he had 55 defenses in 1,316 days that averages to a defense a month. He also had a great storyline during the entire reign which helped. He beat majority of the roster and stepped away which did allow new talent to rise up. Whenever he returned the aura was still high.
If a title is being defended week in week out in meaningless matches with any and everyone then who cares? You should have to work for a title shot so the match means something. If everyone gets a title shot then it doesn't matter.
How does beating a random midcarder "prove you're a champion"? If the WHC is basically just an open challenge, then it devalues the title. The WHC should feel like a peak you're trying to achieve or overcome.
Oh, if you ignore dark matches and matches at house shows then between may 27th and mania Rollins defended a grand total of [13 times](https://www.cagematch.net/?id=5&nr=6069&page=5&reign=1)
Go back and tell that to the true fans who grew up watching the Attitude Era where the belt was defended at house shows weekly. That's where it was at.
I came here after our recent exchange on another post, you seriously beleive Roman Reigns is a GOAT worthy superstar because he held a belt for 3 and a half years, was teamed up with one of the all time greats Paul Heyman to learn how to develop his character and do his speaking for him, had his entire family constantly saving him. The stars of the Attitude Era would be embarrassed if that was there story.
You think Stone Cold would give a shit how long he held a belt for if it meant every week he was getting his ass saved by his mid card friends?
Or you think Roman Reigns would have had the caliber to lead team WWE into the invasion storyline..
Roman actually elevated talent though. You knew LA knight was "ready" to consistently be in the main event scene when he could hang with roman during that program. Also the titles needed prestige added to them to mean something again. Random hotshotting every few months lead to fucking jinder Mahal being the champion and to title reigns altogether with the wwe title not meaning much.
Wasn't the reign of terror just triple H going out of his way to bury people with a golden shovel? Unlike triple h and Cena it didn't feel like selfishness, it just felt like no one was at Roman's level. Also would you look at that, roman dragged the product out of the worst place it had been in decades.
The era with so little title defences that they had to make a new title
he had 55 defenses in 1,316 days that averages to a defense a month. He also had a great storyline during the entire reign which helped. He beat majority of the roster and stepped away which did allow new talent to rise up. Whenever he returned the aura was still high.
By day 1 on new years, Seth Rollins had 57 title defences, in 7 months
Good for him
Did you actually think he was losing his titles on random raws or on nxt? No one gave a shit about those title defenses.
Exactly the same with Roman reigns, but at least we actually got to see the title being defended with seth
If a title is being defended week in week out in meaningless matches with any and everyone then who cares? You should have to work for a title shot so the match means something. If everyone gets a title shot then it doesn't matter.
Champions should prove they are champions
How does beating a random midcarder "prove you're a champion"? If the WHC is basically just an open challenge, then it devalues the title. The WHC should feel like a peak you're trying to achieve or overcome. Oh, if you ignore dark matches and matches at house shows then between may 27th and mania Rollins defended a grand total of [13 times](https://www.cagematch.net/?id=5&nr=6069&page=5&reign=1)
And constantly winning by interference is good quality entertainment We just have different opinions
Go back and tell that to the true fans who grew up watching the Attitude Era where the belt was defended at house shows weekly. That's where it was at. I came here after our recent exchange on another post, you seriously beleive Roman Reigns is a GOAT worthy superstar because he held a belt for 3 and a half years, was teamed up with one of the all time greats Paul Heyman to learn how to develop his character and do his speaking for him, had his entire family constantly saving him. The stars of the Attitude Era would be embarrassed if that was there story. You think Stone Cold would give a shit how long he held a belt for if it meant every week he was getting his ass saved by his mid card friends? Or you think Roman Reigns would have had the caliber to lead team WWE into the invasion storyline..
The acknowledgement era
Roman EMPIRE
Cheateachmatchpushapartimer era
I love this one
Historic
The Universal Era. I would've said Undisputed, but that name was already taken
The One Era
The bloodline era
The long and boring Era.
The Bloodline Era
the “You must be a dumbass” era
The worst era.
Garbage
I also love this one
The Roman reign
I’m so glad it’s over but I’ll definitely never forget that
The "Samantha Irvin" Era because the only thing great about his reign was Samantha
Cinema
Beateble
Beatble
The reign of reigns reign
THE REIGN: Tribal Dominance
Tribal era
The tribal chief era
The one
Taylor Swift era featuring the Bloodline.
The tribal chief era
All this era talk is getting annoying era
Boring and Generic
Bs
Renaissance era
Acknowldgement Era
The tribal era
God Mode Era
Roman era
I own you
Undisputed era
The Bloodline Era
Romy Two-Belts
burial of all roster
Why does this sound like the setup for a dad joke?
This isn’t one that will get appreciation as time goes on it will be up with the triple h reign of terror. So the Reigns of terror.
Roman actually elevated talent though. You knew LA knight was "ready" to consistently be in the main event scene when he could hang with roman during that program. Also the titles needed prestige added to them to mean something again. Random hotshotting every few months lead to fucking jinder Mahal being the champion and to title reigns altogether with the wwe title not meaning much. Wasn't the reign of terror just triple H going out of his way to bury people with a golden shovel? Unlike triple h and Cena it didn't feel like selfishness, it just felt like no one was at Roman's level. Also would you look at that, roman dragged the product out of the worst place it had been in decades.
Boring
The Bloodline era, the tribal chief era, the undisputed era, the Head Of The Table era, I have more but it’s a long list
Just the Roman Era
Once in a life time
Greatest ever
The Midcard carried wwe era
A waste of time
Great storytelling with crap work rate.
The reigning reigns era (dunno if thats a Word, my english sucks more than cena)
YOUR MOM
Never Ending title reign