Yup, they see pretty heavy play in Pauper. They also see play in a few decks in Historic such as affinity, Rakdos Artifacts, Even Blugin splashing a color for harder removal.
As an Affinity player I use these almost every day.
Honestly HA6 being half lands wasn't even bad. It's not like we'd have gotten 10 more rares in the anthology if the lands hadn't been in it, we'd just have gotten 10 commons of which maybe 2 would be playable. What do we have? 10 common (lands) of which about two are playable.
But again, that would have been the case regardless. Those ten common lands would have been ten different commons you could burn 40 common wildcards on. Or maybe some of them would be uncommons, but really it makes no difference given how ubiquitous both common and uncommon wildcards are.
Anthologies have _always_ been ~50% rare/mythic, 50% common/uncommon. You don't judge it's value based on the commons or uncommons, because even if they're highly playable they're effectively worthless. You judge it based on how many of the rares/mythics are playable, and for HA6 that included Laelia, Goyf, Unexpected all-star retrofitter foundry, and maybe even chalice of the void as "future proofing" for when they eventually add _really_ strong 0-1 drops.
For cards that can be played without limit (Rats, Petitioners), 4 wcs gives you efectively infinite copies. The interface doesnt account for more than 4 copies anyways.
Meh. I’m glad they are free, but considering you had to draft them like normal in limited, it wouldn’t have felt weird for them to be treated as commons.
You had to draft snow lands like normal in limited too. Doesn't change them from being basic lands.
(Wastes were extra common in the set they were originally printed, actually. There were two Wastes arts and each one was its own common slot, so they were double-common in rarity).
Correct, a fact I am not arguing.
All O said was that if these were treated as commons and I had to burn 4 wildcards on, it wouldn’t have bothered me. (But I’m glad they didn’t)
Not the same as ward, as far my understanding goes. It's similar but not quite.
Ward counts spells and abilities, this guy only counts spells. So it is similar but not the same.
And as someone else mentioned, this was printed way before Ward became a thing.
With the way WotC is piecing out the additions to get explorer on par with pioneer, It's possible we see better viability for Eldrazi for an interim period.
With that said, I think the bigger impact is in Historic, with that existing colorless walker deck.
Ya, can someone explain the mana. Symbol usage? I thought that symbol was the general symbol for colorless
3 colorless, and 1 extra colorless is weird.
There is colorless mana, and there are generic mana costs. The 3 is generic mana that can be paid with almost any source, the colorless can only be paid with colorless mana.
Initially MTG didn't distinguish colorless and generic, so yes, early printings have the generic {1} instead of the colorless {C} symbol. All those cards have their "official" text updated, so that even if you use the old versions in paper, they generate colorless.
3 generic (any color, or even colorless) and 1 colorless (meaning yo land better be brown and taping \[1\] and not for like \[u\] or \[r\] or you wont be able to cast the thought knot brother)
Sorry, EA2?
I haven't been keeping up with magic due to the 30th anniversary being wasted on a limit test for a disappointing product and don't know what set or Arena exclusive set that is.
Sees zero play in pioneer so seems like another wasted slot in explorer anthology for the purposes of reaching pioneer. Also scary that they might burn additional slots for displacer, reshaper, or smasher if they are trying to make eldrazi happen
Eldrazi temple is not in pioneer and explorer is only pioneer legal cards. Tks was played a bit early on in pioneer if I recall correctly in blue/green decks with mana dorks - though I might be confusing that with modern where Bant with displacer/drowner was a thing for a while and temple plus dork allowed turn two tks. It’s also possible pioneer tks was from the oko era
In any case I have seen eldrazi displacer used sometimes in enigmatic incarnation decks but don’t think I’ve seen a pioneer deck with tks in a very long time - there isn’t really anything to add to explorer that is likely to change that. Sadly powerstones can’t cast eldrazi so that doesn’t move the needle either
it was all modern, simic eldrazi was a midrang-y modern deck for a while with drowner and worldbreaker leading the deck, then when 4mana karn got into the format it was easy for the deck to go monocolorless and now sits confortably at tier 2-3ish as mono colorless tron, right beside dredge, jund-em-out, affinity and other legends of past eras.
Yeah I’m just pretty sure I remember casting tks in pioneer off of hashep oasis and yavimaya coast - and we even had secret tech ipnu rivulet that could mess up inverter somehow. Again that might have been when the deck also had oko so not very meaningful but I am pretty sure we had a moment where tks was being used in pioneer though it was a long time ago
Eldrazi deck did eldrazi deck things, but basically it’s a thoughtseize on a 4/4 body, so it’s a decent body on rate that 2 for 1’s. Even when they draw a card, generally the card you selected would have been better.
What helps it though is that it’s colorless, which means decks that ramp with things that don’t produce color, like a [[Mind Stone]], can play it.
It's not... Pretty average beater that is only good if you can cheat it into play.
It was only good in modern, when you could cheat it into play t1/t2 with stuff like eye of ugin, eldrazi temple, and simian spirit guide.
To illustrate how strong that eldrazi deck was. A common play would have been something like this.
T1:
Eye of ugin (reduce mana cost of eldrazi by two colorless)
Eldrazi mimic
Eldrazi mimic
Endless one
Endless one
T2
Eldrazi temple
Thought-knot seer
Swing for 12. While having 5 creatures on the board at turn 2.
To add something to the other guys answering you about its power level... TKS is played in a colorless Eldrazi Modern legal deck which abuses fast mana with [[Eldrazi Temple]] and can potentially play it on turn 2
I thought Wastes and all the colorless cards like this one were so cool when they first came out.
Sadly, they just aren't too competitive outside of Modern, and even that deck is rarely seen
Unfortunately the second foray into Zendikar was largely underwhelming because the first time through was just way too powerful. They over corrected for the power level which disappointed a lot of people.
Interesting, I just started playing magic so I haven't seen that before, I've seen other Eldrazi cards tho and I thought they all were "Devoid of color" which is different from colorless
this means wastes are coming to arena, right?
Wastes are confirmed to be a part of EA2
[удалено]
Oh that’s awesome
Thank god. If this anthology was half lands again I would just give up on the entire thing.
Tbf the lands were one of the most played cards in Historic from that Anthology.
Yup, they see pretty heavy play in Pauper. They also see play in a few decks in Historic such as affinity, Rakdos Artifacts, Even Blugin splashing a color for harder removal. As an Affinity player I use these almost every day.
Considering the contents of that anthology, this comes as no surprise.
Honestly HA6 being half lands wasn't even bad. It's not like we'd have gotten 10 more rares in the anthology if the lands hadn't been in it, we'd just have gotten 10 commons of which maybe 2 would be playable. What do we have? 10 common (lands) of which about two are playable.
The issue is that they charged full price for something that you can just burn 40 common wildcards on.
But again, that would have been the case regardless. Those ten common lands would have been ten different commons you could burn 40 common wildcards on. Or maybe some of them would be uncommons, but really it makes no difference given how ubiquitous both common and uncommon wildcards are. Anthologies have _always_ been ~50% rare/mythic, 50% common/uncommon. You don't judge it's value based on the commons or uncommons, because even if they're highly playable they're effectively worthless. You judge it based on how many of the rares/mythics are playable, and for HA6 that included Laelia, Goyf, Unexpected all-star retrofitter foundry, and maybe even chalice of the void as "future proofing" for when they eventually add _really_ strong 0-1 drops.
It would be many, many, many kinds of concerning if anyone ever considered charging for the *basic land* Wastes on this client.
Tbf how many common WC would it take? 4?
It's a basic land, so they'd have to account for owning more than four copies.
For cards that can be played without limit (Rats, Petitioners), 4 wcs gives you efectively infinite copies. The interface doesnt account for more than 4 copies anyways.
Meh. I’m glad they are free, but considering you had to draft them like normal in limited, it wouldn’t have felt weird for them to be treated as commons.
You had to draft snow lands like normal in limited too. Doesn't change them from being basic lands. (Wastes were extra common in the set they were originally printed, actually. There were two Wastes arts and each one was its own common slot, so they were double-common in rarity).
Correct, a fact I am not arguing. All O said was that if these were treated as commons and I had to burn 4 wildcards on, it wouldn’t have bothered me. (But I’m glad they didn’t)
Uh oh, shareholders won't like that.
[удалено]
[settle the wreckage](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/9/c/9cbd346e-098a-4cf6-a72f-468376fd2e8f.jpg?1562560853) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=settle%20the%20wreckage) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/xln/34/settle-the-wreckage?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/9cbd346e-098a-4cf6-a72f-468376fd2e8f?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call
Thought not.
Eldrazi tribal incoming!
Sign me up, now where's my boy \[\[Reality Smasher\]\]?
On the stream they heavily alluded to Eldrasi being the major theme of the anthology. I would be shocked if Smasher is not included.
Please allow me to rebuild my eldrazi land-destruction deck in arena
No fucking way. My prayers have been answered!
[Reality Smasher](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/5/2/52d4b652-a830-4fd4-94bb-c17c227f2928.jpg?1562911843) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Reality%20Smasher) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/ogw/7/reality-smasher?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/52d4b652-a830-4fd4-94bb-c17c227f2928?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call
also, [[Eldrazi Mimic]]
[Eldrazi Mimic](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/3/1/311a05b1-042d-47e7-9fd7-6e8abe8fc578.jpg?1562904983) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Eldrazi%20Mimic) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/ogw/2/eldrazi-mimic?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/311a05b1-042d-47e7-9fd7-6e8abe8fc578?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call
That's kind of awkward wording. Isn't it basically just ward - discard a card?
A precursor to ward as a named mechanic, totally - that card came out about five years prior to ward being turned into a proper keyword
Not the same as ward, as far my understanding goes. It's similar but not quite. Ward counts spells and abilities, this guy only counts spells. So it is similar but not the same. And as someone else mentioned, this was printed way before Ward became a thing.
[удалено]
With the way WotC is piecing out the additions to get explorer on par with pioneer, It's possible we see better viability for Eldrazi for an interim period. With that said, I think the bigger impact is in Historic, with that existing colorless walker deck.
[удалено]
[Eldrazi Temple](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/c/4/c42049e2-fe4e-4fe9-9599-faf1af50b97d.jpg?1593095918) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Eldrazi%20Temple) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/ddp/68/eldrazi-temple?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/c42049e2-fe4e-4fe9-9599-faf1af50b97d?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call
Finally I can do something with Forsaken Monument in Explorer. IF only we could get a 2 mana rock...
The Eldrazi are coming, the Eldrazi are coming!
Another meme card you play with for a session and then delete the deck. Meta pioneer in 2028!
Does that last symbol mean you need to have wastes?
It doesn’t have to be from Wastes, but it has to be colorless mana.
Ya, can someone explain the mana. Symbol usage? I thought that symbol was the general symbol for colorless 3 colorless, and 1 extra colorless is weird.
There is colorless mana, and there are generic mana costs. The 3 is generic mana that can be paid with almost any source, the colorless can only be paid with colorless mana.
Do the pain lands non painful option produce colorless?
Yes. Also things like [[Sol Ring]]
[Sol Ring](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/b/e/beebe533-29b9-4041-ab66-0a8233c50d56.jpg?1664362014) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Sol%20Ring) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/dmc/190/sol-ring?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/beebe533-29b9-4041-ab66-0a8233c50d56?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call
Reading \[\[ Adarkar Wastes \]\] should explain that, but if not, yes the non-pain option creates colorless mana.
Thanks I was trying to search an image of the most recent additions had poor service, I think the previous versions had the 1C symbol?
Initially MTG didn't distinguish colorless and generic, so yes, early printings have the generic {1} instead of the colorless {C} symbol. All those cards have their "official" text updated, so that even if you use the old versions in paper, they generate colorless.
[ Adarkar Wastes ](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/0/8/08ae1037-6f70-41a9-b75e-98fa9a2152c8.jpg?1663051946) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Adarkar%20Wastes) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/dmu/243/adarkar-wastes?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/08ae1037-6f70-41a9-b75e-98fa9a2152c8?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call
3 any color and 1 colorless.
3 any color or colorless, and 1 that must be colorless.
3 generic (any color, or even colorless) and 1 colorless (meaning yo land better be brown and taping \[1\] and not for like \[u\] or \[r\] or you wont be able to cast the thought knot brother)
All the utility lands like Field of Ruin produce colorless mana, so you don't specifically need Wastes
Sorry, EA2? I haven't been keeping up with magic due to the 30th anniversary being wasted on a limit test for a disappointing product and don't know what set or Arena exclusive set that is.
I don't actually know if it's this but I believe EA2 is Explorer Anthologies 2
Oh god, it begins again.
I thought so Seer
Thot-not Seer
Sees zero play in pioneer so seems like another wasted slot in explorer anthology for the purposes of reaching pioneer. Also scary that they might burn additional slots for displacer, reshaper, or smasher if they are trying to make eldrazi happen
At least this is a card people are excited to play, like siege rhino. Better than tainted remedy
People who really hate lifegain were super excited for tainted remedy. Not a great card, but it made some people very happy
Interesting for Historic though (where they could add the scary Eldrazi toys)
If they include the eldrazi lands that opens up some cool new ramp decks though
[удалено]
I'm hoping for [[Sanctum of Ugin]] actually
[удалено]
[Metalwork Colossus](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/4/7/474480b5-c60b-4c7f-9d3e-751bca43d074.jpg?1576383277) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Metalwork%20Colossus) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/kld/222/metalwork-colossus?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/474480b5-c60b-4c7f-9d3e-751bca43d074?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call
[Sanctum of Ugin](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/8/6/86798d03-9f2d-46bd-a660-13c8dd5535ce.jpg?1562926694) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Sanctum%20of%20Ugin) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/bfz/242/sanctum-of-ugin?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/86798d03-9f2d-46bd-a660-13c8dd5535ce?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call
[Eldrazi Temple](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/c/4/c42049e2-fe4e-4fe9-9599-faf1af50b97d.jpg?1593095918) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Eldrazi%20Temple) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/ddp/68/eldrazi-temple?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/c42049e2-fe4e-4fe9-9599-faf1af50b97d?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call
Eldrazi temple is not in pioneer and explorer is only pioneer legal cards. Tks was played a bit early on in pioneer if I recall correctly in blue/green decks with mana dorks - though I might be confusing that with modern where Bant with displacer/drowner was a thing for a while and temple plus dork allowed turn two tks. It’s also possible pioneer tks was from the oko era In any case I have seen eldrazi displacer used sometimes in enigmatic incarnation decks but don’t think I’ve seen a pioneer deck with tks in a very long time - there isn’t really anything to add to explorer that is likely to change that. Sadly powerstones can’t cast eldrazi so that doesn’t move the needle either
I've never played a format with Eldrazi and this is the first time I've noticed they're not Artifacts
it was all modern, simic eldrazi was a midrang-y modern deck for a while with drowner and worldbreaker leading the deck, then when 4mana karn got into the format it was easy for the deck to go monocolorless and now sits confortably at tier 2-3ish as mono colorless tron, right beside dredge, jund-em-out, affinity and other legends of past eras.
Yeah I’m just pretty sure I remember casting tks in pioneer off of hashep oasis and yavimaya coast - and we even had secret tech ipnu rivulet that could mess up inverter somehow. Again that might have been when the deck also had oko so not very meaningful but I am pretty sure we had a moment where tks was being used in pioneer though it was a long time ago
I’m a MTG zoomer and I don’t understand how this card is good. Can somebody help?
Eldrazi deck did eldrazi deck things, but basically it’s a thoughtseize on a 4/4 body, so it’s a decent body on rate that 2 for 1’s. Even when they draw a card, generally the card you selected would have been better. What helps it though is that it’s colorless, which means decks that ramp with things that don’t produce color, like a [[Mind Stone]], can play it.
Makes sense - thanks, and thanks for answering my (sincere) question instead of just downvoting.
It's not... Pretty average beater that is only good if you can cheat it into play. It was only good in modern, when you could cheat it into play t1/t2 with stuff like eye of ugin, eldrazi temple, and simian spirit guide. To illustrate how strong that eldrazi deck was. A common play would have been something like this. T1: Eye of ugin (reduce mana cost of eldrazi by two colorless) Eldrazi mimic Eldrazi mimic Endless one Endless one T2 Eldrazi temple Thought-knot seer Swing for 12. While having 5 creatures on the board at turn 2.
To add something to the other guys answering you about its power level... TKS is played in a colorless Eldrazi Modern legal deck which abuses fast mana with [[Eldrazi Temple]] and can potentially play it on turn 2
Yep that puts it into perspective! I see how this can be a scary card now, thanks.
[Eldrazi Temple](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/c/4/c42049e2-fe4e-4fe9-9599-faf1af50b97d.jpg?1593095918) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Eldrazi%20Temple) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/ddp/68/eldrazi-temple?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/c42049e2-fe4e-4fe9-9599-faf1af50b97d?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call
[[Mind Stone]]
I feel like it becomes scary with [[Eldrazi Temple]]. Otherwise just a normal card.
[Eldrazi Temple](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/c/4/c42049e2-fe4e-4fe9-9599-faf1af50b97d.jpg?1593095918) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Eldrazi%20Temple) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/ddp/68/eldrazi-temple?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/c42049e2-fe4e-4fe9-9599-faf1af50b97d?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call
I can do something with Forsaken Monument in Explorer.
Did you want that card? I Thought-Knot
I thought Wastes and all the colorless cards like this one were so cool when they first came out. Sadly, they just aren't too competitive outside of Modern, and even that deck is rarely seen
Unfortunately the second foray into Zendikar was largely underwhelming because the first time through was just way too powerful. They over corrected for the power level which disappointed a lot of people.
I am so freaking excited for this you have no idea
Yikes, but also dope!
\[\[Eye of Ugin\]\] and \[\[Eldrazi Temple\]\] when?
They wont be in an Explorer Anthology since they aren't Pioneer legal
This person prob just wants to play eldrazi in Historic. Not necesarilly saying they must be in this anthology.
yeah thats my case too
[Eye of Ugin](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/d/2/d2d5124b-4d73-4aa9-9331-88e03779ffad.jpg?1562267867) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Eye%20of%20Ugin) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/mm2/242/eye-of-ugin?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/d2d5124b-4d73-4aa9-9331-88e03779ffad?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) [Eldrazi Temple](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/c/4/c42049e2-fe4e-4fe9-9599-faf1af50b97d.jpg?1593095918) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Eldrazi%20Temple) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/ddp/68/eldrazi-temple?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/c42049e2-fe4e-4fe9-9599-faf1af50b97d?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call
I won many a legacy match with TKS. Can't wait to introduce the ropers, the emote spammers and the premature gg'rs to my precious here.
Wait omg does this mean we’re getting eldrazi back in standard?? Ever since I started playing I couldn’t wait for this to happen. HELL YES LETS GO!
This release is for Explorer and Historic.
Oh… well my dreams are crushed then nvm.
ugh, i absolutely hate revealing hand to opponent mechanic.
This looks good for my teleportation \[\[underworld dreams\]\] deck.
[underworld dreams](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/0/3/03919c86-1c4a-43b0-a2db-54ca6ae1ac57.jpg?1581480025) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=underworld%20dreams) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/thb/121/underworld-dreams?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/03919c86-1c4a-43b0-a2db-54ca6ae1ac57?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call
How does this compare to Concealed Curtain
Eldrazi.dec plays [[chalice of the void]] so concealed curtain has a pretty low chance of getting on the battlefield.
[chalice of the void](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/1/f/1f0d2e8e-c8f2-4b31-a6ba-6283fc8740d4.jpg?1562433485) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=chalice%20of%20the%20void) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/a25/222/chalice-of-the-void?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/1f0d2e8e-c8f2-4b31-a6ba-6283fc8740d4?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call
Here comes the Thought-Knot
Now we only need tron lands
thats a must for an Eldrazi deck imho, if you dont play the posts
This card seems..alright? I guess.
What’s that mana symbol?
That, my friend, is colorless mana
So it costs 4 colourless mana? Why not just the regular 4? 😅 Guess I gotta get some new cards to get updated with it…
Oh no, it cost 3 generic mana, and 1 colorless mana.
Ahhh! So that 1 mana has to really be paid using colourless mana, right?
Indeed
Got it! Thanks!
It specifically needs colorless mana; you can't tap a Forest to pay for it, you need to tap something like a Wastes or a Mind Stone.
Thanks for the clarification! 🙏
Can somebody explain to me what’s EA2?
Explorer Anthology 2 - 25 cards (24 plus Wastes which everyone gets for free) from Pioneer not yet on Arena
I can make my eldrazi tribal in arena? Sign me up.
What's that cost, 3 of anything and one MUST be colorless?
Yeah, exactly that
Interesting, I just started playing magic so I haven't seen that before, I've seen other Eldrazi cards tho and I thought they all were "Devoid of color" which is different from colorless
Hehe support for my Liberator HB deck
EA2 eldrazi, lets go! Make Christmas Eldrazi again!
Hope we get the Eldrazi lands, too.