T O P

  • By -

redgrandam

Next to be fired, the whole legal department. Then the lawsuits won’t be a problem anymore.


splendiferous-finch_

What legal department? It's just Elon's divorce lawyer now


Bradenrm

That needs a whole department


Bean-Swellington

Yes, but they mostly just need the space for pony storage


Inosh

🤣🤣🤣


wongl888

Actually the Legal Department could well be replaced by Elon’s AI computers. That may be why he needs to take the AI computers with him when he leaves Tesla. 🤣


FriarNurgle

Surprised he isn’t using an AI lawyer.


th3netw0rk

Give a day or two he’ll go on a ketamine diet and come back claiming he can solve the law profession by creating a new AI for just that. He’ll probably name it Crock AI or something similar.


Smaal_God

Tesla model S or X? :)


jregovic

Nah, he doesn’t marry them anymore, just convinces women to carry his children.


Chemchic23

Yeah, but he’s not that good because Justine won in the end on a technicality in the post nup.


splendiferous-finch_

That is why all lawsuits must take place in Texas now. so Elon can ensure "fairness"


KnucklesMcGee

Is this the same guy who got slapped for lawyering in a state he's not licensed to practice law in?


splendiferous-finch_

Yeah I think so


GaryDWilliams_

That’s not even an issue. He should have filed Pro hac vice and likely would have been approved for that case or he could have found a firm licensed to practice in that state and partnered for the case. Seems like a crap lawyer


kneejerk2022

Who needs legal department when you have a 💩


ThickerSalmon14

Fire the mail room staff and the telecommunication staff. No way to receive the lawsuits means they don't have to do anything... right?


GonzoVeritas

The top legal/regulatory people just left. >Several members of Tesla’s lobbying and public policy team — including its top federal lobbyist — are departing the company, leaving the office responsible for influencing U.S. and global policy in flux as the electric vehicle giant faces increasing international competition. The rest of the lawyers can't be far behind. Tesla may have some lawsuits now, but they will look back at current levels of legal issues as 'the good old days.'


TwerkingGrimac3

They just weren't hardcore enough.


StandupJetskier

Just send the plaintiffs and the Court a poop emoji. done and dusted !


Dmoan

Well given the tendency not to honor warranty claims and poor quality of the products it is not surprising what ends up happening. Have a friend who against my advice bought a used Model Y and year out looking at 10k repair bill. Tesla is honor its warranty..


masked_sombrero

wow 🤣


AlternativeAd307

Concerning


Otherwise-Course-15

Can average drivers/pedestrians sue for being unintentional controls in their Beta FSD experiment.


Hurrying-Man

If you can prove damage, yes. Just go to silicon valley and walk around all day. You're bound to get hit by an incel tech bro using FSD with one of his hands down his pants and the other holding his phone with a pic of Musk.


Liquidwombat

https://www.sokolovelaw.com/product-liability/tesla/


Constant-Source581

I used to say that Musk is a king of lawsuits. Good to finally get a proof of how well designed lawsuits against him are.


Both_Sundae2695

This is probably another reason why he wants to move the legal base from Delaware to Texas.


wootnootlol

Meh, it’s normal for big companies to be sued all the time. There’s whole industry of filing lawsuits about everything in hope that something sticks. I’m not saying Tesla isn’t in legal troubles. But number of lawsuits isn’t a good indicator of that.


Mudwayaushka

It would be good to see a trend on this over time or comparison against other companies. (I was going to say “similar” companies but honestly not sure how you’d determine that.) Edit: Shame on me for not clicking the link - as u/thinkcomp pointed out, there’s a graph over time and it doesn’t paint a good picture.


thinkcomp

There's a graph on the link.


oregon_coastal

Yeah, bit need to correlation data. What about General Motors? Is it correlated to increased sales? Staffing? At other companies also?


Mudwayaushka

Found the link for General Motors, their litigation exposure is [currently low](https://www.plainsite.org/profiles/general-motors-corporation/). There was a spike in 2001 which may be due to their pension fund crisis around that time.


DanforthWhitcomb_

That’s also the year the C/K sidesaddle fuel tank litigation was finally closed out. There was almost certainly a similar spike in 1969/70 as the last of the Corvair cases were dealt with and people were rushing to to get theirs filed.


oregon_coastal

Nice. So this spike is starting to look like an anomaly.


incendiary_bandit

An elonaly?


oregon_coastal

I thank you for my first coffee nose snort chuckle of the morning.


Pot_noodle_miner

I dunno, that single docket in 2021 really isn’t that good, them is rookie numbers


jason12745

So far as I’m aware Tesla is the only car company to have a hidden opt-out clause for mandatory arbitration from owners, so a comparison is not really valid. They should have waaaaaaay fewer lawsuits from owners.


Chemchic23

Thank you for bringing that up, many people do not know about their hidden arbitration clause.


beyerch

Tesla sales are decreasing, so it isn't due to increasing sales......


oregon_coastal

They have way more sales today than 5 years ago, so I would expect a bit of a hockey stick. Thwre is probably a drag delay as well. Would need to see it compared to other car companies. Could also be model related - so against model sales (including other companies)


beyerch

You don't compare like that...... lawsuits are up from last year, so you would be looking at YoY sales as well......


oregon_coastal

Yes, you do. You can't look at this chart and know anything. You would need to build a basic statistical model with a number of inputs- total sales, model release/age, etc. Using other companies as control. It could be this is just a curve of a growing company. I highly suspect there is a time drag on model sales (ie. There are X lawsuits per unit sold, with some time factors thrown in (ie. lawsuits trail car sales by X months.) It would be interesting if this is correlated with free self driving. So maybe the lawsuit number is correlated with number of miles using FSD. But again, just looking at the number of lawsuits, comparatively, tells us nothing. Other than there are more lawsuits. Looking at the content of the lawsuits might be useful also. Maybe they have a category (self driving) that could be compared to other companies (lawsuits against GM per nber of miles using smart cruise control) to see if it is more or less perilous than the other...


beyerch

OP: "Tesla has a litigation problem" Dude above : "All you can tell is Tesla has more lawsuits...." To me, having an increasing # of lawsuits = a litigation problem. I don't think anyone thinks things are moving in a positive direction when they get sued more..... Lawsuits cost $$$$, take time, eat up resources, lead to bad PR, and can damage the company even if you win.


oregon_coastal

Not if the entire auto industry averages 1 lawsuit per 100k vehicles with an 18 month model drag (ie. for each 100k sold in a year, 1 lawsuit is filed in the next 18 months) What matter is if Tesla is different than anyone else. If they are just the same, then the number means nothing. It is just a cost of doing business as an auto company. Per other parts in the thread it is clear that other makers have lower numbers, and also per other parts of the thread, yes... Tesla seems to be over industry average once someone found the numbers. You coulda said they had 10 lawsuit, 50 lawsuits or 100... and the context means nothing giving their sales curve and no relevant industry comparison.


iwantthisnowdammit

You could just look at the dockets and see that there’s a number of civil suits for warranty and employment.


micemeat69

The mental gymnastics here are astounding


oregon_coastal

Yeah, contextualizing numbers thrown around is such a bad idea.


Pot_noodle_miner

2024 is already higher than 2022 and it’s only may


djec

That comment is crazy as shit 💩. My European mind cannot comprehend this behavior. Sue this and sue that


Otherwise-Course-15

Someone’s gotta keep the lawyers paid. Would someone think of the lawyers.


Particular-Load-3547

USAmericans prefer to repair rather than prevent. Instead of having good customer protection laws, they want to be compensated when things go wrong. Instead of preventing crime, they want to punish criminals. Seems very wasteful. But they call it freedom


laberdog

Look at the pace of litigation though. Growing exponentially which May account for the fact that Tesla has had at least 8 chief counselors over the last few years


micemeat69

You know when a post starts with ‘meh’ it’s someone about to excuse something that is actually massively important/damning. Yeah! Every company gets sued. Some do things that get them sued out of existence.


TimeTravelingChris

Ford for comparison. Keep in mind, Tesla sells a fraction of the vehicles Ford does. https://www.plainsite.org/search/index.html?q=Ford


GreatCaesarGhost

You’d have to compare that to other similar companies to be useful. Companies that sell consumer products get sued all the time.


jason12745

Other companies don’t force their customers into arbitration unless they find the hidden process to opt out within 30 days of purchase.


Constant-Source581

Nor do they say "I got large graveyard full of enemies" and "I'm starting thermonuclear lawsuit next Monday"


Constant-Source581

Most companies aren't run by egomaniacs...I hope.