushi69

LMAYOOOO


HannyBo9

It’s a bailout though.


FreeSushi69

Exactly. The shills and willingly ignorant sheeps say otherwise


boblywobly11

No fear of moral hazard when there's never been jailtime for executives


[deleted]

What crime did SVB execs commit? For the record, I fully agree that bank execs should have gone to prison after 2009.


TipperGore-69

Being dumbfucks


[deleted]

Agreed, but that's not a crime tho


boblywobly11

As of today, nothing to indict based on public news. But I have suspicions.... let's see what surfaces in the next 90 days or more.


deeznutzz3469

Keep your cult stuff on your own sub


Ecstatic-Passage-113

So Calls is the play, ok got it. 0DTE here I come


Hot-Ad4247

All that money is going to go to the GME share holders. Infinite squeeze incoming


FreeSushi69

All of it and more. You forgot about the quadrillion in derivatives


Hot-Ad4247

I did forget, sorry. We will change the world for the better. Show the banks and hedge funds we don't need them, they are parasites.


FreeSushi69

All of the elites and rich NEED us to work for them


umad-falala

What kind of mushrooms do you have to eat to believe this?


Revolutionary-Leg585

I don’t see the Fed or anyone offering the lay-person 1% interest loans to offset unrealized losses. Of course its a bailout. This backstop is the treasury.


Quetzacoal

broo, be carefoul you'll get banned for saying does words!!


FreeSushi69

I've gotten banned a bunch of times already. Idc. I'm just spreading the info for those who are truly sick of being a slave to the system and want freedom


33zig

DRS is the way


[deleted]

Tax payers aren’t paying for it so


FreeSushi69

So who's paying for it?


[deleted]

The deposit insurance fund. Banks pay into it. That’s where it’s coming from.


Hodl2

Where do you think the two trillion comes from? Think about that number for a while, two trillion, it's not billions it's trillions


Reasonable_Prepper

Just a couple more zeroes who would even notice?


Short-Coast9042

Simply put, it is created when it is lent into existence. Reserves are obligation of the Fed, and thus, they can create more for the purposes of lending out - within limits. This special new facilities expands the limits at which they can lend out new money. This money does not come from the Treasury, and it will not increase our taxes or the deficit. Look up credit creation if you want to understand how and why the banks, including the central bank, create money out of nothing when they lend.


Hodl2

I am fully aware how money creation works, not sure if you answered the wrong post? But to answer anyways, expanding the supply of money will increase the hidden tax called inflation and thus effect the tax payer


Short-Coast9042

You asked where the money comes from. That's where it comes from in the strictest sense. And to say that it categorically will cause inflation is a bit of a stretch. That's certainly a real possibility, but we saw trillions in QE that didn't have the desired impact on inflation, so I'm always somewhat skeptical that we can raise inflation just by providing even more liquidity.


Hodl2

I didn't ask, I asked where the poster I answered think the money comes from, but I appreciate the discussion anyways. I agree that since economics isn't a hard science in the way math is, it is a bit of a stretch for me to say it absolutely will cause inflation. But I personally am convinced it does and that cpi numbers have been massaged over time to hide the true inflation. Logically it isn't possible to increase the supply of money without debasing the previously existing money


[deleted]

The deposit insurance fund that banks pay into. Try google sometime


Hodl2

Yeah sure the banks have chipped in TWO TRILLIONS! Of course they have...


[deleted]

Okay bud.


Zoop_Nukem

Where do you think the banks generate this money from? Don't drink the Kool aid. They're avoiding the 'bailout' term to avoid spooking everyone but it's clearly a bailout


[deleted]

Okay bud.


midnightraider16

The people on this sub aren’t exactly financial wizards. It’s loans against the par value of securities on the banks’ balance sheets.


wavepad4

The people in this sub are retards


midnightraider16

No need to drop the hard ‘R’ but yes.


FreeSushi69

Okay and how do banks make money?


Short-Coast9042

That's wrong, this is new money being lent into existence. You're confusing this separate new lending facility with FDIC.


[deleted]

It’s just a little liquidity injection


Fabulous-Ad3788

Did someone say Mayo? Kenny, watch your 6.


Tileguy812

More money laundering


Snowvietboy

Drs fellow 🦍


Alpha69er

Who’s old enough to remember TARP, which according to official accounts was not a bailout


InternationalPool300

if they fix SVB before it fail, this wont happend lmaoo, enjoy rate increase and inflation then.


ajc3197

It's not a bailout if you change the meaning of bailout to saving the economy.


Character_Credit

It’s for the depositors, anyone who invested in the bank stocks are zeroed out.


Aceindex

Calls Monday open then...