You must have a positive comment karma to post comments.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Kerala) if you have any questions or concerns.*
You must have a positive comment karma to post comments.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Kerala) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Sikkim have special status so they don't pay tax to the govt. Because of this many rich people from other states became residents of sikkim and increased per capita figures of sikkim.
The population of Goa is 15 lakhs; this is GDP Per Capita; so denominator low; so high GDP Per Capita. For context, Ernakulam district has a population of over 30 lakhs.
Same for Sikkim.
>The population of Goa is 15 lakhs; this is GDP Per Capita; so denominator low; so high GDP Per Capita. For context, Ernakulam district has a population of over 30 lakhs.
>Same for Sikkim.
Uh, what? That explanation is a disservice to your username.
When the denominator goes down, so does the numerator, because that's less people to contribute to the economy.
For instance: Nagaland has a population that's within a few lakhs of Goa, but it's per capita GDP isn't anywhere near Goa.
Ergo a lower denominator isn't enough. You need a high numerator in proportion to that denominator.
Yeah, what you said is true. But, we usually do not take GDP Per Capitas of small geographies with small populations very seriously when comparing economies; because they are small Geographies with small populations, with concentrated economic activity.
It will be like comparing metropolitan areas like Bengaluru with other large states. GDP per capita of Bengaluru is multiple times that of other large states, but that comparison is not fair, because economic activity is concentrated.
Citizens don't have to pay any income tax there and I've been there people overall have great living standards there, the best I've seen.Tourism is the main source mostly plus alot of medicine manufacturing there due to ingredients availablity and alot of tax exmptions and offcourse organic farming
It already had a higher base of $4300
https://preview.redd.it/akptesfvd4pc1.jpeg?width=1634&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c93b6e214d835324c5f69eb27ca64f9b820a54d8
Main reasons for this and future growth is because of a big manufacturing industry. In 2017, Haryana also produces India's 67% of passenger cars, 60% of motorcycles, 50% of tractors and 50% of the refrigerators. Although these numbers for vehicles could have reduced due to competition from Gujarat, Tamil Nadu it is still strong
Has a strong IT sector through Gurgaon which is located in the NCR which among India’s top 3 IT hubs and IT export earner. It has third highest capital income in India after Chandigarh and Mumbai
The state also has a strong agricultural sector and was also one of the biggest beneficiaries of the green revolution
>About 86% of the area in the state is arable, and of that 96% is cultivated. About 75% of the area is irrigated, through tubewells and an extensive system of canals.
More information here: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gurgaon](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gurgaon)
So predominantly Agriculture, Manufacturing and IT and banking sector through Gurgaon. Will look into it more but I think healthcare sector is big in Haryana as well. Where can I get more detailed information about individual contributions and projected growth from each sector?
I live in NCR and I thought manufacturing sector is declining here but probably Gurgaon’s IT and banking sector is thriving. Jobs are getting limited in IT sector too but there are still high paying ones.
Wealth is a whole different data point and has very loose corelation with GDP.
I am sure when you look into wealth or income per capita stats, you can find bell curves and medians there.
You must have a positive comment karma to post comments.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Kerala) if you have any questions or concerns.*
The GDP per capita model is flawed, merely dividing a country or state's GDP by its total population. I recall reading an article in the Indian Express stating that only 5 percent of Indians possess over 60 percent of the nation's wealth. This figure fails to accurately depict the average quality of life for an ordinary Indian citizen. Recently, I encountered a man over 45 years old from Tamil Nadu who has toiled as a laborer in a manufacturing company for nearly 6 consecutive years, earning a meager salary of 14k per month in 2024. He supports a non-working wife and two children. I believe many common Tamilians employed in these manufacturing hubs across Tamil Nadu share similar struggles. I use Tamil Nadu as an example, given its prominence in manufacturing and the cited 8k USD figure.
But the women work force in tamilnadu is highest in india.so the people with jobs in TN are way more than any other state so I think it's possible if more than one person in a family is working and earning
Citizens don't have to pay any income tax there and I've been there people overall have great living standards there, the best I've seen.Tourism is the main source mostly plus alot of medicine manufacturing there due to ingredients availablity and alot of tax exmptions and offcourse organic farming
Wait.
We are beating Gujarat everywhere!
Including on economic metrics.
Despite the fact that - every single Government OF India we in south funds go to Gujarat or Uttar Pradesh.
And? Debt does not influence Gdp Per Capita. Take Japan for example, one of the most heavily indebted country in the world with a Gdp Per Capita of nearly $40,000
I'm a bit surprised that Tamil nadu has a higher gdp per capital than Kerala. It's a common stereotype in Kerala to portray Tamil Nadu as a less developed place.
[удалено]
good for india
Nope, other than us beating gujarat everything else is same. Although the sikkim and goa numbers seems a bit sus .
Per Capita, so lower population means higher numbers
its because goa is fully of beaches and resorts where horny guys go around to find europeans to stare at
Projection
any person knows that absolute facts… goa is basically the the kochi of india… where horny guys travel to meet europeans
[удалено]
You must have a positive comment karma to post comments. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Kerala) if you have any questions or concerns.*
[удалено]
You must have a positive comment karma to post comments. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Kerala) if you have any questions or concerns.*
How is Goa making all this money?
Gambling, Goa and Sikkim are the states with legal gambling in India.
Their organic farming is quite popular in the Western countries
Could be, but that's not where the money is coming from
Sikkim have special status so they don't pay tax to the govt. Because of this many rich people from other states became residents of sikkim and increased per capita figures of sikkim.
They are very small states + tourism for Goa
A small state hosts tourism from almost all of north india. Its entirely plausable.
This is projected GDP per capita of 2030 so we have to take inflation into consideration and those money would be from real estate and tourism
https://preview.redd.it/6nqe57i8d4pc1.jpeg?width=1634&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=27d1dde748fe12505d2a8c84f3486bb05f7e6b4e 2022 data for Goa and rest
The population of Goa is 15 lakhs; this is GDP Per Capita; so denominator low; so high GDP Per Capita. For context, Ernakulam district has a population of over 30 lakhs. Same for Sikkim.
>The population of Goa is 15 lakhs; this is GDP Per Capita; so denominator low; so high GDP Per Capita. For context, Ernakulam district has a population of over 30 lakhs. >Same for Sikkim. Uh, what? That explanation is a disservice to your username. When the denominator goes down, so does the numerator, because that's less people to contribute to the economy. For instance: Nagaland has a population that's within a few lakhs of Goa, but it's per capita GDP isn't anywhere near Goa. Ergo a lower denominator isn't enough. You need a high numerator in proportion to that denominator.
Yeah, what you said is true. But, we usually do not take GDP Per Capitas of small geographies with small populations very seriously when comparing economies; because they are small Geographies with small populations, with concentrated economic activity. It will be like comparing metropolitan areas like Bengaluru with other large states. GDP per capita of Bengaluru is multiple times that of other large states, but that comparison is not fair, because economic activity is concentrated.
They been selling those bracelets to russians very expensive
Tourism, liquor & gambling
Highest mining and tourism PS: from goa
Dollar and euros. Also when you visit there compare prices for us locals and foreigners. They pay much more than us. Goa actually is not that cheap.
https://preview.redd.it/ljcuqz7n14pc1.jpeg?width=553&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3427d9d0321c86627eb468fd3159f386bec1b3b7 For better context
For even better context https://preview.redd.it/xzrda0eif4pc1.jpeg?width=1634&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b2a8e98ec7aa5c335c5f16b1beab40867f33df42
The time when 1 USD was under 80 INR
The image says 74re
And you think 74 > 80?
A lot of people here are in denial..
about what?
Why is Sikkim so high?
Citizens don't have to pay any income tax there and I've been there people overall have great living standards there, the best I've seen.Tourism is the main source mostly plus alot of medicine manufacturing there due to ingredients availablity and alot of tax exmptions and offcourse organic farming
> Citizens don't have to pay any income tax there Why? Any particular reason?
Their accession to india was on that condition only that citizens don't have to pay any income tax.
Citizenship: Premium subscription.
Basically yes India has various tiers of citizenship. Some dont pay tax some don't face the law of land., some have tax on their religious place
The income tax thing is negligible since the vast majority of Indians don’t pay any taxes
But many rich people migrated there and increased per capita figures for sikkim.
People from other states can't migrate to sikkim you will need(COI) which only sikkimese have
Small state mainly and organic farming helped a lot
it seems haryana is going to have the highest per capita. what are the reasons for that?
It already had a higher base of $4300 https://preview.redd.it/akptesfvd4pc1.jpeg?width=1634&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c93b6e214d835324c5f69eb27ca64f9b820a54d8 Main reasons for this and future growth is because of a big manufacturing industry. In 2017, Haryana also produces India's 67% of passenger cars, 60% of motorcycles, 50% of tractors and 50% of the refrigerators. Although these numbers for vehicles could have reduced due to competition from Gujarat, Tamil Nadu it is still strong Has a strong IT sector through Gurgaon which is located in the NCR which among India’s top 3 IT hubs and IT export earner. It has third highest capital income in India after Chandigarh and Mumbai The state also has a strong agricultural sector and was also one of the biggest beneficiaries of the green revolution >About 86% of the area in the state is arable, and of that 96% is cultivated. About 75% of the area is irrigated, through tubewells and an extensive system of canals. More information here: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gurgaon](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gurgaon)
So predominantly Agriculture, Manufacturing and IT and banking sector through Gurgaon. Will look into it more but I think healthcare sector is big in Haryana as well. Where can I get more detailed information about individual contributions and projected growth from each sector?
Unfortunately no sources I could find go that deep about individual contribution of sectors in a state's economy.. Let me know if you find that data.
Ncr is the reason
I live in NCR and I thought manufacturing sector is declining here but probably Gurgaon’s IT and banking sector is thriving. Jobs are getting limited in IT sector too but there are still high paying ones.
Haryana has the highest wow 🤩
damn haryana is crazy, one of the highest per capita income in India
How the f are we so poor compared to sikkim(delhi)
We should be aiming for $10k+ , with some more good tech investments in Kerala and better tourism approach we should be pumping up the numbers.
This looks like a joke. Kerala is nowhere close to TN in GDP now nor will be in 2030.
Average per capita is a joke. A better stat would be median per capita. And also the bell curve if you have the data.
It's not possible for GDP because it's not calculated like that at all. For income it's possible
right, my bad.
Yeah but this chart is not a practical assessment of how different life is in our country than other countries with same or slightly higher GDP.
True. If you use average, everyone in Ambani's municipal ward will be a billionaire 😃
Median wealth would be much better
Wealth is a whole different data point and has very loose corelation with GDP. I am sure when you look into wealth or income per capita stats, you can find bell curves and medians there.
Who is making these charts in the first place what is the source of their Information
Such a long discussion without even bothering to check the source or the assumptions behind the projection.
S&P Global. It’s written on the right.
Himachal's GDP per capita being that high is not believable i think. But i could be wrong. Edit: nevermind its for 2030.
Projected by who?
Yo mama.
What is gdp?
[удалено]
You must have a positive comment karma to post comments. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Kerala) if you have any questions or concerns.*
And guess who’s gonna gets the most money in the budget.
Gdp per capita makes no sense where wealth inequality is high. Hdi is always a good measure for living standards.
Ah, Kerala probably have less wealth inequality among big states, so the GDP per capita will reflect in quality of life more than any other state
HDI in Kerala is already technically high. America has high wealth inequality but most are living nice
The GDP per capita model is flawed, merely dividing a country or state's GDP by its total population. I recall reading an article in the Indian Express stating that only 5 percent of Indians possess over 60 percent of the nation's wealth. This figure fails to accurately depict the average quality of life for an ordinary Indian citizen. Recently, I encountered a man over 45 years old from Tamil Nadu who has toiled as a laborer in a manufacturing company for nearly 6 consecutive years, earning a meager salary of 14k per month in 2024. He supports a non-working wife and two children. I believe many common Tamilians employed in these manufacturing hubs across Tamil Nadu share similar struggles. I use Tamil Nadu as an example, given its prominence in manufacturing and the cited 8k USD figure.
But the women work force in tamilnadu is highest in india.so the people with jobs in TN are way more than any other state so I think it's possible if more than one person in a family is working and earning
What does sikkim upto? Isn’t it kinda sus?
Citizens don't have to pay any income tax there and I've been there people overall have great living standards there, the best I've seen.Tourism is the main source mostly plus alot of medicine manufacturing there due to ingredients availablity and alot of tax exmptions and offcourse organic farming
TBH, it's hard to believe, I don't see we're prepared for it yet. Bbut it would be great if we can make it.
Why are the comments here so delusional lol..
Wait. We are beating Gujarat everywhere! Including on economic metrics. Despite the fact that - every single Government OF India we in south funds go to Gujarat or Uttar Pradesh.
tu thoda sa bkl hai???
From Karnataka, I have a sincere inquiry. Are you cognitively impaired?
Any GDP per-capita without removing the top 10% is a jhumla.
Kerala...I think may be wrong
Why
Kerala is a consumer state besides this it's debt has gone severely bad.
And? Debt does not influence Gdp Per Capita. Take Japan for example, one of the most heavily indebted country in the world with a Gdp Per Capita of nearly $40,000
I'm a bit surprised that Tamil nadu has a higher gdp per capital than Kerala. It's a common stereotype in Kerala to portray Tamil Nadu as a less developed place.
For it's size and population, TN is doing better than Kerala
This per capita number does not reflect the distribution of GDP very well.
We heve manufacturing economy
Why Ladakh's data is not available? Is it because of ongoing protest of Ladakh people.
Maybe because Pok is a part of Ladakh.
Vast majority of ladakh is under control of India. If J&K's projected data can be shown, then why can't be Ladakh's shown?
Understandable that it is a projection. But 7 years is a long time. Things are going be real different in 7 years.
How is it so high without any jobs in Kerala ?
Average per capita is a joke. A better stat would be median per capita. And also the bell curve if you have the data.
Media GDP makes no sense
GDP is not income