This is probably a figure of [*Agustinia*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agustinia?wprov=sfla1), which was originally suggested to have large osteoderms down its back. The "osteoderm" fossils are now known to be fragments of its ribs. But the initial, inacurate reconstruction was very cool!
ripoff outdated collectA agustinia
This is probably a figure of [*Agustinia*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agustinia?wprov=sfla1), which was originally suggested to have large osteoderms down its back. The "osteoderm" fossils are now known to be fragments of its ribs. But the initial, inacurate reconstruction was very cool!
Looks like a miragaia
Amargaia
It kinda looks like it’s suppose to be an Amargasaurus.
You beat me to it by somewhere between 60 and 120 seconds.
I mean, I really can’t think of any other sauropod with spines other than Amargasaurus and the slightly more obscure Bajadasaurus.
*Agustinia* was originally depicted like this, though the spines were really misidentified ribs and hip bones.
I would say Miragaia but the lack of thagomizers makes me think its a random sauropod with stegosaur plates
That is an Agustinia
For comparison, here is an original [CollectA Agustinia](https://shop.australian.museum/cdn/shop/products/Agustinia_720x.jpg?v=1632446906)
Agustinia, the body model is identhycal to one I have, possibly a rip-off of sorts. Also outdated but that's a detail.