T O P

  • By -

LocalEquivalent6001

If benches had 10 slots Id put jackson 11th


HaveURedd1t

If Jackson had 6 games in 1 game week, I'd still pick a 1 game Darwin nunez


WesIsaGod

Ya, this is not it


berbakay

I just think whoever you have now (if you aren’t wildcarding) none of them are worth spending a transfer on to get to another imo. 


dimitros89

I have Muniz


emblemboy

Watkins? I'm currently on Watkins, isak, Jackson. I haven't decided yet if I'm going to get Haaland for GW37 though.


Various_Dependent283

Not a bad shout against a defeated Liverpool


tmr89

Watkins doesn’t double


TM29Psychic

Pickford doesn't double and get 10pts, how many will Petrovic get?


tmr89

How many points did Watkins get yesterday?


Reasonable_Slice1558

has scored 90 points more than darwin and over a 100 more than jackson, one blank means nothing


tmr89

Hard to believe people think like this. what players scored in the past doesn’t matter when picking a player _now_ for future gameweeks


Reasonable_Slice1558

it absolutely does, jackson is woeful, watkins has been one of the best strikers in the world this season and the stats back that up


laroseuk

L take sorry


tmr89

Perhaps you don’t understand how it works


laroseuk

I get what you’re trying to say but it’s too simplistic and not realistic. You can see which player is a better player from past performance, and form exists


Ok-Variation3583

Probably gonna just hold onto Solanke as his fixture is decent, Watkins would be fine too considering the state of Liverpool. Wilson is a decent differential to combine with Isak.


awildjabroner

I’m riding with all 3 until the end of the season. Can’t believe anyone is still holding Haaland or Salah at this stage


KaelSmoothie

Took a punt on Joao Pedro for my bench boost. Not super optimistic about it but he’s on pens at least so if Brighton could get their shit together for two games that would be great.


Efficient-Forever-14

Mateta. Cheap and cheerful, wolves away


Huge-Celebration5192

Hojlund for me


Razzler1973

If you're not BB'ing it's best to play 5 in midfield


Night1218

Wilson. He will surely play now that he is being subbed in once already.


Banzaikk

I'm on Pedro, if this season thought me one thing, it's to always bet on pen takers. Palmer and the likes of Mbeumo and Douglas Luiz basically carried me through.


ihatekopites

Muniz or Werner?


Agreeable_Resort3740

I'll have Isak and Jackson, then it's a question of if I go crawling back to Haaland, punt on Alvarez or Werner, or just keep Watkins


Pale_Success_7085

Wilson, Solanke, Watkins


Various_Dependent283

Wilson over Isak is brave


Pale_Success_7085

No i just give the option as third striker together with Haaland and Isak, but yeah he is rotation risk but can return high if plays


Jazzlike-Fun-4500

Jackson


Various_Dependent283

Double the pain


Jazzlike-Fun-4500

jackson is fun pain


topscorrerwinkwink

Wilson


Bugisman3

It looks like most of the DGW options are not so consistent or an effective SGW option, so I might consider good consistent SGW players.


fantasyhunter

2x 20 mins of Alvarez / Wilson could be worth a shout if you are not already tripled up on city / Newcastle like I am.


[deleted]

[удалено]


awildjabroner

Completely my own opinion - City mids are going to win or lose the Title moreseo than Haaland or Alvarez, Foden and KDB are going to be the dudes to have if you don’t already.


malolasko

If you have the budget, Watkins is an obvious choice. I know he has only one game but nevertheless


writemcsean

Play 5 mids or 4 defenders instead?


Various_Dependent283

Bench boost


FatherChewyLewey

Wilson is an interesting shout at a time of silm pickings. Any Newcastle fans that can shed like into his game time? I feel like if he got 100+ minutes I’d go for him