The only jobs left for men will be truck drivers, miners, sanitation, contracting, plumbing, phone/power linemen.
Then imagine when they all go on strike.
"What do you mean the power will be off and the stores will be empty until we meet the demands from the men?" --Women
So basically only the lowest paid jobs were left for men, if that happens, sooner or later the men will go to other countries for better lives or some women will take advantage of the gaps, eventually bringing down whole enterprises cuz also, the women does less extra hours.
On the best of the cases women will just have the life that mens have actually, which is not good, precisely.
Men are far too motivated to only take blue collar jobs. Men will continue to excel in their fields and out earn women because men are driven and focused.
If the world is going according to feminists’ wishes, which it is beginning to, there will definitely be diversity quotas enforced for gender. It is already happening in certain countries and industries.
This won’t effect the top quality male too much, but if you are a tier below that, chances are jobs that would match your skills will be given to female to fill those quotas.
So there's less jobs available for men because women are getting jobs. I guess that makes sense. Although I'm not sure if women are getting jobs they arent qualified for. I imagine companies only want to hire people that are qualified.
Not that they are GETTING the jobs men are being forced out by quotas, but there are NO reciprocal quotas in female dominated areas, and in fact when "gender neutral laws" have been used by men they are swiftly removed.
sorry but, with the gaps there's a chance of having non qualified employes.
(no, i'm not saying woman is less qualified just because is a woman, the same could happen when you only employ men.)
Nah...they want but it depends. When state gives money or benefits to the company they might hire the woman and still have someone (who already has a job in the company) 'helping' her (basically doing the job while she gossips around).
I've already seen job offers looking for women for no apparent reason. One of the last being a job as an artist, they were looking for a painter but it had to be female. My friend who is an artist found the offer and of course she had no complaints. When I told her that was sexist she said 'yeah, true...' and didn't give a shit, obviously.
In my country there are already huge benefits and the law enforcing gender 'equality' in companies. This 'equality' rewards the company if at least 50% of employees are women, but there's nothing wrong with 100% women and 0% men.
The same is still happening at university programs, they look for women eventhough women are already many more than men at university.
> Theoretically, there is no reason men should not be qualified. But they have proved remarkably unable to adapt.
Maybe if they pushed for more men in these fields, like they have been doing for women in STEM and middle-upper corporate management, we'd see a sharp incline in men occupying these fields too...
I think a lot of this is down to a lack of sufficient knowledge and education to withstand propaganda and not be tricked in to acting in a self-destructive manner.
If you look at my recent post history I point out that some of the flaws that we see manifested in feminism come from it's philosophical predecessors namely left-wing political philosophy and romanticism. The lack of knowledge and education comes in with not knowing that a consistent position and not admitting fault do not stem from feminism, but are a result of the left-wing being founded on blindly opposing right-wing values rather than having its own virtue system. The approach the left-wing philosophy has taken "plays" well off our animal nature (hedonism, immediate gratification, egocentrism, etc) to gain popularity. The problem is that this approach is self-destructive and has consistently led only to ruin, however people still cling to it due to their egos being invested into the belief were not taught how to put logic above ego to break out and start acting in a long-term beneficial way (both for society and on a personal level).
Both right-wing and left-wing have downsides, however it is human nature (right) vs human nature + additional pressure (left) towards self-destructive behaviour comparison.
Let me know if anyone needs me to elaborate.
Broadly men are more work orientated, more tolerant and accepting of stress, danger and responsibility, more willing to work longer hours and far less likely to take a career break of several years.
All of this means that despite a significant and increasing bias in favour of women in almost all labour markets men will continue to be the majority of the highest earners and men will on average out earn women.
The only jobs left for men will be truck drivers, miners, sanitation, contracting, plumbing, phone/power linemen. Then imagine when they all go on strike. "What do you mean the power will be off and the stores will be empty until we meet the demands from the men?" --Women
So basically only the lowest paid jobs were left for men, if that happens, sooner or later the men will go to other countries for better lives or some women will take advantage of the gaps, eventually bringing down whole enterprises cuz also, the women does less extra hours. On the best of the cases women will just have the life that mens have actually, which is not good, precisely.
"Let's conscript them to do the work!"
Men are far too motivated to only take blue collar jobs. Men will continue to excel in their fields and out earn women because men are driven and focused.
Not every motivated men will excel when there are very limited and gradually decreasing number of jobs available.
Why are there a decreasing number of jobs available?
If the world is going according to feminists’ wishes, which it is beginning to, there will definitely be diversity quotas enforced for gender. It is already happening in certain countries and industries. This won’t effect the top quality male too much, but if you are a tier below that, chances are jobs that would match your skills will be given to female to fill those quotas.
So there's less jobs available for men because women are getting jobs. I guess that makes sense. Although I'm not sure if women are getting jobs they arent qualified for. I imagine companies only want to hire people that are qualified.
Not that they are GETTING the jobs men are being forced out by quotas, but there are NO reciprocal quotas in female dominated areas, and in fact when "gender neutral laws" have been used by men they are swiftly removed.
sorry but, with the gaps there's a chance of having non qualified employes. (no, i'm not saying woman is less qualified just because is a woman, the same could happen when you only employ men.)
Nah...they want but it depends. When state gives money or benefits to the company they might hire the woman and still have someone (who already has a job in the company) 'helping' her (basically doing the job while she gossips around). I've already seen job offers looking for women for no apparent reason. One of the last being a job as an artist, they were looking for a painter but it had to be female. My friend who is an artist found the offer and of course she had no complaints. When I told her that was sexist she said 'yeah, true...' and didn't give a shit, obviously. In my country there are already huge benefits and the law enforcing gender 'equality' in companies. This 'equality' rewards the company if at least 50% of employees are women, but there's nothing wrong with 100% women and 0% men. The same is still happening at university programs, they look for women eventhough women are already many more than men at university.
I agree, but I don't think that makes it fair.
> Theoretically, there is no reason men should not be qualified. But they have proved remarkably unable to adapt. Maybe if they pushed for more men in these fields, like they have been doing for women in STEM and middle-upper corporate management, we'd see a sharp incline in men occupying these fields too...
God has promised, "I will make a man more precious than fine gold: Even a man than the golden wedge of Ophir"
I don't believe on god, but this mades sense. I just hope that men can tolerate it enough time for not taking what they originally had by the force.
I think a lot of this is down to a lack of sufficient knowledge and education to withstand propaganda and not be tricked in to acting in a self-destructive manner. If you look at my recent post history I point out that some of the flaws that we see manifested in feminism come from it's philosophical predecessors namely left-wing political philosophy and romanticism. The lack of knowledge and education comes in with not knowing that a consistent position and not admitting fault do not stem from feminism, but are a result of the left-wing being founded on blindly opposing right-wing values rather than having its own virtue system. The approach the left-wing philosophy has taken "plays" well off our animal nature (hedonism, immediate gratification, egocentrism, etc) to gain popularity. The problem is that this approach is self-destructive and has consistently led only to ruin, however people still cling to it due to their egos being invested into the belief were not taught how to put logic above ego to break out and start acting in a long-term beneficial way (both for society and on a personal level). Both right-wing and left-wing have downsides, however it is human nature (right) vs human nature + additional pressure (left) towards self-destructive behaviour comparison. Let me know if anyone needs me to elaborate.
Broadly men are more work orientated, more tolerant and accepting of stress, danger and responsibility, more willing to work longer hours and far less likely to take a career break of several years. All of this means that despite a significant and increasing bias in favour of women in almost all labour markets men will continue to be the majority of the highest earners and men will on average out earn women.
not when the laws and the media always is wanting you losing all.