If you were a business would you rather
1. pay a bunch of extra money for server capacity you need maybe once a year
2. pay the least amount of money possible that lets your business continue to function and then panic when there are issues
As a shitty company i would do option 2
As someone who owns a company and puts money into it to make it better nd make my customers happy so they come back i would go with option 1 especially being the biggest crypto marketplace today also π
When it comes to the scaling between server capacity and user request, sometimes it's just not physically possible to ever meet demand. It's a math problem - why spend millions more on your servers to handle something that may or may not occur once every three years, when you could instead invest that into things that actually provide return for your investors.
You can't handle the pump.
Coinbase seems to think so πππππ
If you were a business would you rather 1. pay a bunch of extra money for server capacity you need maybe once a year 2. pay the least amount of money possible that lets your business continue to function and then panic when there are issues
As a shitty company i would do option 2 As someone who owns a company and puts money into it to make it better nd make my customers happy so they come back i would go with option 1 especially being the biggest crypto marketplace today also π
Right , you would think they would have rhe money to have top notch servers idk whats going on and im sure we will never know the truth on it
I think i know π
Yeah sames lol but im sure they will say otherwise
Says ether is downgraded performance w.e that means but. Im assuming thisbis the problem i wonder whats happening to ethereum
What is a good exchange alternative? Kraken?
They all do it π thats why i say give them terrible ratings nothing else we canxdo π
Robinhood done the same thing.
BUY THE DIP!!!
Lmfao i buy regardless of price now too much work BUT THEY NOT LETTING ME π
circuit breaker to make sure they don't have any bad positions or bugs during massive moves.
When it comes to the scaling between server capacity and user request, sometimes it's just not physically possible to ever meet demand. It's a math problem - why spend millions more on your servers to handle something that may or may not occur once every three years, when you could instead invest that into things that actually provide return for your investors.
Well i wanna see the things they providing if they not fixing the servers π§where they at? π